Khakuate
Khakuate
About
- Username
- Khakuate
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- —
Comments
-
@Thatsmartguy said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1477036#Comment_1477036
I was joking cuz I find it funny how u quote killers crying about x item when 8/10 it's a survivor on the forums crying about something a killer perk or something a killer does. Not butt hurt just found it funny. But u seem to be
well that's your experience, I can easily say 9/10 killers cry about DS or something a survivor can do.
It goes both ways, bud
-
@gofu said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1479118#Comment_1479118
Yes, I'm not saying the commons should become the very/ultra-rares.
I'm saying the very/ultra-rares should do something significant compared to the commons/uncommons.
Well devs dont want this, I think, Just look at the new killers ultrarare and the nerfed survivor ultra rares..
-
@Virusmain said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1478131#Comment_1478131
I think it will, if not then we need a gauge to see who uses wired and wireless connections
I play fighting games online more, but I usually play pig,huntress,oni and myers as a killer.
But if i played on etheopian interenet instead of wired connection, i imagine i could hit a lot more hits than i should be able to as any killer.
Yeah, they should as well fix vpning
-
@Virusmain said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1478100#Comment_1478100
On This thread yes, its just too funny. He came off as arrogant as hell lol
I see he edited his post, so ill respond better
Just to clarify she is balanced, and fair, but his real complaint is server to killer connection.
Which btw is the sigle biggest issue in any game online, especially fighting games.
Dbd needs to fix their server side detection and and adjust netplay, which to be fair they are trying to fix the mid chapter patch. Deathslinger has to hook you, and reel you in, with huntress its very wonky looking when she throws on bad connection to the server.
If sluzzy has fiber, its more than likely hes playing against a wifi killer who doesnt understand wired connections at all.
Thing is, even when I play huntress I always see some bs hits, and I always have less than 50ms, her hitboxes are just too big, but hopefully the server side hit detection will fix it
-
A random guy on this forum would never hurt my feelings, just saying, but yeah I agree
-
@Virusmain said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1477978#Comment_1477978
Lolol are you real, this is the most fun ive had on this forum
Also is it true you DC as a survivor when the killer finds you?
I can smell your bias since milles.
@Sluzzy it isn't worth to discuss with this guy, he's a bait account and are here just to troll, ignore him.
-
@MusicNerd_TC said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1477074#Comment_1477074
People don't complain about DS because it is an anti tunnel perk. let me give you a scenario. Just hooked someone as wraith, cloak, see scratch marks going to a hook, go back, hit the unhooker with make your choice and instant down them. I hook the unhooker, I cloak, see the unhooker on nurses calling hit them, pick them up and get hit with DS. I have 2 options now. Pick them up or slug. If I pick them up I get striked, if I slug, they pick themselves up.
How do you exactly know if they have unbreakable? Oh yeah, you can't. (Unless you're hacking)
If the unhooked DS user would hook rush, you could easily slug 2 survivors, even if they pick themselves up they're not a gen!! and while they're picking themselves up, you could be pressuring the gens or chasing someone else, and you're applying pressure to 3 survivors.
-
Ohh another thread of you, I really miss them /s
If you really want us to take you seriously, dont use caps on titles
-
@snozer said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1476582#Comment_1476582
Drop the pallet early OMG COUNTERED!!!!!!!!!!
DS????? erm slug? oh they have unbreakable ... erm ... er... stand there and throw the game?
DS counter? dont tunnel and slug, go and patrol the gens and dont forget to git gud
-
@teamdehn said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475993#Comment_1475993
lol asking people to be respectful is hardly a rulebook scenario. Don't downplay douchebaggery. seriously this community is what keeps many people from playing. do you really want this game to die because some children cant grow up?
This is a game, you dont have to play respectful, you play how you WANT.
I paid money too, and staying at the exit gate isn't bannable, so yeah cry harder
-
@MigrantTheGreat said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1476338#Comment_1476338
Though I'm pretty sure you've already seen this video!
As you can see I already have 2 other survivor's hooked, and Jane was unhooked 2 chases and hooks ago but I got punished for capitalizing on Feng's and Yui's mistakes in their chases, and me avoiding Yui is proof enough that I had no intentions on not tunneling. Despite it being early game, this is still one of the problems that have with DS. Being punished for playing fairly and not tunneling!
Why did the oni grab the jane?
He could perfectly do a swing so the game doesn't grab jane and it would basically be a hook trade, and he let jane go, like #########.... My impression of this video is that the Oni wanted to eat the DS on purpose to try to show that it is "OP"
He could easily slug jane, and hit yui and feng so they have to mend = free pressure.
-
put a video please.
and i think that's a spirit buff, she's sooo weak /s
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1476194#Comment_1476194
Yeah, I feel like DS could use some changes, mostly for lockers and gens.
As for sluzzy, I've got into a fight with 3 anti vaxxers yesterday (2 of them were family members), I'm a little tired of arguing with people like that.
Thanks for being so understanding! Most of the time I get called any number of things, none of them are very kind.
I think it doesn't need changes for gens.
You can do swing (dont be close to the survivor so the game doesn't grab the survivor) and slug him, but locker DS has no counter, but anyways i'd rather eat the ds, they're going to be in the floor again in 15s lmao.
I think you should just ignore them, they're really anooying and toxic, they just seek for attention, everytime I see a "COVID-19 vaccine has a chip so bill gates can control us" i laugh out loud 😂, they just seek for attention that's all what they want, hopefully oxford vaccine will help us to end this pandemic once and for all.
And dont worry, people on internet are really rude, a lot of them are just salty kids, if they insult you just leave the discussion (that's what I do) they suffer more when you don't pay attention to them.
I reccomend you to watch some series on netflix, there are a loot of good series!
My fav series are:
El Final del Paraiso: As the new DEA director in Colombia, Catalina Santana will have to deal with a dangerous gang of drug traffickers, as she faces demons who threaten to destroy her family. (You should watch sin senos si hay paraiso so you can understand this season)
Control Z: After a hacker begins to expose the secrets of the students of the National College in front of the entire school, the distant and observant Sofia sets out to discover her identity.
La reina del flow: Yeimy Montoya pays an unfair sentence in New York after being deceived by the man she loved. Therefore, he makes a pact with the judicial authorities to capture the man who murdered his family. (This is a really good serie) btw srry for the low quality pic, it is actually high res but it seems like a forum issue
Stranger things, but I think everyone knows this serie lol
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1476162#Comment_1476162
Sorry your edit didn't get approved. While your situation isn't a perfect example of what my poll is (It assumes everyone is biased towards one, mine had a similar problem, not to the same extent.) i see the problem with my reasoning. I was a little tipsy and got into an argument with my mates, they sprayed me with a hose, that seems to have cured it. Sorry for my stubbornness. On a different note, can you help me with this anti global warming guy? Since you are far better at this than me.
Dont worry, we're all here to help us each other, DS needs a change, which is to deactivate in lockers, that's the only change I think it needs IMO, it doesn't bother me as a killer but I see why.
And are you talking about sluzzy? oh well, I need to analize his comments but right now I'm going into a virtual class, so I'll see what I can do.
All I can say, thank you for being mature and accept that you're wrong, a lot of people on the forums are unable to do that
-
@Zaitsev said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1476165#Comment_1476165
Yes I can slug. But thats boring, and I dont run slug perks. All my builds focus on gen slowdown. Id rather eat the stun, and proceed with the kill anyways. In that very common scenario, DS does nothing anyways.
So why you're complaining.
And you dont need slug perks in order to slug.
And freddy is boring for me, does that mean it needs a nerf?
-
@Zaitsev said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1476152#Comment_1476152
I thought about making the timer based on killer proximity, but thats totally OP. You can have infinite DS even when the killer isnt tunnelling.
So? are you going to fix that or what..
And DS doesn't need any changes, why can't you slug?
-
Looks like my comment didn't get approved, so i'll just say this:
I'll do a survey to 100 people. All of them are biased to the red color.
I'll ask them they're favorite color, they're obviously going to answer red.
So now I should pretend EVERYONE likes the red color and is their favorite color?
See why your argument is wrong?
-
So if the killer moonwalks for 30s DS is basically usseles (remember old legion moonwalk tech?)
Yeah, no. And I think @BigBrainMegMain already debunked your idea
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD I edited my comment but im waiting for it to be approved, so yeah guess you should wait for my response
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1476055#Comment_1476055
You still ignore what I have to say. I already stated why the 45 votes matters to it. I controlled for variables to get the farthest of each situation. Yet here you are, still claiming all I'm saying is "duh 45 people mean majority", the difference between my views and yours is that my views are backed by science. You have yet to address my points either. "Similar to how 100 people is normally a sample size used to demonstrate the common populations ideals in the real world, if 100 can be used as a stand in for 7.8 billion people, why can't 64 be used as a stand in for 35,019 people? And I am not saying 34,955 people are asking for it to be changed, how you got that statistic I don't know."
Didn't ignore it, that you ignore mine because the majority is against your post and you have no one to respond to is another matter.
Science has been wrong and many times, I already told you to google them, but since you ignored that, it is not my problem.
And if you are going to base yourself on an assumption, the truth is that it is not worth arguing with you.
MANY and too many times the pools have been wrong, quite a few reliable sources have confirmed it, that you want to choose your cherry picked web sites is another matter.
Most of the DBD community are survivors (4: 1 ratio) so if those 100 people are killer mains they would obviously want DS nerfed, and you would be hovering over 34,955 people believing that they all think the same as a main killer would do.
Do you see the problem with your argument?
A good example would be:
I do a survey to 100 people who are biased with the red color.
All of them are obviously going to reply that they like the color red.
So should I assume that all human beings like the color red?
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD I can't edit but read this.
As the polling season commences, wild allegations will be made about poll results. But the evidence is in, polls are not to be trusted. Here's why investors must do their own work when it comes to these matters. -
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1476014#Comment_1476014
Science can not by definition be wrong, either some unknown variable is changing science, or the science was based in fallacy and should not have been considered science in the first place. The 2016 polls were technically right, Hillary got more votes, from what I can tell they didn't account for the electoral college. You keep confusing what I'm saying, the poll is an indication of what the majority thinks. Its not 100% accurate (Thats why I keep adding/ditching 20%) Those 64 people are stand ins for the game community. Similar to how 100 people is normally a sample size used to demonstrate the common populations ideals in the real world, if 100 can be used as a stand in for 7.8 billion people, why can't 64 be used as a stand in for 35,019 people? And I am not saying 34,955 people are asking for it to be changed, how you got that statistic I don't know.
"the poll is an indication of what the majority thinks"
Yet you're back at it... dude I already told you why this is wrong, yet you just ignore it or dont adress it, if you're not going to adress my points, then im sorry but i'll be forced to leave.
You are revolving around a conspiracy / assumption that could be like this or not, it is a 50/50, what you could not understand is that this does not apply to games ..
Right now there are 29,151 people playing, you cannot say that just because 45 people said that DS needs changes, the rest think the same, when it is not, it is only a conspiracy.
-
why not, but buff pharmacy too and we have a treat!
-
How do we exactly know you're not a killer main?
Please dont bring this to the table if you dont have any proof about it, saying that doesn't make your argument more valid.
As for the gen speed problem, yes we need a secondary objective
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475958#Comment_1475958
Science is applied to reality, thats why we have science. Tell me one time science has been wrong. And as for the upvote argument, at this time the post has 238 views, you have 20 upvotes at this time, this does not account for the potential of someone liking multiple comments at a time. Same goes for mine. Therefore, neither can be used as a proper basis for it. Though statistics would indicate that you are more widely believed to be true, whilst I am in the minority. The difference between the devs kil statistic and my opinion is just that, one is a hard statistic taken from the game without controlling for variables. Mine is an opinion poll that has. (In case your wondering what I controlled for, that is the 20% difference that was said.) Consider this a response to the other replys you made in the time it took for me to write this = as well. This comment took a while to make. You have given a good bit too think about, thank you.
A lot of time, search it on google.
" at this time the post has 238 views, you have 20 upvotes at this time, this does not account for the potential of someone liking multiple comments at a time."
Using your logic, your poll had 174 views and only 45 people think DS should be nerfed.
And the difference is, that variables apply to your poll too, and we can't balance the game around 45 people. That is obvious, if you dont realize this then you're blind.
And no, polls are not reliable, remember when a lot of posters predicted that Hillary Clinton would win the 2016 election? You already know what happend.
So dont pretend that only because 45 people think DS needs to be nerfed, 34,955 thinks it should too, no one knows what is going to happen.
And even then, back to the kill rates, if plague ever gets nerfed, that's not healthy for game and balance, and this pretty obvious, thanks god devs dont do polls on this game, so basically this discussion is pointless cause devs dont listen to this.
-
Let me put my glasses on.. uhh .... jus...just a minute please... got it
Let me open the killer rulebook for survivors... got... got it..
Page 128, paragraph 6.... "Survivors should instantly leave once they open the gate, otherwise they will get banned and we will cry in the forums"
-
that's why i hate ps4 community. anyways just ignore them, this game is full of entitled babys
-
@azame said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475786#Comment_1475786
This forum is full of killer mains that's why.
He thinks only because 45 people said they want it nerfed everyone thinks that too, it's just hillarious at this point
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475947#Comment_1475947
Everyone is biased, that is how the game works. Its the bias of whether or not they think something is fair based on their own experience. You appear to confuse my usage of the word "bias", I am not using bias as in the context of bias of unfair, I am using it in the context of bias built up over playing the game. As for the kill statistic. Those are factors they create, so they have the power to change them. I never said they should change bubba based on that statistic, because they didn't control for variables.
"I never said they should change bubba based on that statistic, because they didn't control for variables."
This apply to DS too, and dude only 3 people agree with your discussion, everyone else is against a DS nerf, so the majority thinks DS doesn't need a nerf (Using your logic)...
Your problem is, you think only because 45 people think DS should be nerfed, you think the rest of the playerbase thinks it should be nerfed, when it doesn't work like that. What if they dont? What if they think it should be buffed?
No one knows, and BHVR isn't dumb to balance around 45 people that are upset about X perk
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD Using your logic:
I got more upvotes than you on this discussion, and im against a DS nerf, so the "Majority" agrees with me so whats your point?
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475930#Comment_1475930
And we've circled right back to the exact same thing. How do we know any of your examples are truly broken then? The poll is backed by science, the recommended idea is that you have 10 voters per variable, in which case 64 should suffice. Since he poll is backed by science, it can be assumed the results are somewhat accurate (Science says that something as drastic as a 20% difference can occur, though its unlikely), in which case approximately half the playerbase would want it changed, which is still enough imo.
Science is science, this is reality.
A lot of things can happen, You are assuming that half of the playerbase would vote that DS needs a nerf, I am assuming that 33,955 people would vote it doesn't. And my assumption would be as valid as yours since you never know what could happen.
I give you a lot factors yet you're ignoring them.
And this is a pointless discussion, devs never use statistic so my argument is valid and they already said it when they posted the kill rates statistic, so just a tip: dont waste your time doing polls.
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475923#Comment_1475923
The problem with that is, the bias of the people doesn't matter, thats the point of the pole. Its the bias of the pole maker that matters and whether or not they skew the results. And DS is one specific DBD factor, therefore it can be voted on in a bubble. And yes, statistics state that there are likely to be 4x as many survivor mains as killer mains, but wouldn't that prove the point about DS needing a change? If its likely to be 4x the amount of bias towards survivors as there are killers?
So do you SERIOUSLY think we should balance around biased people? holy f...
I gave you valid arguments and you come up with this? I literally told you why statistic dont work in DBD.
You wanna know why they didn't use kill rate statistic? cause they dont know the factor, if the killer used a mori, camped, if a survivor was afk etc... theres a lot of factors and you can't balance around it.
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475919#Comment_1475919
What does that have to do with my post? The majority thinks DS along with your examples are not fine, so they are not fine. I focused on DS because I had a poll and just got off a game where all 4 survs had it. If I got tunneled 3 games in a row you better believe I'm gonna complain about it.
Majority isn't 45 people.
AS i said before 34k are currently playing, 45 people think ds needs a nerf, what if the other 33,955 thinks it doesn't?
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475910#Comment_1475910
The point of statistics is to get peoples biases. And leatherface might need a nerf depending on how the devs want to balance the game. If the game is balanced around 70% kill rate hes fine, if its balanced around 50% kill rate hes unbalanced. Same with trapper.
You need to be joking at this point.
The point is, statistic doesn't prove anything on DBD cause
- There are a lot of factors
- We dont know if they're biased or not
- There's a lot more survivors than killers (4v1) so if every DBD player voted, survivors would get a lot more votes in their favor, how is that fair?
That's why I say statistic dont work on DBD
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475906#Comment_1475906
And when did I say those didn't need changes? Those are all BS too.
The thing is, they're still here and devs dont say anything about that, so basically devs think these are fine?
As I said It is supposed to be a defensive perk with conditions and anti tunnel aspects.
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475891#Comment_1475891
Statistics is being applied to the game, thats the point of statistics. To be applied to stuff. And if you had an unbiased poll that said plague needs to be nerfed, with no invites or skewing of results, then plague would need to be nerfed. Because thats how statistics worked. You dismiss the statistic for no reason. What do you think the chances are that 70% of the people who saw that post were not just killer mains, but bad killer mains?
No they're not, or then why didn't they nerf all killers?
How do we exactly know that the people that are going to vote are unbiased? Oh yeah, we can't.
Does that mean old leatherface needs a nerf? he has a 70% kill rate.
Does that mean trapper needs a nerf too? No, cause statistic doesn't work with DBD.
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475880#Comment_1475880
So what else is it supposed to do? Because in its current form it rewards people for making stupid plays.
Noed, freddy, spirit with stridor, ebony mori, iri head, deathslinger insta shoot, camping and tunneling reward stupid plays too, and yet they're still here... So?
It is supposed to be a defensive perk with conditions and anti tunnel aspects.
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475868#Comment_1475868
Statistics says a sample size like that should be a decent enough indication of the majority. Not perfect, but enough to say over half.
We're talking about a game community my dude, not statistic.
Does that mean plague should be nerfed too? Me and a lot of other gamers find her anooying cause she doesn't let me use my medkits, is that a indication of plague being op? No.
Get a decent number of votes and we can talk about it, I repeated this a lot, 64 is nothing considering 34k people are currently playing. It isn't a indication of the "Majority" What if 33,995 think DS is fine?
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475862#Comment_1475862
The problem with DS isn't that its anti tunnel, lord knows we need a way to deal with them. The problem is that it can be abused.
It isn't supposed to be anti tunnel, it has anti tunnel aspects and that's all.
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475852#Comment_1475852
Mate, do you know how statistics work? Look it up if you don't believe me. As for the clown comment, the fact you have to resort to insults instead of stating a proper point is honestly disappointing.
I perfectly know how they work, but dont try to get a perk nerfed only because 45 people are upset about it. Dont act like if everyone wants it nerfed and dont say "Everyone" cause that's just flat out wrong.
And I think @Nicholas got this pretty clear
-
@Nicholas said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475838#Comment_1475838
No demographics. I could survey 200 campers and they would probably unanimously agree that BT is too strong. Survey 1000 tunnelers and they would agree DS needs to be deleted. There is currently no anti-tunnel perk, DS can help with being tunneled ONCE but not much else. Tunneling is a Survivor problem, yet every complaint is about making tunneling even easier (and it's already easy and effective) and exclusively from The Killer's perspective.
Pretty much this, I defend DS a lot cause when I get DS off my build, basically that's a big neon sign above my survivor head saying "tunnel me"
Sorry killers, but I dont want to be gone in less than 5 min.
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475834#Comment_1475834
And clown jokes, real mature. You couldn't make it 5 posts without resorting to insults.
Oh look! a special snowflake...
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475834#Comment_1475834
Mate, 30 is a common sample size for how the population feels about something with 3 variables, I gave you a sample size of over 60. Your ignoring statistics.
The population? as I said before there's currently 34k people playing DBD, 45 people saying DS should be nerfed doesn't mean anything, you can't make everyone happy.
Using that logic should freddy, spirit and every other killer be nerfed too only because 70 people say they're op? NO.
Get a considerable number and we can discuss, this is just a bait thread.
-
@RoMainPuppy said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475816#Comment_1475816
If they're slugged they're not on a gen, if they don't have Unbreakable a teammate has to get off a gen to come save them. That's potentially two people not doing gens. If you find and chase a third survivor that's 3 people not doing gens. Don't see a problem here. Or just slug all of them. Can't use DS if they haven't been hooked. If they Unbreakable slug em again, unbreakble gone.
Some killers like to slug left and right, but they're unable to slug the ds user for some reason smh 😂
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475811#Comment_1475811
That is not an answer to my rebuttal, There are 7.8 billion people in the world, why is 100 a common sample size?
So don't act as if the majority of the DBD community wants DS nerfed, when you have a considerable amount of people we could have a better discussion, but 64 people? you're just baiting at this point.
"Everyone is talking about it, it is in almost every single match. I made a poll about it, at this time 70% of the votes are for it to be nerfed."
Kekw "everyone" 😂
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475798#Comment_1475798
That is a sample size of over 50, the recommended sample size is 30 for something with three variables.
Dude that's only 64 people, that's nothing!!! currently there's 34k people playing DBD on PC, now add console to the playerbase....
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475791#Comment_1475791
Ignoring body blocking and the ways it can be abused. What if that survivor gets off the hook and immediately goes on a gen? Or starts slf caring right in your face. Your dismissal of the vast majority is pretty stupid.
If he repairs a gen in your face then dont swing do a lunge so the game doesn't grab him.
Is it really hard to slug? Killers like to slug left and right, but when you ask them to slug the DS user, it's like they're unable to! 😂
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475782#Comment_1475782
Then why was 70% of the votes for it to be nerfed? Why is it constantly being talked about in the context of being too powerful?
Forums are not even 30% of the DBD community and only 64 people voted! That's not even 2% OF THE DBD community, ######### man.
-
Cause it doesn't need one.
@BigBrainMegMain we need you here!
-
@Darkskies said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475542#Comment_1475542
Nice meme but in all honesty not enough love is given I don't care how you play what perks you use what offerings you bring..
I thank you for the game with out you we wouldn't have one thank you
🐷💖
Owww, same for you!
Hopefully I met you so I can boop the snoot 🐷
-
@azame said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475538#Comment_1475538
Tunneling then is necessary to get one out of the game. You did a good job, you got a 4k with the odds stacked against you.
I mean you're right, but I feel bad for her :( she was a baby claudette self caring in the corner of the map, but she was the gen jockey, so I sadly had to tunnel her