The_Fallen_Utopia
The_Fallen_Utopia
About
- Username
- The_Fallen_Utopia
- Joined
- Visits
- 143
- Last Active
Comments
-
My idea for a Plague Doctor's power was for them to use a non damaging ability when in melee range of the survivor that inflicts them with random debuffs that grow more powerful the longer they go uncured. They are cured by finding random items around the match similar to Jigsaw boxes and getting within a certain range of another survivor has a chance to spread the disease to them as well.SarDeantje said:Thanks man! Im actually curious about your idea. What had you in mind? :chuffed:
At max strength the survivor is unable to perform actions properly and moves slower until cured. And if possible I think they should sometimes see other survivors as the Plague Doctor. Haven't decided on what debuffs it could cause yet though it's in early stages right now. -
I got frustrated like most of you survivor mains do every match you don't escape. Stop trying to continue this it's over now.skvirl said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
@Lowbei sorry about that earlier comment btw. Reading problems will cause that sometimes.LOL, reading problems? You still commented on what he wrote, and reading problems doesn't take away from the fact that you disagreed with the comment about "wrong opinions"....but then you backpedaled hard when you saw that it was your hero writing it. You're following people blindly because you like them. That's called being a sheep. Try forming your own opinions. You called him out on his comment about "wrong opinions", now own it.
-
Fair enough. If you do write this then I'll try and give you an unbiased response on what I think of it. Usually I can see things from both sides now.AlphaJackson said:@Lowbei said:
your opinions are welcome. please try to be balanced if possible. many people come here and make threads about how killers shouldnt be allowed to kill them, or camp, or breath, or use m1 or the W key.id love to hear what you think about the new dlc! the spirit is great right?
I think the spirit is really fun to play against, but I'm still earning the shards to buy her. From what I've heard of a friend tho. She sounds great!
@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
Well there are some people who would try and answer honestly but alot of people just pick sides and try to deny the other side any positive changes.I want to be as unbiased as possable, shouldn't be too hard. History in school put me into the habit of not being biased with essay writing. And ofcourse I play survivor and killer equally now, so naturally I want to maximise my fun on both sides.
Edit: spelling mistakes.
-
You mean 3 people? The killer wouldn't mind at all.MhhBurgers said:Struggling is not a choice unless you want to [BAD WORD] over the 4 other people.
-
Well there are some people who would try and answer honestly but alot of people just pick sides and try to deny the other side any positive changes.
-
I often forget to take off the perk to be honest lol. So while yes it's logical.. I'm forgetfulPeasant said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
Peasant said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
The current shrine doesn't have anything even close to being good.. third seal will just get destroyed instantly and territorial is worse. Pharmacy might be the only decent perk this time.
You can all laugh at Pharmacy now, but once I have finished building my pyramid of Emergency Aid Kits we'll see who's laughing!
What if a killer has Franklin's Demise though? lol
Logically the killer won't have Franklin's Demise as using Pharmacy means that I enter the trial empty handed which in turn discourages the perk.
-
Distract campers? More like give them more time to bait over altruistic survivors..Khalednazari said:Distract campers, you mean? -
If they add more ways to get survival points then maybe they should change it but Altruism maxes out alot more then survival does right now anyway.
-
Or they should just change those other things as well. Some people have eyes that are particularly sensitive to light levels changing too quickly.
-
I agree with the post.. Are the devs trying to promote toxic playstyles now? It makes no sense to me. Smaller and non toxic streamers should be promoted more.
-
What if a killer has Franklin's Demise though? lolPeasant said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
The current shrine doesn't have anything even close to being good.. third seal will just get destroyed instantly and territorial is worse. Pharmacy might be the only decent perk this time.You can all laugh at Pharmacy now, but once I have finished building my pyramid of Emergency Aid Kits we'll see who's laughing!
-
Thunderous Steps might combo well with Beast of Prey then if they ever actually make it a good perk.TreblucFayle said:Yeah, I know that a map altering ability like this would probably never happen. It was just a fun addition that went with the theme I was making. The momentum effect itself is more the point of the power. Add-ons could be fun to toy with the power and/ or add effects to it.
Stone-Faced could be used WITH enduring, LOL! But really the perk is more for maintaining sight of survivors after a stun. You would be able to maintain control of your view, and maybe even avoid a flashlight blind after a stun. I also thought it would be fun to use on nurse so she can keep sight of survivors after blinking.
Heavy-Handed WOULD combo awesomely with Save the Best For Last. You'd still have a slight slow during the cooldown, but the survivor wouldn't be able to get as far before you're in control again.
Thunderous steps is intended for exactly that purpose. Imagine hearing the footsteps of the stealthy killers like Myers or Freddy. Or even in chases you wouldn't be able to track the killer through walls as easily.
-
I agree and am sorry about that..SoylentPixie said:Wow......just wow. Well the thread was nice while it lasted @George_Soros.
-
That sounds like a fun strategy. I'll try that when I can. Thanks.thesuicidefox said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
thesuicidefox said:Gramma's Heart is really nice IMO. If you set up your traps properly then you can get a free Insidious/Tinkerer effect and sneak up on people. I also rather use it with Mint Rag over Shackles because you can pull a lot more serious mindgame by teleporting to another trap near the one that was tripped and completely jump scare whoever hit the trap. It's a lot more effective than shackles because I find when you run shackles everyone plays EXTRA immersed, more than they even normally would against a Hag because they don't want to hit a trap. I'd rather they hit a trap, know it, then not see me coming from a complete different angle.
Can't really comment on ear, I don't use it. It could be useful in a chase, but IMO heart is way better.
I'll have to try that combo when it's fixed. I usually ran it with the turtle egg to keep my terror radius down longer.
Set up a "web" of traps so that you always have one nearby another if it gets hit. I have been using Whispers on Hag with MR/GH and when Whispers is dark I know I'm free to place traps. Then just track the direction the survivor is going, when they hit a trap then teleport to the next trap and a lot of the times you catch people because they are looking away from you.
-
The current shrine doesn't have anything even close to being good.. third seal will just get destroyed instantly and territorial is worse. Pharmacy might be the only decent perk this time.
-
If they rework it people will just wait by the last hook though
-
If rank meant nothing then why do so many people derank?Bravo0413 said:In the current ranking system rank doesnt mean a thing... it's way too easy to pip... survivors who dont even know how to use the shack pallet are at rank 1...... its gross... you can climb from 13-5 in the matter of hours and this can be done by anyone because I dont claim myself to be an awesome player by any means... rank 1 is supposed to be the tip of the spear and atm its just a mixture of week 1 noobs and 1s the competition is nowhere near like it was and saying "rank1 btw" doesnt mean as much.. -
@Lowbei sorry about that earlier comment btw. Reading problems will cause that sometimes.
-
I dug myself deep? I'm not the one who's too scared to post a video proving my skillonly1biggs said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
only1biggs said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
only1biggs said:
@The_Fallen_Utopia said: only1biggs said:
@The_Fallen_Utopia said: Lowbei said:
only1biggs said: @Lowbei said: only1biggs said:
@yeet said: @only1biggs said: @yeet said: @George_Soros said: @Lowbei said: people should play both sides. i think “balanced perspecive” is the highest compliment you can give someone around here. that being said, ive seen dozens, literally dozens, of survivormains come claim to be killer mains while advocating for killer nerfs, only to check their steam profile and see zero total players sacrificed. May be my naivety, but I just can't wrap my head around this. Why on earth would someone try to cripple the "other" side? What's this with so many people wanting ezpz games? If I want it easy, I play Plants Vs Zombies or something. No salt there for sure. there are many survivor players who exclusively play survivor and mostly in SWF, sure there is some people who exclusively play killer but that is much rarer, oftentimes these players only play the game to bully the killer, and want the game mechanics to enable that. Absolute nonsense. The % of players in such a low player base (DbD) doing this would be 0.01%. Get a grip. I know many people who play the game exclusively to do this, maybe you are just out of touch? Your subjective experience is not the same as everyone else. I say again...get a grip. If anyone is out of touch, it's you I'm afraid.
no kiddo, its you who is out of touch. yeet is 100% correct. you are simply too inexperienced at this game. you should stop posting nonsense and go play the game to get more experience. I have over 4k hours across 3 platforms. You imply you have more experience then state to someone else that "this is a side game for you". So..which is it? I mean, unless your life is lived in front of your monitor, your side game experience would be less than mine, yes? I'm probably older then you. Yeet is not 100% correct. It is you and he that post nonsense. no, you dont have anywhere near 4k hours on 3 platforms, and nobody here believes you. furthermore you bringing up age just shows how insecure you are about this. you can keep your hilariously wrong opinions to yourself at this point, as we are just throwing them in the forum trash, which is already full.
If he truely had 4000 hours then he'd show no hesitation to show us all video proof of his "skill" now am I right? YEAH! Yeah! You're SO right! YEAH!
I wouldn't hesitate to make a video to show my skill but I'll admit I'm a bit rusty. (4 month break from the game will do that to you) but least I'm honest instead of making up that I'm amazing at this game. I never said I was amazing.
You have several times on different posts.. I'm not blind you know.
Quote me. For real. When have I ever said that?
And judging by your last post, thinking I was Lowbei, yeah, you're blind or can't read :')
Yes so what? I have reading problems due to a horrible brain condition but at least I don't lie to everyone.. you on the other hand? I can tell you are a lier.. as for the quote.. you claimed a screenshot proves your amazing because you beat a SWF group..
My god now you're playing the victim card? I don't care about your brain condition.
I posted that screen shot to show that it's not impossible to beat good, coordinated swf's, with 4xDS, flashlights et al...
Again. QUOTE ME. When have I ever said I was amazing.
You've dug yourself so deep now it's getting embarrassing.
-
"I can call someone an idiot that makes me cool" pathetic.. pathetic pathetic pathetic.. that's all you are and all you will be in this game.only1biggs said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
This thread might be going a little too off topic now.. this "Killer main" is irrelevant to the community now I think.. show a video of your supposed skill and I'll believe you.. until then? You're probably newNope, you're just an idiot. See ya

-
Yeah sorry about that.. Like I said I have reading problems. Things get blurry to me at times.Lowbei said:
... a quick example ill make up...The_Fallen_Utopia said:
Wrong opinion?! Not only are you afraid to show us your skill but you don't even understand real life facts? No opinion is wrong.. if you think that there can be wrong opinions you are a fool.Lowbei said:
yeah, you have opinions, and they are wrong.only1biggs said:@Lowbei said:
only1biggs said:@Lowbei said:
only1biggs said:
@yeet said: @only1biggs said: @yeet said: @George_Soros said: @Lowbei said: people should play both sides. i think “balanced perspecive” is the highest compliment you can give someone around here. that being said, ive seen dozens, literally dozens, of survivormains come claim to be killer mains while advocating for killer nerfs, only to check their steam profile and see zero total players sacrificed. May be my naivety, but I just can't wrap my head around this. Why on earth would someone try to cripple the "other" side? What's this with so many people wanting ezpz games? If I want it easy, I play Plants Vs Zombies or something. No salt there for sure. there are many survivor players who exclusively play survivor and mostly in SWF, sure there is some people who exclusively play killer but that is much rarer, oftentimes these players only play the game to bully the killer, and want the game mechanics to enable that. Absolute nonsense. The % of players in such a low player base (DbD) doing this would be 0.01%. Get a grip. I know many people who play the game exclusively to do this, maybe you are just out of touch? Your subjective experience is not the same as everyone else. I say again...get a grip. If anyone is out of touch, it's you I'm afraid.
no kiddo, its you who is out of touch. yeet is 100% correct. you are simply too inexperienced at this game. you should stop posting nonsense and go play the game to get more experience.
I have over 4k hours across 3 platforms.
You imply you have more experience then state to someone else that "this is a side game for you". So..which is it? I mean, unless your life is lived in front of your monitor, your side game experience would be less than mine, yes?
I'm probably older then you.
Yeet is not 100% correct.
It is you and he that post nonsense.
no, you dont have anywhere near 4k hours on 3 platforms, and nobody here believes you. furthermore you bringing up age just shows how insecure you are about this.
you can keep your hilariously wrong opinions to yourself at this point, as we are just throwing them in the forum trash, which is already full.
Okay? You called me "son". I didn't bring up age, i said, if you can read, that I am probably older then you, suggesting that you calling me "son" would be silly. Also, what does age have to do with hours played? I am insecure about hours so I bring up age? What? What are driveling about?
"wrong opinions". Jesus dude, are you really THAT stupid?
I was amused, but I feel like it would be bullying on my part to continue conversing with you.
Seriously, get a grip.
are you still here? bye felicia
... theres a crazy guy down the street who sits on the corner yelling at cars. he might tell you that he thinks poop tastes like candy. thats his opinion. i cannot convince him otherwise, despite it being quite factual that poop does not taste like candy.
his opinion is wrong.
you may see players who think that telling the other side to kill themselves in after game chat, makes them cool. its their opinion, and it is wrong
-
Yes so what? I have reading problems due to a horrible brain condition but at least I don't lie to everyone.. you on the other hand? I can tell you are a lier.. as for the quote.. you claimed a screenshot proves your amazing because you beat a SWF group..only1biggs said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
only1biggs said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
only1biggs said:
@The_Fallen_Utopia said: Lowbei said:
only1biggs said: @Lowbei said: only1biggs said:
@yeet said: @only1biggs said: @yeet said: @George_Soros said: @Lowbei said: people should play both sides. i think “balanced perspecive” is the highest compliment you can give someone around here. that being said, ive seen dozens, literally dozens, of survivormains come claim to be killer mains while advocating for killer nerfs, only to check their steam profile and see zero total players sacrificed. May be my naivety, but I just can't wrap my head around this. Why on earth would someone try to cripple the "other" side? What's this with so many people wanting ezpz games? If I want it easy, I play Plants Vs Zombies or something. No salt there for sure. there are many survivor players who exclusively play survivor and mostly in SWF, sure there is some people who exclusively play killer but that is much rarer, oftentimes these players only play the game to bully the killer, and want the game mechanics to enable that. Absolute nonsense. The % of players in such a low player base (DbD) doing this would be 0.01%. Get a grip. I know many people who play the game exclusively to do this, maybe you are just out of touch? Your subjective experience is not the same as everyone else. I say again...get a grip. If anyone is out of touch, it's you I'm afraid.
no kiddo, its you who is out of touch. yeet is 100% correct. you are simply too inexperienced at this game. you should stop posting nonsense and go play the game to get more experience. I have over 4k hours across 3 platforms. You imply you have more experience then state to someone else that "this is a side game for you". So..which is it? I mean, unless your life is lived in front of your monitor, your side game experience would be less than mine, yes? I'm probably older then you. Yeet is not 100% correct. It is you and he that post nonsense. no, you dont have anywhere near 4k hours on 3 platforms, and nobody here believes you. furthermore you bringing up age just shows how insecure you are about this. you can keep your hilariously wrong opinions to yourself at this point, as we are just throwing them in the forum trash, which is already full.
If he truely had 4000 hours then he'd show no hesitation to show us all video proof of his "skill" now am I right? YEAH! Yeah! You're SO right! YEAH!
I wouldn't hesitate to make a video to show my skill but I'll admit I'm a bit rusty. (4 month break from the game will do that to you) but least I'm honest instead of making up that I'm amazing at this game.
I never said I was amazing.
You have several times on different posts.. I'm not blind you know.
Quote me. For real. When have I ever said that?
And judging by your last post, thinking I was Lowbei, yeah, you're blind or can't read :')
-
This thread might be going a little too off topic now.. this "Killer main" is irrelevant to the community now I think.. show a video of your supposed skill and I'll believe you.. until then? You're probably new
-
You have several times on different posts.. I'm not blind you know.only1biggs said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
only1biggs said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
Lowbei said:
only1biggs said: @Lowbei said: only1biggs said:
@yeet said: @only1biggs said: @yeet said: @George_Soros said: @Lowbei said: people should play both sides. i think “balanced perspecive” is the highest compliment you can give someone around here. that being said, ive seen dozens, literally dozens, of survivormains come claim to be killer mains while advocating for killer nerfs, only to check their steam profile and see zero total players sacrificed. May be my naivety, but I just can't wrap my head around this. Why on earth would someone try to cripple the "other" side? What's this with so many people wanting ezpz games? If I want it easy, I play Plants Vs Zombies or something. No salt there for sure. there are many survivor players who exclusively play survivor and mostly in SWF, sure there is some people who exclusively play killer but that is much rarer, oftentimes these players only play the game to bully the killer, and want the game mechanics to enable that. Absolute nonsense. The % of players in such a low player base (DbD) doing this would be 0.01%. Get a grip. I know many people who play the game exclusively to do this, maybe you are just out of touch? Your subjective experience is not the same as everyone else. I say again...get a grip. If anyone is out of touch, it's you I'm afraid.
no kiddo, its you who is out of touch. yeet is 100% correct. you are simply too inexperienced at this game. you should stop posting nonsense and go play the game to get more experience. I have over 4k hours across 3 platforms. You imply you have more experience then state to someone else that "this is a side game for you". So..which is it? I mean, unless your life is lived in front of your monitor, your side game experience would be less than mine, yes? I'm probably older then you. Yeet is not 100% correct. It is you and he that post nonsense. no, you dont have anywhere near 4k hours on 3 platforms, and nobody here believes you. furthermore you bringing up age just shows how insecure you are about this. you can keep your hilariously wrong opinions to yourself at this point, as we are just throwing them in the forum trash, which is already full.
If he truely had 4000 hours then he'd show no hesitation to show us all video proof of his "skill" now am I right?
YEAH! Yeah! You're SO right! YEAH!
I wouldn't hesitate to make a video to show my skill but I'll admit I'm a bit rusty. (4 month break from the game will do that to you) but least I'm honest instead of making up that I'm amazing at this game.
I never said I was amazing.
-
Wrong opinion?! Not only are you afraid to show us your skill but you don't even understand real life facts? No opinion is wrong.. if you think that there can be wrong opinions you are a fool. Sorry I got confused as to who said that lol bad memoryLowbei said:
yeah, you have opinions, and they are wrong.only1biggs said:@Lowbei said:
only1biggs said:@Lowbei said:
only1biggs said:
@yeet said: @only1biggs said: @yeet said: @George_Soros said: @Lowbei said: people should play both sides. i think “balanced perspecive” is the highest compliment you can give someone around here. that being said, ive seen dozens, literally dozens, of survivormains come claim to be killer mains while advocating for killer nerfs, only to check their steam profile and see zero total players sacrificed. May be my naivety, but I just can't wrap my head around this. Why on earth would someone try to cripple the "other" side? What's this with so many people wanting ezpz games? If I want it easy, I play Plants Vs Zombies or something. No salt there for sure. there are many survivor players who exclusively play survivor and mostly in SWF, sure there is some people who exclusively play killer but that is much rarer, oftentimes these players only play the game to bully the killer, and want the game mechanics to enable that. Absolute nonsense. The % of players in such a low player base (DbD) doing this would be 0.01%. Get a grip. I know many people who play the game exclusively to do this, maybe you are just out of touch? Your subjective experience is not the same as everyone else. I say again...get a grip. If anyone is out of touch, it's you I'm afraid.
no kiddo, its you who is out of touch. yeet is 100% correct. you are simply too inexperienced at this game. you should stop posting nonsense and go play the game to get more experience.
I have over 4k hours across 3 platforms.
You imply you have more experience then state to someone else that "this is a side game for you". So..which is it? I mean, unless your life is lived in front of your monitor, your side game experience would be less than mine, yes?
I'm probably older then you.
Yeet is not 100% correct.
It is you and he that post nonsense.
no, you dont have anywhere near 4k hours on 3 platforms, and nobody here believes you. furthermore you bringing up age just shows how insecure you are about this.
you can keep your hilariously wrong opinions to yourself at this point, as we are just throwing them in the forum trash, which is already full.
Okay? You called me "son". I didn't bring up age, i said, if you can read, that I am probably older then you, suggesting that you calling me "son" would be silly. Also, what does age have to do with hours played? I am insecure about hours so I bring up age? What? What are driveling about?
"wrong opinions". Jesus dude, are you really THAT stupid?
I was amused, but I feel like it would be bullying on my part to continue conversing with you.
Seriously, get a grip.
are you still here? bye felicia -
I wouldn't hesitate to make a video to show my skill but I'll admit I'm a bit rusty. (4 month break from the game will do that to you) but least I'm honest instead of making up that I'm amazing at this game.only1biggs said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
Lowbei said:
only1biggs said:@Lowbei said:
only1biggs said:
@yeet said: @only1biggs said: @yeet said: @George_Soros said: @Lowbei said: people should play both sides. i think “balanced perspecive” is the highest compliment you can give someone around here. that being said, ive seen dozens, literally dozens, of survivormains come claim to be killer mains while advocating for killer nerfs, only to check their steam profile and see zero total players sacrificed. May be my naivety, but I just can't wrap my head around this. Why on earth would someone try to cripple the "other" side? What's this with so many people wanting ezpz games? If I want it easy, I play Plants Vs Zombies or something. No salt there for sure. there are many survivor players who exclusively play survivor and mostly in SWF, sure there is some people who exclusively play killer but that is much rarer, oftentimes these players only play the game to bully the killer, and want the game mechanics to enable that. Absolute nonsense. The % of players in such a low player base (DbD) doing this would be 0.01%. Get a grip. I know many people who play the game exclusively to do this, maybe you are just out of touch? Your subjective experience is not the same as everyone else. I say again...get a grip. If anyone is out of touch, it's you I'm afraid.
no kiddo, its you who is out of touch. yeet is 100% correct. you are simply too inexperienced at this game. you should stop posting nonsense and go play the game to get more experience.
I have over 4k hours across 3 platforms.
You imply you have more experience then state to someone else that "this is a side game for you". So..which is it? I mean, unless your life is lived in front of your monitor, your side game experience would be less than mine, yes?
I'm probably older then you.
Yeet is not 100% correct.
It is you and he that post nonsense.
no, you dont have anywhere near 4k hours on 3 platforms, and nobody here believes you. furthermore you bringing up age just shows how insecure you are about this.
you can keep your hilariously wrong opinions to yourself at this point, as we are just throwing them in the forum trash, which is already full.
If he truely had 4000 hours then he'd show no hesitation to show us all video proof of his "skill" now am I right?
YEAH! Yeah! You're SO right! YEAH!
-
You get a bunch of crows? I just get a bunch of Seagulls making more noise then the entire town lol. I'd say they are similar to the crows except.. more annoying lol.Kilmeran said:We have a lot of crows here in Baltimore County. I'm sitting in my home office getting ready to start work, and a bunch of them just sounded-off outside. My first thought was: There's a Survivor nearby.
-
If he truely had 4000 hours then he'd show no hesitation to show us all video proof of his "skill" now am I right?Lowbei said:
no, you dont have anywhere near 4k hours on 3 platforms, and nobody here believes you. furthermore you bringing up age just shows how insecure you are about this.only1biggs said:@Lowbei said:
only1biggs said:@yeet said:
@only1biggs said:
@yeet said:
@George_Soros said:
@Lowbei said:
people should play both sides.
i think “balanced perspecive” is the highest compliment you can give someone around here.
that being said, ive seen dozens, literally dozens, of survivormains come claim to be killer mains while advocating for killer nerfs, only to check their steam profile and see zero total players sacrificed.
May be my naivety, but I just can't wrap my head around this. Why on earth would someone try to cripple the "other" side? What's this with so many people wanting ezpz games?
If I want it easy, I play Plants Vs Zombies or something. No salt there for sure.
there are many survivor players who exclusively play survivor and mostly in SWF, sure there is some people who exclusively play killer but that is much rarer, oftentimes these players only play the game to bully the killer, and want the game mechanics to enable that.
Absolute nonsense. The % of players in such a low player base (DbD) doing this would be 0.01%.
Get a grip.
I know many people who play the game exclusively to do this, maybe you are just out of touch?
Your subjective experience is not the same as everyone else. I say again...get a grip.
If anyone is out of touch, it's you I'm afraid.
no kiddo, its you who is out of touch. yeet is 100% correct. you are simply too inexperienced at this game. you should stop posting nonsense and go play the game to get more experience.
I have over 4k hours across 3 platforms.
You imply you have more experience then state to someone else that "this is a side game for you". So..which is it? I mean, unless your life is lived in front of your monitor, your side game experience would be less than mine, yes?
I'm probably older then you.
Yeet is not 100% correct.
It is you and he that post nonsense.
you can keep your hilariously wrong opinions to yourself at this point, as we are just throwing them in the forum trash, which is already full. -
Wow a screenshot those totally can't be faked am I right? So what you had 1 good game? Everyone has probably beaten those things before.. video evidence is needed I say. Otherwise there is no proof of your "skill"only1biggs said:@DeadByFlashlight said:
@only1biggs said:
@Attackfrog said:
@only1biggs said:
@LightsOut88 said:
Just another kick in the killers balls in my opinion. If they keep this crap up no one will even want to play killer soon. Then the survivors can have it how they have always wanted it and just do all the gens and leave without even seeing a killer lol. Fun game lately DEVS...Not! Every change you have made lately has been for the worse if you are a killer. Im getting seriously tired of the favoritismNot jokes? Wow.
You know you don't have to camp if you just get better at the game, right?
Right @Orion ?
Lol, statements like that are usually said by people who have no clue how to play an effective killer. It's ok, though, you just don't know any better.
I, for one, love this change. I no longer get penalized (by ranking up) for effectively guarding the hook.
In fact, they could "penalize" me more if they want! Make it an instant de-pip for engaging in a chase near the hook!
Nice try. I 4k 90% of the time with different killers and play to have fun, not sit and "guard a kill" or tunnel. You justify it however you like sweetheart, you're just trash.
Still waiting for proof, until it arrives I will put that statement into the "killer is ez nerf killer pls" category

I posted a screen shot the other day of a wraith game I had to hand. 4k'd a 4 man swf's, all with DS, flashlights etc...which on the forums, are all "OP" apparently. They were pretty good players too. I was just better. Simple. If they had a Coldwind they might have won, but, they didn't. It was on console too, which as killer is a nightmare and way easier on pc (i play across all platforms).
Moreover, I don't want killer nerfed, despite whatever that category you have is. Yikes. Against a 4 good survivors on a bad map, you'll lose. Finding 4 good survivors together is a rarity though, despite what the trash killers here and other forums would have you believe.
But you keep "guarding you hooks" buddy lol
-
As someone with more then 1000 hours in this game I'm starting to question if you're really as good as you say or just some survivor main pretending to be a killer. No offence but no one can play this game while never camping. If all generators are complete and you don't camp the kill then I'm sorry but you're the trash one here.. There's multiple situations where camping is right.. I am against it as much as the survivors are yet I know when it's needed and when it's done at the wrong time.only1biggs said:@Attackfrog said:
@only1biggs said:
@LightsOut88 said:
Just another kick in the killers balls in my opinion. If they keep this crap up no one will even want to play killer soon. Then the survivors can have it how they have always wanted it and just do all the gens and leave without even seeing a killer lol. Fun game lately DEVS...Not! Every change you have made lately has been for the worse if you are a killer. Im getting seriously tired of the favoritismNot jokes? Wow.
You know you don't have to camp if you just get better at the game, right?
Right @Orion ?
Lol, statements like that are usually said by people who have no clue how to play an effective killer. It's ok, though, you just don't know any better.
I, for one, love this change. I no longer get penalized (by ranking up) for effectively guarding the hook.
In fact, they could "penalize" me more if they want! Make it an instant de-pip for engaging in a chase near the hook!
Nice try. I 4k 90% of the time with different killers and play to have fun, not sit and "guard a kill" or tunnel. You justify it however you like sweetheart, you're just trash.
-
Your idea would be interesting especially as Mori's are secret and the obsession (Probably with Decisive Strike) might be unaware of what's about to happen lol.Mister_xD said:or you could make it like this:
You will become obsessed with one survivor.
Grants the ability to kill your obsession by your hand during the next trial.
Only one obsession per game.So you can kill with it like with all the other moris, but therefore you cant decide who shall die. with other words, the cypress mori wont let you decide who to kill, the ivory mori lets you decide who to kill and the ebony mori lets you kill all.
you could also add more moris, like a common one, which allows you to kill the last survivor and a very rare one that allows you to kill two survivors.
what do you think? -
That's fine if that's how you want to see it. There's a difference in enjoying low rank play (more casual player) and outright denying that rank matters because you like to derank (No I'm not saying you derank I'm saying alot of people say rank doesn't matter as an excuse to derank) so you can bully weaker killers and farm views on Twitch or somethingOrion said:I'm a casual by choice. I enjoy some challenge, but not the kind that forces me to be at 100% all the time or else I get smashed. That's why I stay away from high ranks.
I prefer to die a lot as Survivor because I'm not paying attention to my surroundings or lose chases because I didn't pay attention to blood stains than have to always be "on", if you know what I mean.
I simply find it more fun when I don't have to stay hyperfocused - maybe it's my ADD, I dunno.If you find always having to play perfectly fun, that's fine, but don't say that "fun is ____" because it simply doesn't work that way; fun is subjective.
-
Oh I see. They really should look towards people at the highest level to balence the game around. New players may complain sure but most PvP games are supposed to be hard at first. The game should stop being balenced around rank 20s or something.RSB said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
RSB said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
RSB said:
@The_Fallen_Utopia said: RSB said:
@The_Fallen_Utopia said: RSB said:
@The_Fallen_Utopia said: RSB said:
@The_Fallen_Utopia said: RSB said:
@The_Fallen_Utopia said: RSB said:
@The_Fallen_Utopia said: I imagine if 1 of the 2 killers catches someone with Decisive Strike the other killer could just wait next to them and instantly down them again lol. But anyway yeah it feels like this would be way more balenced then the current 1v4 gameplay. Stops people from taking away all map pressure simply by running in circles. And while they chase 1 survivors, there are 5 more working on a gens, so... I do not not know if 2 killers chasing one guy would benefit them so much. It would be definetly more balanced.
The thing is when I mentioned Decisive I meant the killers could use their coordination to stop the perk and then go hunt seperate people again. Though if this ever were to be added coordinated double Nurse mains will be terrifying to go against. Maybe this would need to be set so only 1 player can be the select killer. Example if 1 picked Nurse the other would have to pick someone else. Just a suggestion. While the thing with Decisive would be okay, because well, it is Decisive, people should literally [BAD WORD] survivors using this broken perk, I agree that there should be max 1 of each killer. 2 Nurses would be weaker, than a good Nurse with a good Doc, because of aura reading etc, in my opinion, and more fun.
Good point there. Nurse is countered by Stealth but I assume she'd see the screaming survivors like the Doctor can. That does sound like a very powerful combo I have to agree. Not sure how Freddy will work though because the other killer wouldn't be in dream world so I suppose they'd be unable to see him? I think while Nurse should see the Doc's phantoms, and hear screaming survivors while playing with Doc, she should not see the survivors aura while playing with Freddy, for balance.
By the time we get a mode like this Freddy should of been reworked anyway. Apparently he won't see the aura of sleeping survivors anymore and will see the auras of awake survivors instead.. so yeah maybe they shouldn't shere aura reading like that between killers. But should another killer be able to see the triggered Hag traps auras or would that again be too strong? Triggered traps, I think, should be seen by other killers as well in my opinion. They are just a stationary cues, not aura reading.
Actually Hag traps can be seen through walls and always face the survivor who set them off. And with certain add ons the survivor is revealed after setting them off too. I can tell which way the survivor ran by looking at the mud phantasms aura. Of course, just like Doc's phantoms - they always face the survivor, and still, it would not be OP, only aura reading like Freddy has would be OP, I think.
They'll probably test this sort of thing in a PTB anyway. That'll help decide what should and shouldn't work with other killers. Of course, I agree, but... We all know how PTBs work here. If something is not approved by survivors, it won't go through. And that's the issue.
They really should leave the balence talk to the high ranks and not the people who derank to have easier matches or new players. As in those who actually play at the highest level consistently.
Devs should play for themselves on the high ranks in the first place. Now... Look at this, for example -
Look at his level and rank, it is obvious the devs don't even play their own game (maybe besides Not_Queen, but sadly, she has nothing to do with the changes in the game).
Unfortunately I'm on mobile so can't really see that right now but I'm guessing he's low ranked or made some bad plays or something along those lines?
McCote has level 19 and is on R16 in his own game. Yet, he is in charge of deciding about balance.
Don't get me wrong, I like that guy, but he is responsible of balance in here, and how can you be responsible for balance, when you play below the R15? -
Practice makes perfect as they say.Peasant said:@Lowbei As a casual player I can confirm that I am inherently bad. On survivor I can barely rank up, but given the situation (rank. 14) that's to be expected. Half of my allies are just incompetent and the other half want to stay in the low ranks and try to de-pip everyone else as an "act of kindness".
As a killer I'm just not ready. I main Huntress and my aim is in the middle of the spectrum. Some matches I 4k, others, the survivors 4k. I need to get better on both sides. It will just take time. -
Unfortunately I'm on mobile so can't really see that right now but I'm guessing he's low ranked or made some bad plays or something along those lines?RSB said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
RSB said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
RSB said:
@The_Fallen_Utopia said: RSB said:
@The_Fallen_Utopia said: RSB said:
@The_Fallen_Utopia said: RSB said:
@The_Fallen_Utopia said: RSB said:
@The_Fallen_Utopia said: I imagine if 1 of the 2 killers catches someone with Decisive Strike the other killer could just wait next to them and instantly down them again lol. But anyway yeah it feels like this would be way more balenced then the current 1v4 gameplay. Stops people from taking away all map pressure simply by running in circles. And while they chase 1 survivors, there are 5 more working on a gens, so... I do not not know if 2 killers chasing one guy would benefit them so much. It would be definetly more balanced.
The thing is when I mentioned Decisive I meant the killers could use their coordination to stop the perk and then go hunt seperate people again. Though if this ever were to be added coordinated double Nurse mains will be terrifying to go against. Maybe this would need to be set so only 1 player can be the select killer. Example if 1 picked Nurse the other would have to pick someone else. Just a suggestion. While the thing with Decisive would be okay, because well, it is Decisive, people should literally [BAD WORD] survivors using this broken perk, I agree that there should be max 1 of each killer. 2 Nurses would be weaker, than a good Nurse with a good Doc, because of aura reading etc, in my opinion, and more fun.
Good point there. Nurse is countered by Stealth but I assume she'd see the screaming survivors like the Doctor can. That does sound like a very powerful combo I have to agree. Not sure how Freddy will work though because the other killer wouldn't be in dream world so I suppose they'd be unable to see him? I think while Nurse should see the Doc's phantoms, and hear screaming survivors while playing with Doc, she should not see the survivors aura while playing with Freddy, for balance.
By the time we get a mode like this Freddy should of been reworked anyway. Apparently he won't see the aura of sleeping survivors anymore and will see the auras of awake survivors instead.. so yeah maybe they shouldn't shere aura reading like that between killers. But should another killer be able to see the triggered Hag traps auras or would that again be too strong? Triggered traps, I think, should be seen by other killers as well in my opinion. They are just a stationary cues, not aura reading.
Actually Hag traps can be seen through walls and always face the survivor who set them off. And with certain add ons the survivor is revealed after setting them off too. I can tell which way the survivor ran by looking at the mud phantasms aura. Of course, just like Doc's phantoms - they always face the survivor, and still, it would not be OP, only aura reading like Freddy has would be OP, I think.
They'll probably test this sort of thing in a PTB anyway. That'll help decide what should and shouldn't work with other killers.
Of course, I agree, but... We all know how PTBs work here. If something is not approved by survivors, it won't go through. And that's the issue.
They really should leave the balence talk to the high ranks and not the people who derank to have easier matches or new players. As in those who actually play at the highest level consistently.
Devs should play for themselves on the high ranks in the first place. Now... Look at this, for example -
Look at his level and rank, it is obvious the devs don't even play their own game (maybe besides Not_Queen, but sadly, she has nothing to do with the changes in the game).
-
They really should leave the balence talk to the high ranks and not the people who derank to have easier matches or new players. As in those who actually play at the highest level consistently.RSB said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
RSB said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
RSB said:
@The_Fallen_Utopia said: RSB said:
@The_Fallen_Utopia said: RSB said:
@The_Fallen_Utopia said: RSB said:
@The_Fallen_Utopia said: I imagine if 1 of the 2 killers catches someone with Decisive Strike the other killer could just wait next to them and instantly down them again lol. But anyway yeah it feels like this would be way more balenced then the current 1v4 gameplay. Stops people from taking away all map pressure simply by running in circles. And while they chase 1 survivors, there are 5 more working on a gens, so... I do not not know if 2 killers chasing one guy would benefit them so much. It would be definetly more balanced.
The thing is when I mentioned Decisive I meant the killers could use their coordination to stop the perk and then go hunt seperate people again. Though if this ever were to be added coordinated double Nurse mains will be terrifying to go against. Maybe this would need to be set so only 1 player can be the select killer. Example if 1 picked Nurse the other would have to pick someone else. Just a suggestion. While the thing with Decisive would be okay, because well, it is Decisive, people should literally [BAD WORD] survivors using this broken perk, I agree that there should be max 1 of each killer. 2 Nurses would be weaker, than a good Nurse with a good Doc, because of aura reading etc, in my opinion, and more fun.
Good point there. Nurse is countered by Stealth but I assume she'd see the screaming survivors like the Doctor can. That does sound like a very powerful combo I have to agree. Not sure how Freddy will work though because the other killer wouldn't be in dream world so I suppose they'd be unable to see him? I think while Nurse should see the Doc's phantoms, and hear screaming survivors while playing with Doc, she should not see the survivors aura while playing with Freddy, for balance.
By the time we get a mode like this Freddy should of been reworked anyway. Apparently he won't see the aura of sleeping survivors anymore and will see the auras of awake survivors instead.. so yeah maybe they shouldn't shere aura reading like that between killers. But should another killer be able to see the triggered Hag traps auras or would that again be too strong? Triggered traps, I think, should be seen by other killers as well in my opinion. They are just a stationary cues, not aura reading.
Actually Hag traps can be seen through walls and always face the survivor who set them off. And with certain add ons the survivor is revealed after setting them off too. I can tell which way the survivor ran by looking at the mud phantasms aura.
Of course, just like Doc's phantoms - they always face the survivor, and still, it would not be OP, only aura reading like Freddy has would be OP, I think.
They'll probably test this sort of thing in a PTB anyway. That'll help decide what should and shouldn't work with other killers.
Of course, I agree, but... We all know how PTBs work here. If something is not approved by survivors, it won't go through. And that's the issue.
-
They'll probably test this sort of thing in a PTB anyway. That'll help decide what should and shouldn't work with other killers.RSB said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
RSB said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
RSB said:
@The_Fallen_Utopia said: RSB said:
@The_Fallen_Utopia said: RSB said:
@The_Fallen_Utopia said: I imagine if 1 of the 2 killers catches someone with Decisive Strike the other killer could just wait next to them and instantly down them again lol. But anyway yeah it feels like this would be way more balenced then the current 1v4 gameplay. Stops people from taking away all map pressure simply by running in circles. And while they chase 1 survivors, there are 5 more working on a gens, so... I do not not know if 2 killers chasing one guy would benefit them so much. It would be definetly more balanced.
The thing is when I mentioned Decisive I meant the killers could use their coordination to stop the perk and then go hunt seperate people again. Though if this ever were to be added coordinated double Nurse mains will be terrifying to go against. Maybe this would need to be set so only 1 player can be the select killer. Example if 1 picked Nurse the other would have to pick someone else. Just a suggestion. While the thing with Decisive would be okay, because well, it is Decisive, people should literally [BAD WORD] survivors using this broken perk, I agree that there should be max 1 of each killer. 2 Nurses would be weaker, than a good Nurse with a good Doc, because of aura reading etc, in my opinion, and more fun.
Good point there. Nurse is countered by Stealth but I assume she'd see the screaming survivors like the Doctor can. That does sound like a very powerful combo I have to agree. Not sure how Freddy will work though because the other killer wouldn't be in dream world so I suppose they'd be unable to see him? I think while Nurse should see the Doc's phantoms, and hear screaming survivors while playing with Doc, she should not see the survivors aura while playing with Freddy, for balance.
By the time we get a mode like this Freddy should of been reworked anyway. Apparently he won't see the aura of sleeping survivors anymore and will see the auras of awake survivors instead.. so yeah maybe they shouldn't shere aura reading like that between killers. But should another killer be able to see the triggered Hag traps auras or would that again be too strong?
Triggered traps, I think, should be seen by other killers as well in my opinion. They are just a stationary cues, not aura reading.
Actually Hag traps can be seen through walls and always face the survivor who set them off. And with certain add ons the survivor is revealed after setting them off too. I can tell which way the survivor ran by looking at the mud phantasms aura.
Of course, just like Doc's phantoms - they always face the survivor, and still, it would not be OP, only aura reading like Freddy has would be OP, I think.
-
Hag is the killer I've played most actually. Even before her buffs I played her without add ons. At rank 1. A challenge yes but I won more then I lost.Lowbei said:
im a big fan of the hag lately!Vietfox said:
@The_Fallen_UtopiaThe_Fallen_Utopia said:If people want to prove how truely skilled they are they should try reaching rank 1 as survivor using No Mither as their only perk.. that's a real challenge. As for killers.. playing without add ons can be considered quite a challenge now unless the killer is Nurse. And I agree with the idea of getting skilled players to help with balence and not some deranking coward on Twitch who plays SWF all day because they are too weak to play otherwise.
The hag can easily do well without addons in rank 1 as well. -
I don't blame you. Points mean everything in this game lol.Peasant said:I love BBQ and Chili. Not for the subpar aura-reading mind you, for the points. -
True. It would probably be completely fine. Would look funny though.RSB said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
RSB said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
Lowbei said:
The_Fallen_Utopia said: Lowbei said: i would support a kwf mode with 8v2 or 7v2 or whatever it came down to after balance testing. i think it would be fun Obviously you mean 8 killers v 2 survivors. lol jk hah, tho that does bring up the point of, can killers in kwf hit each other to make them drop a survivor they want to kill instead? like when freddy fought jason because jason was stealing his kills.
That would probably lead to alot of trolling. Also how would an Ebony Mori work I wonder. Probably would make it so the killer who used the offering can kill survivors while the other couldn't.
As I stated in my proposition, killers should be able to play in KWF (Kill With Friend), something like SWF for killers, or with a random killer, when you do not have a friend to play with, so when your friend trolls you... Well, it is friendly, you would probably have a lot of good laugh then, not anger as if it would be a random, other killer.
I can imagine 2 killers arguing about whether they should give a survivor the hatch or not lol. Some killers like to do that if another one disconnects
On the other hand, we see SWF sandbagging each other, and still we have this mode in our game. So I think trolling in KWF would not be a big problem.
-
Actually Hag traps can be seen through walls and always face the survivor who set them off. And with certain add ons the survivor is revealed after setting them off too. I can tell which way the survivor ran by looking at the mud phantasms aura.RSB said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
RSB said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
RSB said:
@The_Fallen_Utopia said: RSB said:
@The_Fallen_Utopia said: I imagine if 1 of the 2 killers catches someone with Decisive Strike the other killer could just wait next to them and instantly down them again lol. But anyway yeah it feels like this would be way more balenced then the current 1v4 gameplay. Stops people from taking away all map pressure simply by running in circles. And while they chase 1 survivors, there are 5 more working on a gens, so... I do not not know if 2 killers chasing one guy would benefit them so much. It would be definetly more balanced.
The thing is when I mentioned Decisive I meant the killers could use their coordination to stop the perk and then go hunt seperate people again. Though if this ever were to be added coordinated double Nurse mains will be terrifying to go against. Maybe this would need to be set so only 1 player can be the select killer. Example if 1 picked Nurse the other would have to pick someone else. Just a suggestion. While the thing with Decisive would be okay, because well, it is Decisive, people should literally [BAD WORD] survivors using this broken perk, I agree that there should be max 1 of each killer. 2 Nurses would be weaker, than a good Nurse with a good Doc, because of aura reading etc, in my opinion, and more fun.
Good point there. Nurse is countered by Stealth but I assume she'd see the screaming survivors like the Doctor can. That does sound like a very powerful combo I have to agree. Not sure how Freddy will work though because the other killer wouldn't be in dream world so I suppose they'd be unable to see him?
I think while Nurse should see the Doc's phantoms, and hear screaming survivors while playing with Doc, she should not see the survivors aura while playing with Freddy, for balance.
By the time we get a mode like this Freddy should of been reworked anyway. Apparently he won't see the aura of sleeping survivors anymore and will see the auras of awake survivors instead.. so yeah maybe they shouldn't shere aura reading like that between killers. But should another killer be able to see the triggered Hag traps auras or would that again be too strong?
Triggered traps, I think, should be seen by other killers as well in my opinion. They are just a stationary cues, not aura reading.
-
I can imagine 2 killers arguing about whether they should give a survivor the hatch or not lol. Some killers like to do that if another one disconnectsRSB said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
Lowbei said:
The_Fallen_Utopia said:
Lowbei said:i would support a kwf mode with 8v2 or 7v2 or whatever it came down to after balance testing.
i think it would be fun
Obviously you mean 8 killers v 2 survivors. lol jk
hah, tho that does bring up the point of, can killers in kwf hit each other to make them drop a survivor they want to kill instead? like when freddy fought jason because jason was stealing his kills.
That would probably lead to alot of trolling. Also how would an Ebony Mori work I wonder. Probably would make it so the killer who used the offering can kill survivors while the other couldn't.
As I stated in my proposition, killers should be able to play in KWF (Kill With Friend), something like SWF for killers, or with a random killer, when you do not have a friend to play with, so when your friend trolls you... Well, it is friendly, you would probably have a lot of good laugh then, not anger as if it would be a random, other killer.
-
By the time we get a mode like this Freddy should of been reworked anyway. Apparently he won't see the aura of sleeping survivors anymore and will see the auras of awake survivors instead.. so yeah maybe they shouldn't shere aura reading like that between killers. But should another killer be able to see the triggered Hag traps auras or would that again be too strong?RSB said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
RSB said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
RSB said:
@The_Fallen_Utopia said: I imagine if 1 of the 2 killers catches someone with Decisive Strike the other killer could just wait next to them and instantly down them again lol. But anyway yeah it feels like this would be way more balenced then the current 1v4 gameplay. Stops people from taking away all map pressure simply by running in circles. And while they chase 1 survivors, there are 5 more working on a gens, so... I do not not know if 2 killers chasing one guy would benefit them so much. It would be definetly more balanced.
The thing is when I mentioned Decisive I meant the killers could use their coordination to stop the perk and then go hunt seperate people again. Though if this ever were to be added coordinated double Nurse mains will be terrifying to go against. Maybe this would need to be set so only 1 player can be the select killer. Example if 1 picked Nurse the other would have to pick someone else. Just a suggestion.
While the thing with Decisive would be okay, because well, it is Decisive, people should literally [BAD WORD] survivors using this broken perk, I agree that there should be max 1 of each killer. 2 Nurses would be weaker, than a good Nurse with a good Doc, because of aura reading etc, in my opinion, and more fun.
Good point there. Nurse is countered by Stealth but I assume she'd see the screaming survivors like the Doctor can. That does sound like a very powerful combo I have to agree. Not sure how Freddy will work though because the other killer wouldn't be in dream world so I suppose they'd be unable to see him?
I think while Nurse should see the Doc's phantoms, and hear screaming survivors while playing with Doc, she should not see the survivors aura while playing with Freddy, for balance.
-
That would probably lead to alot of trolling. Also how would an Ebony Mori work I wonder. Probably would make it so the killer who used the offering can kill survivors while the other couldn't.Lowbei said:
hah, tho that does bring up the point of, can killers in kwf hit each other to make them drop a survivor they want to kill instead? like when freddy fought jason because jason was stealing his kills.The_Fallen_Utopia said:
Obviously you mean 8 killers v 2 survivors. lol jkLowbei said:i would support a kwf mode with 8v2 or 7v2 or whatever it came down to after balance testing.
i think it would be fun -
Good point there. Nurse is countered by Stealth but I assume she'd see the screaming survivors like the Doctor can. That does sound like a very powerful combo I have to agree. Not sure how Freddy will work though because the other killer wouldn't be in dream world so I suppose they'd be unable to see him?RSB said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
RSB said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
I imagine if 1 of the 2 killers catches someone with Decisive Strike the other killer could just wait next to them and instantly down them again lol. But anyway yeah it feels like this would be way more balenced then the current 1v4 gameplay. Stops people from taking away all map pressure simply by running in circles.
And while they chase 1 survivors, there are 5 more working on a gens, so... I do not not know if 2 killers chasing one guy would benefit them so much. It would be definetly more balanced.
The thing is when I mentioned Decisive I meant the killers could use their coordination to stop the perk and then go hunt seperate people again. Though if this ever were to be added coordinated double Nurse mains will be terrifying to go against. Maybe this would need to be set so only 1 player can be the select killer. Example if 1 picked Nurse the other would have to pick someone else. Just a suggestion.
While the thing with Decisive would be okay, because well, it is Decisive, people should literally [BAD WORD] survivors using this broken perk, I agree that there should be max 1 of each killer. 2 Nurses would be weaker, than a good Nurse with a good Doc, because of aura reading etc, in my opinion, and more fun.
-
If people want to prove how truely skilled they are they should try reaching rank 1 as survivor using No Mither as their only perk.. that's a real challenge. As for killers.. playing without add ons can be considered quite a challenge now unless the killer is Nurse. And I agree with the idea of getting skilled players to help with balence and not some deranking coward on Twitch who plays SWF all day because they are too weak to play otherwise.
-
Then we'll wait for a barrage of Freddy op threads.. oh wait we already have those! lol some survivors are pathetic no offence to them.Tsulan said:
They don't like Freddy. Don't know why they are against a complete overhaul.The_Fallen_Utopia said:
Freddy? Balenced? Those words should not go together right now. Those same people probably called Wraith op before his buffs.. Nurse is really the only balenced killer for the highest level of play right now.Tsulan said:
A month ago survivors tried to make it look like Freddy was balanced, by opening several threads about how good he is on rank 1.The_Fallen_Utopia said:
Well I think the only ones worth listening to are the ones who are willing to put in the effort to find out the facts about something. I wonder if the truth is such a new player that he thinks Freddy is op. If so that's enough evidence for me to ignore their opinions.Orion said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
In my opinion more people need to judge things based on facts and evidence to back up points rather then just looking at something and claiming it's good or bad without looking into it at all.That is the right way to do it, but it requires work. People are naturally intellectually lazy - our brains evolved that way.
It almost looked like they fear facing other killers than the nurse on high ranks. -
The thing is when I mentioned Decisive I meant the killers could use their coordination to stop the perk and then go hunt seperate people again. Though if this ever were to be added coordinated double Nurse mains will be terrifying to go against. Maybe this would need to be set so only 1 player can be the select killer. Example if 1 picked Nurse the other would have to pick someone else. Just a suggestion.RSB said:@The_Fallen_Utopia said:
I imagine if 1 of the 2 killers catches someone with Decisive Strike the other killer could just wait next to them and instantly down them again lol. But anyway yeah it feels like this would be way more balenced then the current 1v4 gameplay. Stops people from taking away all map pressure simply by running in circles.And while they chase 1 survivors, there are 5 more working on a gens, so... I do not not know if 2 killers chasing one guy would benefit them so much. It would be definetly more balanced.
-
These threads are always good for a laugh.. as others have said no killers should be nerfed.. if anything they should all be buffed so they are all op.. why? Because this is a 1v4 game not a 1v1 the killer is supposed to be overpowered to counter a team..
-
I imagine if 1 of the 2 killers catches someone with Decisive Strike the other killer could just wait next to them and instantly down them again lol. But anyway yeah it feels like this would be way more balenced then the current 1v4 gameplay. Stops people from taking away all map pressure simply by running in circles.