Theninjajesus

@Slashstreetboy said:
Drop sloppy. It does make the Survivors bleed more, bt doesn´t make them drop more orbs per se.

Thanks!

in Help with an Oni build Comment by Theninjajesus January 5, 2021

@honestyoverbias said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1842395#Comment_1842395
Interesting...
that’s straight up exactly what most survivors do, I’m getting the idea you’re inexperienced.
Anything that doesn’t financial compensate me is not my job, otherwise I’d put it on my taxes. I choose to provide examples and I have so scroll up and find them if you want to read more about it.
To exploit; to selfishly take advantage of someone or something at benefit to one’s self, commonly at the cost of another. (Nothing to do with coded errors, exploitation is, as you stated, a behavior)
setting traps, breaking pallets, yada yada yada, does not take much time, so if given a grace period of say 10 seconds of not pausing the hook and your still there, yeah, your obviously camping and trying to find an excuse to still be in the area.
I’m not “sorry” per say, that you’re getting “a little heated” in a community discussion, but it is unfortunate. Nobody is going to back down because you want them to, that’s not how things work in the real world.

I spend my time playing, not spamming forums. I've already spent more time on this obviously bad idea that's bad than I'd like. You're clearly a bad faith debater- you know that exploit as a noun is different than exploit as a verb (or maybe you don't, but it's not my job to teach you parts of speech). If you're just going to toxic survivor all over the place, feel free to scream into the void. I'll just hope I never encounter you in game and not bother with you anymore here. Way to take a fun ribbing of OP's suggestion and turn it into two days of irritation and disgust.

in Should the hook timer freeze within a certain range? Comment by Theninjajesus December 30, 2020

@honestyoverbias said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1840007#Comment_1840007
Not showing survivors auras is no guarantee that all 3 are in range, there are several ways to hide your aura from that perk you should be aware of.
there’s plenty of ways to make such a feature less exploitable if you put some thought into it.
camping in itself is an exploit so if your going to resist this function on those grounds you should acknowledge the former.
any killer worth their salt has no fear of unhooking. Unless you are not confident in being able to find a survivor more than once.

1) Yes you can hide in lockers and whatnot; most Survivors don't bother doing that. And if you don't see anyone, they certainly ALL wouldn't hide in lockers outside 40M away. If you don't see anyone you might as well hunt around the hook region.

2) it's YOUR job to demonstrate how you could make it unexploitable. YOU'RE the one saying this is needed.

3) No, it's not. It's a behavior, not an error coded into the game. It's a real scumbag move. I hate it and it makes the game worse for all parties.

4) yes, you're right. The corollary to your statement is that a good killer may stay NEAR a hook without camping to do some of the other stuff I said (reload, set traps, break pallets, kick gens), and, by the extremely bad idea you support, would not get any hook progression.

You got camped by someone who felt uncertain in their skills. I'm sorry you had that terrible experience. It sucks. This solution makes the game unplayable for killers. Every killer has several things that survivors do that are jerk things to do that aren't exploits and gets them riled. Flashlight flicking, teabagging, gesturing at the killer, locker spamming? These are all jerk moves. I'm not going to suggest something like giving anyone who crouches 10 times in 5 seconds exhaustion for 30 seconds for basically doing squat thrusts in front of me.

Your idea is not a solution.

Edited to take the edge off a bit. I'm getting a little heated by you spamming this forum topic trying to suggest this "solution" as a thing that wouldn't completely break the game. It would. Stop.

in Should the hook timer freeze within a certain range? Comment by Theninjajesus December 29, 2020

@honestyoverbias said:
This comment is lazy and you should form a worthwhile response
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1839271#Comment_1839271

Guess you're not a Futurama watcher, then. Otherwise you'd understand I was quoting said show.

I could go into other things about how pausing a hook timer while a killer is within range, say, setting traps, or using intel they have from their perks (if bbq and chilli doesn't show everyone, then all three must be within range, but I'll run away and let them get that unhook for free because if I don't walk away the hook timer will never start...), or breaking pallets, or any number of things that aren't camping but would be treated as such by this bad suggestion, but I really didn't want to do anything other than convey my point with a pithy quote.

In short, this is impossible for survivors to NOT exploit, even by mistake, and it's impossible it's not punitive against killers. What OP suggests is "What if all survivors had a free hook pausing perk that they could exploit by keeping the killer within range?"

in Should the hook timer freeze within a certain range? Comment by Theninjajesus December 28, 2020

This suggestion is bad and you should feel bad!

in Should the hook timer freeze within a certain range? Comment by Theninjajesus December 27, 2020

*A* fix needed to happen. *THIS* fix was garbage. It took me all of 30 seconds to think up a more effective system.

Every two hooks gets you a kill to use. Tentative additional restriction: the survivor had to have been hooked at least once to use the kill.

As things stand, setting it to two hooks per makes it less time consuming to find a hook and death hook them rather than kill a survivor. Don't be surprised if they announce virtually nobody has used Moris following these changes, and they are going to try to figure something else out now.

In essence, I think the Devs are going to make more work for themselves by taking the "easy" solution.

in Killers, what do you think of the mori changes? Comment by Theninjajesus December 19, 2020

@sQuAde said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/213237/i-feel-like-dbd-has-been-scaring-off-new-killers
"gave bad killers a chance to at least do decent."
first of all, if you're doing bad you shouldn't deserve a kill in the first place. The mori nerf was a good change.

Nah, it was a bad change. But a change at all was necessary. Don't conflate the two.

in I feel like DBD has been scaring off new killers Comment by Theninjajesus December 19, 2020

@noctis129 said:
Ppl are scared the devs will bring mori's back if enough ppl complain.

I don't want them to bring it back to one. I want them to not do the laziest option to "fix" it. Now it's longer to kill than to just bring to a hook. Keys still needed a fix but since that would require effort because they put thought into appeasing survivors, they logjammed this through instead.

Here's a fix that retains Mori usefulness. Make a Mori give you a kill for every two hooks you get. If it needs a restriction above and beyond that, make it so that you can only use your banked kills against a survivor who's already been hooked once.

That solution took literally a minute to think up and it's still better than what they did.

Look, I get why the Devs do this stuff this way. There needs to be four times as many Survivors as Killers so of course they're going to favor the Survivors. But if they keep this up, there's not going to be people who want to play Killers, and then there's no game at all.

in QUIT COMPLAINING ABOUT MORIS! Comment by Theninjajesus December 11, 2020

@TheButcher said:
Freddy's stats are incredibly skewed, and it's dissapointing to see a dev team make this bad of a judgement

"There's nothing wrong with Object of Obsession"

-the same Dev Team.

in Devs..you need to hold back the killer sledgehammer Comment by Theninjajesus December 4, 2020

Just have the tiers work like discordance. Yellow, all gens within 32m regress. Green, all within 64m. Purple, all within 96m.

in Should Surge Be Buffed? Comment by Theninjajesus December 3, 2020

In the Sylvia Plath sense of the word, yeah, I get it, we're all dying. But Dead By Daylight isn't dying the way Chloe over there is dying.

in Dead by daylight is infact dying Comment by Theninjajesus November 8, 2020

Yes, can't wait for a Cannibal/Hillbilly style knockoff of the trapper.

in Friday the 13th Shutting down, now we can have Jason? Comment by Theninjajesus November 5, 2020

I'll pick "Survivors are teabagging a$$faces" for 400, Alex.

in Why don't killers come to the exit gates anymore? Comment by Theninjajesus November 3, 2020

@Crap_Martini said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1723019#Comment_1723019
I would hope that you wouldn't teabag someone in real life either.
Unless they consent.

Consent is key. 😄