Gay Myers (Luzi)
Gay Myers (Luzi)
About
- Username
- Gay Myers (Luzi)
- Joined
- Visits
- 4,707
- Last Active
Comments
-
@Lowbei said:
idk about you, but every time i get impaled in real life, i feel refreshed and ready to run.
That's lowkey kinky and I'm okay with that.
-
@Raccoon said:
" Is it literally like it resets or that it still has the normal exhaustion effect? "
Ok that is a yikes.
-
@Mesme said:
@Gay Myers (Luzi) said:
You need to kill 25 of each required survivor.So it's kind of an objective thing? I see.. again I never really saw this before take it I can find more about it on the wiki or something?
I think you might.
It's basically sacrifice 25 Jakes, Dwights, Megs and Claudettes for the masks.
-
@Raccoon said:
@Gay Myers (Luzi)Resets
?
-
You need to kill 25 of each required survivor.
-
@Lowbei said:
pretty sure my immersion is already broken by a huge score screen :P
I misread that terribly wrong the moment you typed huge.
-
@Lowbei said:
i understand the migraine thing. it would be nice if there was a “blind in white or black” option.
I really dislike the quote system... Anyways, yes. I've been pushing for this for a very long time already, basically since I became a mod, but eh, lol.-
-
@Lowbei said:
@Gay Myers (Luzi)as long as we are on the topic, the devs have been asked for like 6 months now in every QA about why the report form was taken down before another was put up, and how long it will take to make one. they dodge the question every single time, to the point where its become a joke around here, since apparently its easier to make dlc like maps, killers and survivors, than to make a basic web form.
the lack of a report and the ingame one being a joke (proof with video goes unchecked for months) has lead to an influx of speedhackers in the past few months, but bhvr wouldnt know that since they dont have a system to keep track of it.
i dont honestly expect answers, i just want you to know that this looks bad.
And I cannot give you any information in that regards. I've my limitations. I've to use the same report system as everyone else, but in the long run that's not the topic at hand
.> @Raccoon said:
"because every action should have some sort of consequences"
Like getting hooked refills your exhaustion.
C'mon, folks, let's take a nice relaxing break on the hook.
-Mashes Sprint while getting unhooked-
Camping has a very real consequence - It's a loss vs SWF / anyone that realized you're standing still.
Bloodlust would not be necessary if they:
1) Balanced the maps
2) Fixed the hitboxes to remove Nascar Racing Sim 2000It depends with camping, because a lot of people will still rush in like beheaded chicken. So it can easily be beneficial for those who camp.
And it is way too punishing that exhaustion wouldn't go down when you're hooked. Now for clarification, I actually did not watch the Q&A (the irony as mod). Is it literally like it resets or that it still has the normal exhaustion effect? The latter is what I'm okay with, if it literally resets, no spank you.
BL is the same reasoning I gave earlier - balance maps and you added the hitbox issue.
-
@Hades378 said:
@Gay Myers (Luzi) said:
@Hades378 said:
I haven't seen anything on this thread answering the original question. Is there a reason why Behavior hasn't added an in-game chat function? Have they even discussed the subject before?Yes, several times and usually their answer was basically for immersion reasons, if I remember correctly.
Really? I mean, I understand that they can't prevent other forms of communication outside of the game, but considering that people are "breaking immersion" anyway, one would think their reasoning would be more substantial than that. Especially when the pros outweigh the cons so heavily.
I believe it was that, because down the road they just kept saying no no no each time they were asked and stopped explaining why.
-
@Hades378 said:
I haven't seen anything on this thread answering the original question. Is there a reason why Behavior hasn't added an in-game chat function? Have they even discussed the subject before?Yes, several times and usually their answer was basically for immersion reasons, if I remember correctly.
-
@Lowbei said:
Gay Myers (Luzi) said:@Lowbei said:
Gay Myers (Luzi) said:
Bloodlust needs to go. It promotes bad killer plays and requires you to learn less. It's one of the reasons I stopped playing killers aside from killers FOV and flashlights white screen giving me migraines. I hated using BL and I would instantly lose it if I ever reached tier III, because it meant for that I did not play optimally. Yes, maps need adjusting still and I can prolly live with BL staying until then, but once maps get balanced, it needs to go. Also when you're hooked, you're not doing anything. It makes perfect sense exhaustion cooldown would go down when you're hooked. This tells me you must not play at ranks where pallet looping happens, because pallet looping can only be countered by bloodlust (or nurse), else you can spend 5 minutes looping every pallet in the map. The devs stated that they wanted survivors to not be feeling “safe” in front of killers, thats why they made bloodlust, yet after i loop a killer a few times for bloodlust to activate, all i have to do is make them break the pallet and they lose it, then on to the next one. Its clear by these ridiculous changes that the review bomb actually worked, despite near universal praise from your vet players as a long awaited step in the right direction.
Its still abundantly clear that the devs do not consult their most experienced players when making decisions about a game they only play at non-competitive ranks.
I have played in these ranks. I was rank 2 max and that is enough to almost always meet rank 1 players. I just never was bothered by it that much and I was able to play around it enough when I was playing. Usually matches would end pretty quickly on my end as killer, but I had to stop playing mainly killer after the FOV change. I can only play a bit of killer otherwise it will cause migraine due to the FOV + flashlight white screen. I do know my killrate in percentage from the time I was playing and that only includes 4ks, it was decent enough that I can say I did not have that many issues in the old times and I mean really old issues. I started playing when Myers released.
Bloodlust was made as a bandaid until map would be balanced - that's how it was introduced and that it will go once maps are balanced. That is the point. Once maps get fixed in the best ways, it can go, because it's not needed anymore and for me to reac BL tier III is as if I'm being carried and I don't like that.
Theres my point. Youve once, in a couple years, got a killer to rank2... and i would go so far as to bet that youve made it further than most of the devs.
Like i said, they simply do not consult with their most experienced players, aka the people who know the actual gameplay better than them, about massive gameplay changes.
No offense, but your personal experiece from years ago for a couple weeks or so, is not an informed opinion for the current state of the game.
I can personally pallet loop a non-nurse killer for the entire map, with nearly zero fear or pressure until the pallets are all gone, and by that time the gens are done. Thats not balanced.
Its fine. The game will go on, but as the majority of your vets have said over and over, the game will never be balanced while the devs clearly continue to make decisions based on their rank20 gameplay.
It wasn't once though. It was every time until the huge chance in February-March to the FOV that kept getting worse. :P I said in my post I stopped playing killer mostly when the FOV changed, the biggest change was in February 2017.
Not disagreeing with the rest that much, so no real comment here on my end.
-
@No_Mither_No_Problem said:
Well, what level of Kindred are we talking about here? T1 is pretty good. T2 is even better. T3 might be OP. If they are making Kindred default, then my biggest question is, what happens to Kindred? Will it be changed or removed?Good question. I think that could be asked in the next Q&A. I will see if I can get a answer earlier though. I think T2 would be fair. I agree T3 would be too much.
Actually, did they answer that in the current Q&A?
-
@Esheon said:
Gay Myers (Luzi) said:@Esheon said:
RemoveSWF said:
Black T-shirts - because Claudette wasn't OP enough already.
I know you like to complain a lot, but this cosmetic has been available in this way for a LONG time. It's not new.
And it used to be worse.
True, it used to be solid black and now it has lighter folds.
And they added the red marks.
-
@Lowbei said:
Gay Myers (Luzi) said:Bloodlust needs to go. It promotes bad killer plays and requires you to learn less. It's one of the reasons I stopped playing killers aside from killers FOV and flashlights white screen giving me migraines. I hated using BL and I would instantly lose it if I ever reached tier III, because it meant for that I did not play optimally.
Yes, maps need adjusting still and I can prolly live with BL staying until then, but once maps get balanced, it needs to go.
Also when you're hooked, you're not doing anything. It makes perfect sense exhaustion cooldown would go down when you're hooked.
This tells me you must not play at ranks where pallet looping happens, because pallet looping can only be countered by bloodlust (or nurse), else you can spend 5 minutes looping every pallet in the map.
The devs stated that they wanted survivors to not be feeling “safe” in front of killers, thats why they made bloodlust, yet after i loop a killer a few times for bloodlust to activate, all i have to do is make them break the pallet and they lose it, then on to the next one.
Its clear by these ridiculous changes that the review bomb actually worked, despite near universal praise from your vet players as a long awaited step in the right direction.
Its still abundantly clear that the devs do not consult their most experienced players when making decisions about a game they only play at non-competitive ranks.
I have played in these ranks. I was rank 2 max and that is enough to almost always meet rank 1 players. I just never was bothered by it that much and I was able to play around it enough when I was playing. Usually matches would end pretty quickly on my end as killer, but I had to stop playing mainly killer after the FOV change. I can only play a bit of killer otherwise it will cause migraine due to the FOV + flashlight white screen. I do know my killrate in percentage from the time I was playing and that only includes 4ks, it was decent enough that I can say I did not have that many issues in the old times and I mean really old issues. I started playing when Myers released.
Bloodlust was made as a bandaid until map would be balanced - that's how it was introduced and that it will go once maps are balanced. That is the point. Once maps get fixed in the best ways, it can go, because it's not needed anymore and for me to reac BL tier III is as if I'm being carried and I don't like that.
-
Nothing should really happen, considering audio and such makes people audible.
-
@Esheon said:
RemoveSWF said:Black T-shirts - because Claudette wasn't OP enough already.
I know you like to complain a lot, but this cosmetic has been available in this way for a LONG time. It's not new.
And it used to be worse.
-
@SadonicShadow said:
@Gay Myers (Luzi) said:
Bloodlust needs to go. It promotes bad killer plays and requires you to learn less. It's one of the reasons I stopped playing killers aside from killers FOV and flashlights white screen giving me migraines. I hated using BL and I would instantly lose it if I ever reached tier III, because it meant for that I did not play optimally.Yes, maps need adjusting still and I can prolly live with BL staying until then, but once maps get balanced, it needs to go.
Also when you're hooked, you're not doing anything. It makes perfect sense exhaustion cooldown would go down when you're hooked.
I agree with this. Bloodlust is a bandaid for a much larger issue. I would take balanced maps over bloodlust any day. Hopefully before the end of 2018 every map is balanced so that there is no critical time wasters or safe spots and then BL rightfully gets the axe.
I hope so. With proper balance of maps and BL gone, I would have more reason to start playing the game again. > @WalterWh1te said:
Gay Myers (Luzi) said:
Bloodlust needs to go. It promotes bad killer plays and requires you to learn less. It's one of the reasons I stopped playing killers aside from killers FOV and flashlights white screen giving me migraines. I hated using BL and I would instantly lose it if I ever reached tier III, because it meant for that I did not play optimally.
Yes, maps need adjusting still and I can prolly live with BL staying until then, but once maps get balanced, it needs to go.
Also when you're hooked, you're not doing anything. It makes perfect sense exhaustion cooldown would go down when you're hooked.
100% agree. If you rely on current BL 3 to catch someone something is wrong.
Also the pallet interaction didn't feel intuitive in the PTB. Getting a hit on someone after the stun should have kicked in is no bueno.
Those changes are not a overnight reaction to some reviews. Its a general roadmap to make the game fun for both sides.
This includes more fluid animations and interactions.
But keep on going with the victim entertainment. Its pretty hilarious tbh.
Oh yeah, a hit after the stun sounds no bueno, even though it could be latency? Considering the amount of posts I saw about that, I doubt it is latency though. That doesn't sound too fancy to me. It might change with the animation change that McLean showed on Stream though, because it could explain some issues with the pallets on both sides.
@KillingInstinct said:
@Gay Myers (Luzi) said:
@KillingInstinct said:
@Gay Myers (Luzi) said:
Bloodlust needs to go. It promotes bad killer plays and requires you to learn less. It's one of the reasons I stopped playing killers aside from killers FOV and flashlights white screen giving me migraines. I hated using BL and I would instantly lose it if I ever reached tier III, because it meant for that I did not play optimally.Yes, maps need adjusting still and I can prolly live with BL staying until then, but once maps get balanced, it needs to go.
Also when you're hooked, you're not doing anything. It makes perfect sense exhaustion cooldown would go down when you're hooked.
While that may be true. They are first beginning with BL and not with the map balance. Killers are just getting nerfed again and it pisses me off. ''Hey! The survivor players gave us over 440 bad reviews in one day and over 650 in two days. Let's reward with buffs and killer nerfs, am I right?''
You can't possibly say that ######### is fair at all! They have to buff Brutal Strength then so we can still keep up with the survivors!
BS is fine where it is and anymore buffs would make it way too strong. There is a difference between balancing and just outstraight oping stuff. Numbers need to be treated carefully in DBD, because the multipliers are really weird, so buffing BS in numbers might just break the perk.
Balancing is nerfing and buffing on both sides. You cannot get anything right immediately. I've never seen that done in any game that XY patch was right away the perfect patch. I never said things are fair, because a lot of things are unfair in the game for both sides, but when I look at these changes I'm usually very cold towards them. They make sense to me on a rational basis.
They needed to lower BL so people can start to learn mindgames, because a lot of players are nowadays new players who never played the game with no BL, so they can get used to a different type of game and develop new strategies, because the end goal is to remove it once maps are balanced. I do believe lowering the numbers are needed before that can happen at all, even after map balance, because a ice cold removal of the feature would throw a lot of players out of the loop.
Like others points out, that change was mentioned several times in the past few weeks.
Balancing is nerfing and buffing, yes. But this game is branded as asymmetrical. It should be power vs numbers. It's power vs numbers with power right now.
A BS buff wouldn't make it OP. IT would make it how it used to be. Even if it's only up to 30%.
They should buff all killers a bit. Make MM like he used to be for example. Almost infinite stalking range and stacking EW succ speed
MM is in a good place right now. Infinite stalking range would literally break the game due to the render issues with some objects causing him to look through some objects. I think his stalking right now is bugged, at least the way he is collecting his stalk from survivors when a red survivors in the frame - it slows down, so it can hinder your process.
And no, currently how the game is any buff to BS would make it too strong. BS is in a really good place right now and it can cut off enough to catch up to someone and I think there will not be a buff in the near future for it considering the pallet changes.
Buff the killers generally, yes, but even if it's asymmetrical, you cannot buff something to hell and risk that a huge amount of players won't have fun. There is a difference between making a scary and thrilling experience and a unfair and unfun experience. Depending on the way you do it, it can shift to the unfair and unfun side really quickly and it's not even a matter of adapting. No amount of adapting can change the unfairness of some things and if they just get frustrating, it's not a good change.
-
@KillingInstinct said:
@Gay Myers (Luzi) said:
@Raccoon said:
Survivors are also getting MASSIVE buffs.In-built kindred, invincibility frames while being unhooked (killer will act as though they hit a hooked survivor if the survivor has not regained control after unhooking), and HOOKING REMOVES EXHAUSTION.
Chase that guy for 2 minutes after a well-time Sprint Burst and hook them?
Oh no, they're getting unhooked! * watches them mash Sprint and escape during I-Frames *
Fair and balanced, fam, especially with the speed of BL3 being nerfed by 50%.The in-built Kindred is fair, because every action should have some sort of consequences - also camping. Invincibility frames were very much needed after being unhooked. It caused too much frustration and it used to be in the game, but it was removed for animation reasons. It wasn't even a balance reason, but animations.
BL needs to go. It's one of the reasons I stopped playing killer and I always felt like it was carrying me when I reached tier III, so I would intentionally lose it. Maps need to be balanced before it can be removed, but then it should go 100% once maps are balanced enough for both sides to work out if you play optimally. Never forget both sides need to play optimally and everyone needs to analyze their mistakes.
Maps are never going to be balanced tho. Balance would mean a decrease of pallets. I'm not talking about only 1 or 2 pallets. I'm talking about 5 or something like that. And if even one more pallet gets removed per map, survivors are gonna review bomb the game again and then get a buff
The BL change had nothing to do with the review bombs or any of these changes. They were talked about before and it was always said they will monitor every change, because the exhaustion nerf hit perks that should not have been hit by it. Only Sprint Burst needed to be nerfed and I still think it needs to be nerfed. Reduce speed you run at with the exhaustion nerf.
I think long wall windows are something that are overlooked a lot of times. These need to go. Literally just go, because all of them are nuisance or remove the pallet that's usually right next to a long wall window, but most of them need to go, because they're a issue for both sides.
And if you chase the guy for 2 minutes with SB, it's still two minutes he couldn't use it compared to how it used to be, so the chase might have been longer than 2 minutes with the previous SB.
-
@KillingInstinct said:
@Gay Myers (Luzi) said:
Bloodlust needs to go. It promotes bad killer plays and requires you to learn less. It's one of the reasons I stopped playing killers aside from killers FOV and flashlights white screen giving me migraines. I hated using BL and I would instantly lose it if I ever reached tier III, because it meant for that I did not play optimally.Yes, maps need adjusting still and I can prolly live with BL staying until then, but once maps get balanced, it needs to go.
Also when you're hooked, you're not doing anything. It makes perfect sense exhaustion cooldown would go down when you're hooked.
While that may be true. They are first beginning with BL and not with the map balance. Killers are just getting nerfed again and it pisses me off. ''Hey! The survivor players gave us over 440 bad reviews in one day and over 650 in two days. Let's reward with buffs and killer nerfs, am I right?''
You can't possibly say that ######### is fair at all! They have to buff Brutal Strength then so we can still keep up with the survivors!
BS is fine where it is and anymore buffs would make it way too strong. There is a difference between balancing and just outstraight oping stuff. Numbers need to be treated carefully in DBD, because the multipliers are really weird, so buffing BS in numbers might just break the perk.
Balancing is nerfing and buffing on both sides. You cannot get anything right immediately. I've never seen that done in any game that XY patch was right away the perfect patch. I never said things are fair, because a lot of things are unfair in the game for both sides, but when I look at these changes I'm usually very cold towards them. They make sense to me on a rational basis.
They needed to lower BL so people can start to learn mindgames, because a lot of players are nowadays new players who never played the game with no BL, so they can get used to a different type of game and develop new strategies, because the end goal is to remove it once maps are balanced. I do believe lowering the numbers are needed before that can happen at all, even after map balance, because a ice cold removal of the feature would throw a lot of players out of the loop.
Like others points out, that change was mentioned several times in the past few weeks.
-
@Raccoon said:
Survivors are also getting MASSIVE buffs.In-built kindred, invincibility frames while being unhooked (killer will act as though they hit a hooked survivor if the survivor has not regained control after unhooking), and HOOKING REMOVES EXHAUSTION.
Chase that guy for 2 minutes after a well-time Sprint Burst and hook them?
Oh no, they're getting unhooked! * watches them mash Sprint and escape during I-Frames *
Fair and balanced, fam, especially with the speed of BL3 being nerfed by 50%.The in-built Kindred is fair, because every action should have some sort of consequences - also camping. Invincibility frames were very much needed after being unhooked. It caused too much frustration and it used to be in the game, but it was removed for animation reasons. It wasn't even a balance reason, but animations.
BL needs to go. It's one of the reasons I stopped playing killer and I always felt like it was carrying me when I reached tier III, so I would intentionally lose it. Maps need to be balanced before it can be removed, but then it should go 100% once maps are balanced enough for both sides to work out if you play optimally. Never forget both sides need to play optimally and everyone needs to analyze their mistakes.
-
Bloodlust needs to go. It promotes bad killer plays and requires you to learn less. It's one of the reasons I stopped playing killers aside from killers FOV and flashlights white screen giving me migraines. I hated using BL and I would instantly lose it if I ever reached tier III, because it meant for that I did not play optimally.
Yes, maps need adjusting still and I can prolly live with BL staying until then, but once maps get balanced, it needs to go.
Also when you're hooked, you're not doing anything. It makes perfect sense exhaustion cooldown would go down when you're hooked.
-
@RemoveSWF said:
@Gay Myers (Luzi) said:
@RemoveSWF said:
An unfair advantage for SWF doesn't become a fair advantage if you extend the same ability to all survivors.A better solution would be to remove SWF.
And that most likely will shrinken the game a lot which almost happened in the beginning that players got frustrated by people leaving lobbies until they matched with their friends and so on and on.
Good. That'll be a waste of their time, not mine.
I'd rather wait for a good game against solo survivors than a grief-fest against SWF scum.
You're wrong in that matter, because it will waste everybody's time. Killers were affected as much as solo players were, because people constantly left their lobbies in a desperate try to match with their friends. That won't do good to anyone. It will cause more harm.
In general OP, it could fill the gap between SWF + solo players, but I wouldn't support a in-game chat system myself, because it might need to be a auto enabled feature without having the option to turn it off and that would bug me a lot.
Not everyone is a native speaker. I'm not a native speaker.
-
@RemoveSWF said:
An unfair advantage for SWF doesn't become a fair advantage if you extend the same ability to all survivors.A better solution would be to remove SWF.
And that most likely will shrinken the game a lot which almost happened in the beginning that players got frustrated by people leaving lobbies until they matched with their friends and so on and on.
SWF will most likely never be removed.
-
@Lowbei said:
Gay Myers (Luzi) said:I want the old menu music back
Well I want you to stop denying my friend requests, but we cant always get what we want darling
I'm confused?
-
I want the old menu music back
-
Hey, in-game reports is all you can do and we cannot give out any information how the reports are being handled once you report them.
-
@Envees said:
@Vortexas said:
https://www.facebook.com/DeadByDaylight/photos/left-4-dead-black-shirts-join-the-dead-by-daylight-community-on-steam-httpsteamc/1323299344385301/Link in the post. Join the community IE click follow get black l4d shirts for your survivors.
As if getting ingame, unchecked and disgusting, abuse for simply playing the game is not enough? Now you want us to reveal our real names and locations to you? Think not! lmao.
I am not that stupid but i am sure you can gather up enough ignorant, millenial snowflakes to do it.
What? you don't even have to post that on the FB post. Just click the steam link and it will link you to the Steam Community Hub of DBD and you can follow the HUB on Steam.
-
That's on Xbox Live and not us. Xbox Live has a system in which your account gets restricted and eventually locked down if enough people report you - that goes for any online game they have. Whatever happens there is out of our power. not_Queen talked about this in a stream and she explained they tried to opt-out, but Microsoft won't let them.
For more info, you can DM me, @WarthogFury
-
Hey, sorry for the kind late response. If you used family sharing with your account and you buy a copy of DBD, it should keep your data. I will ask to make sure.
I asked and it definitely should transfer your data when you buy a new copy of the game.
-
@Cardinal_Copia schrieb:
Nein, das geht leider nicht. Nimm es locker und sieh es als Lehrgeld.Falsch.
@HerrVorragend bitte kontaktiere den Support: http://support.deadbydaylight.com/
-
@βLAKE said:
Please guys. If you're about to comment on here please remember that we are in the 'LORE' forum section. I love to read these comments about the topic but it pains me when people start talking about gameplay aspects of having kids in DBD.And I have mentioned lore. "Plus there might be kids, but always keep in mind that the entity has several realms and we're just playing one of them, so there is a possibility in another realm there are kids, but it's less likely for us to ever see that unless it's done as a killer."
Shouldn't really disregard that, because this is lore. It is a confirmed lore piece by the devs. There are several realms and we are playing only in one, not all that exist.
-
The main reason might be the reason why Fallout removed the ability to kill kids: Controversy and potential bans in certain countries.
Try to justify yourself as a company that lets kid be playable as survivors and explain they get hooked on hooks and can be mori'd, which vary from cannibalism to slashing and chainsawing.
You have to consider, in the long run the devs are the entity.
Plus there might be kids, but always keep in mind that the entity has several realms and we're just playing one of them, so there is a possibility in another realm there are kids, but it's less likely for us to ever see that unless it's done as a killer.
-
Sind übersetzt, aber bitte beachte, dass wir alles Freiwillige sind, die auch arbeiten, dadurch können sich Übersetzungen verzögern.
-
To add to that, you have to include the evidence yourself. As in, upload the video, link it in the in game report.MandyTalk said:The only way to report any players is through the in game report system. Please do not use the support form for this purpose. Thank you.
-
It is not directly blacklisted, but neither whitelisted .
-
@Tezzis schrieb:
@Queen_Shepis ich weiß, mit "Ich treffe nur selten auf Leute die wirklich laggswitchen" meinte ich auch ingame. Aber es gibt genug Leute die sonst woher kommen und die so eine Kartoffelleitung haben, dass deren Ping wie ne Achterbahn hoch und runterfährt; dauerhaft. Darum sieht man das auch in der Lobby schon, und kann es dadurch gut dodgenLeider gibt es nur ein oder zwei Probleme bei der Aussage, dass wenn der Ping hoch und runterfährt wie ne Achterbahn... Wenn der Killer die Profile von Spielern überprüft, dann schießt der Ping nach oben. Das Gleiche passiert, wenn der Killer zwischen verschiedene Killer hin- und herwechselt.
-
In der Regel um 19-20 Uhr. Also, so war es, als die Updates immer mit dem Stream released wurden.
-
I'm sorry this is happening to you, but right now all we can do is to ask you to keep using the in-game tool. You need to add evidence yourself. I'm very sorry about this and I'm fully aware that this situation is not ideal.