N0IDEA
N0IDEA
About
- Username
- N0IDEA
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- —
Comments
-
@Orionbash said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1992310#Comment_1992310
You can turn anything into horror, though. Schools are not normally scary but they can be made to be that way. Same with hospitals, police stations, etc... A neon-light filled street could absolutely be a horror setting. Look at Resident Evil 3 remake. The shopping district had tons of lights and stuff and they did a good job at creating a horror atmosphere in my opinion.
I remeber seeing this in Silent Hill 3. But I remeber there's a psychological factor for it. Public spaces and daily places tends to be unnerving when empty or even at dark. Try to pace around a school in the night shift
-
Stop to thinking now, the Twins would be perfect for a gothic map, so,yeah... but Blight and Trickster don't
@Orionbash said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1992142#Comment_1992142
How hard would it be to create a small section of a city with back alleys and what not with a map and pallets to loop? Heck, there could even be a couple of small buildings that have generators and a few windows to loop like Haddonfield and Springwood.
I can see a way more"this is not horror anymore" threads . Also, how a neon street or a techno beat factory have to do with his lore? He's a idol, not a christmas Tree
-
@TalesIsSad said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/231582/from-horror-to-kpop-whats-next-fall-guys
True but like we already have some stuff like that. For example theres: The Legion, Mr Puddles skin and Bunny Feng. This game isn't horror anymore so I wouldn't really mind having more killers like him. Plus he looks like Joker or some Serial killer.
I don't see the point. Is "UwU cutie" pop vibes, like every slasher once did with comedy or similar
DBD is build after slasher movies that aren't even terror
-
@Mooks said:
Yeah it’s ridiculous that a KPop idol was added as a killer. The fact that he was a sadistic serial killer had probably nothing to with that.
and this theme in a horror game? Outrageous. After the best horror tropes of a Western themed killer (Deathslinger is literally a Cowboy) or the Wraith (someone who worked at a scrapyard). THOSE are the scary themes we want!
Sasaeng, stalkers and usuall ######### life at Korea can and have been themes of a lot of very dark works
Like Perfect Blue. The devs just made the killer the idol, what was a mistake.
-
@Ivaldi said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1988010#Comment_1988010
Ignorant? Please explain how a kpop star with a bat is scary or how it compares to any of the horror icons and monsters we have? When you have survivors literally running to him because they want to be killed by it and adore it, you've done something wrong. At this point you've opened the door for literally anyone to be a killer now.
Pls, show me how ANY killer is scary
-
Torturers aren't interesting and stuff. They like to hear screams and stuffs, and that's his intire "personality"
Jeffrey/The clown is a way more emotional focus
@Mooks said:
Yes, diverse backstories are very well appreciated.
i especially hope for more heartless female killer backstories, because most of them are actually sad and all. We have that pig lady from the first tome that would be a good candidate for that.
Who??
-
I think it was very repetitive and unoriginal,lol
He's bascially Ghostface, but an idol
-
I can't imagine a neon or studio map with a lot of pallest and space to jump trought, so I see their point.
Twins and Blight are too specific lore killers to have a map
-
@Orion said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1992031#Comment_1992031
You're getting two concepts mixed up here: relationship status and sexual orientation. Just like gay men and lesbian women can get opposite-sex partners to "fit in", they don't become heterosexual just because they did so. See my example above.
Sexual desire and will to be in a long term or emotional relationship are two different things, but I guess this is not the right place to discuss it
-
@Orion said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1992003#Comment_1992003
You can't be a heterosexual asexual, those are mutually exclusive concepts.
U do, u can't be heterossexual and Arromantic, but u can be assexual and be in a romantic relationship. It just doesn't include sex (or kisses and huges if u take it as sexual)
-
@Rescultir said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1991400#Comment_1991400
Nope, I am only showing you that there will only be more problems than solutions. I am still sticking to my original statement and showing you how it would only work against you.
So obvs we must accept homophobia to avoid homophobia.
Genius, that's mindset make world's a ######### sometimes
-
@UncleStabby said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1991061#Comment_1991061
It almost seems like heterosexuality is the abnormal thing these days. Way too many people consider themselves LGBT just because that's what's popular. Its frustrating.
Heteressexuais can be LGBT too,lol[
They can be trans,assexual, non-binary and etc,etc
Bi and general homossexuais people are very prob more minority, but if we take everything LGBT fits,the number is a way bigger
@Rescultir said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1991299#Comment_1991299
Yea so you see the problem here then? The game is rated M for mature but parents still let their kids play BUT the parents won't put that blame on themselves, they'll point it at the game and the devs, and then the media will jump on it like they always do. This has also been going on for years to other games.
Yes I know that's not how it works, calm down I am only saying that showing underdeveloped kids that kind of stuff can turn them in a direction they might not want to go. Not so much for Lesbian or Gay but the more extreme stuff and I use the word "extreme" only because you can change/alter your appearance and won't be able to reverse it. It is not intended to be offensive.
I should also mention that by "kid" I mean anyone younger than 15. Maybe 16
I'm pretty sure that even before 15 they know what homossexuality is, and mostly of them is into it since about 13 or 14,lol
-
@Mooks said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1989524#Comment_1989524
That’s my entire point of view. I never myself have directly asked for that representation nor do I really actually want or need it. I definitely wouldn’t mind it though and would probably love it if the execution was great, just how I like the newly revealed chapter.
i just don’t see why the devs should restrict themselves in their creativity or why exclusion should take place if there is no reason for it.
Yeah,I wasn't even a little interested in a LGBT character but see so many people being against it make it necessary
-
@CriticalWeasel said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1986942#Comment_1986942
Dude not even Micheal Myers kills 8 year olds.
William does it multiple times, Freddy is depicted to kill teenagers but not children that young.
Also got his son insane for leaving all the murders on him.
That's because Michael Myers is a movie villain, and we have rules agaisnt childs being explicit deads in movies or videogames.
That's why any movie adaption is a way more soft than books original counterpart.
This remind a scene of Bunnyman where he massacre middles schoolers with a chainsaw, and he fits DBD a way better as a slasher villain
-
@Mineguy said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1986999#Comment_1986999
No it doesn't, the killer shouldn't get points but not the survivors
Why would u get chase points if u aren't being chased??
-
@TrialByFire476 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1987005#Comment_1987005
If it's "obvious" then why didn't the OP say it? Why did they just talk about how toxic survivors were and not mention that killers can be toxic, too?
Because they can, but they VERY USUALLY don't
Gotcha?
And obvs, all survivs are nazis
-
@UncleStabby said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1988718#Comment_1988718
Ah, another Homophobe card! This will make a fine addition to my collection! *Cough cough*
@WheatleybySatellite said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1986993#Comment_1986993
I'm transgender, mate. I just dislike the louder drama hungry lgbt community acting like they universally speak for everyone when they actually make things a lot harder. Like throwing a fit about a character in a slasher video game that hadn't even been announced yet to warrant outcries of being done wrong.
But yes, anyone that disagrees is by default homophobic, we can assume that instead and feed the drama.
1-Basically, u're complain about the community act like they're universally speaking by speaking by urself a LGBT character wouldn't work because it's desnecessary even literally all others lgbt people thinking otherwise?
Seems ironical
2-I don't think u know what homophobia is at all, cause that's literal homophobia in a dictionary
-
@Hyraga91 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1980521#Comment_1980521
That is exactly the issue.
We as heterosexuals do not pay attention to the sexualities of the characters. Whether or not they are straight we don't care, we don't pay attention to those things.
There is no update message, nor any promotion about X character is straight, there is the issue.
When LGBTQASIUDASIDAetc characters appear, they make promotions to it, as if it were something special. And that is what catches our attention.
As a developer you want to place gay people or those who are lovers of tofu? That seems perfect to me. But don't promote them as disabled characters.
And something that I always notice in this class of people like you ... they get offended very quickly and take it very personally. I would recommend you change that tone when writing, it only denotes that you are a resentful person.
Is the same thing as "Men don't have the same rights as women, so women are obvs overrated and us men are opressed by the system"
Exactly same vibes
-
@blacknemesy said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1986992#Comment_1986992
Sexuality has been in games since you ever were able to romance an NPC of the same sex, the difference is that the character defining trait was not his/hers sexuality, aka, forcing something that adds absolutely nothing except being PC. You want representation? OW has representation and no one cares, if a character is good or fun it does not make a difference where they are from, their race or their sexuality, that is the point. If you really want to make a character all about their sexuality then at least make it matter.
That brings us to the "Why?" "Why not?" part. Representation for the sake of representation is a good reason not to define sexuality and leave it to interpretation.
But yeah,man
If we add a LGBT character we will have a rainbow pack, and his special ability will be ######### any hunter of the same sex,yeah
-
@blacknemesy said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1986992#Comment_1986992
Sexuality has been in games since you ever were able to romance an NPC of the same sex, the difference is that the character defining trait was not his/hers sexuality, aka, forcing something that adds absolutely nothing except being PC. You want representation? OW has representation and no one cares, if a character is good or fun it does not make a difference where they are from, their race or their sexuality, that is the point. If you really want to make a character all about their sexuality then at least make it matter.
That brings us to the "Why?" "Why not?" part. Representation for the sake of representation is a good reason not to define sexuality and leave it to interpretation.
Dude, I asked for a LGBT character, stop with "ThIs DoEsNt afTc tHr GamEplAy,bAcKsToTy"
And as I said, make a big deal about a sexual preference of a character show how much u guys """don't care""" about it
I think we would take ur word seriously if u were part of the Lgbt community but I think we need to give a special aility or backstory to a gay character
-
@FregglesFred said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1986928#Comment_1986928
Welcome to Dead By Gaylight.
Also,ur pfp is ugly
So leave
-
@FregglesFred said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1986928#Comment_1986928
Welcome to Dead By Gaylight.
U seems fragile
No ######### a girl today=Not straight
Not straight=St0P
-
@Mister_Holdout said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1985894#Comment_1985894
There's no way you could possibly know what the true frequency is. Anecdotal evidence isn't going to cut it.
When there's a consense in the intire cimunnity we know hich side is a #########
-
@TrialByFire476 said:
I think both sides have people like this. It's not just survivors and it's not just killers.
I think that's the "Not everyone is like this and not a single side" OBVIOUS advise moment
-
Seems self explanatory
-
@WheatleybySatellite said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/230892/lgbtq
I've only seen LGBT people really hung up on whether the new chapter has it or not. It's actually kind of confusing, the front page of General Discussions last I looked has quite a few new posts on the LGBT topic, all made by LGBT people, claiming that people should stop being homophobic or upset that there might be an LGBT character. Except I don't see ANY forum posts complaining about it EXCEPT by LGBT people -- primarily them pre-complaining that this new character might be "done wrong" or not meet some standard or something. To be honest, at the moment the forums sort of looks eccentric, full of a lot of people making new posts on the same topic pretending to be at war against these imaginary homophobic posts that don't exist.
The closest I've seen so far to anything anti-LGBT, and this is a bit of a stretch to even call it that, was some comments concerned that the introduction of a LGBT character might be more based on political correctness than actually trying to properly represent the demographic.
Literally the first comment in this topic is a complain agains't it and so is in the others topic I have read
I'm assume that u guys are so homophobic that u don't realize it
-
I knew even beofre checking this out that someone would be like "WhY LgBt ChArAcTeRs In A hOrRoR gAmE" when the real question must be "Why not?"
This is for sure the "I don't care about sexuality ig as long it isn't lgbt" straight bias
@UncleStabby said:
Sexuality has no place in this video game. Why is everybody so hung up on wether the new chapter is going to have an LGBT+ theme? Its a horror game about people getting hung on hooks.
Yup, I was right
-
@bubbabrotha said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1984088#Comment_1984088
Silent hill was always boring and confusing to me.
Now we know why u think FNaF is a masterpiece,lol
-
@bubbabrotha said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1983846#Comment_1983846
The games really aren't the selling point imo. The lore is great, its like a sci-fi horror.
The lore is just Messed up, and so people think it's complex cause no one know what's going (even the creator). Wanna a complex lore? Go watch Saw, or play POopgoes, that's an interesting enough FNaF fangame
-
@CriticalWeasel said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1985723#Comment_1985723
People might not realize the first game came out years ago and now most of the “kids” are like 17-18 now. For me now 21, lots of them still like Fnaf, hell I sure do. The jump-scares are cheesy but a serial killer who lures children as security guard is pretty mature content.
The games themselves is lighter but the story of Fnaf is kinda #########.
Actually, the story is also okay. What's dark there? Murder?
This is a everyday ocasion in absolute any horror media. We don't want FNaF because it sucks, doesn't fit the game and the Fanbase is also a #########
-
@CriticalWeasel said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1985723#Comment_1985723
People might not realize the first game came out years ago and now most of the “kids” are like 17-18 now. For me now 21, lots of them still like Fnaf, hell I sure do. The jump-scares are cheesy but a serial killer who lures children as security guard is pretty mature content.
The games themselves is lighter but the story of Fnaf is kinda #########.
The peopoe who grow up on this left the fanbase a way ago, and even if they don't, more than half of this still five years old,lol
-
@FregglesFred said:
because it isn't lgbt.
This doesn't seems like health cristicism joke