DangerScouse
DangerScouse
About
- Username
- DangerScouse
- Joined
- Visits
- 943
- Last Active
Comments
-
@Wampa1 said:
Played for 20 mins as killer tonight and left to play survivor which I did for 30 mins.Left killer as it is so frustrating,then left as survivor as was to boring.The game is totally imbalanced,never played as a 4 k killer or expecting to survive.I was happy with a fair balanced game that lasted more than 5 mins and loved the challenge.Played this game since its release on both PC and console and really loved it despite some of its gameplay issues,but c’mon BHVR get it together the game is absolutely rotten and no fun to play as killer and boring and repetitive as survivor.If something is not done soon this game will be a dead duck soon.
,.
The game popularity is going up. Don't listen to all the people on here who moan moan moan for attention, then carry on happily playing regardless.
Personally. I think the game is in a worse state than it has been since I started playing, and it is so heavily favouring survivors now, more than i have ever seen it. So I switched to survivor and have loved it ever since.
-
@coolmacc said:
Just like how survivors have to to bones for noed killers have to do bones for boons.
And dont comment killers have to worry about patrolling, loops, kicking gens, keeping pressure, hooking etc etc we don’t have time to do bones.
Cause I’ll comment survivors don’t have time to worry about 5 totems getting done we have to loop, do gens, unhook, heal, open gates etc etc
Do Bones for killers is invalid because Boons can be re blessed. Pretty easy rebuttal to your argument.
-
@StarLost said:
Seriously, what a misery that was.
Had a feeling it was going to be an ugly game when I spotted the obvious premade in the lobby.
End up on Ironworks, playing Demo.
Very tough game, finally get 2 survivors dead and I'm left with a very decent 3gen.
So...do the Ash and the Meg try to be smart? Lead me off?
No, they go and play hide and seek for 45 frigging minutes, doing just enough not to get AFK crows as I try and hunt them around the map. Finally just ended up AFKing, and it took another 30 minutes for them to finally end.
What the hell is wrong with some people? Is it really worth wasting nearly 180 minutes of time between two people to be a butt to someone because you lost?
-
I recently moved from Killer Main to survivor. Best thing I did. Killer is in the mud and playing survivor is so easy. Best thing I did.
-
@GoodBoyKaru said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652667#Comment_2652667
Idk what's more circular, this argument or the Ontological argument
I have conceded to end a silly argument to a very good debater. Should have phrased my original statement better.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652675#Comment_2652675
Your original statement is not an opinion; just wrong. An example of an opinion would be "NFTs are fine, and people who have issues with them are misguided." If you want to use that as what you originally meant, that's fine.
The planet would be a better place if people genuinely cared that much, so when I perceice outrage to be false, when it would have cause to be genuine, it upsets me.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652660#Comment_2652660
Regardless, the original statement you have made regarding issues about NFTs is incorrect.
I conceed that I should have been clearer in my original statement, that what I said was my opinion and not facts. I apologise. It was not factually correct. Just my belief.
Can we be friends 😁. Good debate. Thank you. And thank you for Disagreeing but not being insulting.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652660#Comment_2652660
Regardless, the original statement you have made regarding issues about NFTs is incorrect.
Next time I'm in an argument, may I have permission to have you on my side. You are good. 😁
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652650#Comment_2652650
An opinion is subjective and cannot be correct or incorrect. You are actively contradicting yourself.
I like you 😂😂😂
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652644#Comment_2652644
As stated before, it doesn't matter if you believe them or not. If you believe them to be false, then it is on you to prove that their outrage is indeed false. You have no obligation to do so, but until you do, your original statement is incorrect.
I believe my opinion to be correct.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652620#Comment_2652620
I already have by showing you that there are comments in this thread showing that they have issues with NFTs, which runs directly contradictory to your original claim that we don't have issues with NFTs.
My point is I don't believe people on here are being entirely genuine, and that their outrage at NFTs is false.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652612#Comment_2652612
I never said you were not allowed to have that belief. In fact, I have actively stated multiple times that you are allowed to have that belief. But the belief is incorrect and has been demonstrated to be incorrect by the comments in this thread. But you are allowed to still have that belief despite that.
You can't prove my belief is incorrect
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652602#Comment_2652602
Incorrect. Either people do have issue with NFTs in this thread, or they do not. It is not possible for both to be true. Ergo, there can't be subjectivity, rendering the statement unable to be considered an opinion.
I am allowed to believe they don't, and I'm allowed to believe that if they claim to then I don't believe them. Maybe I should have prefaced my original post with "It is my opinion that...."
But I won't allow you to bully me out of my opinion.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652595#Comment_2652595
There is no subjectivity in that statement, so it cannot be an opinion since subjectivity is fundamental to an opinion. The statement is either true or false, which is antithetical to what an opinion is.
Yes there was.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652588#Comment_2652588
No, it is not an opinion. There's no subjectivity to whether or not people in this thread have issue. That fact is either true or false. Ergo, your initial statement is a factual claim. A factually incorrect one, but a factual one nonetheless.
It was an opinion.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652576#Comment_2652576
An incorrect statement is not the same as an opinion. An opinion is subjective; your original statement is either objectively correct or objectively incorrect. More specifically, it is an incorrect statement based on the comments in this thread actively contradicting that statement.
You assumed my original statement wasn't an opinion. I apologise if that wasn't clear. I was stating my belief. Based on what I have seen. But an opinion nevertheless
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652569#Comment_2652569
Correct, but you have not and cannot prove that to be the case.
True. But I'm allowed to have an opinion. And I'm allowed to state my opinions in a respecful way. I'd love to be proved wrong.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652559#Comment_2652559
I am aware, and that belief is demonstrated to be wrong based on the comments in this thread showing people having an issue.
.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652549#Comment_2652549
You're allowed to do that, but it doesn't matter whether you do or not. The fact that they have made those issues and concerns known actively demonstrates your original claim wrong.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652540#Comment_2652540
Unless you can prove that the people in this thread have been faking it, it doesn't matter if you believe them or not.
I can believe they are without proof.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652530#Comment_2652530
Well, then you interpreted it incorrectly. The people in this thread have been demonstrating their issues and voicing their concerns.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652520#Comment_2652520
It is.
https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/issue
"Concern" is listed as a synonym of "Issue." Therefore, to voice a concern is the same as to voice an issue.
I was interpreting it differently
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652514#Comment_2652514
That is exactly what it means.
But you do articulate yourself and argue really well. You make some valid points.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652514#Comment_2652514
That is exactly what it means.
Not really.
-
@WTBacon said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652393#Comment_2652393
Made this real quick, just for you! ❤️
https://us.v-cdn.net/6030815/uploads/16H7YBYVNA33/untitled2.png
Thank you.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652501#Comment_2652501
I mean, that is generally how it works. Standing by an incorrect statement doesn't make it less incorrect. The reality is that there are multiple comments in this thread voicing their issues with NFTs, standing in direct contradiction with your original claim. You choosing not to believe them and standing by that incorrect statement does not change or remove those comments.
Voicing concerns doesn't mean "we have an issue".
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652498#Comment_2652498
Disagreeing doesn't make your incorrect statement less incorrect. It just means that, as you said earlier, you stand by that incorrect statement.
If you say so. If you could convince me I'm wrong I'll acquiesce.
-
@Brokenbones said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652485#Comment_2652485
isn't virtue signaling pretending to believe something to seem like a good person
how is saying that you don't like a company getting involved in something you dislike and has potential consequences you dislike virtue signaling?
besides what does anyone have to gain from trying to convince the DBD forums that you're a good person. Free auric cells? Sign me up I guess
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652485#Comment_2652485
You're also allowed to be 100% confident in an incorrect statement, but your statement about people's stances on NFTs will still continue to be incorrect, as I stated previously.
If you say so. I disagree.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652479#Comment_2652479
You're allowed to stand by an incorrect statement, but the statement continues to be incorrect, with the correct statement being that people in this thread have stated their issues with NFTs.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652465#Comment_2652465
Then that means you've demonstrated yourself to be an unreliable source and thus your claims can be safely discarded. As such, your original claim regarding people here having no issues with NFTs continues to be objectively incorrect.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652458#Comment_2652458
Why would I claim to have proof that we don't have an issue?
-
@Pulsar said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652451#Comment_2652451
"I'm right and I swear I have proof, I just cannot show anyone, trust me bro"
Yeah, right.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652452#Comment_2652452
Do you have proof that we all in this thread collectively don't have an issue?
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652442#Comment_2652442
Your original statement in this thread was not that some people on the forum are falsely claiming to have an issue. Your original statement was that we don't have an issue. Do you have proof of that?
-
@Pulsar said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652438#Comment_2652438
You said, "We don't. Just a few people on here playing the hero "I'll stop playing"... yawn yawn. Virtue signal yawn yawn. So don't worry."
You spoke for the Forums. It isn't just the Forums either. I think you got called out and are backpedaling.
Why make a statement you know you can't back up?
Because I'm right.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652436#Comment_2652436
Oh, you have proof that no one in this thread has issue with NFTS?
-
@Pulsar said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652427#Comment_2652427
No. You made a claim.
Think of it this way, I say that Neptune's core is made of cheese. Nobody can prove it isn't, but the burden of proof falls to me since I made the claim.
Likewise, you made the claim, ergo, the burden of proof falls to you.
I made a statement. And I have seen proof to back this up. I am not naming and shaming these people to win an argument and therefore respect if people choose not to believe me.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652428#Comment_2652428
If one person says that the moon is made potatoes and spaghetti and one person says that the moon is not, then one of those views is objectively wrong because both views cannot be correct at the same time. Differing views does not mean that there isn't an objectively correct answer. It just means that one of those views is objectively wrong. In this case, it is your view that is wrong and cannot be demonstrably proven.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652420#Comment_2652420
Your original claim of "We don't" is objectively wrong unless you can prove otherwise.
Agree that we have differing views here and end it there. Respectfully like adults.
-
@GoodBoyKaru said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652402#Comment_2652402
https://us.v-cdn.net/6030815/uploads/2FVIDJMOO4CR/image.png
Last of Orion's comments, and since then nothing DBD related has been posted on any of his socials.
https://us.v-cdn.net/6030815/uploads/YJ0JZVGXWG4B/image.png
https://us.v-cdn.net/6030815/uploads/LKNGPGDLSZP3/image.png
Last of Boss' comments, and once more nothing has been put on any other socials.
Obviously I cannot prove that they haven'y been playing DBD, however you also cannot prove that they have.
You are free to respectfully disagree. And I respect you right to do so. No hard feelings.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652410#Comment_2652410
Until you can demonstrate it to be true, then your claim is not valid. Simple at that. Another user on here had no problem posting names of users.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652405#Comment_2652405
Okay, show me the people saying that they are quitting and then show me that they haven't.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652399#Comment_2652399
Okay, so demonstrate it to be true.
Like I said. I know people who have stated they are quitting and haven't.
-
@GoodBoyKaru said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652393#Comment_2652393
Well (ex)-Forums users Orion and Boss are two such examples.
Prove it.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652388#Comment_2652388
What about the people who actually do stop playing?
Not seen any of those.
-
@GoodBoyKaru said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652375#Comment_2652375
Burden of proof isn't exclusively used in Courts. It's a basic concept of an argument- if you make a claim, you prove it. There are very few exceptions to this rule.
-
@ThiccBudhha said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652378#Comment_2652378
Surely I smell like sweat from all the survivors I demolish. Ayy.
Fair comment 😁
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2652375#Comment_2652375
Burden of proof is a basic concept of argument. If you cannot demonstrate that the claim you are making is true, then the claim cannot be taken seriously. So you either demonstrate that the people stating to have issue are pretending as per your claim, or your original post that "we don't" is wrong.