Boss
Boss
About
- Username
- Boss
- Joined
- Visits
- 3,150
- Last Active
Comments
-
They won't because their reasoning for not keeping the old Nightmare is because he has unfun mechanics on him.
So you would have to give the Killer the option to play the old Nightmare, but you'd also have to give the Survivors the ability to not face the old Nightmare, as the devs consider him factually unfun to play as & against.
And one other thing the devs absolutely don't want is for Survivors to be able to not face certain Killers.
If they'd introduce it here, soon enough you'd start seeing others ask for the ability to dodge the Nurse, Hillbilly, Doctor, etc.
And only because, to them, they're unfun.
TL;DR - They don't want you to play a Killer that they deem unfun towards Survivors.
-
@DaS_only said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/578599#Comment_578599
Then people should start learning to read the whole post and not just the title. The title is never represent the whole post.
They probably should.
I'm also very sure you saw this coming when you made the title.
-
Since you don't state a Killer, i'll assume my lovely Wraith.
Enduring & Make Your Choice.
-
I like how Wraith goes from 0 to 100 real hard.
"Oh god, i crushed so many people!...######### YOU, BOSS! *crunches him flat, rips out skull and spine*"
-
@DaS_only said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/578571#Comment_578571
What has this to do with my discussion? Nowhere I mentioned balance.
They more than likely refer to your title not fitting one bit.
-
Ehh, i'll be worried once it goes below 5k on average.
-
Kill Dailies are still a thing?
Man, i haven't had one of those in months!
I'll be able to sleep if Ebony gets nerfed.
Would really like to see Cypress become standard though.
Devs are like: "We make you die on the Hook immediately to speed up the match that's pretty much already over."
Cypress would go along well with that idea, though i can already hear DS users coming to say no to this. 😋
-
@LordGlint said:
@Boss So am I right in assuming you commented based off the title alone?
No.
-
@LordGlint said:
@Boss Maybe, lol. I DID avoid writing a book for an opening text though, and I think I was quite clear.
I don't really care if you keep it short or not, if i think it's a good subject, i'll read it. (I hate text with no paragraphs though.) 😫
-
@LordGlint said:
@Boss But the initial question was about the term itself. I even asked people to think OUTSIDE the genre, so i dunno why ppl keep revolving around DBD and other asymmetrical games.
Cause that's what these forums are for?
If you don't want it involving DbD, then this should be in the Off-topic subforum.
-
Then I guess some players are just more brave.
Also BP can be pretty easily made on any character from what I've experienced.
-
@LordGlint said:
@Boss I feel like the term simply refers to any role in which you are forced to respond to. Shao Kahn as the final boss in mortal kombat isnt switching up his playstyle depending on which character you choose. Hes gonna throw his hammer either way. You have to respond to HIM be dodging that hammer. The devs of mortal kombat dont feel the need to buff up their boss because he doesnt win enough or something. The game doesnt have to be fair to Shao Kahn. Unfortunately when "the boss" is a living person... That person wants an equal chance of winning.
If youve ever played a match of Overwatch with one of the MANY player made "Boss battles", the best ones are when any single player in the team AGAINST the boss can avoid simply being rushed down. Its ok if the boss doesnt win half the time. Its actually fairly normal.
It's why I answered within the context of DbD.
Singleplayer games don't have to worry about the fun- & balance factor for the player-less side.
Hence I find it a bad comparison for this question.
-
Yeah, i'm sick of Survivors camping MY Generators! 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
-
@LordGlint said:
@Boss Would you not consider ANY videogame boss battle to be "the power role", even if its a single player game?
If anything, i find the player character to be the power role between the player and the boss.
But regardless of that, i answered this question within the context of both roles needing a player or players to fill said roles.
-
I'm not sure what you want me to acknowledge.
That Sprint Burst was strong?
That it got nerfed too hard?
That there's baby Killers?
-
I would define it as: The power role is to be able to beat the odds of being outnumbered.
This was my first game ever to be asymmetrical though, so no examples from me.
-
A bug, and it's fixed in the test build.
FEATURES & CONTENT Content - Added support for 4 new languages: Latin American Spanish, Dutch, Turkish and Swedish. -
That'd be awesome, but how does that have to do with balance?
It's like saying they'd make Survivors Exposed 24/7, but also give 5 times the amount of BP and say it's balanced now.
-
@Wubsyy__ said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/575356#Comment_575356
He said to ban other killers, not maps
There's still enough reasons.
Just going from the patch list, people might want to test if Pig really does crouch faster now with the Add-on.
Or Trapper's camera that keeps looking down after picking up a Bear Trap.
Or Ghost Face to not get a warning when they spot him in front of him.
Etc. etc.
-
only read the title
Yes.
-
This ain't Friday The 13th.
-
Cause they don't want you to have a disabled Perk for the entire match just cause others equipped it too and were more lucky than you to become the Obsession.
I would like it more if the Obsession would be the Obsession to the Killer and other Object of Obsession wielders.
Like this: If you're the Obsession, the Perk works like normal.
If you're not the Obsession, the Perk reveals the Obsession's Aura instead.
It's like having an Empathy, but a pro is that it works all the time, but a con is that it only works on one.
-
When your character is only better than others at 1-2 things, you'll wanna capitalize on those, or you'll just get looped like usual.
-
Ehh, Wraith could use SOME more, but he's not in dire need.
If they can squeeze in a lil buff or 2, sure, but i'm fine with him not being the main focus.
-
Aside from him wanting to prolong the game with more boring nothingness and not being understandable half the time talking about maps, it's a fine video.
-
You only have 11 posts, so it's understandable you didn't know that this is something that went up for testing, the testing Survivors abused it hard, and it was quickly scrapped.
-
Last thing solo play needs is to make it even less appealing.
Not that i'm against the idea, as Killer i'd love to see someone get thrown into my reach. 😜
-
Not on me, but I stay on the Hatch cloaked as Wraith, waiting for the Survivor to get close, then shut it right in front of them.
The purpose is to find them and have 0 exits available, but from their perspective, it probably looks pretty scummy.
-
I always have one who doesn't ready up.
So I appreciate anyone readying up, but it matters little.
-
Devour Hope
-
I'm already happy to have such a variety of responses.
I seriously thought I'd be swarmed with opposing opinions. (Not aggressively or anything, but I can see why people would defend them.)
In the end, I'm not gonna be bothered by either a fitting nerf or leaving it like this.
Only a buff would feel like anti-QoL.
Again, that's excluding Cypress.
-
I thought that Sloppy Butcher would reduce the amount of time Survivors have in the Dying Health State.
-
@BBQnDemogorgon said:
@Boss How do you do both at once? Need advice.
It's a gift.
-
No, i also breathe.
-
Yes, it has 0 effect currently.
Yes, it's a longer stun than normal, since it uses the Lightburn-stun effect, which is a special stun for him that forces him out of cloak.
Apparently, this is NOT how it's supposed to be, and a mod passed along the message.
Basically, it's a bug and i hope to see it be fixed soon.
-
You versing the Killer on your own is biased towards the Killer?
In a 4v1 game?
Who would've thought that...
It's easier than ever to escape on your own.
The best thing they could do is make it so, when you're the last one left, you can press & hold CTRL while in the Dying state to speed up your bleeding, rapidly going faster until it races to 0 seconds left and you die.
-
What if the 2 bigger ones were removed, Cypress was standard, and every single Killer will now have at least 1 Add-on (either Very Rare or Ultra Rare) which will make you work for it hard, but will allow you to kill Dying Survivors?
Not a handicap version, as that would allow you to start killing immediately.
Just sharing a thought...
-
Poor Cannibal & Ghostface.
-
@tavdogg11 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/572599#Comment_572599
Have you actually played against the new Freddy. While I haven't done that yet Freddy can still be won against. Besides I can smell the clickbate from here.
I have not played as or against him, nor was i judging him.
Merely gave you a link to a post.
-
@Wubsyy__ said:
Everyone is saying he is better and his traps are weak, I have yet to see any 'opopop' posts.
@tavdogg11 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/572513#Comment_572513
And that is great. I just wanted to prevent those post.
I'm gonna start by saying that I only started playing this game in March so I am not the most experienced survivor or killer. -
Fitting username.
-
@oxygen said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/572549#Comment_572549
I thought that was just one incident, did they revert all of them? They certainly posted a ban warning (on Twitter of all places, not sure where else) similar to what they did for the Legion blades exploit in-game.
And did people banned for the Legion blades get anything beyond a "standard" ban as dictated by the system with escalating ban length for repeat offenses or what?
I'm fairly certain Asylum exploiters were excused later on.
That's all i know though.
-
@DaS_only said:
That's not in the hands of the devs, they need to get permission from the licence holder. But since Freddy has the normal prestige cosmetics it might be quite easy to get permission. It's basically just the blood but a different texture.
Idk if legacy would be the right thing. Something different would be more interesting imo.
Well then the question becomes: Do they not mind if they do stuff like that to their cosmetics, or do they like blood on Nightmare cause it fits him?
I'm not sure if glowy patches is fitting...
-
TECHNICALLY, yes, they do have an effect.
But it's SO small, you truly truly truly might as well have no Add-on equipped.
Either don't buy them, or buy them but don't use them so if they're ever re-worked, you have a ton of them.
-
@Cheers said:
Tbh I think we're all jealous of not being able to teleport and appear in a bloody pool.
What a great party trick it would be.
Well sure, but i'm trying to stay in Wraith's theme.
If he could do that, they'd surely remove the faster move speed and any movement speed Add-ons.
Not being seen from afar would be a gigantic help.
He's already meh at applying pressure, but if they see you walk around on the other side, that's big information that'll hurt him.
Wraith's a Killer who they need to suspect could be next to them at any moment. (Unless of course Spine Chill, Premonition, Object of Obsession (unfortunately) etc.)
-
@DemonDaddy Whenever someone tells me why i play so seriously in a videogame, i'll tell them i do it to make DemonDaddy proud. 😭
-
@oxygen said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/572527#Comment_572527
The old Asylum out-of-bounds exploit as well as the dropdown exploits that allowed survivors to trap killers as long as they wanted both led to bans I'm pretty sure.
Not that it would make much sense to complain about people getting banned for any of those, as they both were extreme cases of taking the game hostage. Pretty obviously something that should be punished.
Didn't they revert those bans?
-
@Dehitay said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/572407#Comment_572407
According to what so many people keep saying to validate not touching swf, swf groups aren't common enough for that to be a valid arguement apparently.
Then they haven't seen my lobbies.
-
I wouldn't mind, i'm not a big fan of the IS prices in the first place.
But refunds shouldn't be necessary, prices drop permanently all the time everywhere.
What they should do, if they ever make it cheaper, is announce it at least a month ahead, so no one buys it and then it gets cheaper only a few days later.
