Which movie killer has the most evil story?
In this post I don't want to say that killers are overpowered etc. All these days I hear that candyman will join in dbd so I decided to go and watch his movie. Candyman's movie is one of the sadest stories I have ever seen. Idk the story just made me feel bad. He ruined a woman's life... So I want to hear your thoughts which killer's movie is sadest? Also which killer has the most evil story?
Comments
I didnt say that Orion was rude to you. I said that Orion was rude to Martesa55
The Oni isn't the Spirits father, he's her great great great great (ect) grandfather.
That was the REMAKE and we do not talk about it.
They changed Freddy. That's just unacceptable. Robert Englund Freddy was only a child killer, never a pedo.
I'll agree with Doctor for this one, since he was gleefully using electroconvulsive therapy as a form of torture, and if his archives are to be believed a combination of drugs and electrocution to lobotomise people. That stuff is N A S T Y and seriously dangerous.
And I can understand a licensing issue and cost with getting the original Nightmare on Elm Street licensing, but the general consensus with a lot of horror fanatics is that the 2010 remake of Nightmare and Freddy doesn't exist because they changed too much of Freddy from the original Nightmare on Elm Street series. He lost his sense of joy and playfulness from being what he is, and they added the paedophilia without it ever being hinted or stated. He only ever KILLED children and that was it.
people out here really be sleepin on Ghost Face.
The motivation changes from Ghostface to Ghostface but most of the time it was for fame/money, and none of them had any kind of sympathetic element to them. They just did it because they were selfish to the point that they'd take people's lives.
Um...Candyman didn't ruin someone's life. He was a victim of racism at a dark time. That said, he became evil afterwards with the whole vengeance thing.
Myers and Freddy Krueger are the more evil of the bunch, though I can't really say one is more evil than the other, even if kids were involved with Freddy's sick behavior.
I don't treat the new movie as making the others non-canon. I treat it simply as a different Myers. and a different world. A "What if?" movie.
He got shot six times off a balcony and got back up after being stabbed twice in the neck and face.
He later gets shot, run over, shot again, stabbed, has his neck broken by a close range rifle shot to the face, AND still survives.
He's the bogeyman; not a mistreated kid turned into a monster. As important as understanding and not demonizing those with psychological health issues is, it's not applicable to Michael Myers.
He's not human; he's pure evil.
The game's story for Ghost Face is definitely my favorite.
He's a charismatic reporter that commits the very same murders he writes about. Stalking his victims for weeks, planning the perfect murder, then killing them with no evidence. Then he skips town and does it again somewhere else.
as I said in previous commwnt the idea of the post was which killer has done the most bad think in his movie. In Candyman 1 he made everyone thought that Helen is the killer. He also killed her best friend
of course the title goes to Krueger. He raped kids. I honestly dont know how can he has fanpages🤢
HE didn't do that, THEY just automatically thought that. THE people he killed called his name 5 times, including her if I remember correctly. It wasn't like he was going around saying "LOOK OFFICERS, SHE KILLED ALL THOSE PEOPLE".
It was never said he raped kids, in the original anyways. The remake is just that, a remake. I don't consider it the source material any more than I consider Child's Play's "remake" source material, considering neither follow the actual storyline of the originals.
That depends what we consider canon, is the curse canon for you?
Myers cannot be played down to be just a child with mental illness, that wouldn't explain its resilience and its regenerative factor or the fact he can survive being stabbed, falling and being shot.
Myers must have something more to him and as annoying as it is the curse of Thorn does explain Myers supernatural powers
Actually just like people get the idea of where Freddy's glove came from wrong which was actually an idea from the creators cat clawing the side of his couch. The original freddy was suppose to be a pedophile. But at that point in time it was pretty much a no go for films and books. So they swapped him to child killer.
The remake actually brought him back to his roots.
On a side note: did anyone notice that myers is a pretty good driver despite being locked up his whole life.
Well, Freddy messed with kids and killed a few, so I think he is a more evil individual than Myers. Myers is Unfeeling, while Freddy delights in his kills.
I'm pretty sure that the version of Freddy in Dbd is from the remake. And I don't remember the original getting all that playful until the 3rd movie.
He wasn't "SUPPOSED TO BE", Wes Craven wanted to, but decided on Child Killer due to pedophilia being a less talked about thing at the time, I guess, so original Freddy was a Child Killer. The remake changed that, and while I won't say it was good or bad, it's not the original creator's work, so I don't count it.
As for the glove, from what I saw on the glove's creation, it was based on a bear not a cat. He talks about taking himself back to primal man and what it was like back then, and he read an article about cave bears reaching into crevices and hooking people with their claws. You can find that on a YT video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3LKwJR0Z2M&t=29s
The remake failed in a lot of things, namely Freddy's character, he just wasn't the same. He just didn't exhibit the chilling atmosphere of the original killer to me, his voice and attitude was just NOT Freddy. I'm not saying he should have been joking all through the movie or anything, but the original Freddy just had confidence, wit, and creativity. Remake Freddy was pretty bland, especially his voice. Not saying everything was a failure, but it obviously wasn't the Nightmare on Elm Street many people expected.
jeepers Creepers that would be freaky
He is, and I did also mention that maybe due to licensing issues they'd have to go for the remake, but 2010 Nightmare is in the same sort of movie infamy for me as Shyamalan's live action Avatar: the Last Airbender, as in better off not being made at all.
As for his playful side, it's more that Englund just seem to have fun with the role. He's not just this grim, determined guy strolling menacingly towards a small child.
Definetly Myers. He's pure evil
@Strancol Mike Myers story is not evil it is just twisted. It’s a serial killer not an evil story if you think that is evil then the zodiac killer story is more evil
Yeah, the remake came in the time of grittier takes on things. And The Last Airbender was ruined by Paramount. He had to make cuts based on requirements. Though the earth ending village scene has no excuse. That was just bad.
He bares the mark of thorn, of course he's evil. You can kill a serial killer. You can't kill mike.
Exactly! Mike is like concrete. You can stab him, you can shoot him but you won't do anything to him!
You can't kill the Boogeyman
@Feiten actually he did die in part two but the doctor who was was watching him said his sister name and that is what brought him back to life so it’s just some weird brother obsession for his sister not evil just creepy lol