Spaaaaaace_steam_
Spaaaaaace_steam_
About
- Username
- Spaaaaaace_steam_
- Joined
- Visits
- 15
- Last Active
Comments
-
@oRabble said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
Your tips really help , i have got myself 5 4 kills matches with wraith lol , and on 6th match i have wrecked them before they even finished the first gen , i felt guilty and let the last guy escape , after breaking all pallets chasing him.Woah! To be honest, my highest 4k streak so far in the game has been 3 in a row only! You're clearly more talented than me and only needed some strategic tips to enjoy Wraith
i am not at rank 1))) not at all mate)))
-
Your tips really help , i have got myself 5 4 kills matches with wraith lol , and on 6th match i have wrecked them before they even finished the first gen , i felt guilty and let the last guy escape , after breaking all pallets chasing him.
-
@Vietfox said:
As @245_Trioxin has said, taunting you with the flashlight and t-bagging is an ass behaviour, but 360s are not toxic at all, you just need to get better (i dont mean this in a bad way at all).
I've said this many times, but i'll say it again: not everything that bothers you is toxic, just because you find it annoying doesnt mean that survivor needs to get facecamped, so learn to tell the difference between a toxic behaviour and skills which annoy you.
This is a pvp game and i know you like to be succesful, but if you are gonna get mad for stuff like that you are not gonna enjoy the main purpose of a game, which is to have fun.As you said its a pvp game so if killer decides to facecamp 1 survivor who is just outclassing them it is OK , using your logic )))
-
@Mikysama said:
When i know survivors are dumb enough to run in the trap ( survivor hooked used as bait ) i will always stay close the hook. Never face camping though. Is that really camping when you patrol near the hook? Not in my opinion.Today i got a funny message from a survivor crying ( as usually ) because: "we have 2 chance to get hooked so it's AGAINST the game rules to camp ( which i didn't do ). I will report you good luck with your account ban"
What to answer to this? Even explaining them i wasn't camping they still don't believe it and cry ( or insult ).
camping doesent help you win , it just lets you kill 1 survivor straight which annoys them , you mostly will lose the match if you are facecamping.
-
@oRabble said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
how do you deal with pallet loopers ? Because if i start breaking a pallet they just run to another , and to another one ,etc ,ect.You have to evaluate the situation at each loop:
*Unsafe short loop: Do not break and mindgame/chase the survivor. He either will abandon the loop or get hit by your lounge.
*Safe but windstorm-dash-size loop : Do not break, cloak, position yourself in the shortest corner to the pallet. Uncloak and mindgame the survivor starting your windstorm dash in one direction but changing it almost instantly to the other side. If done correctly, survivor will be stuck in animation long enough to be hit by your lunge out of windstorm dash
*Safe pallet loop: If survivor is facing an zone with already broken pallets, break the pallet and follow the chase if you have not yet build bloodlust or just keep running with your bloodlust momentum toward him without breaking the pallet. If survivor is not facing such zone, loop around the pallet to see if the survivor has either abandon it, or has vaulted over and is now facing the right zone for you.
*God mode ultra safe pallet: Break it. There is nothing else you can do.
Whenever you're forced to break a pallet you must evaluate if the survivor is close to you (10 meters) and if you can easily catch him before next safe loop area. If the answer is not, cloak and evaluate if you can predict his escape route so you can try to move around unnoticed (not directly behind him as he will see your glimmer) in order to ambush him. If neither are possible, keep your cloak and find your next prey. With every pallet you break you're creating a bigger and bigger hunting ground for you where you can safely finish a chase successfully.
thanks for the tips, and what do you do when you face a party of survivors ? should i try to beat them or just end it faster?
-
@245_Trioxin said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@245_Trioxin said:
Okay, so I get that teabagging and flashlight clicking can be seen as toxic, but I'm really confused on how 360s are. Most players are pretty bad at them, and you can usually catch them out on the 2nd try, if they actually pull it off the first time. I know some players can go a bit overboard with them, but it is a legitimate way to attempt to dodge a killer's attack when there are no structures around.More so, I'm incredibly confused by "messing with the killers aim". What do you mean by this?
is it legit tho ? Killer can really do anything about it , and it works really well against doctor and michael , while on wraith i have no problem with it , and at least for me its REALLY annoying that its possible .
Sure they can. It's really not difficult to catch a survivor out when they try to 360. It tends to work better on new killers, but once they get used to the timing on the attack, 360s become far less effective. I really don't see how it would be considered toxic. That's effectively asking the survivor to not dodge an attack out in the open.
But, back to my question. What do you mean by "messing with the killer's aim"?
i meant 360 and other kinds of mechanic breaking bullshit
by legit I mean that it was intended by devs , i am pretty sure that it wasn't intended by devs , and even the tiny second this legit trick gives can be enough to make it to another bloody pallet and continue the loop so that's why i am calling it annoying -
@245_Trioxin said:
Okay, so I get that teabagging and flashlight clicking can be seen as toxic, but I'm really confused on how 360s are. Most players are pretty bad at them, and you can usually catch them out on the 2nd try, if they actually pull it off the first time. I know some players can go a bit overboard with them, but it is a legitimate way to attempt to dodge a killer's attack when there are no structures around.More so, I'm incredibly confused by "messing with the killers aim". What do you mean by this?
is it legit tho ? Killer can really do anything about it , and it works really well against doctor and michael , while on wraith i have no problem with it , and at least for me its REALLY annoying that its possible .
-
Tbh if I catch a really toxic survivor I either spam mori em a few times or camp them. I like to think it teaches them to not be toxic in future games. As an added bonus some toxic survivors are swf and camping them could lead to a 4K if they’re team hook rushes.
how do you spam mori?
-
@oRabble said:
I felt in love with mr Bing Bong when I started playing a month ago, and my heart was dismayed when I learned he was the second to worst killer in the meta. Nevertheless that did not stop me to P3 him and run for the Killer Rank 1 Bing Bonging my way.
If you have any question do not hesitate to ask please!
In case any kind of proof is needed, some screenshots from the last captured game:
how do you deal with pallet loopers ? Because if i start breaking a pallet they just run to another , and to another one ,etc ,ect.
-
they should die when they escape with it lol , maybe icon got glitched
-
@Touken said:
Dr_Trauts said:...clown is balanced, just learn how to play against him like every other killer
Could you plz answer my questions? So have you faced a clown? Do you know how fast he can catch up to you? even without his atonics? I kinda know how to juke the clown a bit but it's only temporary.
i played as clown lol , he is worse then wraith in terms of speed , with laggy survivors i can hit them thru the pallet as wraith , while clown is a fat and slowswinging poor guy.
-
@Dabrownman1812 said:
I think it would be better to hear the entity like in whispers if you're found or something. Talking can be spammed and it won't be scary so it will take away from the chat, then the voices have to think about translation and all kinds of issues. If there was killer chat prompts, I think it's better if the killer can't do it on demand, if it activates under a condition because people can spam and chat spam is an issue in games that has that. It could potentially make people take the killer not as serious or just imcrease salt levels in killers/survivors.You can just make an option to disable the chat , and rep for chat spams resulting in 1 or 2 days chat ban then
-
@Mister_xD said:
it already got an extreme nerf, i dont think anotherone would be possible, without completely turning this add-on into trash...what nerf are you talking about? Axes ammount reduction?
-
@C4Garuda said:
More DS cries sheesh....Dead by DS?This guy cries that DS is not too OP lol
-
@Tsulan said:
Pallets are NOT the problem.
The problem is the difference between survivor and killer collision boxes. Survivor collision boxes are smaller and therefore they can run in smaller circles than the killer. This makes the default killer speed bonus useless, because both now run at the same speed. Bloodlust was introduced to address this issue, but since it breaks on a hit, short loss of LoS or when breaking a pallet it´s punishing only survivors that don´t loop.My proposal: Remove Bloodlust (it´s redundant anyway) + make killer and survivor collision boxes the same size = no more looping.
thats a gud idea because there are also some places killer can't go through and survivor can , resulting in ez escape
-
@Techn0 said:
Billy, Nurse, HuntressBilly is too easy. Nurse makes me dizzy. Huntress is too slow.
Have you tried Huntresses 1 hit ko axes with +2 axe addon?)))
-
@Boss said:
Trapper & Nurse.
All that Trapper needs to utterly fail is a greedy Survivor following him and disabling his Bear Traps.
And Nurse just goes HHHUUUUUUUUUHHH for 60% of the time and watches the ground 70%, annoying.take whispers and you will see when you can safely put traps
-
@Amanda55 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
No I still enjoy the game. If you want to balance the game, give killers more perk slots than survivors but don't take away our perk slots.Maybe to balance the game and add more depth to the game, everybody should have their one unique strong perk? Like if you want to use sprint burst, you need to use meg but you won't be able to run self care because it is going to be claudette's.
I don't want what I said to be implemented though. I think that the perk system is fine as it is. It could be cool if the killers had 2 more perks though since survivors have 16.
the thing i don't like is that the survivor is not bounded to anything while choosing the character when killer is bound with its killer power
What do you want though? Placing traps with nurse or blink with hillbilly LUL. Survivors are just skins at this point.
and you think its ok that survivors are just skins?
uhm.. yes? If you want to lock us in our own perks than as a killer you won't choose your own perks too. You won't get BBQ with hillbilly or nurse. You will just have lightborn enduring and tinkerer as a billy and as a survivor bill I will have unbreakable, left behind and borrowed time. Deal?
deal
wow you will be the only one who says deal to this offering as a killer. Most killers' abilities are bullshit and they can't do good with them. Just take huntress as an example. Her perks are garbage and you might as well play her perkless.
We still can use meg very well though. Quick and quite, sprint burst and adrenaline are already strong perks. Everybody try to play with her and instead of balance you will get more survivor sided game.
i like huntresses basement hack skill it helps not to camp to win
That doesn’t make much sense. Even then, lots of games people don’t even get a basement hook
well most perks in the game are situational , aren't they? I really try to kill people near basement
Most perks are also useless trash
lel you told meh (in another discussion) that devs really don't like to“throw away their precious time and effort” why then make trash perks)
Because they thought they were good. What kind of question is that?
why publish an update without testing eh? Just so they can fix Op/trash perks in the next update to keep the people busy ? In my country laws are like that so i know what i am talking about.
I'm just gonna assume your here to troll atm.
well this tactic is working for em as i see it
-
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
No I still enjoy the game. If you want to balance the game, give killers more perk slots than survivors but don't take away our perk slots.Maybe to balance the game and add more depth to the game, everybody should have their one unique strong perk? Like if you want to use sprint burst, you need to use meg but you won't be able to run self care because it is going to be claudette's.
I don't want what I said to be implemented though. I think that the perk system is fine as it is. It could be cool if the killers had 2 more perks though since survivors have 16.
the thing i don't like is that the survivor is not bounded to anything while choosing the character when killer is bound with its killer power
What do you want though? Placing traps with nurse or blink with hillbilly LUL. Survivors are just skins at this point.
and you think its ok that survivors are just skins?
uhm.. yes? If you want to lock us in our own perks than as a killer you won't choose your own perks too. You won't get BBQ with hillbilly or nurse. You will just have lightborn enduring and tinkerer as a billy and as a survivor bill I will have unbreakable, left behind and borrowed time. Deal?
deal
wow you will be the only one who says deal to this offering as a killer. Most killers' abilities are bullshit and they can't do good with them. Just take huntress as an example. Her perks are garbage and you might as well play her perkless.
We still can use meg very well though. Quick and quite, sprint burst and adrenaline are already strong perks. Everybody try to play with her and instead of balance you will get more survivor sided game.
i can play only with tinkerer its gud
no it's not because tinkerer is gonna be changed. RIP insta chainsaws.
really? oh my ,then how do you even use his chainsaw to kill , lol , gud survivors can dodge it at any distance
-
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
No I still enjoy the game. If you want to balance the game, give killers more perk slots than survivors but don't take away our perk slots.Maybe to balance the game and add more depth to the game, everybody should have their one unique strong perk? Like if you want to use sprint burst, you need to use meg but you won't be able to run self care because it is going to be claudette's.
I don't want what I said to be implemented though. I think that the perk system is fine as it is. It could be cool if the killers had 2 more perks though since survivors have 16.
the thing i don't like is that the survivor is not bounded to anything while choosing the character when killer is bound with its killer power
What do you want though? Placing traps with nurse or blink with hillbilly LUL. Survivors are just skins at this point.
and you think its ok that survivors are just skins?
uhm.. yes? If you want to lock us in our own perks than as a killer you won't choose your own perks too. You won't get BBQ with hillbilly or nurse. You will just have lightborn enduring and tinkerer as a billy and as a survivor bill I will have unbreakable, left behind and borrowed time. Deal?
deal
wow you will be the only one who says deal to this offering as a killer. Most killers' abilities are bullshit and they can't do good with them. Just take huntress as an example. Her perks are garbage and you might as well play her perkless.
We still can use meg very well though. Quick and quite, sprint burst and adrenaline are already strong perks. Everybody try to play with her and instead of balance you will get more survivor sided game.
i can play only with tinkerer its gud
-
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
No I still enjoy the game. If you want to balance the game, give killers more perk slots than survivors but don't take away our perk slots.Maybe to balance the game and add more depth to the game, everybody should have their one unique strong perk? Like if you want to use sprint burst, you need to use meg but you won't be able to run self care because it is going to be claudette's.
I don't want what I said to be implemented though. I think that the perk system is fine as it is. It could be cool if the killers had 2 more perks though since survivors have 16.
the thing i don't like is that the survivor is not bounded to anything while choosing the character when killer is bound with its killer power
What do you want though? Placing traps with nurse or blink with hillbilly LUL. Survivors are just skins at this point.
and you think its ok that survivors are just skins?
uhm.. yes? If you want to lock us in our own perks than as a killer you won't choose your own perks too. You won't get BBQ with hillbilly or nurse. You will just have lightborn enduring and tinkerer as a billy and as a survivor bill I will have unbreakable, left behind and borrowed time. Deal?
deal
wow you will be the only one who says deal to this offering as a killer. Most killers' abilities are bullshit and they can't do good with them. Just take huntress as an example. Her perks are garbage and you might as well play her perkless.
We still can use meg very well though. Quick and quite, sprint burst and adrenaline are already strong perks. Everybody try to play with her and instead of balance you will get more survivor sided game.
i can play only with tinkerer its gud
-
@lyric said:
Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:@lyric said:
Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Jack11803 said: @Spaaaaaace_steam_ said: @Jack11803 said: @Spaaaaaace_steam_ said: @Someissues said: What on earth are you talking about I am talking about that survivors are just skins right now If survivors ever got anything unique, it’s be separate from perks. What would they say “oh those millions of bloodpoints you spent I Dwight? Well lol guess what, he’s gotta use prove thyself now.” Yeah this power should be apart from perks (like killer power ) but i think it will add something to the strategy part of the game Only thing It’ll add is LESS DIVERSITY because people will just use Claudette for stealth, and whoever gets the most meta power. No. Thats why i said that it should be balanced well
I agree with jack on this one and besides killer mains already cry about survivors being op, we both know survivors aren’t but there would be a real outcry from that and I can’t say I would blame them when 4 Dwights pop in a lobby and his “unique ability” gen rushes the killer to no possible chance of winning and having to camp a survivor for a kill, it would equal out to the fact that the abilities create extra perks that shouldn’t be there
so you are the survivor main , i presume?)
Yes I am but I play killer as well, Ive been to rank 5 casually playing killer, I just like survivor more because of the thrill of playing against different killers rather than knowing who’s coming in everytime and rush trying to build perks around items or perks you may know they use if you played against them before, I’ll admit it’s more stressful to be a killer but I don’t think it’s harder to be honest the game really is well balanced but you need to get your killer to 50 and keep spending those points and getting a bunch of perks tiered up to where you have the ability to play a different style if you’re in a position to, you run into a lot of the same people when you start getting high ranked and a lot of similar perk builds so the more highly tiered perks you have the better even if they aren’t the main perks you usually run.
well of course playing every game with ultra rare addons is ez (like foken 1 shot axes , so OP with +2 axes bag) but for me playing survior just with perks even without an item and addon AND contributing to the rank is much easier then as the killer , these 360, messing with the killer ai, pallet looping , instaflashlight , full team with top items and 4 salty lips , with all this you can't play killer for fun without super gud addons , and thats the problem, the only thing i really hate as a survivor and i think that needs to be removed is a mori
-
@lyric said:
Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Someissues said:
What on earth are you talking about
I am talking about that survivors are just skins right now
If survivors ever got anything unique, it’s be separate from perks. What would they say “oh those millions of bloodpoints you spent I Dwight? Well lol guess what, he’s gotta use prove thyself now.”
Yeah this power should be apart from perks (like killer power ) but i think it will add something to the strategy part of the game
Only thing It’ll add is LESS DIVERSITY because people will just use Claudette for stealth, and whoever gets the most meta power. No.
Thats why i said that it should be balanced well
I agree with jack on this one and besides killer mains already cry about survivors being op, we both know survivors aren’t but there would be a real outcry from that and I can’t say I would blame them when 4 Dwights pop in a lobby and his “unique ability” gen rushes the killer to no possible chance of winning and having to camp a survivor for a kill, it would equal out to the fact that the abilities create extra perks that shouldn’t be there
so you are the survivor main , i presume?)
-
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
No I still enjoy the game. If you want to balance the game, give killers more perk slots than survivors but don't take away our perk slots.Maybe to balance the game and add more depth to the game, everybody should have their one unique strong perk? Like if you want to use sprint burst, you need to use meg but you won't be able to run self care because it is going to be claudette's.
I don't want what I said to be implemented though. I think that the perk system is fine as it is. It could be cool if the killers had 2 more perks though since survivors have 16.
the thing i don't like is that the survivor is not bounded to anything while choosing the character when killer is bound with its killer power
What do you want though? Placing traps with nurse or blink with hillbilly LUL. Survivors are just skins at this point.
and you think its ok that survivors are just skins?
uhm.. yes? If you want to lock us in our own perks than as a killer you won't choose your own perks too. You won't get BBQ with hillbilly or nurse. You will just have lightborn enduring and tinkerer as a billy and as a survivor bill I will have unbreakable, left behind and borrowed time. Deal?
deal
wow you will be the only one who says deal to this offering as a killer. Most killers' abilities are bullshit and they can't do good with them. Just take huntress as an example. Her perks are garbage and you might as well play her perkless.
We still can use meg very well though. Quick and quite, sprint burst and adrenaline are already strong perks. Everybody try to play with her and instead of balance you will get more survivor sided game.
i like huntresses basement hack skill it helps not to camp to win
That doesn’t make much sense. Even then, lots of games people don’t even get a basement hook
well most perks in the game are situational , aren't they? I really try to kill people near basement
Most perks are also useless trash
lel you told meh (in another discussion) that devs really don't like to“throw away their precious time and effort” why then make trash perks)
Because they thought they were good. What kind of question is that?
why publish an update without testing eh? Just so they can fix Op/trash perks in the next update to keep the people busy ? In my country laws are like that so i know what i am talking about.
-
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
No I still enjoy the game. If you want to balance the game, give killers more perk slots than survivors but don't take away our perk slots.Maybe to balance the game and add more depth to the game, everybody should have their one unique strong perk? Like if you want to use sprint burst, you need to use meg but you won't be able to run self care because it is going to be claudette's.
I don't want what I said to be implemented though. I think that the perk system is fine as it is. It could be cool if the killers had 2 more perks though since survivors have 16.
the thing i don't like is that the survivor is not bounded to anything while choosing the character when killer is bound with its killer power
What do you want though? Placing traps with nurse or blink with hillbilly LUL. Survivors are just skins at this point.
and you think its ok that survivors are just skins?
uhm.. yes? If you want to lock us in our own perks than as a killer you won't choose your own perks too. You won't get BBQ with hillbilly or nurse. You will just have lightborn enduring and tinkerer as a billy and as a survivor bill I will have unbreakable, left behind and borrowed time. Deal?
deal
wow you will be the only one who says deal to this offering as a killer. Most killers' abilities are bullshit and they can't do good with them. Just take huntress as an example. Her perks are garbage and you might as well play her perkless.
We still can use meg very well though. Quick and quite, sprint burst and adrenaline are already strong perks. Everybody try to play with her and instead of balance you will get more survivor sided game.
i like huntresses basement hack skill it helps not to camp to win
That doesn’t make much sense. Even then, lots of games people don’t even get a basement hook
well most perks in the game are situational , aren't they? I really try to kill people near basement
Most perks are also useless trash
lel you told meh (in another discussion) that devs really don't like to“throw away their precious time and effort” why then make trash perks)
-
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Jack11803 said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
No I still enjoy the game. If you want to balance the game, give killers more perk slots than survivors but don't take away our perk slots.Maybe to balance the game and add more depth to the game, everybody should have their one unique strong perk? Like if you want to use sprint burst, you need to use meg but you won't be able to run self care because it is going to be claudette's.
I don't want what I said to be implemented though. I think that the perk system is fine as it is. It could be cool if the killers had 2 more perks though since survivors have 16.
the thing i don't like is that the survivor is not bounded to anything while choosing the character when killer is bound with its killer power
What do you want though? Placing traps with nurse or blink with hillbilly LUL. Survivors are just skins at this point.
and you think its ok that survivors are just skins?
uhm.. yes? If you want to lock us in our own perks than as a killer you won't choose your own perks too. You won't get BBQ with hillbilly or nurse. You will just have lightborn enduring and tinkerer as a billy and as a survivor bill I will have unbreakable, left behind and borrowed time. Deal?
deal
wow you will be the only one who says deal to this offering as a killer. Most killers' abilities are bullshit and they can't do good with them. Just take huntress as an example. Her perks are garbage and you might as well play her perkless.
We still can use meg very well though. Quick and quite, sprint burst and adrenaline are already strong perks. Everybody try to play with her and instead of balance you will get more survivor sided game.
WOULDN’T ACE BE OP!? /s
his perks are gud?
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Jack11803 said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
No I still enjoy the game. If you want to balance the game, give killers more perk slots than survivors but don't take away our perk slots.Maybe to balance the game and add more depth to the game, everybody should have their one unique strong perk? Like if you want to use sprint burst, you need to use meg but you won't be able to run self care because it is going to be claudette's.
I don't want what I said to be implemented though. I think that the perk system is fine as it is. It could be cool if the killers had 2 more perks though since survivors have 16.
the thing i don't like is that the survivor is not bounded to anything while choosing the character when killer is bound with its killer power
What do you want though? Placing traps with nurse or blink with hillbilly LUL. Survivors are just skins at this point.
and you think its ok that survivors are just skins?
uhm.. yes? If you want to lock us in our own perks than as a killer you won't choose your own perks too. You won't get BBQ with hillbilly or nurse. You will just have lightborn enduring and tinkerer as a billy and as a survivor bill I will have unbreakable, left behind and borrowed time. Deal?
deal
wow you will be the only one who says deal to this offering as a killer. Most killers' abilities are bullshit and they can't do good with them. Just take huntress as an example. Her perks are garbage and you might as well play her perkless.
We still can use meg very well though. Quick and quite, sprint burst and adrenaline are already strong perks. Everybody try to play with her and instead of balance you will get more survivor sided game.
WOULDN’T ACE BE OP!? /s
his perks are gud?
That was sarcasm. Very obvious sarcasm at that. It even had /s....
i didn't notice it , i am kinda new to the forums and its tricks
-
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
No I still enjoy the game. If you want to balance the game, give killers more perk slots than survivors but don't take away our perk slots.Maybe to balance the game and add more depth to the game, everybody should have their one unique strong perk? Like if you want to use sprint burst, you need to use meg but you won't be able to run self care because it is going to be claudette's.
I don't want what I said to be implemented though. I think that the perk system is fine as it is. It could be cool if the killers had 2 more perks though since survivors have 16.
the thing i don't like is that the survivor is not bounded to anything while choosing the character when killer is bound with its killer power
What do you want though? Placing traps with nurse or blink with hillbilly LUL. Survivors are just skins at this point.
and you think its ok that survivors are just skins?
uhm.. yes? If you want to lock us in our own perks than as a killer you won't choose your own perks too. You won't get BBQ with hillbilly or nurse. You will just have lightborn enduring and tinkerer as a billy and as a survivor bill I will have unbreakable, left behind and borrowed time. Deal?
deal
wow you will be the only one who says deal to this offering as a killer. Most killers' abilities are bullshit and they can't do good with them. Just take huntress as an example. Her perks are garbage and you might as well play her perkless.
We still can use meg very well though. Quick and quite, sprint burst and adrenaline are already strong perks. Everybody try to play with her and instead of balance you will get more survivor sided game.
i like huntresses basement hack skill it helps not to camp to win
That doesn’t make much sense. Even then, lots of games people don’t even get a basement hook
well most perks in the game are situational , aren't they? I really try to kill people near basement
-
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
No I still enjoy the game. If you want to balance the game, give killers more perk slots than survivors but don't take away our perk slots.Maybe to balance the game and add more depth to the game, everybody should have their one unique strong perk? Like if you want to use sprint burst, you need to use meg but you won't be able to run self care because it is going to be claudette's.
I don't want what I said to be implemented though. I think that the perk system is fine as it is. It could be cool if the killers had 2 more perks though since survivors have 16.
the thing i don't like is that the survivor is not bounded to anything while choosing the character when killer is bound with its killer power
What do you want though? Placing traps with nurse or blink with hillbilly LUL. Survivors are just skins at this point.
and you think its ok that survivors are just skins?
uhm.. yes? If you want to lock us in our own perks than as a killer you won't choose your own perks too. You won't get BBQ with hillbilly or nurse. You will just have lightborn enduring and tinkerer as a billy and as a survivor bill I will have unbreakable, left behind and borrowed time. Deal?
also if the perks are such trash why are they even in the game eh?
-
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
No I still enjoy the game. If you want to balance the game, give killers more perk slots than survivors but don't take away our perk slots.Maybe to balance the game and add more depth to the game, everybody should have their one unique strong perk? Like if you want to use sprint burst, you need to use meg but you won't be able to run self care because it is going to be claudette's.
I don't want what I said to be implemented though. I think that the perk system is fine as it is. It could be cool if the killers had 2 more perks though since survivors have 16.
the thing i don't like is that the survivor is not bounded to anything while choosing the character when killer is bound with its killer power
What do you want though? Placing traps with nurse or blink with hillbilly LUL. Survivors are just skins at this point.
and you think its ok that survivors are just skins?
uhm.. yes? If you want to lock us in our own perks than as a killer you won't choose your own perks too. You won't get BBQ with hillbilly or nurse. You will just have lightborn enduring and tinkerer as a billy and as a survivor bill I will have unbreakable, left behind and borrowed time. Deal?
deal
wow you will be the only one who says deal to this offering as a killer. Most killers' abilities are bullshit and they can't do good with them. Just take huntress as an example. Her perks are garbage and you might as well play her perkless.
We still can use meg very well though. Quick and quite, sprint burst and adrenaline are already strong perks. Everybody try to play with her and instead of balance you will get more survivor sided game.
i like huntresses basement hack skill it helps not to camp to win
-
@Jack11803 said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
No I still enjoy the game. If you want to balance the game, give killers more perk slots than survivors but don't take away our perk slots.Maybe to balance the game and add more depth to the game, everybody should have their one unique strong perk? Like if you want to use sprint burst, you need to use meg but you won't be able to run self care because it is going to be claudette's.
I don't want what I said to be implemented though. I think that the perk system is fine as it is. It could be cool if the killers had 2 more perks though since survivors have 16.
the thing i don't like is that the survivor is not bounded to anything while choosing the character when killer is bound with its killer power
What do you want though? Placing traps with nurse or blink with hillbilly LUL. Survivors are just skins at this point.
and you think its ok that survivors are just skins?
uhm.. yes? If you want to lock us in our own perks than as a killer you won't choose your own perks too. You won't get BBQ with hillbilly or nurse. You will just have lightborn enduring and tinkerer as a billy and as a survivor bill I will have unbreakable, left behind and borrowed time. Deal?
deal
wow you will be the only one who says deal to this offering as a killer. Most killers' abilities are bullshit and they can't do good with them. Just take huntress as an example. Her perks are garbage and you might as well play her perkless.
We still can use meg very well though. Quick and quite, sprint burst and adrenaline are already strong perks. Everybody try to play with her and instead of balance you will get more survivor sided game.
WOULDN’T ACE BE OP!? /s
his perks are gud?
-
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@SadonicShadow said:
Nah i dont think the killer should be able to choose the map everytime. the regulation of map choice being tied to rare offerings is good. If killers could choose the map it would be the same maps over and over again. Instead i would rather the devs balance all of the maps so that all of them are fair and enjoyable. That means balancing pallets and killing the horrific old infinites aka really long loops now. Fractured cowshed, groaning store house, coal tower, cow tree, etc. All the maps need to be made enjoyable to play.Killer has 1 offering tho survivors have 4 and i really don't like this randomness and torture for some killers
Did you ever, in the slightest way, think survivors aren’t a hive mind who just share ideals and opinions. All the survivors could want DIFFERENT maps, and any SWF crap is just... well it’s a problem with SWF
maybe they are not a hive mind but they have a chat...
O RLY!? Guess you forgot PS4 and Xbox exist then
wait , so you tell me that i can get in que with ps4 or xbox player?
No, simple context would tell you that was a retort. Seeing how you mentioned lobby chat, and it’s a retort to that, it’d mean those 2 systems DO NOT HAVE CHAT. Simple argumentative skills dude
but then don't implement these changes there , many games have completely different versions on pc and consoles
-
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Bhazgrim said:
I feel like most killers would choose The Game (The Pig map) because it's the easiest to find survivors on, and it is amazing for most killers, especially the Nurse and the Doctor because of the two story layout. It would be too biased, and you would probably never see half the maps made for the game if that was the case. DBD just needs more unbiased maps for both sides (if that's even possible).Also some survivors let you find them deliberately and pallet loop you to the eternity if you are not the nurse
So one guy doesn’t like stealth so no one gets it? What kinda ass backwards logic is that?
if somebody doesn't like stealth what is he doing in a stealth based game eh?
Yet you completely side step what you said... which was basically screw stealth cuz a few people run at the killer..... yeah ok
if the map is too bad then why don't remove it ? And devs kinda screwed stealth with some addons and perks
Bevause removing something would mean the devs would “throw away their precious time and effort”. AND they use spaghetti code, so any change to the game can create a bug
i didn't know about the code, but aren't we gathered here to give ideas to the devs, its devs work to implement them , and if its not possible then its fine
-
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Bhazgrim said:
I feel like most killers would choose The Game (The Pig map) because it's the easiest to find survivors on, and it is amazing for most killers, especially the Nurse and the Doctor because of the two story layout. It would be too biased, and you would probably never see half the maps made for the game if that was the case. DBD just needs more unbiased maps for both sides (if that's even possible).Also some survivors let you find them deliberately and pallet loop you to the eternity if you are not the nurse
So one guy doesn’t like stealth so no one gets it? What kinda ass backwards logic is that?
if somebody doesn't like stealth what is he doing in a stealth based game eh?
Yet you completely side step what you said... which was basically screw stealth cuz a few people run at the killer..... yeah ok
if the map is too bad then why don't remove it ? And devs kinda screwed stealth with some addons and perks
-
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Bhazgrim said:
I feel like most killers would choose The Game (The Pig map) because it's the easiest to find survivors on, and it is amazing for most killers, especially the Nurse and the Doctor because of the two story layout. It would be too biased, and you would probably never see half the maps made for the game if that was the case. DBD just needs more unbiased maps for both sides (if that's even possible).Also some survivors let you find them deliberately and pallet loop you to the eternity if you are not the nurse
So one guy doesn’t like stealth so no one gets it? What kinda ass backwards logic is that?
if somebody doesn't like stealth what is he doing in a stealth based game eh?
This game is not stealth based game dude. It never was and devs don't want it to be either.
Then what is it based on?
-
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@SadonicShadow said:
Nah i dont think the killer should be able to choose the map everytime. the regulation of map choice being tied to rare offerings is good. If killers could choose the map it would be the same maps over and over again. Instead i would rather the devs balance all of the maps so that all of them are fair and enjoyable. That means balancing pallets and killing the horrific old infinites aka really long loops now. Fractured cowshed, groaning store house, coal tower, cow tree, etc. All the maps need to be made enjoyable to play.Killer has 1 offering tho survivors have 4 and i really don't like this randomness and torture for some killers
Did you ever, in the slightest way, think survivors aren’t a hive mind who just share ideals and opinions. All the survivors could want DIFFERENT maps, and any SWF crap is just... well it’s a problem with SWF
maybe they are not a hive mind but they have a chat...
O RLY!? Guess you forgot PS4 and Xbox exist then
wait , so you tell me that i can get in que with ps4 or xbox player?
-
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
No I still enjoy the game. If you want to balance the game, give killers more perk slots than survivors but don't take away our perk slots.Maybe to balance the game and add more depth to the game, everybody should have their one unique strong perk? Like if you want to use sprint burst, you need to use meg but you won't be able to run self care because it is going to be claudette's.
I don't want what I said to be implemented though. I think that the perk system is fine as it is. It could be cool if the killers had 2 more perks though since survivors have 16.
the thing i don't like is that the survivor is not bounded to anything while choosing the character when killer is bound with its killer power
What do you want though? Placing traps with nurse or blink with hillbilly LUL. Survivors are just skins at this point.
and you think its ok that survivors are just skins?
uhm.. yes? If you want to lock us in our own perks than as a killer you won't choose your own perks too. You won't get BBQ with hillbilly or nurse. You will just have lightborn enduring and tinkerer as a billy and as a survivor bill I will have unbreakable, left behind and borrowed time. Deal?
deal
-
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Someissues said:
What on earth are you talking aboutI am talking about that survivors are just skins right now
If survivors ever got anything unique, it’s be separate from perks. What would they say “oh those millions of bloodpoints you spent I Dwight? Well lol guess what, he’s gotta use prove thyself now.”
Yeah this power should be apart from perks (like killer power ) but i think it will add something to the strategy part of the game
Only thing It’ll add is LESS DIVERSITY because people will just use Claudette for stealth, and whoever gets the most meta power. No.
Thats why i said that it should be balanced well
-
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Bhazgrim said:
I feel like most killers would choose The Game (The Pig map) because it's the easiest to find survivors on, and it is amazing for most killers, especially the Nurse and the Doctor because of the two story layout. It would be too biased, and you would probably never see half the maps made for the game if that was the case. DBD just needs more unbiased maps for both sides (if that's even possible).Also some survivors let you find them deliberately and pallet loop you to the eternity if you are not the nurse
So one guy doesn’t like stealth so no one gets it? What kinda ass backwards logic is that?
if somebody doesn't like stealth what is he doing in a stealth based game eh?
-
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@SadonicShadow said:
Nah i dont think the killer should be able to choose the map everytime. the regulation of map choice being tied to rare offerings is good. If killers could choose the map it would be the same maps over and over again. Instead i would rather the devs balance all of the maps so that all of them are fair and enjoyable. That means balancing pallets and killing the horrific old infinites aka really long loops now. Fractured cowshed, groaning store house, coal tower, cow tree, etc. All the maps need to be made enjoyable to play.Killer has 1 offering tho survivors have 4 and i really don't like this randomness and torture for some killers
Did you ever, in the slightest way, think survivors aren’t a hive mind who just share ideals and opinions. All the survivors could want DIFFERENT maps, and any SWF crap is just... well it’s a problem with SWF
maybe they are not a hive mind but they have a chat...
-
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Someissues said:
What on earth are you talking aboutI am talking about that survivors are just skins right now
If survivors ever got anything unique, it’s be separate from perks. What would they say “oh those millions of bloodpoints you spent I Dwight? Well lol guess what, he’s gotta use prove thyself now.”
Yeah this power should be apart from perks (like killer power ) but i think it will add something to the strategy part of the game
-
@Jack11803 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@βLAKE said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@βLAKE said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
SO you mean thats ok that items that can be only bought can give you an advantage ?don't go off topic and to answer what you said killers bring items as well with fast charge addons or mori, etc.
I meant bought by real money mate , its called pay to win (p2w) and its not gud.
what are you talking about? please make sure you read the topic that is being discussed. I think you are lost.
look , you use the cosmetic item that can be bought only with real money ,and cry that it doesen't help you not to be seen
It can be bought with shards. Anything that is paid only is basically gurenteed to be EXTRAVAGANT AS A RAINBOW
but cosmetic items should not influence the gaming process eh
-
@Someissues said:
What on earth are you talking aboutI am talking about that survivors are just skins right now
-
@Delfador said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Delfador said:
No I still enjoy the game. If you want to balance the game, give killers more perk slots than survivors but don't take away our perk slots.Maybe to balance the game and add more depth to the game, everybody should have their one unique strong perk? Like if you want to use sprint burst, you need to use meg but you won't be able to run self care because it is going to be claudette's.
I don't want what I said to be implemented though. I think that the perk system is fine as it is. It could be cool if the killers had 2 more perks though since survivors have 16.
the thing i don't like is that the survivor is not bounded to anything while choosing the character when killer is bound with its killer power
What do you want though? Placing traps with nurse or blink with hillbilly LUL. Survivors are just skins at this point.
and you think its ok that survivors are just skins?
-
@βLAKE said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@βLAKE said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
SO you mean thats ok that items that can be only bought can give you an advantage ?don't go off topic and to answer what you said killers bring items as well with fast charge addons or mori, etc.
I meant bought by real money mate , its called pay to win (p2w) and its not gud.
what are you talking about? please make sure you read the topic that is being discussed. I think you are lost.
look , you use the cosmetic item that can be bought only with real money ,and cry that it doesen't help you not to be seen
-
@βLAKE said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
SO you mean thats ok that items that can be only bought can give you an advantage ?don't go off topic and to answer what you said killers bring items as well with fast charge addons or mori, etc.
I meant bought by real money mate , its called pay to win (p2w) and its not gud.
-
@Delfador said:
No I still enjoy the game. If you want to balance the game, give killers more perk slots than survivors but don't take away our perk slots.Maybe to balance the game and add more depth to the game, everybody should have their one unique strong perk? Like if you want to use sprint burst, you need to use meg but you won't be able to run self care because it is going to be claudette's.
I don't want what I said to be implemented though. I think that the perk system is fine as it is. It could be cool if the killers had 2 more perks though since survivors have 16.
the thing i don't like is that the survivor is not bounded to anything while choosing the character when killer is bound with its killer power
-
SAW OP
-
@Buily09 said:
@Spaaaaaace_steam_ said:
@Buily09 said:
Just because some perks are stonger than others, that doesn't mean that EVERYTHING should be nerfed just because some few balance issues. Also, that would kill lot of fun builds and for me, I allready feel when I want to play some fun builds... I need one more perk slot. So no, that would be way too much.But wont 3 perk games make the game itself more challenging , i don't think you can play this game for fun anymore.
I think in some way you still can. Also, you don't have to use all perk slots If you want challenge. If you want challenge, you can play like 1, 2 or none. Or No Mither with nothing else, that's a challenge.
I meant that it would make game challenging for EVERYONE at the same time and also kinda fits 3 unique perk thing, i just want balanced gaming , no skillless bullcrap and crutches
-
@SadonicShadow said:
Nah i dont think the killer should be able to choose the map everytime. the regulation of map choice being tied to rare offerings is good. If killers could choose the map it would be the same maps over and over again. Instead i would rather the devs balance all of the maps so that all of them are fair and enjoyable. That means balancing pallets and killing the horrific old infinites aka really long loops now. Fractured cowshed, groaning store house, coal tower, cow tree, etc. All the maps need to be made enjoyable to play.Killer has 1 offering tho survivors have 4 and i really don't like this randomness and torture for some killers
-
SO you mean thats ok that items that can be only bought can give you an advantage ?