AnotherRandy
AnotherRandy
About
- Username
- AnotherRandy
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- —
Comments
-
Also, why is there a difference for devs between farming and beeing AFK? Cuz if all are farming together it seems like not a problemThaznar said:@Peanits said:
If you're doing it a lot, yes, because that is ruining the game for others.If you just forget the game's running once or twice, no biggy.
And how you determine if someone is AFK without that person being reported?
-
Damn, I was hoping to derank with that so I could get my lobbys filled quicker (30-40 minutes lobby Q the last days).Peanits said:If you're doing it a lot, yes, because that is ruining the game for others.
If you just forget the game's running once or twice, no biggy.
This is so sad, can we nerf matchmaking please? I cant take this anymore.. -
Can we get some attention to this? Every event I end up with a bunch of offerings left at the end. And they get locked to use afterwards. On top of that, I'm prestiging sometimes so there is no record of how many I had left either. Trading them with flashlights and medkits would be awesome. For killer, maybe trading them puddings would be good aswell
-
Probably the most important QoL change we need right NOW (30 minutes lobby Q btw)Kenshin said:can you open the ranks from 1-10? so rank 1 can be matched with rank 10 what means lower queue times for high ranks. that would also stop the purpose of deranking to get faster queues. thanks.
-
Hello dear DbD Team!
Can we get some more QoL changes for the gameplay?
Few examples I would really appreciate to see changed is struggling and wiggling, the option to toggle the sprint and crouch button, not to have to repress M1 at dying state if a mate doesn't fully healed you at dying state, leatherface charging mechanic like billy etc. Just some example I have in my mind. Please also share other QoL changes your planing to do soon™
Greetings from Germany -
I never ever had long Q's as survivor in 2018MuttonChops said:
Nahhhh this is what survivors have to deal with all the time. Welcome to the fogAnotherRandy said:Dear DbD team,
I thought about to do a global rank reset or if possible a rank reset only for people in red and purple ranks. This would be the fastest and easiest way to hotfix the killer Q during the event. I'm sure 99% would be happy what
Idk about ps4, but I'm on PC and I'm definitely not going to the pain of playing on ps4. Also I tried DbD on ps4 aswell one month ago, same thing at least at rank 20 tho, ultra long Q's. But at rank 15 Q's went much fasterBravo0413 said:Play on ps4 you queue up fast there 😏 seems the lopy bug is only on pc
Cuz many survivors are depipping hard right now, they suicide the hell out of this event. Even I dropped from rank 7 to 15 as survivor. Also it was always that the most people are at low ranks. Rank reset would give a huge pool and potentially faster Q'saltruistic said:What is a rank reset going to do? I played 11 hours of Survivor between yesterday and today. Rank 10 to Rank 2. It takes a half day to get the highest ranks in this game. -
I never ever had long Q's as survivor in 2018MuttonChops said:
Nahhhh this is what survivors have to deal with all the time. Welcome to the fogAnotherRandy said:Dear DbD team,
I thought about to do a global rank reset or if possible a rank reset only for people in red and purple ranks. This would be the fastest and easiest way to hotfix the killer Q during the event. I'm sure 99% would be happy what
Idk about ps4, but I'm on PC and I'm definitely not going to the pain of playing on ps4. Also I tried DbD on ps4 aswell one month ago, same thing at least at rank 20 tho, ultra long Q's. But at rank 15 Q's went much fasterBravo0413 said:Play on ps4 you queue up fast there 😏 seems the lopy bug is only on pc
Cuz many survivors are depipping hard right now, they suicide the hell out of this event. Even I dropped from rank 7 to 15 as survivor. Also it was always that the most people are at low ranks. Rank reset would give a huge pool and potentially fasteraltruistic said:What is a rank reset going to do? I played 11 hours of Survivor between yesterday and today. Rank 10 to Rank 2. It takes a half day to get the highest ranks in this game. -
I remember last Halloween, I was able to get nearly 1 event item every bloodweeb, sometimes even 2 or 3. But this Halloween, damn man, I have to finish 10 bloodwebs at least to get one event item (p3-50 btw), it's definitely not the same. I spend 1 million Bloodpoints into survivor, I got a total of 5 event medkits and 2 event flashlights. It's mental man
-
Can we get a quick petition or something starting to get the attention of the devs? @Not_Queen can you help us in this weird situation? This event feels like a huge win as killer but not a huge win as survivor
-
Can't agree more. I don't care about a casual Gamer who plays like 2hrs dbd per week, if someone doesnt play more he doesn't need the skins either. Those skins should be grindy, if you don't put the time into it then just buy it (even if I don't agree with the high pricing, but that's not my problem).Smashen said:@Judgement said:
Might_Oakk said:@Judgement said:
If they allow 30/30 Survivors to continue collecting Cankers, those Survivors would be extremely likely to be greedy or troll - “I’ll get this plant because I want bloodpoints, screw your event progression.”
How BHVR SHOULD have made it work, is that all Survivors share the same vial progression. One or all Survivors can work on the same or separate Cankers, and the leftover ones can work on generators. At the end, all Survivors would have progression to their vials.
I don’t see why BHVR didn’t make it that way. I know they prevent 30/30 Survivors from juicing Cankers to prevent trolls and greedy players but this is also punishing those who don’t.
Take notes BHVR - make all Survivors share the same vial progression, as was the case on all other events.
Dude people were done one side in a few hours. If you can't get 30 vials in 2 weeks I dunno what to say.
Oh I don’t know, maybe people who don’t have ‘a few hours’ to play consecutively as hardcore as a legend like you to 100% their vials in exactly 30 matches?
Or maybe people who are busy with other stuff that takes priority over a damn game?
Or maybe people who play other games more than they play Dead By Daylight? Other games that are more enjoyable than Dead By Daylight, I might add?
Or Civilisation V?Do you have ‘something to say’ about those circumstances, Might?
Oh what am I saying? You already said you don’t.Honestly I don't care about casuals. I play this game all day.
Finally there is an REALLY NICE Event and I have to realy on others for my extra BP???
There are up to 7 Plants right now.
Sidenote: Killers do not get ######### like this !!!
But soon no one will use those Offerings anymore so those people you want to speak for are ######### by that too. So whats you whole point? Just fix this Behaviour please.
It is just sad there is an Event going on and you can't participate in it anymore after 2 days.
Why do we need to carry those "uh I don't want to grind or fight for those points, but I want everything" people? Lol, those people are most likely playing a bit during a new DLC and drop the game after first week and repeat -
THE ISSUE IS
As soon as everyone in the lobby is maxed, noone gets a single BP bonus. I spend BP into an offering, I use it and the only one who benefits from that is the killer (of he manages to use all event hooks) -
Maybe there was a tiny bit missing? Also, you need to wait some seconds at the scoreboard to see that full vial counting
-
Is this related to Hex third seal? Cuz if got my third seal 4 stacks the game is pretty much over, unless they found my totem. Seriously, even swf groups on certain maps struggle to find the slug
-
Alright good to know. Well then, let's just hop on the suicide train aswell I guess
-
I wrote that on my phone with my feet while doing shoulder pushups and talking with a friend. Also not native English, but hey, if someone nails the correct nerve there is always the last opportunity of b*tching about texting mistakes. Just shows how poor you are, even if you try to act like a rich boy.Lowbei said:
its spelled “you’re”, im in my 30s, and i dont play fortnite.AnotherRandy said:
Your 100% a fortnite kid, no doubt.Lowbei said:Will you people stop whining about free events? they dont owe you #########. shut up.
stay in school son. you will learn about 5 letter words like “you’re” in the 3rd or 4th grade. -
It's not about getting all for free at the first place. It'sGeorge_Soros said:Has the Western world sunk into communism while I wasn't watching?
You guys don't need those items. They are cosmetic. Hence the name "cosmetics". You can grind a full set of them for free too. You'd want the whole stuff? You understand that the developer team has to be paid for all the work they do to keep the game fresh, but you still want everything just handed to you?
Why not petition for limitless access to free beer while you're at it?
1) the insane pricing and
2) the lack of exclusiveness.
Both combined into an event is for most veterans confusing right now, cuz we expected something different from the devs since we followed how they developed over the years.
You need to understand the other perspective and not only yours -
The reason why the game industry is so broken right now is exactly this mindset. Pay2Win needs to be stomped to the ground, don't give it space to breathVortexas said:@Mister_xD said:
so you want to encourage pay2win?
cause thats exactly what you would do: force players to spand money in orer to get stuff they could need for killing / surviving and that is exactly what Behaviour said they never wanted in their game, so yeah. that wont happen.And?
If 4-6 Dollars brings you to the BREAKING POINT then you should probably go back to the foodbank and get line instead of hitting up dbd.
-
Don't mix up animations with game mechanicsVortexas said:@AnotherRandy said:
Agree, it feels not realisticIt's as realistic as a Man sewing his own intestines back in after getting hit by a chainsaw, then sprint bursting away like Usain Bolt.
-
Agree, it feels not realistic
-
Was always the meta perk if you r the one who wants to get chased whole game
-
I kinda understand that publishing the exact settings will lead to abusing. But at the same time, people need at least some orientation to know how close they are. Maybe implementing 24hrs softbans but a lower trigger would be a better option than a high% of DC to trigger one strike which could permanently ban you from this game.not_Queen said:Hello @Shadoureon !
Let me clarify something for you.
We are not getting in detail on HOW we are setting our ban rules for the simple fact that we do not want players to abuse the system. Be sure that we thought about details like you are mentionning.
Players who are being punished right now deserved it.
Tbh, im not aware of a single game punishing so hard for leaving a match. DbD isn't even a competitive game, it's more a casual game at current state. Yet, high competitive pvp game punish not at all or just 10 minutes and stuff like that.
Also something: most DCs comes from solo players. So devs, think about why especially solo players DC out of frustrating and work on that instead of banning. Just my opinion -
This isn't the fault of the person, more the fault of the game code/netcode/host connection. This happens to me aswell, I just get kicked out during the loading g screen while the other 3 survivors load in. This needs to be fixed by the devs (dedicated servers, we are all looking at you for years oooff)DeadByFlashlight said:- In a 1vs3 there was already a guy DCing during loading screen, such DCs need to be punished and it will occur less (tahts the whole reason why to punish Dcs)
-
Yet the most perks I see in shrine are on placeTheEliteTurtle said:The whole point of the shrine is to be able to get perks you don't have access to. So that paying isn't the only way to get some good perks.
1) perks of the original characters
2) bad perks of with shards buyable characters
3) good perks of characters with shards
4) bad perks of licenced characters
5) good perks of licensed characters
No way this ranking is coincidence, it's 100% a business plan from the devs -
Smurfing is not bannableChesterTheMolester said:Stop smurfing or risk a perm ban. -
Which fogstreamer and how do you know?DeadByFlashlight said:Even fogstreamers derank by DCing and the devs support this instead of punishing it.
If you really want to derank either go afk or walk directly to the killer and let him kill you. -
######### got my comment deleted? Is here live censoring happening right now? Seems like I hit the correct nerve
-
@Vortexas said:
@AnotherRandy said:
I dont want to pay money for a sh*t killer like lestherface I don't enjoy. I JUST want bbq. It's not only a good perk to locate survivors but also farm BP double as fast as without. I would put this as pay2win even now, because it didn't show up a single time for a year now. And before I'm going to blindly buy all DLC ,the devs have to fix that game first. I'm not interested into more content, I'm interested into a balanced, fun and bugfree game. Before this didn't happen, I won't support. They already got 20 bucks to begin with but yet the core issues of this game are still thereIn all that time you could have simply boughten leatherdaddy and grinded it out for the perk.
I agree though it's been retardedly long since BBQ was on the Shrine, which is why i say we should just remove Movie Survivor/Killer perks from the Shrine entirely.
It's about the principle man. Especially now, after waiting so long I won't buy it. Devs got enough time and enough money. I won't clap my hands for them and gift them even more money for not doing the job a real game development team has to do.
Especially with the faux pas of MCote to the community and in general not having an honest open ear for the community or at least big streamers who kinda represent their own community. Nope, those people only understand by red numbers of money -
Daily rituals and events are already good options to bring variation for main players. Don't force people to play what they don't want, this will kill the playerbase. Especially now with dbd beeing 2 years like how it is nowTzeentchling9 said:Great idea in theory. I'd love people to actually have to play the other side occasionally. It doesn't actually work in practice though. -
I dont want to pay money for a sh*t killer like lestherface I don't enjoy. I JUST want bbq. It's not only a good perk to locate survivors but also farm BP double as fast as without. I would put this as pay2win even now, because it didn't show up a single time for a year now. And before I'm going to blindly buy all DLC ,the devs have to fix that game first. I'm not interested into more content, I'm interested into a balanced, fun and bugfree game. Before this didn't happen, I won't support. They already got 20 bucks to begin with but yet the core issues of this game are still there
-
Or at least tell on which website they upload the artwork and I will search by myself
-
Noone can help?
-
Alright, so?KillJiggy said:@AnotherRandy said:
KillJiggy said:@AnotherRandy said:
@KillJiggy said:
@AnotherRawe ndy said:
Only one person has it. The only really easy change to ds would be that only one person can use it. Everyone who takes DS has to take a 5th perk. The survivors who isn't the obsession (random) will get it replaced with the 5th perk chosen in zhe lobby.
As killer, the non obsession DS user is hurting more then the obsession DS.
Honestly, this would be the easiest and laziest way to balance it and I'm pretty sure that even survivor mains will be okay with that
The problem with this, Is that EVERYONE would run decisive. It would basically be a game mechanic.
What? Hell no, only one will have ds in the match, what are you talking?
Everyone would have DS in their kit. Yes only one person would have it but everyone would have it equipped. Therefore it would be basically a game mechanic where every match one person gets DS.
I don't get the problem, it's equipped, but you can't use it unless ur the obsession. So, what is this argument trying to say?
Im saying there wouldnt be a point in not having it equipped
-
I don't get the problem, it's equipped, but you can't use it unless ur the obsession. So, what is this argument trying to say?KillJiggy said:@AnotherRandy said:
@KillJiggy said:
@AnotherRawe ndy said:
Only one person has it. The only really easy change to ds would be that only one person can use it. Everyone who takes DS has to take a 5th perk. The survivors who isn't the obsession (random) will get it replaced with the 5th perk chosen in zhe lobby.
As killer, the non obsession DS user is hurting more then the obsession DS.
Honestly, this would be the easiest and laziest way to balance it and I'm pretty sure that even survivor mains will be okay with thatThe problem with this, Is that EVERYONE would run decisive. It would basically be a game mechanic.
What? Hell no, only one will have ds in the match, what are you talking?
Everyone would have DS in their kit. Yes only one person would have it but everyone would have it equipped. Therefore it would be basically a game mechanic where every match one person gets DS.
-
@KillJiggy said:
@AnotherRandy said:
Only one person has it. The only really easy change to ds would be that only one person can use it. Everyone who takes DS has to take a 5th perk. The survivors who isn't the obsession (random) will get it replaced with the 5th perk chosen in zhe lobby.
As killer, the non obsession DS user is hurting more then the obsession DS.
Honestly, this would be the easiest and laziest way to balance it and I'm pretty sure that even survivor mains will be okay with thatThe problem with this, Is that EVERYONE would run decisive. It would basically be a game mechanic.
What? Hell no, only one will have ds in the match, what are you talking?
-
@Global said:
@AnotherRandy said:
@xxaggieboyxx said:
@AnotherRandy said:
@xxaggieboyxx said:
I think just make it to where only one uses it. Obsession only perk. If someone has it and not obsession sucks for them. Then whey would just have another perk. This perk should be more high risk than just "oh you don't get to use it here have a different perk" but like @Orion said. What about when my ruin is cleansed before I can even get to it? Not a bad ds nerf idea but I wouldn't say it is a good one eitherThis will just hurt solo survivors, swfs will just at coordinate who will take the DS and everyone else won't waste it. Think a minute before u type man
lol "think before you type" maybe you should think too because not only would this perk still be crutch for the survivor that uses it. it would still reward the people that dont get to use it. there is this thing called chat so it wouldnt always hurt solo survivors. and like i said this perk shouldnt be all fine and dandy completely safe to use with absolutely no drawbacks. do you know how many killer perks have built in drawbacks?? the strongest ones all have something survivors can do to stop it or counter it. the only thing that can be done with ds is enduring and droping them off a ledge. but if they have balanced landing they get away scott free.
so yeah i have thought.
PS: there was no reason to be a dick
Mate, r u mental or deluded or something? Pls try to use ur human brain and logic, I break that down one last time:
The suggestion of "who took ds but isn't obsession loses a whole perk slot" will just hurt solos more again. Because premades will clarify who going to be the one taking ds. SWF will be 100% run all 4 perk slots (16+ aura reading for free).
On the other side solos who can't communicate and clarify who will take ds will end in someone gas only 3 perks for the whole match. SWFs will never ever have this situation of someone with 3 perks. I swear, if someone can't take this logic Im done with my faith in humanity. Such a simple logic but people don't get it. I'm superior to the majority in this forum or are just some kids under 16yo writing? Ffs...Wait? you expected to get logic from the DbD community? I think you are the one who is truly mental here.
True point, u caught me
-
@xxaggieboyxx said:
@AnotherRandy said:
@xxaggieboyxx said:
I think just make it to where only one uses it. Obsession only perk. If someone has it and not obsession sucks for them. Then whey would just have another perk. This perk should be more high risk than just "oh you don't get to use it here have a different perk" but like @Orion said. What about when my ruin is cleansed before I can even get to it? Not a bad ds nerf idea but I wouldn't say it is a good one eitherThis will just hurt solo survivors, swfs will just at coordinate who will take the DS and everyone else won't waste it. Think a minute before u type man
lol "think before you type" maybe you should think too because not only would this perk still be crutch for the survivor that uses it. it would still reward the people that dont get to use it. there is this thing called chat so it wouldnt always hurt solo survivors. and like i said this perk shouldnt be all fine and dandy completely safe to use with absolutely no drawbacks. do you know how many killer perks have built in drawbacks?? the strongest ones all have something survivors can do to stop it or counter it. the only thing that can be done with ds is enduring and droping them off a ledge. but if they have balanced landing they get away scott free.
so yeah i have thought.
PS: there was no reason to be a dick
Mate, r u mental or deluded or something? Pls try to use ur human brain and logic, I break that down one last time:
The suggestion of "who took ds but isn't obsession loses a whole perk slot" will just hurt solos more again. Because premades will clarify who going to be the one taking ds. SWF will be 100% run all 4 perk slots (16+ aura reading for free).
On the other side solos who can't communicate and clarify who will take ds will end in someone gas only 3 perks for the whole match. SWFs will never ever have this situation of someone with 3 perks. I swear, if someone can't take this logic Im done with my faith in humanity. Such a simple logic but people don't get it. I'm superior to the majority in this forum or are just some kids under 16yo writing? Ffs... -
@xxaggieboyxx said:
I think just make it to where only one uses it. Obsession only perk. If someone has it and not obsession sucks for them. Then whey would just have another perk. This perk should be more high risk than just "oh you don't get to use it here have a different perk" but like @Orion said. What about when my ruin is cleansed before I can even get to it? Not a bad ds nerf idea but I wouldn't say it is a good one eitherThis will just hurt solo survivors, swfs will just at coordinate who will take the DS and everyone else won't waste it. Think a minute before u type man
-
@Tsulan said:
Can we just turn hex perks into normal perks, please?
They are not really that strong.Besides third seal and d hope I can agree, ruin for example shouldnt be a hex perk
-
@Orion said:
@AnotherRandy said:
@Orion said:
@AnotherRandy said:
This would just hurt solos again, since they can't organize their perks with each other. SWFs will just outrun it by planning who takes DS. U need to think about solo survivors matePre-game chat. Use it.
So u really want to make it for solos harder, just for the sake of beeing against survivors or what? That's trashtalk tho, not everyone is typing in chat, and not every one speaks English. But yeah, ur change would be just one more reason to leave solo beside and queue up as swf. Thank you.
No, I want Survivors to use the pre-game chat for something other than whining or telling others to "ready/shut the [BAD WORD] up". It's a problem if they don't speak your language, though.
So stupid of you. Sometimes it takes so long till the lobby fills in. So do I have to wait like freak I'm the lobby to type and clear up things if the lobby is filled? No sorry, I just chill on youtube till the round starts, ur not efficient with ur time lol
-
@Justicar said:
There's no need to make this so complicated. For DS, only the Obsession gets the drop (like it is currently), everyone else gets a 1.0/1.5/2.0 second stun without a drop. Problem solved.Again, this would hurt only solos, cuz ds without obsession is useless in this change. SWFs will just coordinate that one person has ds.
Guys seriously, are you all so blinded and can't understand that changes has to balance solo and swf equal? -
@SenzuDuck said:
YawnMore killers thinking that hexes should only be positives, if you don't like losing perks, don't use them.
More "but my totem" yes, it's risk vs reward. Hopefully they make hexes more viable by making totems more stealthier, but stop trying to make hexes into reward + reward.
Yeah, I don't know why it takes so long for the devs to work on the places for totems. Whatever, doesn't really have to do with DS, dunno why people bring this up here
-
@SenzuDuck said:
@Orion said:
@AnotherRandy said:
This would just hurt solos again, since they can't organize their perks with each other. SWFs will just outrun it by planning who takes DS. U need to think about solo survivors matePre-game chat. Use it.
Except killers dodge if lobbies take too long because they're worried of a last second switch, but yea - just have everybody not ready up and chat about perks, that'll fix it!
Yeah this aswell, absolutely no sense. The goal is balance survivors without hurting solos more then swf, if that's not done, it keeps to be unbalanced af.
-
@Orion said:
@AnotherRandy said:
This would just hurt solos again, since they can't organize their perks with each other. SWFs will just outrun it by planning who takes DS. U need to think about solo survivors matePre-game chat. Use it.
So u really want to make it for solos harder, just for the sake of beeing against survivors or what? That's trashtalk tho, not everyone is typing in chat, and not every one speaks English. But yeah, ur change would be just one more reason to leave solo beside and queue up as swf. Thank you.
-
That's why only the obsession shoukd have ds and as killer u have the choice of going for the DS guy or not. At current state, even if u ignore the DS guy, u get suprised DS from non obsession survivors. That's the only problem of dsmcNuggets said:DS is not fine at all.
You can loop for minutes and then [BAD WORD] the killer over because you have a perk. -
Dude, this only hurting solos, those people who already have a harder time then swfs. My change would address the solos aswell. Think about itMister_xD said:or, if multiple ppl use it, all non obsessions will have a useless perk.
that way its a high risk - high reward perk, like its supposed to be.
i mean, us killers dont get any extra perks for an destroyed totem, so why should you survivors get a 5th one? i mean, this useless perk slot thing is nothing new for the game, at least for killers. we all know that feeling when we are playing the game with only 3 perks and the 4th one (noed) is supposed to have an effect in the end game, but hey! all totems cleansed -> we played a whole round with only 3 perks. -
This would just hurt solos again, since they can't organize their perks with each other. SWFs will just outrun it by planning who takes DS. U need to think about solo survivors mateOrion said:@AnotherRandy said:
Yeah but what about someone who takes all 4 perk slots as hex ?
But the idea is good, hex totems get destroyed way to fast and by replacing them it doesn't hurt as much as now.However, what is ur opinion about my DS nerf idea?
First one to get destroyed is replaced.
I think your fifth perk slot idea is bad, if the perk is to stay as it is. It's so powerful (prolongs a chase by 50%) that it needs an equally powerful drawback. Just making it so non-obsessions don't get anything from it is enough. -
Yeah but what about someone who takes all 4 perk slots as hex ?Orion said:@AnotherRandy said:
What do you exactly mean?5 perk slots so that when the Hex perk is gone, it gets replaced with something different.
But the idea is good, hex totems get destroyed way to fast and by replacing them it doesn't hurt as much as now.
However, what is ur opinion about my DS nerf idea? -
What do you exactly mean?Orion said:Could we get the same change for Hex perks?
-
Why isn't this in the PTB??
-
This would just reward camping even more lolWolf74 said:My idea about MS:
It should just deactivate ANY survivor perk if they are in the basement.