iTz_KilLaZ_x

Raccoon said:
@iTz_KilLaZ_x said:
Visionmaker said:

@iTz_KilLaZ_x said:

Visionmaker said:
@fGringo said:
@Doc_W__HOLLIDAY said:
Keep her at 110% when she is armed with hatchets, but increase it to 115% when she's all out.
tha's actually pretty good idea! when she losses all her hatches, she should be able to be at 115%. In a way, she's really a powerless killer without hatches, buffing her while being without hatches, definitely will help on "those" chases that you BARELY miss a hatchet and still be able to be scary as any other killer.
In essence, she's 110% with hatches, 115% without hatches just because she lost the wieght of the hatches lol



I think it's a good compromise but bad solution. The Huntress should keep the weakness of needing to reload because it rewards survivors for juking and then being stealthy.

After I juke 4-5 hatchets, my next reaction shouldn't be "ok now she has 115 MS and she'll BL-M1 me to death". It's counterproductive.

If anything, more killers need to be like Huntress (skill-based and rewarding for both sides) and not the other way around.
Did you see what I said about how I think it’ll only slightly increase her killrate if she gets 115% speed

I care less about the killrate and more about the design of the game. And as it is now, survivors already die more than 1/2 the time at every rank and they're still buffing killers across the board.

This is supposed to be an asymmetrical game. Killers are designed to be strong. Now how strong is subjective, but I don’t approve of the strength regarding certain killers in this game. I’m fine with huntress as of right now but I would LOVE if she got 115% speed. It would make my experience more fun and like I said, she wouldn’t be OP
*rides survivor at 115% movement speed, mashing M2 with 6 hatchets, as M1 is now obsolete.

Not OP at all.

If you can loop, you’ll be fine

in Huntress should have 115% movement speed Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 26, 2018

Visionmaker said:
@iTz_KilLaZ_x said:
Visionmaker said:

@fGringo said:
 @Doc_W__HOLLIDAY said:
Keep her at 110% when she is armed with hatchets, but increase it to 115% when she's all out.
tha's actually pretty good idea! when she losses all her hatches, she should be able to be at 115%. In a way, she's really a powerless killer without hatches, buffing her while being without hatches, definitely will help on "those" chases that you BARELY miss a hatchet and still be able to be scary as any other killer.
In essence, she's 110% with hatches, 115% without hatches just because she lost the wieght of the hatches lol

I think it's a good compromise but bad solution. The Huntress should keep the weakness of needing to reload because it rewards survivors for juking and then being stealthy.

After I juke 4-5 hatchets, my next reaction shouldn't be "ok now she has 115 MS and she'll BL-M1 me to death". It's counterproductive.

If anything, more killers need to be like Huntress (skill-based and rewarding for both sides) and not the other way around.

Did you see what I said about how I think it’ll only slightly increase her killrate if she gets 115% speed
I care less about the killrate and more about the design of the game. And as it is now, survivors already die more than 1/2 the time at every rank and they're still buffing killers across the board.

This is supposed to be an asymmetrical game. Killers are designed to be strong. Now how strong is subjective, but I don’t approve of the strength regarding certain killers in this game. I’m fine with huntress as of right now but I would LOVE if she got 115% speed. It would make my experience more fun and like I said, she wouldn’t be OP

in Huntress should have 115% movement speed Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 26, 2018

Visionmaker said:

@fGringo said:

@Doc_W__HOLLIDAY said:
Keep her at 110% when she is armed with hatchets, but increase it to 115% when she's all out.

tha's actually pretty good idea! when she losses all her hatches, she should be able to be at 115%. In a way, she's really a powerless killer without hatches, buffing her while being without hatches, definitely will help on "those" chases that you BARELY miss a hatchet and still be able to be scary as any other killer.

In essence, she's 110% with hatches, 115% without hatches just because she lost the wieght of the hatches lol

I think it's a good compromise but bad solution. The Huntress should keep the weakness of needing to reload because it rewards survivors for juking and then being stealthy.

After I juke 4-5 hatchets, my next reaction shouldn't be "ok now she has 115 MS and she'll BL-M1 me to death". It's counterproductive.

If anything, more killers need to be like Huntress (skill-based and rewarding for both sides) and not the other way around.

Did you see what I said about how I think it’ll only slightly increase her killrate if she gets 115% speed

in Huntress should have 115% movement speed Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 26, 2018

ScottJund said:

@iTz_KilLaZ_x said:
If BHVR wasn’t so scared to try things, maybe we could see if huntress would be too strong with 115% movement speed. I would bet money that her kill rate would only slightly go up during testing.

Of course it would go up, but the argument is that it doesn't need to go up because she's already good.

Slightly is the key word though. She’s not going to be OP if she was given 115% movement speed. She’d be more of a threat than she already is but that’s a good thing. Survivors should be scared of every killer. When I know I’m going against a Freddy for example, I usually know it’s going to be a gg.

I know huntress can be very scary and tough to go against. But with how ridiculously fast gens can be done, I just want her to be able to apply more pressure around the map. Her speed really hinders her. And yes, I know she can use those hatchets in many deadly ways... but what she can’t do is traverse the map quickly

in Huntress should have 115% movement speed Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 26, 2018

If BHVR wasn’t so scared to try things, maybe we could see if huntress would be too strong with 115% movement speed. I would bet money that her kill rate would only slightly go up during testing.

in Huntress should have 115% movement speed Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 26, 2018

brokedownpalace said:

This is like asking Hag, Nurse or T1 Myers to be normal speed. The reason they are not is BALANCE. You are supposed to rely on their power. A good Huntress is absolutely deadly and nearly unavoidable. If you want to buff her to normal speed the devs would need to nerf her in another way.

But then she'd just turn into a bad Hillbilly or Leatherface that doesnt even use their power because they suck at it.

That’s why you test things. Maybe give huntress 115% movement speed and see how the kill rate with her fluctuates. I honestly think it would only go up slightly and not significantly

in Huntress should have 115% movement speed Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 26, 2018

ScottJund said:

@iTz_KilLaZ_x said:
ScottJund said:

@Poweas said:

@ScottJund said:

@Poweas said:

At least they made her viable.

I'm sorry but if the only way you could win with Huntress was with instathrow, you are just a bad Huntress and your opinion of her is obviously not accurate or supported by enough experience.

What I didn't even have her maxed back then and I didnt even play her until after her nerf.

If you didn't even play her with instathrow how do you know what the experience of using instathrow is like?

@iTz_KilLaZ_x said:

Idk how Scott, a veteran DBD player, doesn’t recognize how unbalanced this game can be when solid swf teams step in. You’re a great huntress but come on now... you should know how easy survivors still have things if they play optimally

If a full team has like 4 toolboxes, 4 DS, 4 Unbreakable, 4 Sprint Burst, all on comms, then yes, that's overpowered.

Has that ever actually happened to you? Maybe one game ever?

I disagree dude. This patch has been the easiest it has ever been for killer. Some maps are just completely dead and there's nothing survivors can do on them anymore. There are also still some strong Survivor maps too, but the game is the easiest its ever been for killer. I don't care how much they're talking on comms, it doesn't help them not die faster in a chase.

I can attest that on Xbox at rank 1, there are many swf teams that all run meta perks with items. It doesn’t happen every match but it’s not as rare as you frame it out to be. My point is, I just want huntress to be slightly more of a threat. Why is it that billy can have all these benefits with very little drawbacks? Huntress is certainly not weak. But her drawbacks hold her back from being on Billy’s level

Oh no wonder you think she's mid tier, you play on console. Yeah she's not great at all on console.

I have an Xbox one x AND I play on PC too when I go out of town for my job. The frames on the X are tolerable enough to play huntress well. I know my stuff. She’s definitely not up there with billy and nurse...

in Huntress should have 115% movement speed Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 26, 2018

ScottJund said:

@Poweas said:

@ScottJund said:

@Poweas said:

At least they made her viable.

I'm sorry but if the only way you could win with Huntress was with instathrow, you are just a bad Huntress and your opinion of her is obviously not accurate or supported by enough experience.

What I didn't even have her maxed back then and I didnt even play her until after her nerf.

If you didn't even play her with instathrow how do you know what the experience of using instathrow is like?

@iTz_KilLaZ_x said:
Idk how Scott, a veteran DBD player, doesn’t recognize how unbalanced this game can be when solid swf teams step in. You’re a great huntress but come on now... you should know how easy survivors still have things if they play optimally

If a full team has like 4 toolboxes, 4 DS, 4 Unbreakable, 4 Sprint Burst, all on comms, then yes, that's overpowered.

Has that ever actually happened to you? Maybe one game ever?

I disagree dude. This patch has been the easiest it has ever been for killer. Some maps are just completely dead and there's nothing survivors can do on them anymore. There are also still some strong Survivor maps too, but the game is the easiest its ever been for killer. I don't care how much they're talking on comms, it doesn't help them not die faster in a chase.

I can attest that on Xbox at rank 1, there are many swf teams that all run meta perks with items. It doesn’t happen every match but it’s not as rare as you frame it out to be. My point is, I just want huntress to be slightly more of a threat. Why is it that billy can have all these benefits with very little drawbacks? Huntress is certainly not weak. But her drawbacks hold her back from being on Billy’s level

in Huntress should have 115% movement speed Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 26, 2018

Idk how Scott, a veteran DBD player, doesn’t recognize how unbalanced this game can be when solid swf teams step in. You’re a great huntress but come on now... you should know how easy survivors still have things if they play optimally

in Huntress should have 115% movement speed Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 26, 2018

redsopine01 said:

If your in pc and all these are after game chat you can report it immideatly and there removed from the game with a premnant ban if they went out there way to find out where you live and stuff that's harassment and stalking which is a grounds to have them arrested and a court order to leave you be and you should report the person slandering you to the authority's as spreading stuff like that online with your name and everything can ruin your life and cost you jobs and you said you have a kid if they know this and know were you are they could get people to try and take your son away if you don't take any action now ther going to do it more and more

Yeah I’m going to report it to BHVR with evidence. These types of people shouldn’t even be playing online games

in DbD has the most disgusting playerbase I’ve ever encountered. Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 26, 2018

Visionmaker said:
@iTz_KilLaZ_x said:
Visionmaker said:

@iTz_KilLaZ_x said:

ScottJund said:
@iTz_KilLaZ_x said:

ScottJund said:
@iTz_KilLaZ_x said: ConsoleNurse said:
No git gud.Watch zubatlel or scottjund 
I’m aware... im already good with her and have fun playing her. But against solid swf teams, she’s not good enough to keep up. If you are good enough at her (and you're not on like...Lery's or Haddonfield), yes, yes she is.
You struggled against marths depip squad sooo



Bruh it was literally the sweatiest team on the planet, I didn't use Iridescent Head, or Instathrow, or Ruin, and I was on Swamp of all maps...with Huntress. Also I still won.

Obviously yeah it was hard as balls but there's pretty much 0 teams that try that hard. A normal SWF can be destroyed by a good Huntress.
Idk man... I seem to be encountering depip squads 30% of the time at rank 1. All use meta perks, gen rush, etc. I hate it

Right... like every killer that uses the same meta perks and mori/instadown addons should be called 'depip killers' too.

The meta for killer isn’t as crutch and strong as what survivors have. And besides, gens can still be done at ridiculously fast rates
... So? It's meta anyway. The point is that survivors using the strongest tools in their disposal aren't all out to get the killer to depip, and vice versa.

And I dunno, I find Irihead and Infantry belt Huntress or Mint Rag+Shackle+MYC Hag just as tryhard as Instaheals+DS.

And Ebony Mori is more of a crutch than anything else in this game.

But do you acknowledge that gens still get done ridiculously fast

in Huntress should have 115% movement speed Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 25, 2018

Visionmaker said:
@iTz_KilLaZ_x said:
ScottJund said:

@iTz_KilLaZ_x said:

ScottJund said:
@iTz_KilLaZ_x said:

ConsoleNurse said:
No git gud.Watch zubatlel or scottjund
I’m aware... im already good with her and have fun playing her. But against solid swf teams, she’s not good enough to keep up.



If you are good enough at her (and you're not on like...Lery's or Haddonfield), yes, yes she is.
You struggled against marths depip squad sooo

Bruh it was literally the sweatiest team on the planet, I didn't use Iridescent Head, or Instathrow, or Ruin, and I was on Swamp of all maps...with Huntress. Also I still won.

Obviously yeah it was hard as balls but there's pretty much 0 teams that try that hard. A normal SWF can be destroyed by a good Huntress.

Idk man... I seem to be encountering depip squads 30% of the time at rank 1. All use meta perks, gen rush, etc. I hate it
Right... like every killer that uses the same meta perks and mori/instadown addons should be called 'depip killers' too.

The meta for killer isn’t as crutch and strong as what survivors have. And besides, gens can still be done at ridiculously fast rates

in Huntress should have 115% movement speed Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 25, 2018

ScottJund said:
@iTz_KilLaZ_x said:
ScottJund said:

@iTz_KilLaZ_x said:

ConsoleNurse said:
No git gud.Watch zubatlel or scottjund 
I’m aware... im already good with her and have fun playing her. But against solid swf teams, she’s not good enough to keep up.

If you are good enough at her (and you're not on like...Lery's or Haddonfield), yes, yes she is.

You struggled against marths depip squad sooo
Bruh it was literally the sweatiest team on the planet, I didn't use Iridescent Head, or Instathrow, or Ruin, and I was on Swamp of all maps...with Huntress. Also I still won.

Obviously yeah it was hard as balls but there's pretty much 0 teams that try that hard. A normal SWF can be destroyed by a good Huntress.

Idk man... I seem to be encountering depip squads 30% of the time at rank 1. All use meta perks, gen rush, etc. I hate it

in Huntress should have 115% movement speed Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 25, 2018

ScottJund said:

@iTz_KilLaZ_x said:
ConsoleNurse said:

No git gud.Watch zubatlel or scottjund

I’m aware... im already good with her and have fun playing her. But against solid swf teams, she’s not good enough to keep up.

If you are good enough at her (and you're not on like...Lery's or Haddonfield), yes, yes she is.

You struggled against marths depip squad sooo

in Huntress should have 115% movement speed Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 25, 2018

ConsoleNurse said:

No git gud.Watch zubatlel or scottjund

I’m aware... im already good with her and have fun playing her. But against solid swf teams, she’s not good enough to keep up.

in Huntress should have 115% movement speed Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 25, 2018

Vietfox said:

iTz_KilLaZ_x said:

Giche said:

@SenzuDuck said:

Why argue points when I type something like this

I was answering to this :

@SenzuDuck said:

Survivors die more than they survive, there are no balance issues.

Just commenting on how much you can twist and willingly misinterpret things to fit your narrative depending of the subject.

I had nothing else to add, hence why i encouraged you to read it again.

and your reply is one sentence? You can't argue your side and instead ignore all points made by other people so you can then call them out later in a conversation and say "you're out of arguments" when it's you that shys away from them in the first place.

Replying to what ?

This ?

@SenzuDuck said:

Oh yea, that stat they released one and a half years ago that people like you constantly bring up, LOL.
You defeat your own arguments one after another.
As if stats don't change or anything?

all in all, another useless post from Giche that means nothing.

Strawmans, ad hominem...

Are you blaming me for not taking the bait ? lmao

I never bringed their stats as an argument, the only time you could see me mentioning it was in answers to peoples like you who always used it as a proof that SWF isn't a problem.

I personally never trusted anyone of the Devs stats, they are ALL skewed from the get go, hence why not reliable.

But hey, i wonder why i even bother, you are not here to discuss anything.

Duck seems to not have a job considering he’s on here all day. He also must’ve never went to a school that teachers what fallacies are. I’m just speculating on these claims but I wouldn’t be surprised if I was correct....

@iTz_KilLaZ_x
When someone needs to rely on personal attacks said person lost the argument already.

How am I making a personal attack by making educated guess based on things I’ve seen regarding duck? He’s already demonstrated that he doesn’t what a fallacy is. In terms of not having a job, I have no proof for that but he’s active on this forum everyday for hours. I also checked his stats for this forum and he has a ton of likes and comments.

in The devs don’t actually answer questions during their stream Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 16, 2018

Vietfox said:

iTz_KilLaZ_x said:

Giche said:

@SenzuDuck said:

Why argue points when I type something like this

I was answering to this :

@SenzuDuck said:

Survivors die more than they survive, there are no balance issues.

Just commenting on how much you can twist and willingly misinterpret things to fit your narrative depending of the subject.

I had nothing else to add, hence why i encouraged you to read it again.

and your reply is one sentence? You can't argue your side and instead ignore all points made by other people so you can then call them out later in a conversation and say "you're out of arguments" when it's you that shys away from them in the first place.

Replying to what ?

This ?

@SenzuDuck said:

Oh yea, that stat they released one and a half years ago that people like you constantly bring up, LOL.
You defeat your own arguments one after another.
As if stats don't change or anything?

all in all, another useless post from Giche that means nothing.

Strawmans, ad hominem...

Are you blaming me for not taking the bait ? lmao

I never bringed their stats as an argument, the only time you could see me mentioning it was in answers to peoples like you who always used it as a proof that SWF isn't a problem.

I personally never trusted anyone of the Devs stats, they are ALL skewed from the get go, hence why not reliable.

But hey, i wonder why i even bother, you are not here to discuss anything.

Duck seems to not have a job considering he’s on here all day. He also must’ve never went to a school that teachers what fallacies are. I’m just speculating on these claims but I wouldn’t be surprised if I was correct....

@iTz_KilLaZ_x
When someone needs to rely on personal attacks said person lost the argument already.

Vietfox said:

iTz_KilLaZ_x said:

Giche said:

@SenzuDuck said:

Why argue points when I type something like this

I was answering to this :

@SenzuDuck said:

Survivors die more than they survive, there are no balance issues.

Just commenting on how much you can twist and willingly misinterpret things to fit your narrative depending of the subject.

I had nothing else to add, hence why i encouraged you to read it again.

and your reply is one sentence? You can't argue your side and instead ignore all points made by other people so you can then call them out later in a conversation and say "you're out of arguments" when it's you that shys away from them in the first place.

Replying to what ?

This ?

@SenzuDuck said:

Oh yea, that stat they released one and a half years ago that people like you constantly bring up, LOL.
You defeat your own arguments one after another.
As if stats don't change or anything?

all in all, another useless post from Giche that means nothing.

Strawmans, ad hominem...

Are you blaming me for not taking the bait ? lmao

I never bringed their stats as an argument, the only time you could see me mentioning it was in answers to peoples like you who always used it as a proof that SWF isn't a problem.

I personally never trusted anyone of the Devs stats, they are ALL skewed from the get go, hence why not reliable.

But hey, i wonder why i even bother, you are not here to discuss anything.

Duck seems to not have a job considering he’s on here all day. He also must’ve never went to a school that teachers what fallacies are. I’m just speculating on these claims but I wouldn’t be surprised if I was correct....

@iTz_KilLaZ_x
When someone needs to rely on personal attacks said person lost the argument already.

How am I making a personal attack by making an educated guess based on things I’ve seen regarding duck? He’s already demonstrated that he doesn’t know what a fallacy is. In terms of not having a job, I have no proof for that but he’s active on this forum everyday for hours. I aso

in The devs don’t actually answer questions during their stream Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 16, 2018

Ten bucks says the console optimization patch doesn’t actually come in December like the devs promise

in The devs don’t actually answer questions during their stream Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 16, 2018

Tsulan said:

iTz_KilLaZ_x said:

Tsulan said:

SenzuDuck said:

@Tsulan said:
SC is more popular after the healing nerf?
That's a bold statement.

I was referring to the stats which at that moment where supposed to be correct, but where debunked shortly after.

GOOD GOD.

You, Tsulan, say that the self care percentage was wrong, and imply that you assume it was more popular.

I, SenzuDuck, say that while that may have been true when the stats were released it probably isn't true now, as the perk does see heavy use.

You, Tsulan, now turn those two statements around and say that it probably isn't more popular because of self care nerf?

What point are you trying to make?

Hey, these stats are wrong (he says about year and a half year old stats)

Hey, you're probably right about those stats if we were to look at them now

Yea but it probably isn't common bc self care nerf LOL

Again what are you trying to say?, i've put what you've said into two different formats and I still want to run head first into a wall.

What are you trying to prove or point out?

Why even bring up the Self care nerf. If they said Survivors use self care 90% of the time you'd be on your knees praising them, but because the stats ARE OLD and probably wrong NOW you want to call them out for it?

I know, ignorance is bliss and you life it to the maximum. But even you can't deny that the devs gave us fake stats in the past to calm the angry mob down.

PROVE the devs gave us false stats, where's the proof? You ALWAYS make statements without proof and act as if it's gospel, where are these so called fake stats? Just because the stats aren't true now doesn't mean they're fake when they got released.

Let's see, Matt explained that Freddy had a overwhelming high kill rate. Then he explained that people had a overwhelming high disconnect rate against him and then he explained that the system doesn't differentiate between a kill and a disconnect.
All in the same stream.

If you would actually pay attention to what the devs say, you would notice that. But as always, it's simply impossible to discuss anything with you.

He is the master of strawmans. He just said I find swf impossible to deal with and yet I never claimed or implied that. The guy is stuck in his own mindset and won’t open his mind one bit to other views. Worthless to discuss with. The fact that many people are liking his comments is sad but honestly I’m not surprised with how immature and illogical this community can be

It's actually really sad. But then again, we all know how immature and toxic our community is.

I have always given this game constructive criticism. People like duck don’t provide anything to the discussion because all they do is strawman.

in The devs don’t actually answer questions during their stream Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 16, 2018

Tsulan said:

iTz_KilLaZ_x said:

Tsulan said:

SenzuDuck said:

@Tsulan said:
SC is more popular after the healing nerf?
That's a bold statement.

I was referring to the stats which at that moment where supposed to be correct, but where debunked shortly after.

GOOD GOD.

You, Tsulan, say that the self care percentage was wrong, and imply that you assume it was more popular.

I, SenzuDuck, say that while that may have been true when the stats were released it probably isn't true now, as the perk does see heavy use.

You, Tsulan, now turn those two statements around and say that it probably isn't more popular because of self care nerf?

What point are you trying to make?

Hey, these stats are wrong (he says about year and a half year old stats)

Hey, you're probably right about those stats if we were to look at them now

Yea but it probably isn't common bc self care nerf LOL

Again what are you trying to say?, i've put what you've said into two different formats and I still want to run head first into a wall.

What are you trying to prove or point out?

Why even bring up the Self care nerf. If they said Survivors use self care 90% of the time you'd be on your knees praising them, but because the stats ARE OLD and probably wrong NOW you want to call them out for it?

I know, ignorance is bliss and you life it to the maximum. But even you can't deny that the devs gave us fake stats in the past to calm the angry mob down.

PROVE the devs gave us false stats, where's the proof? You ALWAYS make statements without proof and act as if it's gospel, where are these so called fake stats? Just because the stats aren't true now doesn't mean they're fake when they got released.

Let's see, Matt explained that Freddy had a overwhelming high kill rate. Then he explained that people had a overwhelming high disconnect rate against him and then he explained that the system doesn't differentiate between a kill and a disconnect.
All in the same stream.

If you would actually pay attention to what the devs say, you would notice that. But as always, it's simply impossible to discuss anything with you.

He is the master of strawmans. He just said I find swf impossible to deal with and yet I never claimed or implied that. The guy is stuck in his own mindset and won’t open his mind one bit to other views. Worthless to discuss with. The fact that many people are liking his comments is sad but honestly I’m not surprised with how immature and illogical this community can be

It's actually really sad. But then again, we all know how immature and toxic our community is.

If the community mostly consisted of people like me and you, this game would be so much better for BOTH sides. The devs wouldn’t have to worry about screeching morons. I have always given this game constructive criticism and people like duck just strawman and provide nothing to the convo

in The devs don’t actually answer questions during their stream Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 16, 2018

Tsulan said:

SenzuDuck said:

@Tsulan said:
SenzuDuck said:

@Tsulan said:

SC is more popular after the healing nerf?

That's a bold statement.

I was referring to the stats which at that moment where supposed to be correct, but where debunked shortly after.

GOOD GOD.

You, Tsulan, say that the self care percentage was wrong, and imply that you assume it was more popular.

I, SenzuDuck, say that while that may have been true when the stats were released it probably isn't true now, as the perk does see heavy use.

You, Tsulan, now turn those two statements around and say that it probably isn't more popular because of self care nerf?

What point are you trying to make?

Hey, these stats are wrong (he says about year and a half year old stats)

Hey, you're probably right about those stats if we were to look at them now

Yea but it probably isn't common bc self care nerf LOL

Again what are you trying to say?, i've put what you've said into two different formats and I still want to run head first into a wall.

What are you trying to prove or point out?

Why even bring up the Self care nerf. If they said Survivors use self care 90% of the time you'd be on your knees praising them, but because the stats ARE OLD and probably wrong NOW you want to call them out for it?

I know, ignorance is bliss and you life it to the maximum. But even you can't deny that the devs gave us fake stats in the past to calm the angry mob down.

PROVE the devs gave us false stats, where's the proof? You ALWAYS make statements without proof and act as if it's gospel, where are these so called fake stats? Just because the stats aren't true now doesn't mean they're fake when they got released.

Let's see, Matt explained that Freddy had a overwhelming high kill rate. Then he explained that people had a overwhelming high disconnect rate against him and then he explained that the system doesn't differentiate between a kill and a disconnect.
All in the same stream.

If you would actually pay attention to what the devs say, you would notice that. But as always, it's simply impossible to discuss anything with you.

Where, link it?!

(this is where Tsulan doesn't link anything and pretends he missed my comment and then brushes off the evidence because making stuff up is better)

https://youtu.be/DqtBskYaero
Here you go.
Enjoy the talk about a OP Freddy.

I can’t comment anymore

in The devs don’t actually answer questions during their stream Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 16, 2018

SenzuDuck said:

@iTz_KilLaZ_x said:
Well considering my swf group and marths go against fully decked out killers and still escape consistently kinda destroys your argument. You just don’t want to acknowledge how simple this game really is. Will it ever be balanced to perfection? No and it shouldn’t be. Could they change the game so EVERY killer is viable and can outskill a good team? Yes but they choose not to. As I’ve said so many times, pallet looping destroys some killers in this game. You literally rely on survivors making mistakes.... great game huh

You do nothing but complain about the game, and then imply it's bad with "great game huh". Why even play?
You do nothing much say devs do nothing for killers when all they've done for 5 months is buff them constantly, so much so that survival rate is below 50% (I have no issue with this, just like I have no issue with SWF because I'm an ok killer).

The game is simple, simple for killer, simple for survivors.
They are constantly changing killers, just like they're changing Freddy next, they could take 8 months and not release a patch, or upgrade each killer as they go so you get constant changes.

Just quit whining, the game isn't hard, you have killers on this forum who constantly talk nothing but how they can't wait to derank, or people who claim they dodge every SWF lobby they can but are also "stuck in rank 15" because of SWF.

Ya'll are crazy.

I don’t play much anymore. Just want to see the game get better. It’s a simple game where survivors run in circles or sit on a gen. I have moved on to greener pastures. You need to learn to not strawman buddy. I don’t hate dead by daylight. I just see much more potential than what is currently offered. People like you squander potential because you use fallacious reasoning

in The devs don’t actually answer questions during their stream Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 16, 2018

Tsulan said:

SenzuDuck said:

@Tsulan said:
SC is more popular after the healing nerf?
That's a bold statement.

I was referring to the stats which at that moment where supposed to be correct, but where debunked shortly after.

GOOD GOD.

You, Tsulan, say that the self care percentage was wrong, and imply that you assume it was more popular.

I, SenzuDuck, say that while that may have been true when the stats were released it probably isn't true now, as the perk does see heavy use.

You, Tsulan, now turn those two statements around and say that it probably isn't more popular because of self care nerf?

What point are you trying to make?

Hey, these stats are wrong (he says about year and a half year old stats)

Hey, you're probably right about those stats if we were to look at them now

Yea but it probably isn't common bc self care nerf LOL

Again what are you trying to say?, i've put what you've said into two different formats and I still want to run head first into a wall.

What are you trying to prove or point out?

Why even bring up the Self care nerf. If they said Survivors use self care 90% of the time you'd be on your knees praising them, but because the stats ARE OLD and probably wrong NOW you want to call them out for it?

I know, ignorance is bliss and you life it to the maximum. But even you can't deny that the devs gave us fake stats in the past to calm the angry mob down.

PROVE the devs gave us false stats, where's the proof? You ALWAYS make statements without proof and act as if it's gospel, where are these so called fake stats? Just because the stats aren't true now doesn't mean they're fake when they got released.

Let's see, Matt explained that Freddy had a overwhelming high kill rate. Then he explained that people had a overwhelming high disconnect rate against him and then he explained that the system doesn't differentiate between a kill and a disconnect.
All in the same stream.

If you would actually pay attention to what the devs say, you would notice that. But as always, it's simply impossible to discuss anything with you.

He is the master of strawmans. He just said I find swf impossible to deal with and yet I never claimed or implied that. The guy is stuck in his own mindset and won’t open his mind one bit to other views. Worthless to discuss with. The fact that many people are liking his comments is sad but honestly I’m not surprised with how immature and illogical this community can be

in The devs don’t actually answer questions during their stream Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 16, 2018

SenzuDuck said:

@iTz_KilLaZ_x said:
SenzuDuck said:

@iTz_KilLaZ_x said:

I notice you spend so much time on a forum dedicated to a nascar “horror” game. Did you know the depip squad ran tons of games the other week and demonstrated yet again that this game is easy for survivors if the team actually knows what they are doing... gens getting done ridiculously fast, easy pallet looping, etc... it all happened

Mate, I really don't care about the depip squad, a bunch of 4K hour players acting as if they're a swat team? Damn right they're going to do well.

But again, they're a less than 5% part of the game, and if every killer wants to cry about the chance they might go against a bunch of survivors that are better than them then there is no hope to reason with them.

"Hey guys, I played twenty games today, one of those games I got absolutely destroyed, I think we should nerf survivors into the ground".

Don’t act like it takes 4k hours to be good at survivor. It’s easy to replicate their results if you have a even moderately good swf team. Why can’t you just admit that the core objective of survivors is easy and boring. Looping isn’t hard. I’m a killer main but I genuinely put my bias aside when it comes to game balance discussion. The game itself is not complex. If you factor in time logistics, killers effectiveness and how a swf group basically gets all the aura perks due to comms, you realize how stupid ez things are for them.

It doesn't matter what I say, I think killer is just as easy, but you'll say I'm lying because you find it impossible to compete against SWF.

Once you learn to play killer, and you run builds you're good with, you'll realize how stupid ez things are for them.

Well considering my swf group and marths go against fully decked out killers and still escape consistently kinda destroys your argument. You just don’t want to acknowledge how simple this game really is. Will it ever be balanced to perfection? No and it shouldn’t be. Could they change the game so EVERY killer is viable and can outskill a good team? Yes but they choose not to. As I’ve said so many times, pallet looping destroys some killers in this game. You literally rely on survivors making mistakes.... great game huh

in The devs don’t actually answer questions during their stream Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 16, 2018

SenzuDuck said:

@iTz_KilLaZ_x said:
I notice you spend so much time on a forum dedicated to a nascar “horror” game. Did you know the depip squad ran tons of games the other week and demonstrated yet again that this game is easy for survivors if the team actually knows what they are doing... gens getting done ridiculously fast, easy pallet looping, etc... it all happened

Mate, I really don't care about the depip squad, a bunch of 4K hour players acting as if they're a swat team? Damn right they're going to do well.

But again, they're a less than 5% part of the game, and if every killer wants to cry about the chance they might go against a bunch of survivors that are better than them then there is no hope to reason with them.

"Hey guys, I played twenty games today, one of those games I got absolutely destroyed, I think we should nerf survivors into the ground".

Don’t act like it takes 4k hours to be good at survivor. It’s easy to replicate their results if you have a even moderately good swf team. Why can’t you just admit that the core objective of survivors is easy and boring. Looping isn’t hard. I’m a killer main but I genuinely put my bias aside when it comes to game balance discussion. The game itself is not complex. If you factor in time logistics, killers effectiveness and how a swf group basically gets all the aura perks due to comms, you realize how stupid ez things are for them.

in The devs don’t actually answer questions during their stream Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 16, 2018

SenzuDuck said:

@Tsulan said:
SC is more popular after the healing nerf?
That's a bold statement.

I was referring to the stats which at that moment where supposed to be correct, but where debunked shortly after.

GOOD GOD.

You, Tsulan, say that the self care percentage was wrong, and imply that you assume it was more popular.

I, SenzuDuck, say that while that may have been true when the stats were released it probably isn't true now, as the perk does see heavy use.

You, Tsulan, now turn those two statements around and say that it probably isn't more popular because of self care nerf?

What point are you trying to make?

Hey, these stats are wrong (he says about year and a half year old stats)

Hey, you're probably right about those stats if we were to look at them now

Yea but it probably isn't common bc self care nerf LOL

Again what are you trying to say?, i've put what you've said into two different formats and I still want to run head first into a wall.

What are you trying to prove or point out?

Why even bring up the Self care nerf. If they said Survivors use self care 90% of the time you'd be on your knees praising them, but because the stats ARE OLD and probably wrong NOW you want to call them out for it?

I know, ignorance is bliss and you life it to the maximum. But even you can't deny that the devs gave us fake stats in the past to calm the angry mob down.

PROVE the devs gave us false stats, where's the proof? You ALWAYS make statements without proof and act as if it's gospel, where are these so called fake stats? Just because the stats aren't true now doesn't mean they're fake when they got released.

I notice you spend so much time on a forum dedicated to a nascar “horror” game. Did you know the depip squad ran tons of games the other week and demonstrated yet again that this game is easy for survivors if the team actually knows what they are doing... gens getting done ridiculously fast, easy pallet looping, etc... it all happened

in The devs don’t actually answer questions during their stream Comment by iTz_KilLaZ_x November 16, 2018

Mc_Harty said:

@iTz_KilLaZ_x said:
*Couldn’t care less. Saying “ I could care less” is incorrect lol

See?

These forums are so bad their affecting my grammar lol.

Just trying to help ya out