DC penalty is harsh

we should be able to D/C twice a day before the timer hits 30 minutes ; any longer than 30 minutes is nuts . is this a casual game or not ?

Tagged: Mod

Comments

  • @Deon_1 said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452693#Comment_2452693

    1. Because i paid for the game , you didn't buy my copy
    2. I bought it for my own self enjoyment , i don't owe anyone or complete strangers online jacksh** , that never did anything for me. didnt pay for my internet , didnt pay for my console, didnt pay for my subscription , but yet i owe somebody online something ?

    you're the entitled one for thinking people should sacrifice their own enjoyment of a game for yours . nobody owes you karens anything .

    You bought a multiplayer game and each player is entitled to play the game for their self enjoyment. The fact is that you are not entitled to ruin the game for others by rage quiting a match because you don't like how it is going. You are not owed a win for buying the game or having the game go your way. Just as you do not owe others anyone anything, they don't owe you anything either... win or lose you signed up to playing the game with other people, so play the game. You can rage quit and ruin the game for everyone else, but that is your choice and you are to bear the consequences for your own actions.

    You act like I never have a bad game, I will try and win and you can do the same... if I lose I however don't complain and demand to be able to ruin the enjoyment of others because they need to sacrifice their good time because I am not having a good game. You are the karen in this conversation... you can try and turn it around, but just take the L and play out the game.

    If you want to quit the moment things do not go your way; play against bots!

  • @lemonsway said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452771#Comment_2452771

    So a killer getting a kill is unfair too? I imagine getting a kill at 5 gens means that none of the 4 did anything useful but the blame is the one guy that died first?

    No, because Killers are supposed to do that. Survivors are supposed to do the opposite.

  • Gotta love being forced to play BHVR's bully simulator . If there isn't anything going to be done to clean up the toxicity in the game, then the DC penalty should be removed, that at least will help the health of the game somewhat.

  • Wait did the DC penalty change? Isn't it just 5 minutes?


    edit: Shows how much I DC...humble brag

  • @lemonsway said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452764#Comment_2452764

    So maybe you should probably focus on the reasons why killers DC instead of the fact that they DC'ed and should be punished... You don't fix the result of the issue you fix what causes the issue. You don't punish DC's you make it so DC'ing isn't part of the process.

    No a Survivor DC'ing doesn't ruin the match, your get less work to do for Escape option and you have someone using less resources. It's harder to do gens yes but you have more chase options. You're trading efficiency for extra survivability.

    OFc it's easier for killer in 3v1 but their point is to sacrifice, so over time it should go 3v1, 2v1 and posibly 1v1 and killer getting 4 sacrifices so where is a DC ruinning what the game is supposed to be? No it's not GG, it's only GG cause entitled survivors just quit, that's admitting you're not good enough without numbers advantage when that isn't the reality the game is designed to help survivors, the notion that 1 survivors is powerless is completly false, survivor is the power role cause the game is designed for you to survive, it's why the Hatch exists...

    There is a distinct difference between 3vs1 at 5 gens and 3vs1 at 3/2 gens. And getting faster close to hatch is really not an argument for dcing.

    The escape chances.for more than one survivor through the gates becomes exponentially higher for the left survivor. Even a first Hook suicide give better odds, the killer has first to complete the chase and then, on case of a camper, wait for up to 2 minutes.

    A ragequit makes all of that obsolete and leaves the survivor with more work and less people to either make progress or distract the killer.

  • @AgentTalon said:

    Wait did the DC penalty change? Isn't it just 5 minutes?

    edit: Shows how much I DC...humble brag

    hahaha that's a flex for sure! But no, the DC penalty has not changed, it goes up in increments, kept short initially but increases the more you DC. And the penalty naturally decays over time.

  • @Mandy said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452795#Comment_2452795

    hahaha that's a flex for sure! But no, the DC penalty has not changed, it goes up in increments, kept short initially but increases the more you DC. And the penalty naturally decays over time.

    Thanks!

  • I will say the punishment is too much. I don't think it should go past an hour, maybe two at the most.

  • @TAG said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452790#Comment_2452790

    No, because Killers are supposed to do that. Survivors are supposed to do the opposite.

    So if a kill at 5 gens is fair why isn't a DC? The end result is the same 1 player out of the match early...And you can't tell why someone DC'ed, you can't tell if it's a performance issue, a connection issues, a rage quit, a power outage, some computer problem etc yet here we are accusing each other of DC'ing and wanting punishements regardless of the cause. You just want an action against DC's be it whatever the reason and whatever the penalty.

  • @lemonsway said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452793#Comment_2452793

    So if a kill at 5 gens is fair why isn't a DC? The end result is the same 1 player out of the match early...And you can't tell why someone DC'ed, you can't tell if it's a performance issue, a connection issues, a rage quit, a power outage, some computer problem etc yet here we are accusing each other of DC'ing and wanting punishements regardless of the cause. You just want an action against DC's be it whatever the reason and whatever the penalty.

    Because Killers are supposed to reduce the Survivor number, not the Survivors.

  • @Kalinikta said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452698#Comment_2452698

    You bought a multiplayer game and each player is entitled to play the game for their self enjoyment. The fact is that you are not entitled to ruin the game for others by rage quiting a match because you don't like how it is going. You are not owed a win for buying the game or having the game go your way. Just as you do not owe others anyone anything, they don't owe you anything either... win or lose you signed up to playing the game with other people, so play the game. You can rage quit and ruin the game for everyone else, but that is your choice and you are to bear the consequences for your own actions.

    You act like I never have a bad game, I will try and win and you can do the same... if I lose I however don't complain and demand to be able to ruin the enjoyment of others because they need to sacrifice their good time because I am not having a good game. You are the karen in this conversation... you can try and turn it around, but just take the L and play out the game.

    If you want to quit the moment things do not go your way; play against bots!

    '' The fact is that you are not entitled to ruin the game for others by rage quiting a match because you don't like how it is going.''

    uh , yeah , i am , karen . i don't owe you anything. its that simple. what have you done for people that d/c in a match ? are you their parent ? you bought their game or something ? you pay for their internet ? no ?

    well then .

  • @Mandy said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452795#Comment_2452795

    hahaha that's a flex for sure! But no, the DC penalty has not changed, it goes up in increments, kept short initially but increases the more you DC. And the penalty naturally decays over time.

    yeah it decays after like half a freaking week . if i d/c today on wednesday , then d/c again on friday - its at 15 minutes, lmao.

  • @Ludicris said:

    Gotta love being forced to play BHVR's bully simulator . If there isn't anything going to be done to clean up the toxicity in the game, then the DC penalty should be removed, that at least will help the health of the game somewhat.

    Good luck with that when online anonymity is the basic root of the problem.

    Every online game has to fight toxicity and damn if most have no real chance.

    Also when penalty would be removed for good no trial would see completion at some point. That was already the state when they where implemented. In every trial someone would disconnect because the conditions were perfect to their taste.

    And without the penalty what would keep the rest of the lobby from disconnecting after getting left at a disadvantage.

    I personally see the permanent removal of DC penalties as a nail in the coffin for any online team game.

  • @Deon_1 said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452792#Comment_2452792

    '' The fact is that you are not entitled to ruin the game for others by rage quiting a match because you don't like how it is going.''

    uh , yeah , i am , karen . i don't owe you anything. its that simple. what have you done for people that d/c in a match ? are you their parent ? you bought their game or something ? you pay for their internet ? no ?

    well then .

    Did you buy my game, did you pay for my connection? No! So, why you you have the right to ruin my game by DCing? You booted up the game and you signed up to play the game... so play the game.

    The hypocritical aspect is that you are a child that cannot handle you not dominating other players in a game... go play against bots, you can rage quit all you want.

  • @Mandy said:

    If you're DC'ing, you are quite simply ruining the game for the other 4 players in that match - hence we have the DC penalty in place, as it's clearly not behaviour that's wanted in the game.

    Before putting such a mechanic in game as dc penalty first make sure your game doesn't crash on multiple platforms plus people who unfortunately needs to leave to deal with real life issue or having internet troubles but most important of it is crashes that happens daily to console users I'm forced each time to wait longer period just to play for something I paid for and eventually it will get me banned for days? Weeks? Yeah dc penalty is way too harsh right now as op said and nobody can deny that we are getting punished for playing your products and for giving you money and views

  • Imagine matching 5+ k hours players with noobs.

    Ranks is the ONLY form of matching ATM and even that does not work properly.

    Now throw even that out of the window and lets see who are the real masochists. xD

  • @TAG said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452808#Comment_2452808

    Because Killers are supposed to reduce the Survivor number, not the Survivors.

    DC is only a problem for survivors cause the 3 remaining very rarely try. They rather let the DC affect the match and screw points for everyone by jsut giving up than playing the rest of match. It's not impossible to win 3v1 and if you're in 3 v1 then you should make an effort to help someone escape, be it yourself or one of the other 2 which is what you already had to do when it was a 4v1 so exactly where is the differance?

    THe game is balance on a 2 escape 2 die so either 4v1 or 3v1 somebody is getting killed. If you count the DC as a kill then at least one of the remaining 3 has to die aswell. So isn't it better to just keep the match going and make it harder for the killer to get more kills instead of all 3 just giving up and everyone getting less points?

  • @lemonsway said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452810#Comment_2452810

    DC is only a problem for survivors cause the 3 remaining very rarely try. They rather let the DC affect the match and screw points for everyone by jsut giving up than playing the rest of match. It's not impossible to win 3v1 and if you're in 3 v1 then you should make an effort to help someone escape, be it yourself or one of the other 2 which is what you already had to do when it was a 4v1 so exactly where is the differance?

    THe game is balance on a 2 escape 2 die so either 4v1 or 3v1 somebody is getting killed. If you count the DC as a kill then at least one of the remaining 3 has to die aswell. So isn't it better to just keep the match going and make it harder for the killer to get more kills instead of all 3 just giving up and everyone getting less points?

    Nah, it's generally accepted that a 3v1 from nearly the start is extremely difficult to win unless the Killer is REALLY bad, and it's not because the 3 decide to just accept their fate.

  • @TAG said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452828#Comment_2452828

    Nah, it's generally accepted that a 3v1 from nearly the start is extremely difficult to win unless the Killer is REALLY bad, and it's not because the 3 decide to just accept their fate.

    This is pretty much why it was changed that the match would be cancelled if a player disconnected during loading.

  • Just a reminder to people as well to keep this thread civil - there's no need to attempt to insult people over a differing of an opinion. If you are unable to discuss something civilly, then please do not comment!

  • @TAG said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452828#Comment_2452828

    Nah, it's generally accepted that a 3v1 from nearly the start is extremely difficult to win unless the Killer is REALLY bad, and it's not because the 3 decide to just accept their fate.

    Im sorry WHAT!? So the killer has to be bad for the 3 to win? Thanks for admiting Survivors need all the babysitting in the world. Bad killers and number advantage... Mentality of the Bully.

  • Imagine throwing a fit about the punishment you get for throwing a fit and affecting the other players in a match.

  • Leave it the way it is. Either finish the trial or play something else. Don't go ruining the game for other people because you're upset something didn't go your way.

  • @lemonsway said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452832#Comment_2452832

    Im sorry WHAT!? So the killer has to be bad for the 3 to win? Thanks for admiting Survivors need all the babysitting in the world. Bad killers and number advantage... Mentality of the Bully.

    Yes. As Mandy mentioned above, that's why they changed the system so that matches where a Survivor DCs before everyone is loaded in are cancelled.

  • @Deon_1 said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452772#Comment_2452772

    and it doesn't matter what you have to say about it , see how that works ? nobody owes you anything , and your comment is just an opinion .

    entitled.

    You posted in a discussion forum. Of course you are going to get other people's opinions that either agree or disagree with your point... thats how it works lol! It doesn't make people entitled because they decided to engage with you. If you gonna open up a discussion prepare for opposing point of views. Its not a bad thing!

    DC or encouraging DC is against the rules. Plain and simple. Saying the DC penalty is harsh is silly. Its suppose to be harsh to discourage it ^^"

  • @burt0r said:

    Imagine matching 5+ k hours players with noobs.

    Ranks is the ONLY form of matching ATM and even that does not work properly.

    Now throw even that out of the window and lets see who are the real masochists. xD

    That matching already happens, i have 90 hours on PC ( i've been playing on console since Summer 2018, until i quit because the disastrous RE chapter release) but who do you think i'm matching with on my PC matches?


  • @Mandy said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452832#Comment_2452832

    This is pretty much why it was changed that the match would be cancelled if a player disconnected during loading.

    But you're still punishing the DC'ed player when there's very little reason to. How's that fair? What i can control during a Loading besides the Plug on my PC/Console or Alt-F4/Close App? What reason would anyone have to pull the plug or Alt-F4/Close App?

    A Mori? I don't even know if i'm facing a decent killer player. A Map offering? Same answer as before and valid for survivors aswell. There's no reason to DC on purpose so you're most likely encountering an issue beyond your ability but you're still getting the punishement cause the system doesn't make a distinction.

    Very Fair, very BHVR like.

  • @lemonsway said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452841#Comment_2452841

    But you're still punishing the DC'ed player when there's very little reason to. How's that fair? What i can control during a Loading besides the Plug on my PC/Console or Alt-F4/Close App? What reason would anyone have to pull the plug or Alt-F4/Close App?

    A Mori? I don't even know if i'm facing a decent killer player. A Map offering? Same answer as before and valid for survivors aswell. There's no reason to DC on purpose so you're most likely encountering an issue beyond your ability but you're still getting the punishement cause the system doesn't make a distinction.

    Very Fair, very BHVR like.

    The only way to dc during the loading screen is to close the game so they won't be affected by the penalty

  • @TAG said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452850#Comment_2452850

    Yes. As Mandy mentioned above, that's why they changed the system so that matches where a Survivor DCs before everyone is loaded in are cancelled.

    Canceling the match is robbing everyone of points and sending back to queue where again the wait times and match fairness is in question. you can get an easier match or the one that didn't happen was an easier match. You will never be able to tell. So since that's the case you're forcing everyone to admit defeat, nobody won anything from the last queue. More wasted time for 4 players and even more wasted time for the guy that now has a DC penalty.

  • @lemonsway said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452860#Comment_2452860

    Canceling the match is robbing everyone of points and sending back to queue where again the wait times and match fairness is in question. you can get an easier match or the one that didn't happen was an easier match. You will never be able to tell. So since that's the case you're forcing everyone to admit defeat, nobody won anything from the last queue. More wasted time for 4 players and even more wasted time for the guy that now has a DC penalty.

    You're not forcing anyone to admit defeat because no one loses anything. Not ranks, not items, not even offerings/add-ons.

    Also, I don't think the DC penalty applies to someone DCing before the match loads (though I could be incorrect on this one).

  • @TAG said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452911#Comment_2452911

    You're not forcing anyone to admit defeat because no one loses anything. Not ranks, not items, not even offerings/add-ons.

    Yes you are, you canceled their chances for progression. It would be silly if they actually took anything away from before, but they canceled everything you could achieve.

  • Dc penalty is needed in this game. 72 hours makes more of an impact than getting banned for 1 hour. If you're struggling to play the game because of your internet or the game not running great on your system then there's not much you can do but getting a new isp or system.

  • @lemonsway said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452915#Comment_2452915

    Yes you are, you canceled their chances for progression. It would be silly if they actually took anything away from before, but they canceled everything you could achieve.

    That's not a loss because that is hypothetical.

  • @TAG said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452911#Comment_2452911

    You're not forcing anyone to admit defeat because no one loses anything. Not ranks, not items, not even offerings/add-ons.

    Oh but it does, i've quit a match during loading because i was sent to a Malfunctioning Map before it was disabled and i got the DC penalty. They sent me on purpose to a malfunctioning map and i was the one facing punishment... Being a bully in DbD is rewarded.

  • @lemonsway said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452915#Comment_2452915

    Oh but it does, i've quit a match during loading because i was sent to a Malfunctioning Map before it was disabled and i got the DC penalty. They sent me on purpose to a malfunctioning map and i was the one facing punishment... Being a bully in DbD is rewarded.

    According to my research, you do not get a DC penalty for disconnecting in the loading screen.

  • It's not, the match would happen otherwise. Everything was ready for it but a last second miss happening determined the whole process to be shutdown. Imagine you're buying a home and the banks says yes to everything and then when you're closing the deal the bank backs out, are you not losing your home?

  • @Unifall said:

    Dc penalty is needed in this game. 72 hours makes more of an impact than getting banned for 1 hour. If you're struggling to play the game because of your internet or the game not running great on your system then there's not much you can do but getting a new isp or system.

    ah yes i'll buy a whole new console or PC jsut cause DbD is malfunctioning, great reasoning.

  • @TAG said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452924#Comment_2452924

    According to my research, you do not get a DC penalty for disconnecting in the loading screen.

    And according to my own eyes and experience you do.

  • @lemonsway said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452921#Comment_2452921

    It's not, the match would happen otherwise. Everything was ready for it but a last second miss happening determined the whole process to be shutdown. Imagine you're buying a home and the banks says yes to everything and then when you're closing the deal the bank backs out, are you not losing your home?

    Your experience does not match up with what I am reading from multiple sources.

  • @TAG said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452926#Comment_2452926

    Your experience does not match up with what I am reading from multiple sources.

    And i don't take your research serious either.

  • You do not. Close app before loading in is not a penalty

  • @lemonsway said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452826#Comment_2452826

    That matching already happens, i have 90 hours on PC ( i've been playing on console since Summer 2018, until i quit because the disastrous RE chapter release) but who do you think i'm matching with on my PC matches?

    And smurfing is already a problem in every online pvp games so what does that prove against my point?

    Thank the heavens that smurfing isn't more prevalent and that the matchmaking at least does SOMETHING.

    Making a casual mode without a atleast partially functioning behind the scenes mmr like for example in league of legends would lead to a Smurf like environment not being the minority but potentially all the lobbies.

  • Why play the game if you DC and screw over your teammates?? This is why we have the penalty.

  • @Mandy said:

    And when you play an online game, you're signing up to the EULA of that game and have to play by those game rules. DC'ing is against those rules, hence it's punished.

    you mean the rules that when you click i dont accept....youre not able to play?? hmm sounds more like forcing then choosing

  • @toastcrusher said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452739#Comment_2452739

    you mean the rules that when you click i dont accept....youre not able to play?? hmm sounds more like forcing then choosing

    You chose to click accept, so I don't know how that's forcing.

  • @toastcrusher said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452739#Comment_2452739

    you mean the rules that when you click i dont accept....youre not able to play?? hmm sounds more like forcing then choosing

    that is the point of rules. Can't follow em can't play the game. You have to follow the rules to play the game. That is the point of them being rules

  • i'm not a sheep and not good in folowing bs rules.....the dc penalty is bs like op stated, so is behaviour's behaviour with adressing the main reason why people dc....and you call it ragequit, we cal it....im not gonna play with complete idiots,


    the fact is that a company should not have the power to decide how you use or not use the product you bought and so do none of you.

    the only thing they made sure of is that i and many others will never spend a sinle penny to all company's involved with this game

  • @lemonsway said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2452919#Comment_2452919

    ah yes i'll buy a whole new console or PC jsut cause DbD is malfunctioning, great reasoning.

    Yup. What else can you do? Please tell me bro I'm sure everyone here dealing with freezes/fps drops will appreciate the fix you found. You have 2 options atm play the game as is waiting for an optimization update or buy a whole new system. Thats your only choice at the moment but ima wait for the solution you found. (No dc penalties ain't it)

1 2 3