littlepaw
littlepaw
About
- Username
- littlepaw
- Joined
- Visits
- 90
- Last Active
Comments
-
It might be the case that you stepped over it. Apparently that still causes the blind, even if you're looking away. No clue if that's intended or not though, now i'm curious
-
@Xendritch said:
The new changes to the HUD are cool and all but soloQ I'm predicting will still be horrible cuz of this. The amount of games I have where either me or someone else is on hook the killer is camping and all that happens is people will go in and spend 30 seconds urban evasioning their way to the hook just to get injured and run away and the person on hook dies and nothing was actually accomplished is unbelievable.
Like going down sucks sure but crouching around hooks is the least useful thing you can do so either go in with the understanding that you're probably going on the hook next and we're going with the strategy of rotating hook states while others do gens or just stay on gens and let the person die but this crouch and do nothing until you get injured nonsense has got to stop.
Sorry this is a bit a vent thread but at the same time I do feel like not nearly enough people have any idea how to deal with camping.
now i'm worried. manifesting hook trading energy rn
-
@Grandpa_Crack_Pipe said:
https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/3320645#Comment_3320645
He says, as he steadily makes an argument that didn't start with any hostilities between either of us more and more personal after he decided I was a bubble blowing baby. You're arguing on forums, bud. We're both playing the losing game.
I feel like you literally forgot everything about my posts after reading other than the fact that you didn't like them and didn't want to read them again, so i'll just say that you'll fit right in on the forums and I hope you find a ladder for your horse.
That last statement is hilarious because you made up an argument I nor anyone else in this thread even said so you could dumb down our actual arguments to your level. But whatever, if you're going to be this way there's no real winner in this scenario. You're mad that I called you toddlerish and I'm just confused to where you're making up things I never even said just to win arguments in your head. Whatever helps you sleep tonight man. Best of luck.
-
@Grandpa_Crack_Pipe said:
https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/3320636#Comment_3320636
You are fully capable of being correct without being right.
Yes, it is correct that you literally cannot stop someone from quitting if they really want to. That does not mean that there's no point to trying to stop them at all like some people apparently believe. You cannot stop me from jaywalking 50 feet down from the crosswalk if I really want to, so why do we even bother with crosswalks at all?
Correct statement, silly conclusion.
I do the sIlLy GooFy TyPiNg iN CYcliNg cAPs thing because it's a concept that's goofy and worthy of derision. And if you really wanted to keep the maturity gold star, you wouldn't have played your hand early and gone arguing on a game forum before you even hit double digit posts.
It says a lot about you that you defend your own immaturity with more immaturity, thinking my post amount means anything in the conversation.
This thread was one of the top more recent threads. Why are you surprised a newer account commented on it? Am I just supposed to cover my eyes just because some random dude decided it so that my post number wasn't high enough for their liking?
I don't need 3,000 posts like yours to find that your argument is whiny and toddlerish.
"You cannot stop me from jaywalking 50 feet down from the crosswalk if I really want to, so why do we even bother with crosswalks at all?"
What's this even in reference to? Where did anyone even argue the "so why do we even bother with _____ at all?" part? Where'd you get it from? Who made this argument? I'm genuinely confused. If your point was just the beginning part of the question "You cannot stop me from jaywalking 50 feet down from the crosswalk if I really want to"
Yes, I cannot. Where's your point? People are allowed to do stupid things. Especially people who give up immediately. They have my blessing.
-
@Grandpa_Crack_Pipe said:
https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/3320628#Comment_3320628
Of course it's not going to happen. Almost none of what's suggested on the forums does.
The self unhook action can be saved for deliverance, slippery meat and the luck mechanic can be done away with wholesale and made something else. It's just a silly and outdated mechanic that gives people free outs and occasionally, very occasionally, robs killers.
I don't have any delusions that this will actually happen, let alone on any reasonable timescale, but the people who go "oH MaN nOthING WrONG HerE can'T MaKe sOmEONE staY IN a MatcH iT's aCtuaLlY a gOOd tHINg" are something else entirely.
Well, they're not wrong, are they? You really can't make someone stay in a match they don't want to be in unless you deliberately waste your own time along with it. Their thoughts do come from truth, and tYpInG LiKe ThIs to make their truth seem mockable makes you look more like the toddler. Do I dislike when people go next immediately? Of course I do. I'm not going to be childish in the forums about it, though. Because at the end of the day, if people doing that makes me so miserable, I go do something else with my time. Holding repressed anger for a match that took 3 minutes to end is ridiculous and people in the forums shouldn't be your punching bag.
-
@Grandpa_Crack_Pipe said:
https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/3320561#Comment_3320561
You can't force anyone to do anything. Do we even bother having rules then, 'cause if someone REALLY wants to do something, we can't stop them? May as well cut out the middleman, right?
Y'know what the difference is between suiciding on hook and AFKing?
A rule break.
We have these ways to punish quitters and people who refuse to play that clearly show we can and do want people to actually.. you know. Play the game. Except for this one little unlocked door in the back. Same outcome, but this one's just fine I guess.
Hey, better idea. Remove self unhooks and struggle skillchecks. That way any of this is actually consistent, and people who want out have to either eat the DC penalty we actually have to actually punish quitters or sit there like a toddler in time-out, break a rule and waste more of his time than if he could just have his easy out.
While on paper that may sound amazing to you, in reality it causes more issues than it solves. Now, luck in general needs a rework because Up The Ante and Luck boosting offerings are now useless (they weren't that worthwhile to begin with, but still at least were USABLE in meme builds). Deliverance and Slippery Meat now can't be used because you can't get off the hook by yourself anymore. etc, etc. We can dream that in some amazing DBD people will not be able to give up or "sit there like a toddler in time-out", but I genuinely don't think BHVR wants the headache of rebalancing Luck, Slippery Meat and Deliverance of all things they could be doing right now. It's a one step forward two steps back scenario. If they ever tackle this issue at ALL, they will likely do it differently, to avoid the headache.
-
@appleas said:
https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/3320584#Comment_3320584
If innocent people end up getting banned as a result, they could appeal their ban for BHVR to review accordingly. This would also help BHVR to improve on their ban automation (If they introduce that).
They will probably not get it right on the first try but it’s definitely a step forward rather than doing nothing because of all the “gray areas”. If BHVR decides and properly defines what sort of behavior will be punishable, that wouldn’t be so much argument over when suiciding is “justified”. It’s their game, they should decide what is enforced and what is not, rather than the community.
how on earth are you supposed to appeal a ban that's accusing you of "afking to go next" or "killing yourself on hook to go next"?
like i cannot think of anything unless you have recordings of literally every game you played for the day, which most people do not have on them. or that people need to start screenshotting their end game screens and points, which is tedious and could possibly be not strong enough evidence, as it ignores basically all context of what happened in the match
-
i'm going to be honest i legit didn't even know you offered a change to adrenaline at first because what you just listed is just practically what adrenaline is already 😕
-
@OogieBoogie said:
If you punish people for killing themselves on hook they'll just start going afk while doing something else or deliberately throwing the match to get out quicker. You can't force people to play a match they don't want to. And frankly, there are times where suiciding is perfectly justified. An automated system wouldn't be able to distinguish between rage quitting and peacing out because killer's farming, other survivors are just hiding in the corners, etc. Manual reports would require video evidence and going through their report system, which is already tedious enough when reporting cheaters. Plus it would add way more work from their support team having to manually review a bunch of videos.
i agree with this 1 million times over. people would find a way around it unless you're SUPER harsh on it, and if you're super harsh on it and don't let people afk, don't let people give up so easily and so on and so forth, odds are it'd end up banning innocent people in the process because not everything in this game is as black and white as "ban all people who go next immediately". if it were that simple, they would've done that already, they're in an absolute hellscape for solo survivor fun right now.
-
@bunnyfengenthusiast said:
You are part of the problem. Both are incredibly problematic. Complaining that the killer is using Eruption when you're running full meta perks with DH as your selected exhaustion perk is incredibly hypocritical.
i don't use either. so... ######### dh and eruption