Lowbei
Lowbei
About
- Username
- Lowbei
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- —
Comments
-
lol there is no hack that affects your UI because thats on your client, not the hosts.
more likely you got rekt by a good killer, got upset, and made a forum post about it.
and lol did powerbats just claim that he reports people who dc? hilarious
dont worry, you will get better, just keep trying. -
skilled players usually solo, because swf is bad.
-
its rare that i see people make threads trying to defend their ragequits. bravo.EpicFailTryHard said:i play for 3 reasons. fun, bloodpoints and the least important reason-rank. if i am subjected to what can only be described as a thinly veiled attempt at passive trolling, what reason do i have to stay? this killer angrily messaged me. then had the audacity to say he wasn't tunneling. yeah, i left.
https://youtu.be/0ewUWeXKDeM
if you cant handle losing without ragequitting, then this is the wrong game for you. -
“we dont care about our own ranking system enough to punish players for ruining games”
-
if it makes you feel any better, they wouldnt have looked at it even if you filed it ingame after the match.zero2dash said:FeelsTerribleMan
Ugh. Yeah I asked not_Queen on her stream, she said the same thing.
That sucks. -
you cannot
-
lol who? that salty guy who raged in bold and caps because he demanded gameplay changes so he could compete? i stopped reading his butthurt many posts ago lolZanfer said:@powerbats said:
@Zanfer said:
@powerbats He is never going to read what you say so just give up and move onOh I already know he's just a troll at this point, but watching him make a complete fool out of himself while making 2 contradictory statements at the same time and defending them both simultaneously was funny. I just gave him the exploding cigar with the flashing neon signs that said only fools use this. He's the one that decided to light it up and smoke it.
He's just mad he got exposed and is going to keep posting the same thing hoping that if he lies and insults enough it'l become truth/fact.
Oh and lest we forget the facts patch is tomorrow with MANY GAMEPLAY MECHANIC CHANGES !!!!!!
The best part is now how he is trying to address you still even though you aren't addressing him

the games mechanics are fine. if you cant handle them, then i will quote the dev named Mathieu : “Git gud”
-
the games mechanics are fine. ive heard this whiny doomsaying nonsense since the game came out years ago.EpicFailTryHard said:the dead horse that has been reduced to dust still beckons.a'ight. here it is. this game is doomed. yes, it has grown in popularity but so has the "the bad stuff".swf and camping/tunneling. both go on unabated, rationalized and justified. i heard someone on the dbd forum say, "it's a horror game, it isn't meant to be fun.", in regards to epic camp, hook farm and rehook. i think i speak for all of us when i say that i feel philosophically comforted. overjoyed even, as it all makes sense now. ....whatever....the brutal truth is...if a large part of the community isn't enjoying the experience, they aren't going to stick around. i love this game but i seldom play killer anymore. after a few games, i remember why i don't. (swf) give me a choice is my answer for that. i don't see that happening though.80% of the games i played last night featured epic camp/rehook and tunneling. stack a couple games like that in a row and a less than fanatical frame of mind emerges.just sayin'. these two things....are killing the game. justify the nonsense all you want to but you will soon be muttering it to yourselves.
we get it, you got camped and tunneled for a few games. get over it. -
yeah, adding more bps wont completely fix the problem, but it would give more incentive than without for the moment, resulting in more people playing killer and less lobby dodging, which we can all agree is a positive step.Noodle said:Eh... just giving more bloodpoints won't make the game more enjoyable to play. Giving me more bloodpoints won't help deal with the struggle against survivors who can endlessly loop the entire game or help slow down the rate at which generators complete. I'd rather see a system where dependent on the number of SWF in the lobby they receive a slight debuff for the duration of the match like a decrease in action speed by 5-7-10% based on the size of the SWF group. (2-3-4) I'd also be down with adding in an extra generator to complete (without the debuff) for full SWF groups.
-
so you think doc is op?
-
lol stop having a meltdown, you are embarrassing yourselfpowerbats said:@Zanfer said:
@powerbats He is never going to read what you say so just give up and move onOh I already know he's just a troll at this point, but watching him make a complete fool out of himself while making 2 contradictory statements at the same time and defending them both simultaneously was funny. I just gave him the exploding cigar with the flashing neon signs that said only fools use this. He's the one that decided to light it up and smoke it.
He's just mad he got exposed and is going to keep posting the same thing hoping that if he lies and insults enough it'l become truth/fact.
Oh and lest we forget the facts patch is tomorrow with MANY GAMEPLAY MECHANIC CHANGES !!!!!!

this game is working as intended. git gud. -
lol the salt.powerbats said:@Lowbei said:
haha no. it all boils down to the fact that i think the games mechanics are fine, cuz thats how the devs made them.
Yet you're asking the devs to change some by adding in more BP against SWF groups. It's their fine and you don't need those or they're wrong and you need it.
hes welcome to keep whining about the mechanics and claiming that they are going to change them, but i doubt it. dont worry, not everyone was meant to be rank1.
Ahaha the only one whining about the game mechanics here is you, since you want more bp as stated in op. Also facts are stubborn things you can't make up alternatives to them just to suit your post. The facts the devs are removing some pallets ie changing some of the game mechanics. It's already in the change notes for upcoming patch. Also the only thing you'll ever be rank 1 at is being a troll, a very bad 1 at that.
the fact that hes having a meltdown over this is very entertaining.
The fact you keep having a meltdown and trying more and more worn out and totally useless insults is what's entertaining. but go ahead and keep on entertaining teh forums since come patch day you'll either accept the reality of your false statements or more likely make up new excuses and insults.
stop having a meltdown. the games mechanics are fine, git gud
-
haha no. it all boils down to the fact that i think the games mechanics are fine, cuz thats how the devs made them.Jack11803 said:Dont lie, you read it, you DEFINITELY read it.
hes welcome to keep whining about the mechanics and claiming that they are going to change them, but i doubt it. dont worry, not everyone was meant to be rank1.
the fact that hes having a meltdown over this is very entertaining.
-
lol your butthurt is hilariouspowerbats said:@Lowbei said:
lol thanks for your opinion, now stop your whining
jk i didnt read it. the mechanics are fine, git gud.
Still can't stop your whining and contradictory statements since if the mechanics are fine the devs wouldn't be changing anything. Hence no PTB no other changes etc. The only one that needs to git gud here is you.
I've got to give you credit though, most ppl would stop posting and making idiots of themselves after the 1st few times, you seem determined to prove how much of 1 you are. Your salt merely makes everyone on here have more laughs so keep it up.
the games mechanics are fine. git gud if you cant handle dead by daylight. -
lol thanks for your opinion, now stop your whiningpowerbats said:@Lowbei said:
lol keep your salt in the shaker bro
the mechanics are fine. giving some extra bp to the killer for playing against swf doesnt affect the mechanics of the gameplay at all. this isnt rocket science


Still nothing but insults and if the mechanics are fine the then the points you made are negated, it isn't rocket science. Now to show you how contradictory your statements are.
Game mechanics are constructs of rules or methods designed for interaction with the game state, thus providing gameplay. That's basic gameplay design and all game devs and coders know this basic rule.
So since looping, pallet dropping, and you guessed it playing against SWF groups are all part of gameplay mechanics. Now since those are part f gameplay mechanics and you've said the mechanics are fine your point is once again moot and killers don't need to be compensated.
As you said this isn't rocket science and the only one with salt here is you, you still don't get it that your attempts at insulting are failing miserably. As pointed out above everything in the game is part of the gameplay mechanic. So if you make 1 change it affects the game play mechanic.
Now since the devs have said the mechanics aren't fine and are making changes that once again makes your arguments completely and utterly illogical. If the mechanics were fine the devs would never make changes or even have a PTB because the mechanics are fine.
jk i didnt read it. the mechanics are fine, git gud.
-
lol keep your salt in the shaker bropowerbats said:@Lowbei said:
lol you are so salty
the irony that you whine at me to git gud while you rage about wanting the game mechanics to change because they are too hard for you is funny.
the game is fine. git gud.
I've yet to whine at you to git gud, I merely used your own words against you to show how faulty your logic was. Your continued attempts at changing the focus to be me instead of accepting that you made contradictory statements shows you're the salty one here.
So which is it then, are the mechanics fine and the devs agree in which case your post had no merit? The other alternative is that the game mechanics aren't fine and the devs agree which is why they're tweaking them. Which means that you're whining about them instead of git gud. You keep contradicting yourself here and either option you choose makes you look bad using your own words.
Instead of trying to sling insults at me and others on here, simply come up with solutions and defend them. If someone points out a weakness or fault with your ideas don't try and insult because you can't take the criticism. try and think of a solution to the problems brought up.
the mechanics are fine. giving some extra bp to the killer for playing against swf doesnt affect the mechanics of the gameplay at all. this isnt rocket science
-
lolSadonicShadow said:@Dragonredking said:
@Lowbei said:
Dragonredking said:@Master said:
@Dragonredking said: @Master said: @Dragonredking said: @Master said: @Dragonredking said: @Lowbei said: SadonicShadow said: @Jack11803 said:@alchemist_z said:
Campers make the game less fun and I think they should be dealt with. I want to know if camping would be counted as an "exploit" or "trolling". If I can't report then what is there to do? I would message teammates of what is going on, but between trying to determine if the killer is camping, getting to a survivors steam account, and then sending the message to the other 1-3 survivors it's hard the fight the timer to struggle phase. Were any updates announced to stop campers?
Why’d you guys report him? He was basically asking in your simple terms without knowing it “is this wrong” and you guys flagged and basically thought “oh, he’s asking a question about if somethings bad, better flag him! Because that totally means he is a bad person for asking a question.
I agree. Its bullshit he is getting flagged. OP is nothing but polite and respectful in all his responses here. I think the flag button has become the replacement for the downvote button at this point.
Thats really ironic since you flagged my post about how 50% bonus xp for the killer during SWF would help, simply because you wanted to whine about the games mechanics.
You are not mature enough for forums. No offense

I must have missed something, since when does you get notificated about who is flagging you?
Flag me and I will tell ya whether I was able to see that it was you
For some reason I cant flag myself

Sure
edit: should normally be done by now
Did you flagg my previous post? I cant see a flag when looking at it and I didnt receive a notification either
I did, it also said that my complain was registered.
Ok interesting, can you see the flag in your post
"Sure
edit: should normally be done by now" From my point of view there is a flag at your post now, but none at mine
Maybe you cant see flags of your own posts at all
Don't know why it didn't worked on my end but I can now confirm that you don't get notified that you're getting flag and even less who flagged you therefor @Lowbei is only speculating that @SadonicShadow flagged him unless he told it to him.
ahh. i know he did, because he posted right after he flagged it that he disagreed with the idea. which is why i found it ironic that he would be talking about flag abuse in another thread at the same time.
Understandable, but it might still just be a coincidence tho
Edit: Jebus christ the quote break easily.
I never flagged lowbei. I might disagree with what he thinks but that dosen't mean i am going to flag him because i disagree with him. I am not the only person on this forum.
-
yes the emblem system is dumb
-
no you dont. you get perks and items, which affect game play. stop trolling.Well_Placed_HexTotem said:
How is that pay to win? lolSadonicShadow said:If they create bloodpoint microtransactions i will straight up quit playing the game, uninstall and forget about it. Pay to win mechanics is the absolute scourge of multiplayer games and the last thing DBD needs is that type of cancer.
All you get for leveling up characters is cosmetic clothing. -
there was no ego in my post.Shadowchao121 said:@Lowbei said:
Shadowchao121 said:@Lowbei said:
I see theres some argument about the doctor.
I have 1700+ hours played. I have all killers P3 50. Ive been rank1 on both sides dozens of times. You can evade a good nurse if played well. You cannot evade a good doctor. If you think you can, then you simply havent seen one. Ive mained doc at rank1. Have you? This is a game about hiding from the killer. You cannot hide from a good doctor. Your position is given away from the very beginning, and while its easy to snap out of it, it doesnt matter if hes chasing. You also cannot pallet loop a good doctor, since you cannot drop a pallet when shocked, nor use items like flashlights. If you lose them as a doc, you simply switch to treatment mode and patrol some gens. They will pop up. If they dont, and the gen is getting slowly done, then you know they are in a nearby locker. Thus, since you can neither pallet loop nor effectively hide from a doc, hes OP. I know because I almost always get a 4K, Im a survivor main, and doc isnt even my main killer, its Myers <3
Again, if you think doc isnt OP, then you simply havent played a good one, or were with SWF, which can overcome anything.
Thinking that Doctor is better than Nurse kinda busts your claim anyway. Either you're a really good Doctor, or a bad Nurse.
It's simple. Anyone can be good with any Killer. Some are better at certain ones rather than others. It's all about potential.
A really good anything is good. Its possible to escape a good nurse (not easily), but you will not escape a really good doctor. its simply not going to happen.
it looks to me like most people here are too new or low ranked to have played against a good doc, tho im sure they think they have.
I mean i only have 800 hours but that's still a lot for a video game...
Assuming everyone else is wrong cause of your hours? Cmon. They're just opinions. No need to be egotistical.
the irony is that the only reason you posted that, is because your ego took a hit when you realized that youve probably never played a good doc. -
what i said was both reasonable and far more likely to happen, but you can be salty if it makes you feel better, no worriesSadonicShadow said:@Jack11803 said:
Give solo queue comms as strong as SWF, then nerf both. That’s the reason SWF isn’t nerfed right now, they can’t code a specific lobby nerf to them alone, and nerfing survivors would make solo queue even more difficult. As it stands, statistically the survival rate is 50% including both modes. SWF alone is 70% (OP) solo is 30% (too weak). So buff solo to what could make them as good as SWF, and have a 70% survival rate, then nerf them both to a nice 50%. If the nerf occurred now, SWF would indeed be balanced, but solo’s 30% rate would be EVEN lower. There, solution.I hope you are taking notes Lowbei. This is an example of a good, reasonable solution to the current problems we are facing. But considering your most recent posts its pretty clear you are anything but reasonable.
-
ahh. i know he did, because he posted right after he flagged it that he disagreed with the idea. which is why i found it ironic that he would be talking about flag abuse in another thread at the same time.Dragonredking said:@Master said:
@Dragonredking said:
@Master said:
@Dragonredking said:
@Master said:
@Dragonredking said:
@Lowbei said:
SadonicShadow said:@Jack11803 said:
@alchemist_z said:
Campers make the game less fun and I think they should be dealt with. I want to know if camping would be counted as an "exploit" or "trolling". If I can't report then what is there to do? I would message teammates of what is going on, but between trying to determine if the killer is camping, getting to a survivors steam account, and then sending the message to the other 1-3 survivors it's hard the fight the timer to struggle phase. Were any updates announced to stop campers?
Why’d you guys report him? He was basically asking in your simple terms without knowing it “is this wrong” and you guys flagged and basically thought “oh, he’s asking a question about if somethings bad, better flag him! Because that totally means he is a bad person for asking a question.
I agree. Its bullshit he is getting flagged. OP is nothing but polite and respectful in all his responses here. I think the flag button has become the replacement for the downvote button at this point.
Thats really ironic since you flagged my post about how 50% bonus xp for the killer during SWF would help, simply because you wanted to whine about the games mechanics.
You are not mature enough for forums. No offense

I must have missed something, since when does you get notificated about who is flagging you?
Flag me and I will tell ya whether I was able to see that it was you
For some reason I cant flag myself
Sure
edit: should normally be done by now
Did you flagg my previous post? I cant see a flag when looking at it and I didnt receive a notification either
I did, it also said that my complain was registered.
Ok interesting, can you see the flag in your post
"Sureedit: should normally be done by now"
From my point of view there is a flag at your post now, but none at mine
Maybe you cant see flags of your own posts at allDon't know why it didn't worked on my end but I can now confirm that you don't get notified that you're getting flag and even less who flagged you therefor @Lowbei is only speculating that @SadonicShadow flagged him unless he told it to him.
-
lol you are so saltypowerbats said:@Lowbei said:
i think the mechanics are fine, and the devs agree. git gud.
**“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.” **– Christopher Hitchens.
Again nothing but insults and the devs don't agree or they wouldn't be changing things or did the latest dev talk and PBT changes completely sail through that space between your ears again? If things are fine then looping and pallet changes don't need to happen, SWF doesn't need to be adjusted and by your logic all killers and survivors need to shut up and play as it is.
Now since we know for a fact the devs have said the mechanics aren't fine and they're removing some pallets to cut down on looping. That'd once again make you completely and utterly wrong as well as being a arse again.
It seems the only one that needs to git gud is you, perhaps go take a debate class in school so you can actually debate on the forums instead of doing nothing but troll. > @Lowbei said:
Up to perhaps 50% bonus xp if its 4 SWF.
This doesnt hurt the survivors, gives the killer an incentive to not dodge the lobby, and solves the entire problem. Why hasnt this simple solution been applied?
Oh and lets not forget this gem from your 1st post.
@Lowbei said:
Up to perhaps 50% bonus xp if its 4 SWF.This doesnt hurt the survivors, gives the killer an incentive to not dodge the lobby, and solves the entire problem. Why hasnt this simple solution been applied?
If game mechanics are fine then the killer won't dodge the lobby and since the killer won't dodge the lobby your solution isn't required, you just need to GIT GUD.
the irony that you whine at me to git gud while you rage about wanting the game mechanics to change because they are too hard for you is funny.
the game is fine. git gud. -
i think the mechanics are fine, and the devs agree. git gud.powerbats said:@Lowbei said:
SadonicShadow said:@Lowbei said:
SadonicShadow said:
@Lowbei said: Up to perhaps 50% bonus xp if its 4 SWF. This doesnt hurt the survivors, gives the killer an incentive to not dodge the lobby, and solves the entire problem. Why hasnt this simple solution been applied? **This is not an a good incentive to not dodge the lobby and it most certainly does not solve the problem in any way, shape or form. Blood point incentives will not make up for bad game play and busted balance. My number one reason i play this game is to have fun and playing against SWF is not fun. Bonus bloodpoints doesn't make it any less frustrating. You could not give me enough bloodpoints to make it worth it.**
... this game is about scoring points. escaping or killing people is simply a scoring event. Your logic that this doesnt do enough to solve the problem, and thus shouldnt be considered, is very ignorant.
You will find that practically no one here agrees with the stupidity you just typed. I am baffled that you think this solves the problem of SWF. That broken ass game mechanics and poor design can all of a sudden be made up for by giving someone more points. The game will still be a broken ######### show whether or not we get 50% more bloodpoints. You are either trolling or just straight up dumb. I honestly cant tell which but regardless what you have to say regarding this game is worth less than dirt. Come back here when you actually have good suggestions because you look like an idiot.
lol the irony that by the current posting, you agreed that the 50% was a good idea, while whining and flagging the op. you are a perfect example of the flagging issue as well as the false reporting issue.
the games mechanics are fine. git gud if you have a problem with them.
Here once you again you show yourself to be a jack a*s. He wasn't saying that in the original post and you taking his last post out of context is hilarious. I bolded the 1st part where he clearly says it won't solve the problems currently.
His latest post says he's all for more bloodpoints in any shape form or fashion. He in no way tied that to his earlier post but in a general sense that he'd like more as would pretty much everyone here. The proof is in the countless threads here and on the Steam forums saying as much.
As far as the game mechanics go if they were fine the devs wouldn't be trying to address the current issues with them now would they? If anyone needs to git gud here it's your debating skills since using Logical fallacies left and right shows you need help.
-
shocking someone makes them unable to use items or interact with windows or pallets for 3 seconds. its not hard to time that.
i dont think youve played a good doc -
A really good anything is good. Its possible to escape a good nurse (not easily), but you will not escape a really good doctor. its simply not going to happen.Shadowchao121 said:@Lowbei said:
I see theres some argument about the doctor.I have 1700+ hours played.
I have all killers P3 50.
Ive been rank1 on both sides dozens of times.
You can evade a good nurse if played well.
You cannot evade a good doctor. If you think you can, then you simply havent seen one.
Ive mained doc at rank1. Have you?
This is a game about hiding from the killer. You cannot hide from a good doctor. Your position is given away from the very beginning, and while its easy to snap out of it, it doesnt matter if hes chasing.
You also cannot pallet loop a good doctor, since you cannot drop a pallet when shocked, nor use items like flashlights.
If you lose them as a doc, you simply switch to treatment mode and patrol some gens. They will pop up. If they dont, and the gen is getting slowly done, then you know they are in a nearby locker.
Thus, since you can neither pallet loop nor effectively hide from a doc, hes OP. I know because I almost always get a 4K, Im a survivor main, and doc isnt even my main killer, its Myers

Again, if you think doc isnt OP, then you simply havent played a good one, or were with SWF, which can overcome anything.
Thinking that Doctor is better than Nurse kinda busts your claim anyway. Either you're a really good Doctor, or a bad Nurse.
It's simple. Anyone can be good with any Killer. Some are better at certain ones rather than others. It's all about potential.
it looks to me like most people here are too new or low ranked to have played against a good doc, tho im sure they think they have. -
Thats really ironic since you flagged my post about how 50% bonus xp for the killer during SWF would help, simply because you wanted to whine about the games mechanics.SadonicShadow said:@Jack11803 said:
@alchemist_z said:
Campers make the game less fun and I think they should be dealt with. I want to know if camping would be counted as an "exploit" or "trolling". If I can't report then what is there to do? I would message teammates of what is going on, but between trying to determine if the killer is camping, getting to a survivors steam account, and then sending the message to the other 1-3 survivors it's hard the fight the timer to struggle phase. Were any updates announced to stop campers?Why’d you guys report him? He was basically asking in your simple terms without knowing it “is this wrong” and you guys flagged and basically thought “oh, he’s asking a question about if somethings bad, better flag him! Because that totally means he is a bad person for asking a question.
I agree. Its bullshit he is getting flagged. OP is nothing but polite and respectful in all his responses here. I think the flag button has become the replacement for the downvote button at this point.
You are not mature enough for forums. No offense
-
lol the irony that by the current posting, you agreed that the 50% was a good idea, while whining and flagging the op. you are a perfect example of the flagging issue as well as the false reporting issue.SadonicShadow said:@Lowbei said:
SadonicShadow said:@Lowbei said:
Up to perhaps 50% bonus xp if its 4 SWF.
This doesnt hurt the survivors, gives the killer an incentive to not dodge the lobby, and solves the entire problem. Why hasnt this simple solution been applied?
This is not an a good incentive to not dodge the lobby and it most certainly does not solve the problem in any way, shape or form. Blood point incentives will not make up for bad game play and busted balance. My number one reason i play this game is to have fun and playing against SWF is not fun. Bonus bloodpoints doesn't make it any less frustrating. You could not give me enough bloodpoints to make it worth it.
... this game is about scoring points. escaping or killing people is simply a scoring event. Your logic that this doesnt do enough to solve the problem, and thus shouldnt be considered, is very ignorant.
You will find that practically no one here agrees with the stupidity you just typed. I am baffled that you think this solves the problem of SWF. That broken ass game mechanics and poor design can all of a sudden be made up for by giving someone more points. The game will still be a broken ######### show whether or not we get 50% more bloodpoints. You are either trolling or just straight up dumb. I honestly cant tell which but regardless what you have to say regarding this game is worth less than dirt. Come back here when you actually have good suggestions because you look like an idiot.
the games mechanics are fine. git gud if you have a problem with them.
-
... this game is about scoring points. escaping or killing people is simply a scoring event. Your logic that this doesnt do enough to solve the problem, and thus shouldnt be considered, is very ignorant.SadonicShadow said:@Lowbei said:
Up to perhaps 50% bonus xp if its 4 SWF.This doesnt hurt the survivors, gives the killer an incentive to not dodge the lobby, and solves the entire problem. Why hasnt this simple solution been applied?
This is not an a good incentive to not dodge the lobby and it most certainly does not solve the problem in any way, shape or form. Blood point incentives will not make up for bad game play and busted balance. My number one reason i play this game is to have fun and playing against SWF is not fun. Bonus bloodpoints doesn't make it any less frustrating. You could not give me enough bloodpoints to make it worth it.
-
lol did that one person above try to defend the garbage emblem system?
its not that complex. people dont like it, not because they dont understand it, but because its ridiculous.
The emblem system goes beyond simple “altruistic” or “bold” etc. Its their attempt to fix what wasnt broken, and the result is yet another ranking system that means nothing. Theres still plenty of bad players at rank1. Theres still plenty of pros at rank20.
Honestly its not rocket science. They simply need to give point incentives to play at better ranks.
For instance. Im pretty good, but for the last few months Ive stayed intentionally at rank 15-20 and i intentionally derank when gone lower. Because theres zero incentive not to. Theres less SWF and its easier to farm and get max tokens for wglf or bbq.
The rank system has been a joke since launch, and the emblem system did nothing to change that. -
I see theres some argument about the doctor.
I have 1700+ hours played.
I have all killers P3 50.
Ive been rank1 on both sides dozens of times.
You can evade a good nurse if played well.
You cannot evade a good doctor. If you think you can, then you simply havent seen one.
Ive mained doc at rank1. Have you?
This is a game about hiding from the killer. You cannot hide from a good doctor. Your position is given away from the very beginning, and while its easy to snap out of it, it doesnt matter if hes chasing.
You also cannot pallet loop a good doctor, since you cannot drop a pallet when shocked, nor use items like flashlights.
If you lose them as a doc, you simply switch to treatment mode and patrol some gens. They will pop up. If they dont, and the gen is getting slowly done, then you know they are in a nearby locker.
Thus, since you can neither pallet loop nor effectively hide from a doc, hes OP. I know because I almost always get a 4K, Im a survivor main, and doc isnt even my main killer, its Myers
Again, if you think doc isnt OP, then you simply havent played a good one, or were with SWF, which can overcome anything. -
camping is legit. gg
-
they do not check reports any more. dont waste your time.
-
this is mainly a pc game. you are lucky you got a port. stop whining.BOSS242 said:Man who dropped the ball on that one? Not happy about the way console players are treated like second class citizens on this game!! We've been waiting just as long as the computer folks and we've had to watch as they all got to play the PTB!! Now they get the everything live first!? This is a HUGE slap in the face!! You should have filed sooner or now make us all wait!!!! To care as much as I do about this stuff and to have you guys just not care about us is very hard to read and makes me very sad
-
they are no longer checking reports.
theres 2month old speedhacker report videos, filed the correct way, that were never checked, and we know that by the view counts.
Speedhacker : “lol who cares? they dont read your reports anyway noobs” -
... you could be describing literally any game right now.RemoveSWF said:99% of reports were used for griefing anyway - survivors reporting killers because they got killed.
Less than 1% were dealing with actual hackers, which are the only people who should be banned, really.
in glad that most games dont simply give up like this, its embarrassing for their company. -
lol what? it doesnt take a big crew to make cosmetics, in fact the art team has been cranking out cosmetics for ages, they simply have been saving them for the cash shop.weirdkid5 said:@Lowbei said:
powerbats said:I'll just leave this here since this is known to be unobtainable unless you hack the game client. I do wonder why if it's known so well by the devs why they 1 left it in game and 2 don't auto ban accounts the moment the game detects it's being used.
They simply dont care anymore. Theyve moved their team on to the next project, left a skeleton crew here in dbd to finish the final dlc, where they will then transition into full free to play mode with a cash shop.
Im sure some fanboy will come rage at me now claiming that they didnt pull the crew from dbd to work on deathgarden, because they believe anything theyre told.
This is all baseless assumption with no backing and just makes you look silly. And I'm usually the one quick to say a company as abandoned a game, like I did when Deathgarden was annoucned.
However, it is also quite ignorant to assume that BHVR doesnt have enough employees for a second game. Theyve been working on Deathgarden for some time now, the Game Director is Ash Panell, who was the Game Director for DbD until the Nurse came out. Clearly, the game kept being made.
And full free to play nonsense? The game isnt going free to play. It's becoming like Siege, a game you buy with unlockable characters with the OPTION to buy them, and a huge cosmetic store. Siege is doing outstanding, and their roadmap for this year shows they have quite a lot in store for DbD for the remainder of the year, unless of course you haven't seen it.
But of course, I dont think a skeleton crew would be able to create new characters, balance the game, stay communicative, AND create a slew of new cosmetics.
You're literally just salty. If you know anything about me from Steam forums, you know i'm super quick to call out these devs on their bullshit.
But in this case there is nothing yo call out aside from erroneously removing the report feature. The fact you somehow inferred they are dropping DbD due to this and Deathgarden is actually quite silly to me.
its ironic to me that you can actively see them removing the person who deals with reports, thus its widely known that reporting does nothing, and also see them remove the report form itself, then claim that they have plenty of staff to keep it all going?
laughable dude, and the hacker community finds it laughable too.
this isnt rocket science. they are not reading reports, nor looking at videos. if you arent caught by EAC, you can do whatever you want. you can be in denial if that makes you feel better. no worries, you arent alone in the denial pool. -
They simply dont care anymore. Theyve moved their team on to the next project, left a skeleton crew here in dbd to finish the final dlc, where they will then transition into full free to play mode with a cash shop.powerbats said:I'll just leave this here since this is known to be unobtainable unless you hack the game client. I do wonder why if it's known so well by the devs why they 1 left it in game and 2 don't auto ban accounts the moment the game detects it's being used.

Im sure some fanboy will come rage at me now claiming that they didnt pull the crew from dbd to work on deathgarden, because they believe anything theyre told.
-
all games get those kind of reports. thats what happens when you have online games.SnakeSound222 said:There were too many meaningless reports. I’m thinking that over 3/4 of the reports they got were “Noob Killer is camping plz ban him” or “I got pallet looped please ban the Survivors”.
the correct response isnt to just give up and let hackers in.
the correct response is to make false reporting a bannable offense.
people report for ANYTHING, despite knowing its not reportable. their comment of “well i dont like it, so ill report and let the devs decide” is not acceptable. they report EVERY game, because they know that it MIGHT hurt the person they are reporting, while not affecting them at all.
The correct response is to make an official statement that false reports are now bannable, and that you may only report for hackers or exploits. if someone keeps spamming reports, you send them “we have received numerous false reports from you. you have been suspended for 24 hours, and one strike on your account.
THAT will put a stop to the nonsense. The people who report every game will stop, and the person whos job it is to sort them will appreciate it.
-
by that ignorant logic, we will of course never have any report system at all, because randos will always report when they lose a match. thats why it was someones “job” to sort thru them, to ensure the community had anti hack support.Master said:pathetic yeah, and this is exactly the reason why they shut down the email report system

that no longer exists. thus theres speedhackers everywhere. thats just logic.
Speedhacker : “lol who cares, they dont read reports anymore, much less watch your videos”
-
no. you may dodge bad connections.
you may not dodge just because you died last game. -
what? this is literally the only post asking this question.Zavri said:stop spamming
its hilarious to me how many salty fanboys absolutely hate when people point out any flaws in the game, and spam your post with flags and whines about spam.
-
exactly. its ridiculous that they removed a working form to say they will someday replace it with a new one. also how does it take months to make one? its a form, not a whole new killer and map... oh wait... they got that finished faster than the form.weirdkid5 said:They said they temporarily removed it for "overhauling." It'll be back, they are just adjusting it probably to make it easier for the mods.
Still, doesnt mean they had to remove what already was working until then.
-
There were zero threads about it on the front page. Now theres one.Runiver said:@Lowbei said:
Thats two threads with this question, and again the other went unanswered for multiple days. The other question asked a time frame. This isnt rocket science. You are simply being a triggered fanboy and spamming the flag button, despite knowing that this is a valid question.Your logic of “well this is a valid issue i agree with, but I know the devs dont care, so I may as well call this pollution” is laughable. The irony is that people like you, flagging any post you disagree with, despite knowing its valid, are what ruined the previous forum, is kind of funny.
At this point, your ego is bruised, and you will continue to attempt to argue with me to derail the thread. Stay on topic or leave.
I'm just saying we don't need 3 threads about that, and 1 was enough.
And you're going apeshit and trying to justify 3 threads.
Keep going, I'll just leave I guess and stop giving you the attention this thread needs, since even tho it deserves some bumping considering the urging issue, you act like a moron about it.
The only person going “apeshit” is you with your bruised ego for being called a fanboy.
If you werent so triggered, you wouldnt have flagged the thread and whined about it while also admitting its a valid question lol.
You will feel better later.
Back on topic. Still waiting on a semi-decent answer to this very important question. -
Thats two threads with this question, and again the other went unanswered for multiple days. The other question asked a time frame. This isnt rocket science. You are simply being a triggered fanboy and spamming the flag button, despite knowing that this is a valid question.Runiver said:@Lowbei said:
This is my 2nd thread asking this question.The question was clearly for a dev, because they are dodging the question on QAs. If you werent being such a fanboy, this wouldnt trigger you so hard.
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/2246/why-did-you-remove-the-report-form#latest
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/2546/can-we-expect-a-report-form-by-2018#latest
AND this one.
I count at least 3.I'm far from being a fanboy. I actually dislike that they removed this feature, and I actually hold quite the grudge against devs.
I just don't feel like this forum should be polluted like the other discussion platforms has been.
Your logic of “well this is a valid issue i agree with, but I know the devs dont care, so I may as well call this pollution” is laughable. The irony is that people like you, flagging any post you disagree with, despite knowing its valid, are what ruined the previous forum, is kind of funny.
At this point, your ego is bruised, and you will continue to attempt to argue with me to derail the thread. Stay on topic or leave.
-
This is my 2nd thread asking this question.Runiver said:@Lowbei said:
Its not spamming to ask a question, days later after it went unanswered.The irony that you are flagging my post with a valid question, while not even attempting to answer it, just makes you look bad.
The fact it's like, your 4th thread about it might be the reason.
I'm not sure how it's irony tho. You might look up the definition of Irony just in case.
Only devs can answer that question, not sure what randoms can do about it, and creating yet another new thread isn't gonna make them want to answer more.
The question was clearly for a dev, because they are dodging the question on QAs. If you werent being such a fanboy, this wouldnt trigger you so hard. -
Its not spamming to ask a question, days later after it went unanswered.Runiver said:@Lowbei said:
If someone asks a valid question, and its not answered, they ask again.Furthermore, if you arent going to attempt to answer it, then dont come here whining about people asking it.
So spamming until they answer is your way to do it ?
Interesting.
The irony that you are flagging my post with a valid question, while not even attempting to answer it, just makes you look bad. -
Of course we feel bad for the person who has to do it. Just like we feel bad for the people who do it in all games. But again, its their JOB. Its an important job, that ensures your players feel at least that someone at bhvr cares about their game.Master said:Because it was flooded by thousands of meaningless reports like "this noob killer camped me" / "please bann this guy" etc etc
I feel really bad for the guy at BHVR who had to go through all this mess manually and sort the actual reports out by hand.Just because it seemed to work from your point of view, it doesnt mean that it actually worked out, always try another angle
(might want to apply this logic to the survivor/killer OP debate aswell)
And its not that it worked “from my point of view”, its that it went from “ok they at least eventually ban hackers” to “they dont care”
thats a huge difference, and is the difference between vets sticking around or leaving. -
If someone asks a valid question, and its not answered, they ask again.Runiver said:Because reasons.
Btw, it's your 2nd or 3rd thread about this.
It's time to stop.
Furthermore, if you arent going to attempt to answer it, then dont come here whining about people asking it.
-
“It is important for there to be a report form, because even if we arent going to pay anyone to look at the forms, the players still need to think theres control.”Snapshot said:Yeah I reported someone over their official report form (it was a google form) with clear video proof about 2 month ago and they didn't even watch the video ONCE... (upload via YouTube and the view count still the same) Of course the reported hacker still plays til today... Just can't understand these devs