Badmanone
Badmanone
About
- Username
- Badmanone
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- —
Comments
-
@DocOctober said:
Badmanone said:@DocOctober said:
There's no thing such as the hook vacuum. All it does it snap the Killer into the correct position for the animations to line up properly.
that was exactly the same with pallet vacuum lol.
No, it wasn't. The pallet vacuum existed because there was no animation for the Survivor passing through the pallet-space, they literally teleported from one side to the other.
sure, because once the animation of hooking is fullfilled, you can get through the hook without any body blocking of survivor. thats not teleporting but its ignoring any collison path.
-
@Delfador said:
@Badmanone said:
@lasombra1979 said:
I am sorry but if you cannot grasp why introducing a real life mass killer into a video game is a bad idea on your own, nothing we can say will help you out there. The fact that most people in this thread have said its a bad idea should be a clue as to why it would be a bad idea.yes i think youre right. its maybe a too big wall because of emotions and prejudices. not because of logic.
Exactly. Logic is not the only part of humans. We have also emotions and prejudices. Your next post proves that.
@Badmanone said:
maybe we should think about a counterpart of tbagging? so killer should able to ######### survivors.You get so upset and emotional that people didn't like your opinion, you become salty. So instead of being a mature and accepting criticism, accepting that your idea was a bad one, you chose to be a dick. Dude if you are going to behave in this way, why do you create a post?
Aristotle - There is only one way to avoid criticism: do nothing, say nothing, be nothing.
fine. now you show your real face. instead of talking about facts youre getting emotional. sorry but we dont need more salty mad survivors like you. for sure a game is unrealistic if a survivor can do his testicle into killers mouth but killer cant ######### survivor. if you cant add any useful to this, you should better stay off.
"We may assume the superiority ceteris paribus [all things being equal] of the demonstration which derives from fewer postulates or hypotheses—in short from fewer premisses; for... given that all these are equally well known, where they are fewer knowledge will be more speedily acquired, and that is a desideratum. The argument implied in our contention that demonstration from fewer assumptions is superior may be set out in universal form..."
-
@DocOctober said:
There's no thing such as the hook vacuum. All it does it snap the Killer into the correct position for the animations to line up properly.that was exactly the same with pallet vacuum lol.
-
@lasombra1979 said:
I am sorry but if you cannot grasp why introducing a real life mass killer into a video game is a bad idea on your own, nothing we can say will help you out there. The fact that most people in this thread have said its a bad idea should be a clue as to why it would be a bad idea.yes i think youre right. its maybe a too big wall because of emotions and prejudices. not because of logic.
-
@RemoveSWF said:
@Xhaviour said:
So in the Patch it said Palett Vacuum was a Bug and Unfair Advantage?but No Killer Obvious wanna Fair Play and get the Hook Vacuum Removed or the Grab Vaacum when you grab a suvivor from unhooking even if you are on other side of the hook.
Whoever taught you English should be fired. I hope you don't actually speak like that.
maybe you can help each other?
-
ok but at least why is that a problem? inspired by a real life killer? isnt it part of artistic freedom? their are so many other games, movies, real life content, real documentaries with real kills. that Game here wouldnt be the worst thing. and that doesnt mean i think everything that happens outside of this forum is fine. just dont get me wrong guys. why do you think ######### will have a massive backlash? you have to explain that further because its already part of other games/videos without backlash.
-
@RemoveSWF said:
Yes, get rid of this.git gud
-
@TheBean said:
@Delfador said:
No, it literally praises them in a way and since both of them are rapists, the devs can not take the chance to include them. It might cause a massive backlash.Killing people in games is fun, killing people in real life is a horrific thing to do. Including these people to the games and trying to earn money from them and dead people is disgusting.
I personally wouldn't want that to happen.
I agree with this statement... We don't need to glorify actual real killers. It is a shame there have been movies already doing this. The Devs in this game don't need to be doing that, even though indirectly they already have.
bro with all respect but youre playing a game where a killer inspired by a real life killer (LF, Clown) gonna smash your head until he cracks, cut off your finger and eat it. the other one put a chainsaw in you and cut you in two pieces. maybe youre playing the wrong game?
-
@AshleyWB said:
Let killer close hatch.Hatch reopens on gen a single generator repair.
Can be closed again.
Makeshift key spawns in basement which can be used only once to open the hatch.
Aura of last survivor revealed after 30 seconds of not working gen, searching chest, other action. Aura is obscured when within 42 meters of killer.
I like the idea of a key hanging up in the basement which makes end game more frantic and gives another option so killer can't camp the things that need to be done and implement balance into the end game phase.
their is no problem, so we dont need any solution. thats it.
-
@azazer said:
I don't really see the problem as long as you aren't putting real life killers in as is. Leather face was based off a real killer, yet there is no outcry for his inclusion in the game. So long as you just call it something else and take a little creative license killers based off real world people isn't some unspeakable taboo.yes i agree to you. its seems like people arguement with differernt measures and its more about their personal view on the world and not by logic. i mean its not something that was never done already or is forbidden? and i think makarenkov shouldnt be included like he is, thats true but inspired by him is really fine. otherwise this could be also a problem with "law". devs stated in stream that they was inspired by him for clown. if you search for it on google you find also another proofs.
-
@Delfador said:
No, it literally praises them in a way and since both of them are rapists, the devs can not take the chance to include them. It might cause a massive backlash.Killing people in games is fun, killing people in real life is a horrific thing to do. Including these people to the games and trying to earn money from them and dead people is disgusting.
I personally wouldn't want that to happen.
why you say devs inculde them? john wayne gacy is already included as clown. they already stated they was inspired by him. however with makarenkov iam not sure. i dont mean they should name him so but maybe get inspired by him. and i agree to you, its a horrific thing to kill or ######### persons in real life but thats just a game. i mean just because youre looking friday the 13th you doesnt kill everyone?