Who wants to have some fun?
Who wants to have some fun?
i want to have some fun.
Are you saying you wanna have fun, or do you really want to have fun?
I really wanna have fun.
But, no.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUztFimZVIwWho wants to have some fun?
i want to have some fun.
Are you saying you wanna have fun, or do you really want to have fun?
I really wanna have fun.
But, no.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUztFimZVIw
Read THIS post.
Tldr: This is an archived version of the DBD forum, it has all posts, comments and media. The archived data will be published at the end of October. This site is not in any way affiliated with or endorsed by Behaviour Interactive.
Comments
What's the problem? Camping is a valid strategy. You should be in awe of this great tactican who owned you and your solo queue team by his strategic superiority.
Classic unskilled killer, I'm surprised he didn't hit you on the hook, it's usually a ritual in this case
if i wanted to have fun I wouldnt be playing this game
Yes people camp in this game, get over it.
Don't you think staring at people trying to rescue you is fun?
Lot of people fail to realize that yes, camping can be a viable strategy. But in 99.99% of cases it ain't fun
Which is what this whole post is about. Literally says fun 6 times if you count the title
He saw how many gens was left and panic.
I'm just saying I wanna have some fun
Do you want to have real fun? Better playing another game right now...
Camping is no fun and no skill but the 0 hook Rebecca really didn't trade. You can always blame solo queue, but really dbd players just are terrible/don't care to the point of tanking the overall kill rates quite a bit. I consider myself not good at survivor and I am better than 60% of the player base at least. It's quite disturbing. You really can't complain if you don't try to get better, although most players won't get better and will simply run better things to make up for their lack of skill.
It doesn't matter if they weren't on comms, Feng and Rebecca easily could have double team that hook regardless of communication. Instead, Rebecca was holding m1 while staring at Instagram.
What? They had 2 gens left and 2 people with 0 hook states. You think it's good that she should stick the gen until the guy was nearly dead on hook from 0 hook states?
There were 2 hooks in the entire game after 3 gens were done and you think it was fine for Rebecca to just not even try to save? Damn average solo queue teammate I guess. The only person who should have been on a gen was the meg who was on death hook. You can always recover when the person hooked has 0 hook states and the killer is camping, that's not even a debate.
Ideal scenario is meg works on gens and the other 2 unhook. From this hook there is 0 chance trickster burns through 4 health states before one person gets to safety(main building). Yeah, all 3 survivors could just work on gens and get out but this is an easy 4 out scenario here, unless noed.
If it was 5 gens you may have a point whatsoever but in this situation you are just wrong flat out.
Didn't watched the vid. All i see is almost 1 gen left (Rebecca is on one) and the killer just got his first hook.
Tbf, camping in this situation isn't really smart. But understandable.
Indeed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6wbKNe89QE