STBFL question
So even though this perk is perfectly balanced how would you feel if they reduced the number of tokens lost when hitting the obsession by 3/2/1 would you agree or disagree let me know your thoughts.
So even though this perk is perfectly balanced how would you feel if they reduced the number of tokens lost when hitting the obsession by 3/2/1 would you agree or disagree let me know your thoughts.
Read THIS post.
Tldr: This is an archived version of the DBD forum, it has all posts, comments and media. The archived data will be published at the end of October. This site is not in any way affiliated with or endorsed by Behaviour Interactive.
Comments
No, it's fine enough as is some killers already have a way around it without using M1 to hit survivors. Demo, cowboy, trapper name a few that i can remember or just don't hit them.
I think they should go halfway on it with injuring the obsession only losing 1 token and downing the obsession losing 2 tokens
Everybody would run the perk you barely lose stacks so you're basically buffing all killers
Pig
Billy,Leatherface,Huntress,Oni,Pyramid Head and Blight ๐
The gameplay patterns you follow to dodge tokkens penalty are quite fun.
Stbfl is good as it is.
Thanks guys. Now I know what to do.