北欧人
北欧人
About
- Username
- 北欧人
- Joined
- Visits
- 280
- Last Active
Comments
-
I had this happening to me also. It was so frustrating... I struggled to not DC the match.
This game is full of bugs.
-
@Orion said:
I escaped with the crown, but I didn't get anything. What's up?
it's only for original characters - what character did you use ?
-
Toxic behaviour will happen no matter what. It's perfectly possible to do all challenges without having a different behaviour than what you normally have.
If you are just focusing on your challenge without caring for the normal gameplay, you're just being selfish. To be honest, I actually think these challenges are a good test to each individuals character.
It's up to each one to choose what you want to be.
-
I posted something similar a while back (https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/80189/dcing-in-order-for-the-last-survivor-to-get-the-hatch-is-perfectly-fine#latest)
DCing for someone else to get hatch won't get you banned. Even if they do it in your face and laught about it in the chat afterwards.
As long as don't DC too much. You're fine. This is not considered an exploit from the devs perspective.
There was another streamer in the tournament using a macro to click the flashlights extremely fast, and knowing this might get you banned, another streamer told him to be careful about it while live.
At the end of the day devs will ban or not ban you for whatever reason they feel its appropriate in their eyes, wether we agree or not.
I have seen people getting temp banned for the most ridiculous things, yet, these public displays of bullshit just get the blind eye.
Smile and wave boys!
-
@Orion said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/620214#Comment_620214
Well, dedicated servers are coming this summer with better DC penalties, and they've talked about a feature that will leave behind a survivor husk when they DC. Is that good enough?
and until then, its fine to DC as long as you don't abuse it too much. Even when you have a video of someone clearly using as an exploit ? Even if there are no doubts about it... we'll ignore because it's a DC. Is that it ?
-
@Orion said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/620209#Comment_620209
The devs treat all DCs the same way. If you didn't know that before, which I highly doubt, you do now.
Well, it's wrong. And if they are serious about the year 4 being all about the game's health. That needs to change.
-
@Orion said:
All DCs are logged and bans are handed out automatically. Why'd you expect something different? This is like sending a letter to your government's finance department every single time you purchase something, even though they have all that information already.
They are taking a competitive advantage from it. It's more than just a random DC. It's an exploit. It's an exploit enabled by DCing.
Literally their definition of exploiting:
"Exploit bugs, errors in design, or undocumented features to gain access to what otherwise would not be available or to obtain a competitive advantage"
How would the last guy get the hatch if not for his pal DC? How is not abusing a design flaw? tell me.
-
@AWesley91 said:
To quote the killer mains here, that sounds like your problem lol. Survivors aren't responsible for your fun. 😂
I don't contribute for the Killer vs Survivor war. I play both roles equally. I play all characters equally. I just want the game to be fun and fair for both sides.
This is an exploit. Plan and simple and the game's support doesn't care so why should I care ?
I'll just start DCing also.
#DCasStrategy #PrettyGoodJobSoFar
-
I've been there and yes, it sucks and feels unfair.
However, I don't think that is the solution. I think the problem is much broader.
First, DCs in itself is a much wider problem that needs to be tackled and hopefully will be after dedicated servers.
Second, about the slugging to get the 4th kill. I do it myself because it is the safe way to get the 4k BUT honestly I utter dislike it. Here is why: if the last survivor is smart, he will drag the game for minutes until the slugged survivor is dead because at that point only 1 survivor will escape (at best) and this creates a very boring stand off for both survivors and killers. This is something that unfortunately the EGC did not took in account.
Moving on I think this is something they should tackle in the future to make this type of end game not so boring.
-
@Orion said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/599488#Comment_599488
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/599490#Comment_599490
And this is why the devs usually stay out of threads.
Orion Member Posts: 11,378
😂😂😂
Ok bud.
-
@PatBrutal said:
Sadly there won't be a summer event this year because our team is focusing on other priorities like the dedicated servers, bug fixing (pips and ranks), archives and more. We want the game health to be at its best before doing another event.
so you are saying that there won't be any more events again in the future ?
-
@GenSim12345 said:
No there hasnt been any change to gen rush. Unless you count pigs nerf as a buff to gen rushing but that's kinda pushing it.
Thank you kind sir! First real answer to my original question. 1 in 4 replies. Not bad!
-
@KateLover said:
I don't think he was being salty. He was quoting a dev. Maybe don't take everything someone says on the internet as an attack?
And yet here you are. Attacking me. Why everyone feels the need to tell others how to feel or react ? Why don't you simply stay on topic? How an amazing world that would be.
-
@KateLover said:
I actually just heard a streamer who was playing killer say "I'm their game master and they're my players, I need to entertain and amuse them". I think that's a poor mentality to take.
I think everyone should play the game as they want as long as it is withing the bonderings of what its permitted.
But again, that's is not my point :)
-
@MystiKasT said:
Part of the game. You exist as entertainment for survivors and nothing more. If you don't like it you can go play Civilization 5.
#########!? why the aggression ? jeezz... leave your high throne and go get some air.
Have you even seen me complain about gen rush? I know it's part of the game. I've 3500hrs, I've gen rushed and been gen rushed hundreds of times. I was just wondering if anything changed since the patch to have made this more common. That's it!
My god... kids on the internet. Always so edgy... "go play civ 5" LUL #########... ridiculous.
-
Disconnect average per game,
-
Survivor slugging while looking for the last survivor will still be a thing. Why are you not addressing this also? Is boring but an effective strategy
-
The problem is that those of us who have been able to play all week long and got to the red ranks are now screwed because we got into a position that we shouldn't have been able to with the old system. So now we can't get games.
These guys just don't think over the consequences of their acts.
-
They turned off the new matchmaking. The old one doesn't look for players very far from your rank and since there are pretty much no survivors at that rank, we're screwed.
Rank 1 killer here we the same issue.
-
Yeah, same issue here.
Rank 1 killer. Can't find any matches. The lobby just sits there empty.
I guess it's because they turned the new matchmaking off and now since there are very few survivors in the red ranks is impossible to find a match.
This is so frustrating. I really have no words to describe how the devs manage this game. I'm not even mad at this point. Its just sad.
-
Yes. I agree DS should be tweaked.
No, I don't agree it's a priority based on the other things broken in this game.
No, I don't agree with this change. They turned a top perk into a trash perk. If that was the goal, then good job.
Other than this I won't waste my time discussing on what they should do, I'm not paid for that. It's their job to design the game. If they want to keep doing this kinda of game design approach, let them. Fortunately, there are other games in the market.
I'm out of patience for the weak design decisions they keep throwing.
-
Yeah, I have to agree with this. Once you do the event objective there is no point in continue playing survivor. At least at high ranks where everyone has completed the goal and no one can farm the plants anymore.
This is the reason why killer queues are so long. Everyone is playing killer because it's the only one that can still farm bloodpoints after the goal is done. I know I am.
So yeah... really bad event design in my opinion. Other than that, the event has actually been pretty fun.
-
Will you ever address the issue that is people not playing the game as expected? (aka intentional disconnect)
This is a big problem, mainly on the survivor side.
-
@TeaLeaf said:
He is getting at your suggestion doesn't remove toxicity all it does is shift it from one place to another. Your only thinking about your situation. Sure killers can no longer exact revenge, but now killers can't avoid toxic survivor/SWF groups.Survivors can't dodge killers. Why should Killer be able to ? Personally, I think no one should be able to dodge a lobby unless there is a high ping. It's the only justifiable reason to dodge a lobby. Keeping the identity for the sake of dodging is an invalid argument as this shouldn't happen at all.
SWF is a whole different subject that can only be fixed by somehow buffing solo survivors and killers, in order to make SWF less strong (but I want to move the discussion to this subject). I don't want to spend 1 minute before every match inspecting if the 4 survivors to see if its SWF or not. I just want the match to be fair regardless of who is there.
@Runiver said:
Showing survivor's name also promotes non-grieffing.
"Taking revenge" can also be karma for being an offender.The "revenge" factor does not come from nowhere is what I actually say.
Sorry but I can't accept this. Revenge shouldn't be acceptable no matter the reasons. This is a game. There is no point in griefing or taking things personally, it just ruins the fun for everyone. Additionally, if you say that is "OK" to take revenge you're leaving a door open for anyone to act regardless of their reasons. Who's going to judge each person's reasons?
-
@Tzeentchling9 said:
Heard it here first, folks. You have to prevent people from avoiding toxic players to fight toxicity.I don't get your point. Did you read my post at all? or just half the words?
-
No?