SirMurphAlot
SirMurphAlot
About
- Username
- SirMurphAlot
- Joined
- Visits
- 31
- Last Active
Comments
-
@NoShinyPony yes it is an insult, anyone that says that is condescending to that person.
@AlwaysInAGoodShape i was wrong about the grammar correction i mistook it for something else, but lets be clear i didnt missquote anything you said and all the points i made against that stupid experiment and why i feel the killer isnt weaker are legit reasons, how is that experiment legit when 4 of the 5 know about the experiment and plan for it. But lets back track i just realized something going back and looking, my original post had nothing to do with rank, rank wasnt brought up in a big way until you so that tells me you were trying to add fluff to your argument and confuse the points i was making and it did because i was irritated you were short changing everyone in rank 1, now i stand by my comments about there being players that earned rank 1 but im done with talking about rank with you because it had nothing to do with my point. Dude your frustrated your arguing that since the .1% of the top survivors beat the inferior 99.9% killers, that killers are weaker by default. I dont know about you but i dont want the lowest possible percentage being considered the norm for me because i have no desire to want to be in the .1%
-
@Master then move along
-
@NoShinyPony no dont give me this ######### about be respectful, i gave my opinion on something and was insulted by numerous people before i even was rude to anyone, heck if you go back and read why i said what i did to you, it was because you insulted me with thats how life is like i havent been through anything. I gave valid reasons as to why that experiment couldnt be taken as the end all truth of the discussion. I threw out the olive branch for people to convince me top tier killers against top tier survivors, random players, no mics, no perks, no addons 100 times, if they cant do that i wont be convinced. How does the game favor the survivor all there most powerful things are limited in some way, be it one time use, a big delay in when they can use it again, or it being consumed, the killer can use its power without much of a drawback, has its addon until end of the game and has an offering that allows them to kill a survivor. Here lets simplify no perks or equipment or offerings whats the only thing a survivor has over the killer, numbers. Killer is faster, stronger and has an ability. The thing with the survivors advantage is that it can be a double edged sword because it can screw you over, the killer can only really screw himself over.
-
@NoShinyPony im talking about survivor wise, since kindred shows the killer wouldnt it encourage survivors giving a morale booster, while im at it killers should get a perk to counter aura reveals like alert and that since survivors get ones. What i meant is for the exit gate not during chases to stop teabagging at the gate because ive played many games as survivor and just shook my head at these ######### players. Maybe next game but seeing killers drop from prenn asylum with nothing added is stupid, your carrying a full adult and dropping a story down.
-
@NoShinyPony no your guys argument doesnt work because you took a small percentage and somehow twisted it in meaning that it was a huge percentage. Thats not how math works, 40% escape rate vs 60% in kills doesnt mean survivor are beating killers, having the top .1% beat the other 99.9% doesnt prove killers have it harder. Not everyone that plays wants to put in countless hours to get to that .1%. So in fps games you cant get weapons or skills that others have, sport games one team is considerly faster. Quit talking out your ass about how life works because im pretty sure someone born rich has it alittle bit easier then someone born poor. Your right it favors killers. But how the way you guys talk killers shouldnt have any chance of beating any top SWF because the gods themselves have blessed these survivors. You know what ill throw an olive branch out there, you know what will make me believe that killers are weaker, if 100 matches happen with the top .1% of killers playing against the top .1% of survivors with no perks, no add ons, no equipment and it being random with survivors no mics, until that happens take your opinion that some youtuber came up with and flush it down the toilet because like i said in my 1st post, this is what i experienced as a low tier player, more ruthless killer awards over escapes.
-
@thesuicidefox yeah your right there is no consistency thats why the experiment fails because of how consistent it is. Same perks and same players (besides the random killers) Why not take the .1% of killers and play against them, but no they used what @AlwaysInAGoodShape has said to be the broken rank system to do there experiment. Yes you can get better at this game just like any player survivor or killer but what i compared was the percentage of it, that was my point. You say killer is weaker because the .1% of great survivors beat the other 99.9% of players, thats a joke of a reason and why its not an experiment because you can control it.
-
@GodDamn_Angela how is that not the same the smallest % is what you people are trying to go by, the .1% of dead by daylight survivors are why you are saying killers are weak.
-
@NoShinyPony i have the rarest blood type should an experiment just involving my bloodtype dictake how it affects you
-
@AlwaysInAGoodShape you know calling out grammar mistakes in your argument shows that your losing the argument. Your argument for rank not mattering is a joke because there are legit players that can go every match and get two pips a match. No denial just how this game works and sure make your vids but you can use your perks just ll play like you have no knowledge like you said. No i want a % as to where everyone else falls. No your the one dancing around the argument how can you legit have an experiment when the majority of test subjects know there part of the experiment, experiments like this arent experiments. I dont need to quote your stuff because i dont need to and you did devalue everyone in rank 1 because i said there were legit players that got to rank 1 and you said because even bad players can get there its not really competative. No i want you to play like you said you played, go around the map aimless to where pallets and windows are, not knowing how some perks work, play against a doctor without knowing his power and how to counter, etc... And i already know the rank system isnt a legit one my point was not everyone in rank 1 doesnt belong there because there are good players
-
@AlwaysInAGoodShape its not that i didnt understand it was the fact you devalued everyone that got to rank 1 because some that got there werent good.
-
@AlwaysInAGoodShape So because multiple people can be rank 1 it negates the rank system, yeah its not a good bench mark but just because some are bad doesnt mean all are bad and didnt earn the rank 1 spot.
Yeah because if you were playing like you said you were, killers would have exploited you especially low ranks and you wouldnt have made rank 1. Sure make a video. So 50% are bad and 0.1% are best where do the rest fall. Im taking into account normal players, ones that dont spend countless hours to play this game, his experiment is about the top .1% of survivor players against the socalled worst 50% how is that a legit experiment. Now if he would have did random with the socalled worst 50% it would be an experiment but since he went with the best of the best he didnt confirm anything. -
@AlwaysInAGoodShape If you think no one plays competative in ranks and doesnt earn rank 1 by being a good player, you are delusional. I find you not having any knowledge about how the game works, playing with randoms, and reaching rank 1 in 2 weeks very questionable unless you put in some time and if you did, you would know how the game worked.
Oh i watched the guy you were promoting and saw his no run perk videos where he beat most survivors pretty easy i also watched his videos about the experiments and its not that good of an experiment, the experiment consisted of him getting together with these people and having them all run the same perks, most people dont play that way. If your argument for survivors being stronger is you take some of the best players in the game have them all run the same perks against random killers and thats why they are stronger, thats a weak argument, it would be like taking the patriots and having them destroy a big league team from a local town and going hey i think we need to give them a huge handicap over these other teams because did ya see what the patriots did to them. Of course there gonna have an edge. -
@AlwaysInAGoodShape what mode do you play with survivor? Me i dont really play swf and dont like being on mic so i would say im a decent player because i got to rank 1 with no communication with randoms. I gave my reasons as to why this game is killer friendly if you dont agree, ok, but you arent convincing me because this so called great player isnt getting the wins he wants. Im going off my experience not anothers. If this game was survivor friendly missing 1 survivor shouldnt have that big of an impact.
@Vancold i came on here to have a dicussion disagreeing with these people is me not liking it
@Bravo0413 yeah thanathobia and all those, a killer can counter all those as well, you play stealthy, a killer has perks or powers to find you, leader you need others so the killer just need to split you from others, resilience you have to have either been hit or running no mither putting you at a disadvantage, stake out need to put yourself close enough to the killer, and a toolbox it is limited.
@GodDamn_Angela im pretty sure your the one that doesnt understand the word.
@ReneAensland thats what i am a solo player, i just prefer playing random because its easier then trying to plan swf with people considering i work nights. But with playing that way i see lots of selfish action like players stop working on gens because one person has died and they are planning for the hatch, and that is why i feel the survivor is weaker then killer because you can play a perfect game but another survivor can ruin your game.
-
@Shad03 thanks for actually trying to discuss and give reasons as to why you think im wrong
1. Yeah 4v1 you have a shot, ill agree but if a survivor isnt helping what are your chances with a 3v1, i play on console so i know, yeah you can disarm a trap but what about the addons that can counter that plus traps come back, any addon a killer uses can help deter those counters
2. No you need the objectives im not saying that, my point with pointing out the objective is to show that the killer only really has to worry about one objective while survivors have many implying thats alot harder, a killer has contol in those chases, he can choose to not be baited by them and go for the others.
3. Ive had a few games where they all ran DS i got hit by all but it wasnt that big of a deal because i usually place my body in a way that forces them in the worst direction, some killers addons are to oped especially when you compare them to survivors addons, ive seen to many games where they run the pink mori and your team gets wiped before the 2nd gen is complete i have even done it.
4. Id agree if it wasnt so impossible to get out of the carry 9 out of 10 times thats how often i fail getting out add in iron grasp or agitation 10/10 -
@Raccoon whered all the bluster go, the talking down to people that disagree with you, cmon throw a meme out there you know you want to
-
@Raccoon well its kind of hard when all you offer are some memes and what i said to you, kind of feels like you cant contribute to the discussion anymore because you have nothing valid to add to it, so you try to seem funny like that one kid that mouths off and gets put in his place
<Insert meme here>
-
@Raccoon i didnt mean to upset you so much, that memes picture say it all, your hurt by my words just look at that face
-
@Bravo0413 oh you can counter thanathobia, make your choice, enduring, lightborn, iron grasp, agitation, nurses calling, should i go on, decisive strike can be dealt with by spinning, unnerving presence, dropping and swinging your weapon,
-
@Bravo0413 theres always the awesome button
-
@Raccoon i know how i play and thats all, i see how much easier it is to be killer then survivor, you dont agree thats fine but your not convincing me, i gave my points and most of you disagreed, some of you gave your reasons and i respect that, others didnt offer anything besides a slight jab that i was wrong your opinions dont mean much at all.
-
@Vancold i cringe as well when people go on forums and see something they apparently dont like then comment on how they dont like it, instead of doing what a rational person would do and read something that interest them.
@HellDescent if your having an issue as killer, you should remember this dont defend just kill the survivors, you said you could remove any type of status effect without equipment, mangled and the blood one need to be healed, cant heal them without either self care, med kit or another survivor if they arent all dead. Yes you could do 99% but seeing as they arent very hard to get, ill use them fully to try and finish thing faster
-
@GodDamn_Angela then dont complain about the offerings i referenced, no they arent you can still kill a survivor. Ok heres how the killer is more versatile 1: he is faster 2: has perks that can negate a survivors best defenses or offences 3: there powers can easily change the game if used right 4: add ons increase the effectiveness of there powers case and point michael myers spoons that allow him to see survivor auras while stalking. 5: Falls dont slow them down. Just to name a few
-
@HellDescent the killer only has one goal kill the survivors, what other goal does he have? The equipment is limited if you use it up its gone, sure you can escape with it but i dont know about you but unless im bringing my purple offering with me its gone , cant heal yourself without either self care or a med kit, cough cough didnt get the point of my first post, and your point on killers relying on add on
-
@TheMidnightRidr wouldnt you get more points my way, if you mori them after the 1st hook you lose out on the next hook, plus it makes sense with a killer getting angry and killing the survivor themselves instead of wanting to hook them.
-
@The_Crusader i agree rank reset is annoying
-
@Dead_by_David Im not saying its super easy for the killer im just saying that the killer is not as weak as people complain about. I gave my reasons and disagreed with others on theres, but from my experience the whole team gets wiped more often then they escape.
-
Because the highest offering a survivor has a luck boost, 2 chests, not losing your item and addons
-
@GodDamn_Angela what offerings would you pick
-
@TheMidnightRidr yeah it should be two hooks they can still be pulled off, its not hard hooking survivors.
@Dehitay put a killer against two survivors or even three and you are gonna have a hard match for survivors.
-
@MysticalMagic92 I play both killer and survivor and have done it at rank 1, so yeah i kinda know what im talking about.
@AlwaysInAGoodShape 1: so 40% escape rate, if it was in favor of survivors it would be higher. 2: Killers are not inferior to survivors at competative level, no idea who that is im going off my play style and getting atleast 3 kills is not hard. 3: Yeah and your shocked point is. 4: yeah i do if you mean tournament then yeah your right i dont play tournaments but as for rank i do. 5: If the problem with killers is your letting them bait you into chases they are hoping for then you need to wise up. They have ruin, thanathobia, overcharge, they have addons that can slow it down. 6: Offerings are more powerful for killer then survivor being able to kill a survivor after 1 hook beats out giving 2 more chests or a boost to luck.7: yeah its always active you hook a survivor it activates, hook another right after it activates again. 8: the graph shows a 10% increase from rank 20 to 1 how does that prove killers have it harder its still not 50%.
I gave my reasons from how i play to what ive witnissed playing both sides, i havent struggled with being killer as much as i have with survivor. -
@Dead_by_David yeah going from survivor to killer is hard at first but once you get the basics downs, youll kill atleast 3 survivors a game
-
Yeah and your point crusader, are you saying it doesnt need a cooldown or what?