Comments

  • What are you referring to? I can't see any insults

  • @Nazzzak said:

    What are you referring to? I can't see any insults

    I think they mean this, but also that its the opposite of what is intended by OP:

    This will result in some totems being snuffable through collision, but we are erring on the side of caution to ensure that all totems can be snuffed by the killer until then. Enjoy it while it lasts, Killer Mains!

    If I'm reading it right, it looks like they were erring on the side of favoring the killers so that they weren't disadvantaged and then saying have fun. If anything, survivors would have more of a right to be angry that instead of being 'fixed' they were favoring the killer side (which, presuming a fix was impossible in the time frame, would have been the right call between those possibilites).

    I wasn't actively playing then so if someone else was an remembers this being treated as an insult I'd be happy to hear the explanation.

  • @crogers271 said:

    https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/3996258#Comment_3996258

    I think they mean this, but also that its the opposite of what is intended by OP:

    This will result in some totems being snuffable through collision, but we are erring on the side of caution to ensure that all totems can be snuffed by the killer until then. Enjoy it while it lasts, Killer Mains!

    If I'm reading it right, it looks like they were erring on the side of favoring the killers so that they weren't disadvantaged and then saying have fun. If anything, survivors would have more of a right to be angry that instead of being 'fixed' they were favoring the killer side (which, presuming a fix was impossible in the time frame, would have been the right call between those possibilites).

    I wasn't actively playing then so if someone else was an remembers this being treated as an insult I'd be happy to hear the explanation.

    Thanks! definitely a reach calling that an insult, reads more like have fun.

    Wish people would stop being weird and personal towards the devs. Alot of the behaviour I've seen is embarrassing enough.

  • @crogers271 said:

    https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/3996258#Comment_3996258

    I think they mean this, but also that its the opposite of what is intended by OP:

    This will result in some totems being snuffable through collision, but we are erring on the side of caution to ensure that all totems can be snuffed by the killer until then. Enjoy it while it lasts, Killer Mains!

    If I'm reading it right, it looks like they were erring on the side of favoring the killers so that they weren't disadvantaged and then saying have fun. If anything, survivors would have more of a right to be angry that instead of being 'fixed' they were favoring the killer side (which, presuming a fix was impossible in the time frame, would have been the right call between those possibilites).

    I wasn't actively playing then so if someone else was an remembers this being treated as an insult I'd be happy to hear the explanation.

    Definitely a stretch. Peanits has a pretty squeaky clean reputation when it comes to talking with the community.

  • @Nazzzak said:

    https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/3996263#Comment_3996263

    Thanks! definitely a reach calling that an insult, reads more like have fun.

    Wish people would stop being weird and personal towards the devs. Alot of the behaviour I've seen is embarrassing enough.

    Its kinda creepy for someone to remember such an obscure detail from a bugfix post from 4 years ago... Who does that?

  • @LordGlint said:

    https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/3996266#Comment_3996266

    Its kinda creepy for someone to remember such an obscure detail from a bugfix post from 4 years ago... Who does that?

    More likely he did a Google search for Peanits to see what he could dig up. Just weird.

  • @Nazzzak said:

    https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/3996278#Comment_3996278

    More likely he did a Google search for Peanits to see what he could dig up. Just weird.

    A part of me is giggling at the idea of spellcheck making his first few attempts to Google "peanits" quite uncomfortable.

  • @LordGlint said:

    https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/3996321#Comment_3996321

    A part of me is giggling at the idea of spellcheck making his first few attempts to Google "peanits" quite uncomfortable.

    Lol as Eric Pope said, it's "Peanits with a t!"