Plague skins and phobias

With the newest rift came a new plague skin, the "Red Death" outfit, whose body is covered in maggots, something that quite literally makes me vomit if i look at it for more than a second or two, i think there should be an option to disable skins like these clientside since they can trigger phobias, would this be possible?

Comments

  • 1% matches are plagues, she has many skins to choose from so the chance to face that kind of plague is super small.

  • Everyone has phobias and they can't counter to a few people with the phobia you have. Sure lots of people will find it gross, but that's the point.

    I have a huge phobia of vomit and anything to do with it, and I'm never going to even think of asking the developers to change their game to suit me. I can simply just not play the game if it bothers me that much.

  • Players when a horror game has horror

  • @idefinitelyloveDBD said:

    https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/3651796#Comment_3651796

    this isn't... horror, though. it's just "haha the skin has bugs xD"

    like, the skin doesn't SCARE me, it just makes me uncomfortable and (i hate using this word but it's the most accurate descriptor i can think of right now) it triggers my formication. i'm not IN FEAR when i see the skin. if you're going to be snarky, at least understand what the people are saying first before you come replying to the thread. i get you're probably not here for an actual discussion, but the least you could do is not be provocative and rude to people who go through things you don't go through. the least you could do is just not reply if you don't understand and have an inkling to be rude.

    It's body horror.

  • @idefinitelyloveDBD said:

    https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/3651818#Comment_3651818

    it's not horror. it's not scary. we can't just switch definitions just because you people like making things out like they're less important than they should be.

    look, you and the other guy can believe whatever you want about my actual anxiety related condition (formication) and whether or not the game should have changes or not because of it, but you cannot claim that we should accept it because "it's horror, you picked up the horror game you should be okay with every horror trope ever". besides the fact this isn't a horror trope, because it's not horror, that's just a really irresponsible thing to say to someone you know has a very clear issue with something for a very valid reason? idk. i just feel kinda disgusted with this thread. i am blatantly being lied to and am being told to accept things because "horror game lol". it's just gross. have your opinion on accessibility features all you guys want, but leave the lies out of it.

    Never mentioned your anxiety. I'm just saying that what you're talking about it's body horror, and it's a horror genre. I'm sorry about your anxiety, I truly am, but that skin IS horror and in specific it's body horror, that's it.

  • @idefinitelyloveDBD said:

    https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/3651818#Comment_3651818

    it's not horror. it's not scary. we can't just switch definitions just because you people like making things out like they're less important than they should be.

    look, you and the other guy can believe whatever you want about my actual anxiety related condition (formication) and whether or not the game should have changes or not because of it, but you cannot claim that we should accept it because "it's horror, you picked up the horror game you should be okay with every horror trope ever". besides the fact this isn't a horror trope, because it's not horror, that's just a really irresponsible thing to say to someone you know has a very clear issue with something for a very valid reason? idk. i just feel kinda disgusted with this thread. i am blatantly being lied to and am being told to accept things because "horror game lol". it's just gross. have your opinion on accessibility features all you guys want, but leave the lies out of it.

    Definition of body horror according to wikipedia:

    "Body horror, or biological horror, is a subgenre of horror that intentionally showcases grotesque or psychologically disturbing violations of the human body or to any other creature. These violations may manifest through aberrant sex, mutations, mutilation, zombification, gratuitous violence, disease, or unnatural movements of the body"

    The skin definitely applies. Whether or not you find it scary is a different topic, but it is undeniably body horror.

  • @idefinitelyloveDBD said:

    https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/3651955#Comment_3651955

    the definition you gave LITERALLY proves y'all are talking out of the side of your mouths. "grotesque or psychologically disturbing violations of the human body"??? it's a girl with bugs on her. girl's body is NOT getting violated. it's just uncomfortable to look at, it's not "grotesque" or "psychologically disturbing", that's way too extreme. it's more like a "i don't wanna look at this skin". i'm not shocked, i don't find it horrifying, it's more of a cringed reaction, a "why is this in the game other than to exist as lazy shock content" reaction. well that, and the obvious formication i've stated earlier, but i'm repeating myself so much i'm getting exhausted.

    "These violations may manifest through aberrant sex, mutations, mutilation, zombification, gratuitous violence, disease, or unnatural movements of the body"

    weird, they didn't even mention bugs once. not even a little bit. especially since bugs are a very common thing in horror, you'd think at least they'd be mentioned if they were considered body horror. but... no. they're not mentioned in your definition. at all. this is literally what i'm saying! you people are stretching a definition! your definition you got further proves you guys are willing to lie about the definition of body horror to put people venting about wanting accessibility features for skins like this down. shame on you! shame, shame, shame!

    it's a shame this thread is getting watered down by people who misread definitions and lie. i feel greatly disrespected as someone with a genuine high-anxiety caused condition and will not be feeding these people any further because they don't have any good words to say to me in their minds and don't care about what i go through no matter how clear i make it, no matter how genuine i write what i go through, they will keep being difficult.

    accessibility matters. it will never stop mattering. whether dbd gets this feature will never be decided by a forum thread anyways. i can hope they will add it, but it's unlikely. i'm not going to stay here and get barraged by bad faith actors over a probable lost cause (at least, i mean that in a sense my words won't change anything accessibility related, but i wanted to share my thoughts here anyways, because i agreed with what the original poster said and i wanted to boost it and agree). :)

    Grotesque violations: she has giant infested flesh wounds, cysts and overall signs of infection and decay all over her body. Half of her face is gone. One of her toes is cut off. Her throat has an open wound. She is vomiting blood. That is definitely grotesque ("comically or repulsively ugly or distorted").

    Disease: she is infected with a deadly plague, her body is going through decay and an infestation is by definition a disease, there is no need to specify bugs ("In general, the term "infestation" refers to parasitic diseases caused by animals such as arthropods (i.e. mites, ticks, and lice) and worms (...)")

  • that would be another item on the ever growing list of things that should have an accessibility option clientside. - If a dev didn't care about that I would say 'well, out of luck, I guess' -- bhvr prides itself in being inclusive and accessible. Sure, not everything will be able to have an accessibility option clientside (take, Doctor shocks and flickering for example) but at the very least the purely cosmetic things should have one; being able to display a character with the default skin to you, for example. Or to be able to mute/replace certain sounds.

    And yes, you face Plague or whatever very rarely. - But that also means the alternative to making it accessible would be to say it's abolsutely fair and appropriate to not play that match. Since it's kinda unreasonable to say the person in question should just stop playing the game altogtether.

  • Many people don’t understand this issue and will use stupid ‚arguments‘ like ‚but this is a horror game!!!‘


    I have asked for phobia optioned that work client sided for years. Obviously only for certain phobias - it wouldn’t make sense to have a Haemophobia or Aichmophobia as these themes are actually present in every single match. But when the trigger is only present in one killer (eg Coulrophobia with Clown) or just one skin as in this case and the setting could be implemented clientsided and SUPER easy (as in, just a neutral skin) then WHY would anyone even be against it? 🤷‍♂️


    @KhrisCo said:

    Everyone has phobias and they can't counter to a few people with the phobia you have. Sure lots of people will find it gross, but that's the point.

    I have a huge phobia of vomit and anything to do with it, and I'm never going to even think of asking the developers to change their game to suit me. I can simply just not play the game if it bothers me that much.

    Maybe don’t try to dictate what kind of feedback and suggestions others make just because you are okay with it. And as already stated - it would not even change the game at all.

  • That's gross.

    I hate those bugs and barf irl if I rarely see em.