4 survivors individually = to 1 killer is bad
because then you 400% vs 100%.
because then you 400% vs 100%.
Read THIS post.
Tldr: This is an archived version of the DBD forum, it has all posts, comments and media. The archived data will be published at the end of October. This site is not in any way affiliated with or endorsed by Behaviour Interactive.
Comments
I mean yeah, isnt that the point of asymmetric pvp games as a whole, both sides should be different but have equal chance to win.
I don't understand why this had to be a new thread... are you replying to someone in particular?
Also it's an "Assymetrical" game not sure if it's clear cut as 400% vs 100%.
It's more like 25%~30% per survivor and the last person has to do a minimum of 10% for a "fair game". While 4 competent players all running around at optimal 30% then it becomes favored to their side at the highest levels.
but players want to 1vs1...
4 players want to 1 vs 1 the one player...
There are some delusional survivor mains that think being able to 1v1 a killer means he's balanced. It's obviously bs, but hey.
people also want to 1v5 in games like League of Legends, just cause you want something doesn't mean it should be easily achievable.
If only there was a way to reduce the four man team's numbers,
Is this the thread you were looking for? It's still on the front page.
Maybe to fix that they could change the MMR for survivors a little. Maybe they should make survivors join together with different MMR. One that has high mmr and those with MMR lower than that. And then have a good average killer.
Shame you can only do so by completing 8% for every 20 to 60% of the opponents task isn't it?
Do you know what the term "assymetric game" means?
It’s more like 40% vs 100%
Survivors are really weak imo. Killers suffer zero cool down in between both missed and landed attacks. Killers are given a lot of information to go from target to target. A lot of The maps are usually too small.