billynair
billynair
About
- Username
- billynair
- Joined
- Visits
- 54
- Last Active
Comments
-
@powerbats said:
survivors have to resort to endless looping to break los until they can try and get to a spot that has some cover to evade.Have you played Killer?!?!? If a Survivor is HONESTLY trying to get away from you, then, BL is NOT really needed, they usually make mistakes before you get to BL1.
As for the 93.2% of the other survivors who purposely try to find the killer so they can get their infinite loop chase on so their Stream Followers can sit back with their hands down their pants, their ONLY intent is to keep that chase going as long as possible, longer chases, more viewers, more viewers, more $$... and since there are so few non-toxic loopers, nerfing BL is ONLY going to boost their viewership and THAT is about it. Honest survivors do NOT need this BL Nerf
-
@powerbats said:
The problem is that getting found is often quite easy for experienced killers since spawn locations are pretty well known.With over 1000 hours, 80%+ as Killer, I never thought about learning the Spawn Points... I really should do that...
-
@yeet said:
imma be real w you pal if a nurse is using bloodlust and you go down you deserve to lose straight upI honestly dont ever remember getting to Bloodlust with Nurse
I honestly have very few games where I don't Bloodlust with the other Killers (even with Amanda I have had to BL to catch a few Dwights)
-
@yeet said:
feffrey said:Why should they be rewarded for their failures
If a killer is able to force bloodlust 3 that is entirely the survivors fault
I dont think I have ever been able to get to BL 1... I am so terrible at looping as survivor, I have nothing but "hide from the killer" perks
-
Sorry, I posted this, then, had to close 6 days straight, so, not much of anything but sleep and work... so, yeah, ill try to respond to you, but, might pass out
-
@powerbats said:
Lets be realistic here, they're talking about BL3 and about totally removing it once maps are balanced.I heard nothing about balancing out the maps, I hope this is true! WAY too many infinities as it stands...
@powerbats said:
If you have to use histrionicsNot doing that, only pointing out what I have already seen in the forums as it is. People saying WAY too many nurses. and, this is not because she is OP, it is because the other Killers are not viable against decent Survivors. The Killers who main other chars are those who want more of a challenge, or are not worried about ranking up.
@powerbats said:
So wait until it actually gets tested and they say it's going live before using ye old sky is falling.I would LIKE to say that "wait and see" is something that can be trusted with these Devs, but, they have managed time and time again to surprise us with new and exciting ways of sabotaging their own game...
-
@Master said:
Fine? Seriously?I was thinking the SAME thing, but, I hope he only meant he doesn't need a Nerf.
as for ANY one saying Freddy is OP, and is not Joking, do a 10-game stream (no cuts, no edits) of them (the person complaining) getting all 4k games, dude, I will take all 2ks, at ranks higher than 12, not gunna happen...
-
if THAT was the ONLY reason to be glad you didnt put $$ down on him... hahhaha
-
@Dragonredking said:
Even doe it seem more likely to me that they'll thrash the mori that let you kill the last survivor and just allow you to mori the last survivor alive or on the map every single time.This already is in the game, if you hook the last survivor he doesnt get any chance to get off the hook. Yes, not technically a Mori, but the ONLY difference is you need to take him to the hook. There is no waiting for him to Kobe off