antbanks1003
antbanks1003
About
- Username
- antbanks1003
- Joined
- Visits
- 6
- Last Active
Comments
-
@AbsoluteArcadia said:
I like where this idea is going, but there are only a couple, so even with another box I think it'd be a bit too easy. How about you see every box unless you are within 12 -16 meters (depending on base or add-on), so they have to actually look for them, they're fairly loud, and it would still be pretty easy to find them, but you'd have to look regardless.
I like that too! Good idea!
-
I completely agree. I think they should do the same for a survivor too. I want them to make a survivor who is in a moral gray area in their lore. Someone who might not have been the best person before being taken by the entity. A lot of the characters have very interesting lore but it can seem one dimensional and redundant when they're all so tragic.
-
@Milo said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1867816#Comment_1867816
It's actually 1,5 seconds to escape.
While it removes the annoyances from killer side, it just becomes a really sad anti-tunneling perk (when not the obsession)
I think that it would still have use as an anti tunnel perk even if you're not the obsession. The major transgression with the perk that I see is that it almost always guarantees you escape the killer/ waste long amounts their time for your team every time you use it. It is also VERY common that I get hit with a decisive by a survivor I wasn't even intentionally tunneling. With the shortened stun as a non-obsession, you would have to think about positioning yourself in a beneficial place to go down. Like a pallet or window. The perk would lose some of its impact though as the game progresses just because pallets would be scarce probably. From a survivor standpoint it will be a flat nerf to the perk but the potential to be as powerful as it is currently is would save it from being absolutely useless. There are still many perks that dictate who the obsession is and those could also find a spot in the meta. But just for the record, I am not trying to choose sides. There are plenty of oppressive things that the Killers have at their utility as well.
-
@Bwsted said:
If you are not the obsession, the killer will be stunned for 2.5 seconds.
Your change makes the perk void. Around last September, DS was bugged on some killers and the stun was about that long. Take into consideration that the survivor is also locked in the falling animation at the beginning. Needless to say, that stun did literally nothing and survivors were re-downed immediately.
you're right there was that bug totally forgot. Maybe if they tweaked the whole falling animation with the perk it could be better. But I don't think it would be void. A stun is a stun. And time is time in DBD. Id take a 2.5 second stun on a killer opposed to getting picked up and taken straight to a hook without any chance to escape whatsoever. A Survivor who only has a 2.5 second stun to work with would have to be a lot more careful about their playstyle. It would eliminate a lot of those annoying instances where survivors will literally hop all in lockers and play very unsafe because they knew they had 5 seconds of time to work with if the killer picks them up. yk?
-
Im excited to hear what you guys think as well as any critiques. Im currently having fun thinking about all of the hypothetical perk interactions with the perk change. Furtive chase would be good at preventing a 5 second stun from happening. Because with that perk, if someone rescues the obsession from the hook, they become the obsesion. And if the person off the hook has decisive, but they are no longer the obsession, they only have a 2.5 second stun to work with. Its real interesting.