Juwlz
Juwlz
About
- Username
- Juwlz
- Joined
- Visits
- 10
- Last Active
Comments
-
@Bran said:
In my own opinion, hook grabbing needs to be more punishable. Simply forcing the survivor to be unable to cancel rapidly so if they try to bait the unhook, the just can't and get grabbed.
A lot of my grabs already break because they can cancel so quickly.
i forgot about that point in my post, that grab baiting is so stupid and no fun for everyone. If a killer wants to camp he grabs you, and puts you down right next to the hook in which case its extremely hard for the other two survivors to rescue any one of them. The overall concept of camping is so benefitial for the killer, for new players its almost a no brainer, no offense. when the game offers you this possibility of playing the game then go on. The thing is that as a survivor you have no such tactics, sure there are ways to f a killer up, but nothing is as strong as straight up hook camping.
-
@jesterkind said:
The idea is definitely to make unhooking risky if the killer's nearby, so that there's a layer of strategy towards when to unhook, and to punish people just rushing the hook straight away. Unfortunately, this does also benefit camping, as outlined above.
I'm also of the opinion that hook grabs should be removed (at least on healthy survivors, injured might be a different situation worth discussing), but there should definitely be trades there. Personally I think damage should just carry over if you're hit while unhooking, so you immediately take damage as soon as the unhook animation is completed. Removing the ability to cancel the unhook could also be experimented with, at least after a certain point of the animation.
Whatever the trade ends up being, I don't think hook grabs should just be removed without some other element of risk being present. Choosing to unhook in the killer's face in non-camping scenarios should carry some kind of risk, and that risk should be taken by the unhooker.
Yeah i get that, you're right. It makes sense to be a somewhat risky move to unhook. But in its present state i cant understand why its in that state for so long. that the damage is dealt after the animation is what i thought too.
@SimplyPixelated06 said:
I feel like grabbing unhooking survivors was a decision made a while ago when dbd was in a completely different state. I don't think it's needed anymore, as long as they also adjust some things and make some changes surrounding hooks.
True, there are many details about the game where this is the case i feel like... That fact makes me so sad, because developers are not really interested in fixing those issues. They just focus on new content and minor adjustments against things like camping just because the community force them to. There is no one questioning old game design deccisions. (i think so at least)
@Ciabe said:
Hook grabs just encourage face camping. This would be one of the easiest and quickest ways to remove face camping. Any damage should pass to the unhooker though.
Absolutly. i dont think camping will completly cease to exist but its a step in the right direction.
-
@kingcarl2012 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/345411/chat-filter-is-too-harsh
Just be thankful you have chat at all Mate
It's like you're saying your fridge is broken, but its better to have a broken fridge than none. im frightened to use the chat because of its filtering, im already thinking what will get filtered while typing a message.