Cool_guy_Steve
Cool_guy_Steve
About
- Username
- Cool_guy_Steve
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- —
Comments
-
I feel like voice chat combined with dbd is a bad idea.. I understand that SoloQ can be difficult when you can't communicate properly, but considering how toxic some players are to each other in this game, the idea to be able to talk to random people is horrible. I have received some harassment and threats from random players sometimes, most recently yesterday when I decided to play a killer game after a long time and some survivor didn't like that they didn't win the game, I've also seen a lot of other horrible messages that some other players have received in this game over the years I've been playing, so I don't even want to know how much worse it would be to have someone yell them in your ear when you're just trying to have fun and play. I see your vision and the idea behind it is good, but I don't think the end result would be good xd
-
@ShanoaLegendaryPlz said:
There was a post about negan's actor reacting to someone asking if he was joining dbd with the rest of the characters. He said he usually doesnt say no if the whole gang is there, and dbd posted "guess its time for us to make some calls". So there is a 'possibility' to see negan later.
Im still waiting for them to fix Rick & Daryl's screams/grunts to closer soundalikes as they are so far from the actors voices that we even reported it as a bug that the placeholder voices carried over from the ptb, then they said it was intended.
As for Carl, he was there for the livestream failure and was in the bhvr studio doing a tour. So if he was going to be added it wouldve been around twd launch. But his character is apparently too young to join the game. And died at that age so they can't really "age him up" like with yoichi and eleven/dustin etc.
Yeah, that was the rumor I had also heard that Negan might be coming, but I just didn't know that DBD had responded to it. It would be nice if it was true and we would get more TWD characters!
Ooh, I didn't know that Dustin and Eleven were aged up and that's why me and my duo were very surprised that they were added to DBD and that's why I thought we would also have a chance to get Carl xd but as for Carl's character's fate it's true that in the TV series his character died which could make it difficult to bring him into the Entity's realm, but if we look at the comics Carl lives until the end of the series, so maybe it would still be possible that they could bring him into existence if they just mixed the story and plot a little with the comics? Okay, I know I sound really delusional right now xd but I think I'll still stick being delulu and I think that bringing him into the game as a character would be somehow manageable. The idea would also have been fun since Chandler has already collaborated with them a bit and was involved in the live as you said and later played with DBD YouTube streamers and seemed to have fun and like the game.
As for Daryl and Rick's voices, yeah! They really need a little improvement xd they're not that bad once you get used to them, but they're not the best either.
-
@Wezqu said:
Depends on the deal they made or how well the original made money. There is always the possibility they add new skins to the game if the licencer is willing to let them.
Yep, I hope they get permission to add more characters in the future! :)
-
@Shinkiro said:
for someone who really has problems with their internet connection
Sorry but, literally a you problem, not a game problem. You should have a stable connection if you want to play online games, this is for you or your ISP to sort out.
Having a lax (and DBD's one already is) DC penalty will just be abused by people to ruin the game without getting punished, and its simply not fair to everyone else that they have to suffer to cater to people with inadequate and spotty connections. There's many methods to circumvent such an open and unpunishing penalty system. If anything DBD's system needs to be harsher.
I think I understand what you're saying, and I'm not saying that the DC penalty should be removed, it's good that there are penalties in DBD and players who leave the game on purpose are punished and I think that's how it should be! But in my opinion, the old system was just better and simpler and I don't really see the reason why it had to be changed. I think the current system is also otherwise good, but the number of games to play could be reduced a little. I think 20 games is just a bit too much, especially for people whose free time doesn't consist of just gaming.
I also feel like I may have written my main feedback a little poorly or could have expressed it a little better, but my internet doesn't throw me out or crash every time I play, but I think it's just annoying if something like that happens in the middle of a match and the game throws you out without you intentionally causing it, so you get punished for it and to get the punishment removed, you have to play a lot of matches, especially if you just can't spend as much time on the game as you would like.
-
@Wezqu said:
Well still its not Behavior's fault either if your internet connection is bad and they have no responsibility to cater to those that have bad connection and still decide to play online game that demands good connection.
hey, so I know this isn't Behavior's fault and I'm not blaming them, I was just giving feedback on what this site is even for and wanted to point out something I think could be improved. I would like to add that my internet is not always bad or kicking me out, but sometimes there can be days when, for example, the environment causes the internet to weaken which causes the internet to go down or there may be a problem with the servers. What I'm trying to say is that when you're a person who works for 8 hours a day and has other things to do but also wants to play, then there simply isn't enough time to play 20 games to reduce your own penalty points that you may not have even intentionally acquired. I don't know if you understand what I'm getting at, but I'm trying to say that if your internet crashes, you'll initially get a 5-minute ban, after which you can continue playing again and it may be that the rest of the time you can play in peace without any problems, but if you don't have time to play 20 games after that, then the next time you hop into the game and if something similar happens, your ban will continue or stay the same depending on how many games you played the last time you were playing and it causes a frustrating cycle. I hope this has clarified things a bit. I would also like to add that the internet is not necessarily the only thing that can suddenly crash a game. For example, if you are playing on a pc and a new update happens to be released on your computer while you are playing, that can also cause the game to crash. I don't think players should be punished for something they didn't cause and with even small changes this new penalty system would certainly be fairer even for those who don't intentionally DC.
-
I had the same problem yesterday, but only as a survivor. I play actively, I have a lot of hours and I don't hide in a bush or a locker during my games without doing anything. Usually I'm really active in my matches and I try to help everyone and do all the survivor tasks and yesterday I also got a notice that I had been inactive and that I could get a penalty if it continued.. I really hope that the developers will investigate this and do something about it, because I've spent so much money and time on this game that if I got banned just because of this new obvious bug, I'd be so mad.. xd
I might take a break from the game myself until they make some fixes, because I don't want to take any risk that their new system will see me as inactive and give me some kind of penalty..