Skip to content

Possibly Controversial Idea for Character Perks

THEghostface THEghostface
in General Discussions

To make Killers and survivors more unique, how about each respected character has one of their personal perks non-teachable? Every Survivor and Killer would have one perk exclusive to their perk list that others can't receive. Now I bet meta reliant players would yell at this if one of the metas would become exclusive to one character, or other people only want the killer/survivor's worst perk as an exclusive only.

What do you think?

Comments

  • Aven_Fallen Aven_Fallen

    Not really a fan of this. For Survivors, it would make DLCs basically worthless to buy, because the good Perks are in the Basegame (+Free DLCs +Halloween DLC).

    For Killers, it would make some Builds simply useless. I mean, how to decide which Perk should be exclusive anyway?

    Lets look at Hillbilly: If you make Lightborn exclusive, nobody would care. But if you would make Enduring exclusive, you would totally remove Spirit Fury/Enduring for ALL Killers except Hillbilly or at least remove one good Perk for M1-Killers.

    Same with Hag - Third Seal exclusive? Cool, doesnt matter. Ruin exclusive? Yeah, sure. Many Killers and Survivors only have one good Perk, if this is going to be exclusive, it would really hurt the game in my opinion.

  • Rydog Rydog

    Wat

  • YaiPa YaiPa

    It would reduce incredibly the build chances.

  • Maelstrom10 Maelstrom10

    This would be nice if they made a new perk for every killer/survivor and made THAT exclusive. something that influences their powers or abilities. but then there would be a pure survivor meta where the one with the best perk would be the most played. thats not neccissarily a bad thing but it leads to a boring meta usually.

Categories