Yikes
If people did honestly answer this then.....yikes that's not good in the slightest
This alone might very well tell and show most problems in dbd.
If people did honestly answer this then.....yikes that's not good in the slightest
This alone might very well tell and show most problems in dbd.
Read THIS post.
Tldr: This is an archived version of the DBD forum, it has all posts, comments and media. The archived data will be published at the end of October. This site is not in any way affiliated with or endorsed by Behaviour Interactive.
Comments
I'm just saying it doesn't look good in the slightest because of how there's not a lot of perspectives on the killer side, and since this shows that more people play survivor then killer (assuming that people did answered that pole honestly and mostly only see the perspective of one side) if someone wanted something change on killer side, you have a few eyes on that side and majority on the other side won't see the perspective of the killer and will most likely disagree with wanting X change
You're implying that just because one side is more popular, that side will always be more powerful. That's not the case at all.
Killers control the ENTIRE trial.
If they are very skilled, they can wipe the team. If they are not skilled, they will feel powerless.
Killers can end the game for someone in literally under a minute. Even if all 4 Survivors are rock stars and slam through gens, the Killer got to play 5 minutes.
That's something you misguided Killah Mainz need to understand.
What is that from?
There are 4 Survivors to 1 Killer each match
So it stands to reason that only 1 quarter of the game can play Killer at any one time and 1 quarts of the game can only play Survivor.
This is why the Killer queue is so long compared to the almost instantaneous Survivor queue.
Tbh playing survivor is less frustrating.
Instagram.
@NeaJovovich In which world does the killer control the trial? If it's a skilled set of survivors and you aren't playing Nurse you have no chance.
@SlinkyJinky Not quite correct, as long as it's not a 4 SWF. The killer has to stay until the match is over, of course. But the survivors who have been killed earlier in the match usually have already moved on to the next lobby and therefore to the next killer.
That's why you need more than 20% killers.
@NoShinyPonyI actually think the dbd population is closer to 50/50 each side because of the fact it takes longer to get a Killer match who has 3 less slots than a Survivors lobby wait expecience which by comparison is relatively shorter.
So there's always 3 Killers next to you playing Survivor who couldn't be arsed waiting in the Killer queue