Skip to content

+10% base speed for both killer/surv

BACKSTABBER BACKSTABBER
in General Discussions

DBD would have more action, more frenetic, more intensity

agree?

Comments

  • MrAnxiolytic MrAnxiolytic

    But in a stream when PTB of 2.4.0 devs say they will never make survivors speed increase to 100% or above so nope

  • Master Master

    @BACKSTABBER said:
    DBD would have more action, more frenetic, more intensity

    agree?

    Do you mean 110 vs 125 or 110 vs 126.5, the first would would be a killer nerf.
    Also latency would become an even bigger problem

  • BACKSTABBER BACKSTABBER

    @Master said:

    @BACKSTABBER said:
    DBD would have more action, more frenetic, more intensity

    agree?

    Do you mean 110 vs 125 or 110 vs 126.5, the first would would be a killer nerf.
    Also latency would become an even bigger problem

    +10% extra base speed for both

  • Master Master

    @BACKSTABBER said:

    @Master said:

    @BACKSTABBER said:
    DBD would have more action, more frenetic, more intensity

    agree?

    Do you mean 110 vs 125 or 110 vs 126.5, the first would would be a killer nerf.
    Also latency would become an even bigger problem

    +10% extra base speed for both

    Its a mathematical difference, are we talking about percentage points or about actual percentages of the percentage values? Either its 125 or 126.5 then

  • White_Owl White_Owl

    @Master said:

    @BACKSTABBER said:

    @Master said:

    @BACKSTABBER said:
    DBD would have more action, more frenetic, more intensity

    agree?

    Do you mean 110 vs 125 or 110 vs 126.5, the first would would be a killer nerf.
    Also latency would become an even bigger problem

    +10% extra base speed for both

    Its a mathematical difference, are we talking about percentage points or about actual percentages of the percentage values? Either its 125 or 126.5 then

    If the aim is just to speed up the game and affect balance it should be 126.5

  • Raptorrotas Raptorrotas
    Might be wrong bzt wouldnt this allow survivors to get more pallets/ windows more easily in a chase?
  • Vietfox Vietfox
    @Master said:

    @BACKSTABBER said:

    @Master said:

    @BACKSTABBER said:
    DBD would have more action, more frenetic, more intensity

    agree?

    Do you mean 110 vs 125 or 110 vs 126.5, the first would would be a killer nerf.
    Also latency would become an even bigger problem

    +10% extra base speed for both

    Its a mathematical difference, are we talking about percentage points or about actual percentages of the percentage values? Either its 125 or 126.5 then

    That's exactly what i was thinking.
  • Mochan Mochan

    I would actually rather slow down the game, aren't we trying to slow games down?

  • White_Owl White_Owl

    @Raptorrotas said:
    Might be wrong bzt wouldnt this allow survivors to get more pallets/ windows more easily in a chase?

    In a certain way yes, but killers would close the distance faster (with a speed of 126.5) and would have more map pressure, so it would compensate. Pallet and windows would probably be more necessary than ever in chases and loops wouldn't be as strong as now. It would be an interesting change to test in a PTB

  • Raptorrotas Raptorrotas

    @White_Owl said:

    @Raptorrotas said:
    Might be wrong bzt wouldnt this allow survivors to get more pallets/ windows more easily in a chase?

    In a certain way yes, but killers would close the distance faster (with a speed of 126.5) and would have more map pressure, so it would compensate. Pallet and windows would probably be more necessary than ever in chases and loops wouldn't be as strong as now. It would be an interesting change to test in a PTB

    If the base speed gets increased, and killers gets proportionally increased ( 110/ 126.5), then the time X to "catch up" to the survivor theoretically stays the same, while both sides cover more distance. The problem thus is that survivors get easier chances to utilise pallets ( more distance covered after window or pallet)
    This would be worse if it'd be increased additionally (110/125).

    While map pressure might increase for everyone except nurse I still think both cases are survivor favored.

  • Dwight_Confusion Dwight_Confusion

    No. The speed of the game is just perfect.

  • Swiftblade131 Swiftblade131

    Only speed that needs to change is generator speed

  • White_Owl White_Owl

    @Raptorrotas said:

    @White_Owl said:

    @Raptorrotas said:
    Might be wrong bzt wouldnt this allow survivors to get more pallets/ windows more easily in a chase?

    In a certain way yes, but killers would close the distance faster (with a speed of 126.5) and would have more map pressure, so it would compensate. Pallet and windows would probably be more necessary than ever in chases and loops wouldn't be as strong as now. It would be an interesting change to test in a PTB

    If the base speed gets increased, and killers gets proportionally increased ( 110/ 126.5), then the time X to "catch up" to the survivor theoretically stays the same, while both sides cover more distance. The problem thus is that survivors get easier chances to utilise pallets ( more distance covered after window or pallet)
    This would be worse if it'd be increased additionally (110/125).

    While map pressure might increase for everyone except nurse I still think both cases are survivor favored.

    Actually no, because you must look at relative speed. Currently killers move at 0.6 m/s relative to survivors (in a straight line) while with the changed speeds they would move at 0.66 m/s (10% faster). Not much, but it would make catching up faster.

Categories