How would you win against teams like these?
3 BNP
Squad of Jakes
Squad of Claudettes
Squad of Megs
3 BNP
Squad of Jakes
Squad of Claudettes
Squad of Megs
Read THIS post.
Tldr: This is an archived version of the DBD forum, it has all posts, comments and media. The archived data will be published at the end of October. This site is not in any way affiliated with or endorsed by Behaviour Interactive.
Comments
How do i win against alchemist ring blight?
If you don’t use meta perks and try to be optimal, then you have no right to complain about losing. The tools are available for everyone to use. It’s on the player to take advantage. Think about how ridiculously overpowered survivors would be if they could consistently win with meme builds. It isn’t possible to balance the game that way.
Nobody said anything about complaining about losing.
There is an ocean of complaints on this forum, crying about camping and tunneling, or certain perks. The root of all of that is people who are upset about losing. If you aren’t going to bring meta stuff, you have to be prepared to lose.
Of course, it's only fair to apply that to Killer as well
You shouldn't be upset about losing as a Killer other than Blight or Nurse
The logic here doesn't work very well.
It actually does. Anyone who doesn’t play those killers is putting themselves at a disadvantage. Let’s also not forget that in pubs, dumb survivors are absolutely the reason that most killers can win. That doesn’t mean that the game is balanced.
The game is balanced well enough at the moment.
I dont think thats the case.
As killer, you can stacks
Of course survivors can do the same.
To cover up their skill and increase MMR.
If you as killer and survivors have equal skill of 5. The chance should be 2E,2K. In that match, which side tries harder should win more. Assume you try harder by using strong addon & perks ; and survivors team is more casual, you should win
Then MMR puts you to a team with skill of 6. Assume if both you and survivors try equally hard, you should lose because other side is better than you. Certainly you can win against them by using Blight/Nurse and tunneling. Which you may even win against teams that's slightly better than you.
Until you reach to MMR against survivors team with skill 8-9 who are too far better than you to even get a hook. This is the point where most killers in forum are complaining about.
As Peanits said:
Most players are average players who use full meta to win more. Just to play against harder opponents.
I’m not sure what your point is or how it relates to what we’re talking about.
There is no disadvantage from not playing Meta. However you play, you keep the same kill/escape rate.
I think that is totally false. If you know how to play the game, meta matters quite a bit. I would only agree that it doesn’t matter for people who don’t know the game, which is why nerfing strong perks doesn’t actually affect most players.
No, it’s not. This is the worst version of the game I have ever played.
You don't think the game is fun?
Not as killer, no. It used to be.
Balance doesn't equal fun.
I refuse to believe you find 1-2 survivors on the ground in EGC with DS & UB was fun. It wasnt even fun for me.
you counter broke stuff with broke stuff
More like I found that actual gen regression let me go for more chases. Unless I’m playing Nurse, going for a lot of chases isn’t possible. You have to play defensively to win in modern DBD and it’s the most bored I have ever been with killer.
Dont just worry about losing just play normally its okay you win some, you lose some just dont let it get to your head and go like"oh i am bad" as someone said in a previous comment its also normal to have like 1 or 2k against a decent team
Any players are easy to beat when they dont know what they're doing, yes.
I usually see "try to 4K against decent team", but if we think about "a decent team should not be able to make 2 escape", that would be more broken.