Again, as has been brought up over and over here, there's nothing preventing the others from opening the gates. They're desperate for a save they don't, in any capacity, have to make. Was hag probably ######### in this scenario? Yeah, given the map layout. Was hag maybe making the experience less worthwhile for dwight? There's a good chance of that, yeah. But let's all take a step back and forget about the sides. Here is one poor little baby Dwight. Trapped behind layers and layers of desperation, pride, fear, and bias. Trapped by the two sides to which people so tightly cling in this game and in this community. He might not know a thing about us. He might think killers and survivors are two peas in the same pod, as we all really ought to be. Maybe he skips post-game chats. No matter the case, there's one thing we can all say for certain. Nobody deserved any of this.
Except [Side I don't main]! ######### them, right? xd
I'be played killer 4x now. Survivor the rest. But as a survivor main can see the stupidity in trying to ban a killer for this...
I did enjoy your little Dwight caught between 2 sides story. ๐
If that's really reportable, then this game is broken.
I disagree that it's such a reportable offense by itself. We have no idea how many times that dweet may have tea bagged that hag, nor do we know how much time he spent in a locker before ending up in that corner.
Since it's such a problem for survivors to stand still (birds) but not killers, why hasn't BHVR implemented the killers version of that protocol? If body blocking is such an issue, why allow it at all, BHVR? Why is insidious camping ok, but this kind of thing is not? How do we know the hag isn't extremely wary of Decisive Strike?
Comparatively, this is no different than camping a hook, which is already a pretty sensitive subject for some.
Either condone camping or don't, but reading Peanits express that this kind of action is reportable gives me the impression that BHVR isn't as consistent with their product as they say they want to be.
Gens are done, gates are probably 99ed, and between DS, BT and Bodyblocking, hooking is a detriment.
Are we including this under the very broad brush of "griefing" then? Because this looks like a rather smart play from the killer at this point.
Look at you cute little noob saying that it is smart to destroy the game for someone. If you don't want the ds stop tunneling, if you don't want borrowed time don't stay near the hook or don't hit the saved guy and against bodyblocking idk anything because I know how to play this game as killer and I don't get bodyblocks really often. Stop crying about everything for survs
If that's really reportable, then this game is broken.
I disagree that it's such a reportable offense by itself. We have no idea how many times that dweet may have tea bagged that hag, nor do we know how much time he spent in a locker before ending up in that corner.
Since it's such a problem for survivors to stand still (birds) but not killers, why hasn't BHVR implemented the killers version of that protocol? If body blocking is such an issue, why allow it at all, BHVR? Why is insidious camping ok, but this kind of thing is not? How do we know the hag isn't extremely wary of Decisive Strike?
Comparatively, this is no different than camping a hook, which is already a pretty sensitive subject for some.
Either condone camping or don't, but reading Peanits express that this kind of action is reportable gives me the impression that BHVR isn't as consistent with their product as they say they want to be.
Things like that should absolutely be reportable. It's not holding the game hostage, but it is griefing. Who cares if that Dwight t-bagged? That doesn't stop the killer from playing the game, lol. ๐
Edit: If the killer is camping a hook the survivor still has a chance at being unhooked. This is not possible if you're being blocked in a corner by a killer.
Things like that should absolutely be reportable. It's not holding the game hostage, but it is griefing. Who cares if that Dwight t-bagged? That doesn't stop the killer from playing the game, lol. ๐
Tldr: This is an archived version of the DBD forum, it has all posts, comments and media. The archived data will be published at the end of October. This site is not in any way affiliated with or endorsed by Behaviour Interactive.
Comments
I'be played killer 4x now. Survivor the rest. But as a survivor main can see the stupidity in trying to ban a killer for this...
I did enjoy your little Dwight caught between 2 sides story. ๐
It took me by surprise, too.
Look at you cute little noob saying that it is smart to destroy the game for someone. If you don't want the ds stop tunneling, if you don't want borrowed time don't stay near the hook or don't hit the saved guy and against bodyblocking idk anything because I know how to play this game as killer and I don't get bodyblocks really often. Stop crying about everything for survs
Things like that should absolutely be reportable. It's not holding the game hostage, but it is griefing. Who cares if that Dwight t-bagged? That doesn't stop the killer from playing the game, lol. ๐
Edit: If the killer is camping a hook the survivor still has a chance at being unhooked. This is not possible if you're being blocked in a corner by a killer.
Idk just seems silly to me
F.
Bruh you didnt work for the kill. This is a very lazy way of getting a kill. Completely underserved.