Skip to content

Dbd mobile has bots but what about pc and console ?

hex_genrush hex_genrush
in General Discussions

in one of the latest patch notes for the mobile version it’s said that bots would be coming and it would work like this, if a survivor dcs a bot will replace them. I don’t think we could really say much about if the bots are sentient or not but it’s bhvr a first attempt well actually not because the tutorial had killer and surv bots but I would like to see this on console for killer and survivor mainly killer due to the fact that my survivor q times are horrible and I know that people are saying “ the bots are going to be so bad “ like if it didn’t matter to the gold ranks that are matched with red ranks anyway point is bots would be a cool feature.

Tagged: Dev

Comments

  • Almo Almo

    Here is Peanits's answer:

    @Peanits said:

    Just to clarify a few things, because I'm guessing this is probably going to be a hot topic for a while:

    • Mobile and core are two different projects with two different teams.
    • Mobile is currently in beta, so there's a lot more freedom to try out new features.
    • With mobile being, well, mobile, a lot of people may lose connection unintentionally (lost reception on the go, for example). On core, disconnections are typically someone choosing to disconnect. As a result, punishing people on mobile for unintentional disconnects wouldn't make a lot of sense, and replacing people with bots on core wouldn't discourage people from disconnecting in the first place.

    None of that means that the core version of DBD will never get bots. We are still under the same roof and we do share with each other. However, it's not a priority at the moment since we're looking to solve different issues.


  • Dehitay Dehitay

    @Almo said:

    Here is Peanits's answer:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1081384#Comment_1081384

    Awwww, why does mobile get the team that seems to care about fixing major problems in the game? Ignoring bots, the husk system would have been easy as hell to implement.

  • StrainedSky StrainedSky

    @Dehitay said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1086761#Comment_1086761

    Awwww, why does mobile get the team that seems to care about fixing major problems in the game? Ignoring bots, the husk system would have been easy as hell to implement.

    Gotta love when someone not on the Dev team or a programmer calls something easy to implement. 😂🤣

  • KingOfGhost KingOfGhost

    @StrainedSky said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1086774#Comment_1086774

    Gotta love when someone not on the Dev team or a programmer calls something easy to implement. 😂🤣

    You need to make so if the player DC the character still exists but lose all the ability they have like movent.

  • fleshbox fleshbox

    If the game keeps going the way it is there wont be any killers left and you will have the game you wanted. A points pinata killer who has been castrated.

  • Biggs Biggs

    @Almo said:

    Here is Peanits's answer:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1081384#Comment_1081384

    I think more players are intentionally dcing in pc version that loosing connection in mobile version tho... :D

    even I as as killer when survivor dcs in first 30 sec match thinks its just bad and those 3 poor guys just instantly lost... adding ai is a great idea..


    same for training mode where we could try out mindgaming of moonwalking, new ideas for builds, survivors for looping and practicing pallets... actually its really shame that in 2020 theres still no mode here... what do I know right ?

  • Dehitay Dehitay

    @StrainedSky said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1086774#Comment_1086774

    Gotta love when someone not on the Dev team or a programmer calls something easy to implement. 😂🤣

    First of all, I can program. Second, the irony and hypocrisy of you saying that when you have no clue whether it's easy to implement or not.

    The husk system actually requires less programming than the instadeath system that's currently in place. A disconnecting player's character just idling like they're afk would be default behavior. BHVR actually had to program them to instadie like they do on disconnects. Though I will admit, the plan they talked about to have the husk die after a minute or so would be more programming, but you don't need to do that right away. Just a basic afk character would be helpful on its own at making up for the otherwise loss in bloodpoints.

  • StrainedSky StrainedSky

    @Dehitay said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1086832#Comment_1086832

    First of all, I can program. Second, the irony and hypocrisy of you saying that when you have no clue whether it's easy to implement or not.

    The husk system actually requires less programming than the instadeath system that's currently in place. A disconnecting player's character just idling like they're afk would be default behavior. BHVR actually had to program them to instadie like they do on disconnects. Though I will admit, the plan they talked about to have the husk die after a minute or so would be more programming, but you don't need to do that right away. Just a basic afk character would be helpful on its own at making up for the otherwise loss in bloodpoints.


  • Carlosylu Carlosylu

    We do have our usual bots every now and then, if you get the joke... Urban evasion"ers" and self care"rs" are in my games every 2 or three games

  • hex_genrush hex_genrush

    @Carlosylu said:

    We do have our usual bots every now and then, if you get the joke... Urban evasion"ers" and self care"rs" are in my games wvwry 2 or three games

    Oh my god 2 of the most useless survivor perks imo

Categories