eveee12
eveee12
About
- Username
- eveee12
- Joined
- Visits
- 9
- Last Active
Comments
-
@4eyed said:
Just play killer bro
...........but why
-
@DangerScouse said:
I find the word *toxic* quite funny, in a game such as this.
And the multiple definitions. Primarily it seems to be used to define actions conducted primarily to antagonise the other side.
Therefore I'd argue most killers who camp and tunnel (again words with very fluid definitions) are not being toxic. But trying to suceed. I say succeed, not *win*, because success and enjoyment in the game is subjective and unique.
Therefore you can't ban toxic behaviour (outside of outright cheating), because you can't easily define toxic behaviour.
You're welcome.
God this is so true. If the otherside is winning at all, you'd probably feel like they're toxic XD
-
@MadLordJack said:
Actually, from what you're describing with your gameplay you sound like toxic person with no regard for your opponents, especially trying to lock people into stun loops and abuse perks, so I wouldn't be surprised if you get flagged similar to a serial insidious facecamper that likes to kebab people. What that means for you I don't know, and to be honest I don't care. So just to be sure, maybe put yourself in your opponents shoes in case the Devs actually decide to do something about people with mountainous reports.
Honestly, eventually after many years of playing... The "toxic" playstyle is just the fun way to play survivor at this point. Especially after hundreds of toxic killers that resort to face camping and tunneling.... I guess I better just start streaming everything, in case I do get a ban somehow at least i'd have evidence of me just playing the game as intended.
-
I'd say Kindred should be up there, but newbies aren't going to take advantage of the information Kindred gives. Kindred should honestly just be default in t he game and not a perk at all.
-
@burt0r said:
Just to give you my two cents. From what I gathered, the auto BAN system is rather an auto FLAG system which marks an account with a high number of reports for inspection by the people that are giving out bans right now. It is simply a tool to make their life easier and not an automated banning system itself. The most reasonable explanation atm is like often bad communication from the devs with the community.
okay this makes sense. I just assumed this was how it already works I guess XD But yeah, they should def add this.
-
@LazyPayday said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2229888#Comment_2229888
You can get reported for rage quiting yes, have I ever seen someone banned because of it, no. 2nd one is a no, 3rd is no unless it's discrimination and your using racial slurs or something of that sort. 4th depends on the severity of the name but either way it seems immature just based on how you put it. 5th will never get you banned, I've gotten reported countless times because people accused me of lag switching back when it was peer-to-peer and I had ass internet, never once got banned. You won't get banned because someone reported you "just in case,"
I was just imagining this situation... where if you finally get 'X' number of reports for a specific topic, then EAC just auto bans you. Then i'd imagine going and asking the devs why you're banned, and then they'd say something along the lines of "We don't know what EAC does" and then you're account is just long gone. But anyway, I'd assume EAC only bans players that are actually cheating, like some 3rd party software going on or something, and not based on player flags.
Imagine seeing a message when you log on saying 'You've been banned for DCing too many times'. LOL, now this would actually be silly now that I think about it... because the DC penalty exists to punish people for this exact reason. People already are banned from DCING constantly, for 'X' amount of time. Yeah, a perma dc ban actually would be silly. You never know what they'll decide to implement tho.
-
Well people should know if this stuff can get them banned anyways.