UselessKeys
UselessKeys
About
- Username
- UselessKeys
- Joined
- Visits
- 75
- Last Active
Comments
-
I get what you are trying to say, I really do, but at what point do I then have to create a youtube page to justify something? At the end of the day, I have literally gotten back into dbd. I have dealt with this as my first game and the fact that, I literally cannot simply report and know it will be dealt with is a bit annoying considering the history of dbd.
-
I google searched and spent like 15 minutes putting a reply in this is what i got in return
An inability to uploaded followed by me attempting to log in and then going with a vanilla report and getting this
-
@SunaIIanu said:
https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/3389430#Comment_3389430
Maybe I'm missunderstanding you but you have to take stats classes to get a psychology degree.
What would you be asking,. because I do agree with the point that was made, my issue is with what I posted was there was no opt out option and with the way the questions was posed it reflected the idea of we will take both as valid answers
-
@Dbdfan398 said:
Why dont they give a character limit and just let us type whatever?
Easier to find out how everyone feels on the game that way.
honestly if they did that, it would take so long to actively sort. I say that as I have actively had to create subsections based on opinion for any other comment questions. The issue is if they are creating these types of surveys and using that as sole analysis that is a huge issue, because regardless of what is being presented it almost seems like you are not doing anything wrong.
-
@MonsterDilf said:
All of the questions about the cosmetics was ridiculous-- asking me how I felt about them, and it was ONLY their female survivor's cosmetics.
Came across as largely sexist imo.
Truth be told a lot of the questions in this survey missed the mark.
I actually started taking the survey, hit this group of questions and stopped caring, then saw all the cosmetic questions and then being to wonder, who actively made these survey questions.
-
@wydyadoit said:
https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/370708/lack-of-survey-accountability
umm...
a lot of the time surveys are intentionally designed to avoid negative responses. the reason for that varies.
only the designer of the questionnaire can completely explain the thought process behind the survey.
however, since we're just commenting on it with our opinions - my opinion is this.
- surveys that exclude certain members of a community are biased.
- surveys that pigeonhole answers are biased
- surveys that utilize only quantitative or qualitative measurements are biased.
- surveys without a sample size of at least 5% of the total community are biased.
- surveys that engage in an opt-in or opt-out format are biased unless the conclusion drawn my opt-out is "neutral" and counted towards the total responses.
- Any survey that refuses to utilize the number zero on a scale of 0-10 or refuses to utilize the words equivalent to zero in this regard will be biased.
- using a "this or that" scenario in a survey is the equivalent of basing an argument on a false dichotomy. which is a logical fallacy. which makes the data biased.
- surveys that have an agenda or an underlying narrative already applied to them are prone to suffering from responses being lead along to a universal conclusion. this means it's biased.
when it comes to surveys there is really only 1 real survey model that is tried and true.
ask a close ended question.
present the answers as 5 tiers:
"disagree", "neutral", "agree", "not applicable", "did not understand the question"
then proceed to ask your questions.
add "slightly" options to "agree" and "disagree" for more variations to answers.
give 1 point to answers that are 1 space away from neutral. give 2 points for answers 2 spaces away from neutral. give 0 points for N/A, did not understands, and neutral. keep a separate tally exclusively for "did not understand the questions" and if a lot of those show up consider redoing the questions and resurveying.
for any desired feedback - leave a feedback box at the end for comments.
then do your p and z scores like any stats analyst would and should. sample size too small? do it again. it's like people that make these things have never seen a stats class and are exclusively psychology based. which is terrible for survey creation. gotta have a background in both.
I certainly agree with what you are saying. The issue I had was I literally would abstain from these question simply because I would not do either. It felt as though these questions lead to your second bullet point where we as the surveyees had no real option. In addition, for a survey that spans 65 questions, creating another 5 questions to allow for better answers wouldnt make too much of a difference imo.
-
@Hex_Llama said:
I actually like those questions, but I think they would have driven me crazy when I was younger. It depends on how you interpret the purpose of the question.
When I was younger, I would have looked at Question 23 and thought the purpose was to find out the main reason people play Dead By Daylight, and thought that the question was structured in such a way that I was being forced to say something that wasn't true, because neither option is the main thing that draws people to DBD. And then I would have felt like I was being manipulated, and I would have gotten angry.
Now, when I read Question 23, I understand it to mean, "Between these two specific things, which do you think influences people more (regardless of whether either thing influences them most)?" And I think the motivation behind asking the question is probably that they're trying to gather data to inform marketing decisions or we don't know about. So I just click the option I think is more true to help them out.
The big issue I have with the questions is the sliders only lead to positive outcomes or results. there is no way to abstain, so no answering the question almost seems like it will just be I am in between.
