annika
annika
About
- Username
- annika
- Joined
- Visits
- 192
- Last Active
Comments
-
Thank you for your, and any new responses!
-
@Ohyakno said:
Killers are actual humans, just like you, trying to play and enjoy their favorite characters. They aren't set dressing for you to play with or to facilitate your experience.
With that in mind, why do you think it's fair to make them sit in longer queues for the sole reason of giving you the experience you want? Doesn't that seem terribly selfish?
I am not sure when I said anything about killers not being humans, or "dressing for me to play with, or to facilitate my experience." Seems like your reading comprehension skills are lacking, so let me clear few things for you.
They do want to enjoy their gameplay as much as Survivors do, and taking in consideration the size of DBD's playerbase, my guess if each Survivor received 2 games per day strictly with their chosen preferences, unfortunately to your thinking, the killers' queue wouldn't be impacted as greatly. (Of my assumption) 2 games per day is barely anything for a regular player. Not to mention the killer of your preference are also humans, and are also (probably) played! In addition, those 2 games could be somehow penalized, as in BP reduction and whatnot; and if there are more killers playing than survivors, those two games could be then converted into, for example, a 30 second wait period, and if the killer of your liking is not found, then it depends by chance. That brings me to my second point.
My second suggestion – only an increased chance you would face that killer. Probability is never certain; it is randomized and could be tailored for to queues be same as before. // And then again, some people don't mind facing certain killers (or the repetitiveness), and some do. If those of "some do" queues be improved, there is a chance the playerbase would even increase, thus bettering the game in various areas.
There are many things to take into consideration. This is not a "Is it fair?" question only. But this question could be flipped as well. Is it fair for survivors to be forced to play with killers they do not like for over and over.
So next time you assume I made this suggestion because I want the game to be "easier for me", or to stare at some killers outfits, think again. I asked for constructive response – not a superficial thought.
-
It would be interesting to hear others' opinions, and relevant suggestions in the comments as well.
*Also by removing pips, what I really meant was both the changed competitive environment and the ranking system.
-
And I did try to restart multiple times but same thing happened over and over. Before I suggested we play together he was playing killer.
-
That is an amazing idea! More weather would add even more immersive-ness, as well as random events like thunder may even improve the horror aspect of this game. About the "The Thing" movie, it is a classic and I think it'd fit right into the roster of killers, and could even be regarded as cousins with The Singularity or The Dredge due to their distorted and grotesque appearances.
-
This also happens when I use the perk Any Means Necessary + when I was on a gen once.
-
Well, I find the answer to be quite obvious, but yes I have.
-
Personally, waiting one year feels a bit much.
-
For me, it is Yui Kimura & Kate. Also, I notice so many people like Dwight, and for what? I give Dwights no mercy.