Avatar

TheMonsterManor

TheMonsterManor

About

Username
TheMonsterManor
Joined
Visits
109
Last Active

Comments

  • @brewingtea said:

    https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/4029949#Comment_4029949

    If you ragequit and come back the next day, it's not like that next match is magically going to be less frustrating because your next DC is only going to cost you 5 mins instead of 2 hours.

    If you're frustrated by 100% of your matches, then it's not cool for you to ruin 100% of your matches for the other players just because those instances happen to be spaced apart by some amount of time. You need to get your percentage down, regardless of time frame, by playing matches (at least occasionally) where you don't DC. The 20-match system accomplishes that.

    I will never understand the whole 'ruining other players game' survivors get a bot and when the killer quits the game ends and the survivor wins along with a quitter BP bonus.

  • @jesterkind said:

    https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/4029925#Comment_4029925

    Anything in particular about that you find objectionable…?

    The having to play 20 games. It seems abit much.

  • @jesterkind said:

    https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/4029913#Comment_4029913

    Well, if they're both good at it, there's not really much of a reason to care which one we keep.

    What don't you like about the new system?

    The play 20 matches thing they ripped out of Overwatch's own horrible penalty system

  • @jesterkind said:

    May I ask your reasoning?

    From my perspective this new system seems better at deterring people from DCing a lot.

    And the old system wasn't? It already took away a whole grade and you had to wait a full day to reset the penalties.

  • It's not even the Killer player's fault. The queue is so long players just go and do something else till it finds a match and end up forgetting or worse they fall asleep waiting.

  • Have both. Have killer players able to play 1v4 while waiting in addition to the choice of survivor. Or if that isn't possible have playing killer require priority queue tokens in 2v8 and can only get them by playing survivor.

  • @UndeddJester said:

    The fact is a lot of players want to play killer cause of the unique killer team experience. It's the most interesting new thing brought to the game, but you still need 4 survivors to every killer, and I'm sorry there is just no reasonable way to bridge this problem...

    You're in a queue for the hottest ticket in the game... that's just the way it is. The game is already survivor sided to encourage more survivors to play, it caters to the much more casual audience and pulls in the vast majority of the players from 1v4,as well boosts the playerbase in general every time it appears.

    I think the current queue while you wait system is the best way you can solve the problem: -

    • You can play games of Survivor while you wait to pass the time.
    • You gain the benefit of the bloodpoint bonus while you wait.
    • You also are assisting in accelerating the queues by filling in the needed player slots for other people in the queue ahead of you.
    • People can actually queue for the role they want to play (killer), but play while they wait, instead of saying "urgh, I really don't wanna wait 15 mins for a game", and being forced to play the other side.

    If you wanna only main killer in 2v8, and the are complaining about killer queues, its the equivalent of getting picked for the wrong side in the schoolyard, and instead of joining in anyway so that the game can go ahead (where you can agree play your preferred role next time), you instead get the munk on and sit out on the side, making them find someone else to fill your spot.

    You're basically trying to gate the killer for yourself, or muscle ahead of all the other people in the line that also wanna play the role... and I'm trying to say this nicely... but if you refuse to queue for survivor, you're not helping anyone but yourself... and to be frank, yeah, you kinda should have to wait the full queue... thats the penalty for not joining in to rectify queue times for everyone else 😐

    @TheMonsterManor said:

    Okay so why not have the option of letting killer mains play 1v4 while waiting for for a 2v8 match. Or shoot even allow killer players to play in custom games until it finds a game?

  • Okay so why not have the option of letting killer mains play 1v4 while waiting for for a 2v8 match. Or shoot even allow killer players to play in custom games until it finds a game?

  • @Duncan_Ellis said:

    What map are you talking about, I've ran into several maps today filled with dead zones.

    It seems like this topic is extremely RNG and situational.

    All of them seems like i couldn't go five feet without a survivor going for one, i'm mostly talking about the recent update to add more Pallets and eliminate many dead zones.

  • @solidgamer44 said:

    Yeah I agree giving the option would be nice but the match shouldn't end for the survivors, some people do like tome challenges in the endgame collapse.

    Then it would be pretty great actually.

    Fair enough then bot killers should be a thing so they can still get their tome challenges.

  • I bet once these Killer changes go live Survivors are going to start getting 20 minute long queues.

  • @Dem34888 said:

    They added a new feature - play while you wait, it puts you in priority, and besides, you can also farm BP at x5, then use them for your killer's addons or for surv's items, a win-win situation

    My friend and I played 3-4 games for survivors, basically our win rate was 60-70% and it was the same on killers, in most games either no one escaped, or 1-2 got hatch
    Against 8 survivors SWF - yes, everything is as usual, 2 hooks - half of the map is already repaired

    Survivors in this mode are mostly very casual and fearful, we have managed to pull the situation out of the triangle/quadron more than once, 1 runs and catches - the second patrols the generators and they all die on the last generator

    The situation is the same with random killers, if a person plays for killers for some time, then he has an idea of ​​how to change the game tactics over time based on the developing situation

    You get put into a priority queue to be Killer if you play Survivor? So they can make queue times faster they just don't want to? Why not have a Prefer Killer or Prefer Survivor queues then?

  • @I_Cant_Loop said:

    How many matches have you played? How many kills on average per match? Which killer(s) are you using? I’ve played about 5-6 killer matches, most as Wraith, and haven’t had any problem getting a lot of kills. I think killers have a very good chance to win in this mode based on my experience so far. I don’t think there would still be huge wait times for killer if everyone was getting gen rushed in 5 minutes.

    I wouldn't mind losing my killer matches if the queue time to play killer wasn't half an hour long, my main issue is the time waiting and the time being in a match.

  • Maybe if his invigoration was instant more people would use the yellow bottles more. But the fact they take a second to activate makes Clown need to spam his bottle throw the whole game to get any value out of his kit.

  • @LordGlint said:

    Im confused... the chainsaw looks yellow in the original.

    That's unfortunately because of the film's age some colors just look off

    1000031784.jpg

    Here's his chainsaw used in the film i brightened it up some.