328
328
About
- Username
- 328
- Joined
- Visits
- 49
- Last Active
Comments
-
Yeah. MMR is a difficult thing to balance, but literally just raising the cap would solve a lot of issues.
For those who don't know, once you reach an MMR that is not particularly high at all, you've reached a "soft cap" where your MMR can technically go higher but everyone above that cap is put in the same bracket, so your MMR is essentially all the same. If they just raised the cap, queue times would suffer a little bit, but the games would be a lot better. That's a worthy sacrifice in my eyes.
-
Is this guy saying the patch isn't survivor-sided enough? Lol. Lmao, even.
-
Are you serious? The point of a PTB is to show off features that are intended to be pushed to live unless people complain. Do you think if the changes are bad and no one says as much BHVR will do anything? Feedback like what OP is giving is absolutely necessary, or else the PTB will go to live unchanged. I've heard your argument a million times, why is this so hard for people like you to understand?
-
@WolfePhD said:
https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/3892336#Comment_3892336
With respect, I do not think you realize the significance of this suggestion. Dead by Daylight is very, very, very popular in the LGBT+ community. The winner of RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars 5 really likes playing Dead by Daylight, and has recommended the game to other RuGirls—that actively stream the game now in their personal time, in drag, for fun. When you have someone with celebrity status, who was on television, recommend your product to other people with celebrity status, who were on television, it will have a ripple effect. That ripple led to Matthew Cote going on Boulet Brothers. I hope you watch the DBD episode to gain perspective.
There should 100% be a charm for everything under the LGBT+ umbrella because these stakeholders are VERY important. Whether your personally agree with it or not should remain off the table. DBD is a business, and the business needs to grow. Telling an important sub-community "We have space in our game for some accepted LGBT+, but not you." is not the message a professional company should send. By creating pride charms in the first place, BHVR committed to the idea. Now they must execute accordingly.
Every single person that voted down this suggestion is acting on emotion and not logic. Give the Witch her charm. Let her exist.
"There should 100% be a charm for everything under the LGBT+ umbrella" You realize that that would require literally thousands of charms to be created, right? And if only 0.0001% of the population is demi-kin-ultrasexual, then no, it's not a good business decision.
"Telling an important sub-community 'We have space in our game for some accepted LGBT+, but not you.' is not the message a professional company should send." This is the problem of everyone needing their own special little identifier. The entire point of the rainbow was that it represented EVERYONE. But so many people decided "No, I'm more special than everyone else, I deserve my own flag/place on the main pride flag/whatever", and now to say that companies are both morally and economically obligated to spend tons of time and resources because of the self-absorbed decisions of other people? Yeah, no.
This is why the original rainbow was such a beautifully simple solution.
-
@Spectralfx said:
Can you detail the changes?
I feel like I am out of the loop on what you are talking about... but it sounds interesting to know, ngl.
As of the most recent update, screams cannot be detected beyond 19 meters. Why they decided to make this change, I have absolutely no idea.