If Decisive Strike is used against tunneling...
Then why do survivors use it not for anti-tunneling purposes?
Then why do survivors use it not for anti-tunneling purposes?
Read THIS post.
Tldr: This is an archived version of the DBD forum, it has all posts, comments and media. The archived data will be published at the end of October. This site is not in any way affiliated with or endorsed by Behaviour Interactive.
Comments
You always have the choice to not pick them up.
Because people inherently want to get the most value out of their perk.
As a killer, you typically have a choice to pick them up or not. Speaking from experience, I know how annoying it gets if, say, you're Cenobite and a DS-user solves your box knowing you can't hook them. Or, you're trying to pickup another surv but they over with a flashlight or for a pallet save.
It's not perfect, not by a long shot. Should some killer interactions be considered a CA? Maybe. But DS's purpose is to be a tool against hard tunnelling.
Playing aggressive and trying to bait the killer into a stun is engaging and fun for a lot of players.
DS is really the least problematic of the tools used this way, since it can be avoided with 100% consistency on the killer end.