Not every killer needs to be strong

I think if MMR and matchmaking is properly implemented, not every killer needs to be strong.

Depending on the selected killer and the player rating for the selected killer, the matchmaking could end up usually working like this:

strong killer + good player = good survivors

strong killer + bad player = medium survivors

weak killer + good player = medium survivors

weak killer + bad player = bad survivors

Yes, it could mean that most often the best survivors would never face the weakest killers and the worst survivors would never face the strongest killers.

What do you think?

Comments

  • @fogdonkey said:

    I think if MMR and matchmaking is properly implemented, not every killer needs to be strong.

    Depending on the selected killer and the player rating for the selected killer, the matchmaking could end up usually working like this:

    strong killer + good player = good survivors

    strong killer + bad player = medium survivors

    weak killer + good player = medium survivors

    weak killer + bad player = bad survivors

    Yes, it could mean that most often the best survivors would never face the weakest killers and the worst survivors would never face the strongest killers.

    What do you think?

    I See it as every killwr should be viable rather than of equal strength

  • @ShadowRain said:

    Correct, but every killer needs to be viable

    Yea and if they aren't viable then their gimmick needs to be good enough to even use ex pig ambush majority or players just stand up

1 2 ›