devs how you value if a negative opinion is acceptable or not?
I was wasting your Q&A and you said that there are some negative opinions that you don't listen about DW so i want to know how you say that this negative opinion if acceptable or not.
Thank for your time.
Tagged:
Trusted
Comments
They don't listen to opinions like this:
FRICK YOU DEVS YOU RUINED NURSE YOU ONLY LISTEN TO SURVIVORS I HATE YOU
Well, the same can be said for "Nice change for the nurse " both of them are opinions that have nothing to say than an emotion.
The reason i post this is that i see that the devs will respond to a positive post about a changer rather a negative that gives a lot of feedback and explain why this X change is bad.
I think it was in reference to the person that made a large post which was basically "how dare you kill off Legion, I give up, I quit" etc with no actual content besides complaining, and then they went to harass the devs about it in their streams.
This is probably just to reinforce the message to create constructive feedback if you want it to get through, not just a big piece on how upset and fragile you are as a player.
^^ Pretty much this.
They will happily read, take into consideration and possibly respond to criticism if it's well written and constructive; a post that addresses the point concise and clearly.
Rage, sarcasm and blind threats will be ignored.
Sarcasm? Oops, guess I know why my posts rarely get replies.
Mild sarcasm is fine. It when a large portion of the post is made sarcastic to mock something, then it's ignored.
Could you point us to where they said that in the stream (like maybe a rough timestamp)? It would probably be easier to explain why they said it if it's made clear exactly what it was they said.
Eh, they ignore all sorts of feedback, whether insulting emotion or constructive criticism, this game has many flaws, ranging from balancing and map design to inherent game mechanics which suck the fun of it dry.
Many of these flaws have been in the game for ages, solutions have been proposed, yet the game remains with the same issues it had for years, they release about 1 patch per month, and more often than not they contain no more than 2 sets of balancing changes for killers and perhaps a perk or item change for survivors, the same patch usually includes a bug, ranging from severely annoying to outright gamebreaking, that has to be fixed a week or two later As to the balancing changes, far more often than not they are nothing but band-aid fixes that do not at all attack the core problem.
Feedback does little to nothing as they have no reason to improve, Dead by Daylight has no competitor, and while they did not lose much with their lack of effort, they have not gained anything either, the game's playerbase number has been stagnant for as long as I can remember, whenever an influx of new players come, they consistently lose approximately all of them immediately, I wonder why?
They have been doing nothing but band-aids when the game would greatly benefit from a surgery.