Would the Archives be better if you could complete more than one challenge per game?

I'm guessing a lot of people have had games since Archives released where they have technically completed more than one challenge in a match. For example Unhook 2 Survivors in a Single Match and Escape as Claudette. Hit 2 birds one stone and you have 2 challenges complete.

I feel it would be interesting to see how the Archives would play out to where you don't select a challenge before queuing for a game but instead you can complete multiple in a match if you reach the requirement and also implement that you need to complete "X" amount of challenges for both sides to unlock more challenges for that specific Tome.

Having this implemented would also encourage people to play both sides to get a better understanding with how the game looks from both perspectives.

Tagged: Trusted

Comments

  • If players could complete multiple challenges per game, then the tome would be infinitely easier.

  • It would be much better. It would make the grinding challenges much more bearable to most people.

  • @Peasant said:

    If players could complete multiple challenges per game, then the tome would be infinitely easier.

    Which is not necessarily a good thing - if the Tome were easier to complete, people would have to grind a lot more to finish the Rift.

  • Better, yes, but that is not the problem with challenges and the Archives, the problem is seeing a guy chasing crows the whole entire game or hook farming with BT to complete it

  • Quite honestly you should be able to select two challenges at once. That being a killer and survivor specific challenge. It's annoying switching roles and forgetting to change your tome challenge. That or each role should have their own tome that way we can avoid the problem all together.

    Now just in general it would be nice to select up to 3 challenges at once although with the way the challenges are placed on the track you'd likely only do one or two at a time anyways as it's a linear line.