SurvivorMentality
SurvivorMentality
About
- Username
- SurvivorMentality
- Joined
- Visits
- 4
- Last Active
Comments
-
@Crowman said:
https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/3798701#Comment_3798701
There's no special control for the killer to move over a dying survivor's body. It's all basic killer controller movement.
Then I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. Thank you for helping bring more attention to this very important issue with all the comments.
-
@Ohyakno said:
It doesn't look anything like humping. It looks like the dude is walking on your character. It's dumb as hell but I had to be told that's what it was to even figure it out. It's happened like twice to me.
Perhaps you could try to imagine how it could feel to someone with sexual trauma in their history. Understand that, just because something is not a problem for you (and I am very happy that it isn't), that not everyone has the luxury of feeling as you do. Failing that, perhaps you could imagine what it looks like if the killer can crouch, like Ghostface, or is already very close to the ground, like the Vampire's wolf-form. And if that doesn't work either, perhaps your time would be better spent engaging with other posts.
-
@darien said:
If you go back and read the original post, you will see that OP is suggesting gameplay fixes that will discourage the toxic behavior without resorting to banning. It doesn't have to be any harder than the face-camping self-unhook timer. The self-unhook timer activates regardless of whether the killer is purposefully griefing the player on the hook or "accidentally" staying nearby. By putting some sort of timer in the game that gives a killer in-game consequences for standing (or humping) over a prone body for an unreasonable length of time, it eliminates the need for video evidence or for someone to decide whether it was humping, slugging, or "just moving". Everyone got used to the self-unhook timer; everyone can get used to a standing-over-a-prone-body timer too, if BHVR would do it.
This. Exactly This.
-
@ReverseVelocity said:
https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/3798641#Comment_3798641
I don't think support will ban people when there's any doubt that the player is acting 100% maliciously. When this is done, it's pretty clear when the killer is doing it deliberately.
I've seen a few sexual assault survivors weigh in on this issue in various different places, and this is a different deal than just teabagging. The connotations of W-Sing on a downed Survivor are a lot more serious, and consistently triggering.
Whether this is something that can be feasibly actioned is up to BHVR, but it's quite clear that this is in a different ballpark than just teabagging.
Appreciate you and thanks for weighing in!
-
@Crowman said:
https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/3798617#Comment_3798617
Survivors have been teabagging at killers for years. Are you going to suggest we also start banning survivors for crouching in the vicinity of the killer, because it's simulating a sex act?
There is a very big difference between crouching in the vicinity of a killer who is able to walk away or hit the survivor and a survivor laying on the ground who can do absolutely nothing to remove themselves from the situation.
-
@Crowman said:
Take action on what exactly? The killer moving over a downed survivor isn't against any rules.
But simulating sex over them should be, which is the entire point of the post.