LadyOhhDalia
LadyOhhDalia
About
- Username
- LadyOhhDalia
- Joined
- Visits
- 8
- Last Active
Comments
-
@RoachesDelight said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2028307#Comment_2028307
It just wouldn't work lol this won't happen
lol okay. That is definitely your opinion, but I think it would be more helpful to you do not believe it would work and why. Thank you, anyway.
-
@RoachesDelight said:
Something to prevent going against a killer over and over sure I'm alright with it. Filtering out a certain killer nah I'm not about that. I enjoy playing against all killers. I'm not even sure how this would work because there's 4 survivors so does mean you get to filter out 4 killers every game or does just one get chosen to be filtered out. Which means the other survivors will be unhappy if the killer they don't want to go against is one that got through. With a game where you choose your character and build before the game even starts something like this just wouldn't work
I’m trying to understand what you mean about the lobby. Killers cannot change their chosen killer once they hit start to begin a queue. Therefore, before a survivor is placed in a lobby, their “veto” we will call it has to be taken into account. They would not be placed in a lobby with the killer they vetoed. Like I had edited in my post, if it is a SWF deal, the veto option would be removed completely. If a survivor has a long queue time, they are encouraged to open their queue to any killer. Also, I mentioned that they could make it less desirable to filter out a killer by making you lose a % of blood points at the end of a match for being queued that way. This way people have the option and can avoid a killer if they want to. They could even just make it a preference instead of a hard NO to a killer.
-
@Seraphor said:
Say you're in a lobby. You've used your veto on Spirit, someone else has denied Freddy, Bubba has been excluded by the third and the fourth doesn't want to face a Hag.
Are you prepared to wait twice as long for a match due to the all the hoops the matchmaking system will have to go through to find you a viable killer?
Are you talking about when with SWF? They could turn the filter off for SWF or make it only 1 veto.
-
@PureHostility said:
Sure, as long as we can select to not play with or against SWF.
This way I can be a solo survivor with 3 other solo survivors and verse only solo survivors as a killer.
I can definitely understand not wanting to play against SWF.
-
@Seraphor said:
Say you're in a lobby. You've used your veto on Spirit, someone else has denied Freddy, Bubba has been excluded by the third and the fourth doesn't want to face a Hag.
Are you prepared to wait twice as long for a match due to the all the hoops the matchmaking system will have to go through to find you a viable killer?
I personally am fine with waiting.
-
I feel like some of you are assuming everyone will choose to filter out the same killer, which could (with a slim chance) happen. It would extend the queues for survivors only if they choose to filter. I do see where it could be concerning for a killer, though. However, since the survivor queue to filter would be long (maybe even reduce the percent of BP the survivor gets), this would motivate other survivors just to stay in the normal queue without a filter. I just think it would be a nice option to have for those that are tired of playing against a certain killer. It burns you out of the game. However, I like the comment about reducing odds of going against same type of killer.
-
When I was thinking of this, I thought of all the DC players and the people that kill themselves on first hook. Maybe this could help lower the percentage of people that do this during a match. Also, I feel like it would help queue times for those that choose to be open to any killer as you are essentially filtering out the ones that want a filter.
-
The point to my comment above is that the game is supposed to be fun and fair for everyone. It is never fun when you wait 15 minutes for a match just to be face camped on first hook with no real hope of rescue without being tunneled or your whole team downing. There is a serious need for balance.
-
I am a red rank survivor and am still getting face camped on first hook by leather face. It has been made too easy for leather face to get downs/hooks. He has BBQ to see where everyone is on the map, he face camps and can down EVERYONE in one swoop. BT doesn’t even help much against this, because his chainsaw swings multiple times. He also hits you through windows when you are far enough away. His chainsaw needs changed to where he can only down 1 person at a time. It isn’t fair that he can face camp and down every single person in 1 swoop. If this change can’t be made, then his chainsaw absolutely needs a longer rev time as he is already a fast runner.