Comments

• I'm going to ignore the trail part at the moment and focus on the campfire scenario.

  I'm not really sure, lore wise, how dying at the campfire is official, if it is even accepted. But I would imagine that death is just as likely in the campfire as it would be in the trials, but motives are going to change.

  In trials, motivation is survival - pretty simple. But with the campfire, and correct me if I'm understanding this wrong, is a place where survivors are just waiting to be chosen for the next trial. Yes, killers are supposedly lurking not far from the site in the fog, but they don't actually attack the survivors. So this is already a more "relaxed" atmosphere for the survivors and gives them time to recover and the think.

  Trying to keep this simple, depression is more than likely present and maybe anger (that one jerk who slammed a pallet on you so the killer downs you and they can run away). So when it comes to the question of survivor vs. survivor, the motivation is going to be the deciding factor. I agree with the earlier comment that if a survivor kills another survivor at the campfire with the full intent on killing them (especially for rage or pleasure), the entity is going to evaluate them to see if they would be a potential killer. Also, how the killer-survivor feels with their actions afterwards can be taken into consideration ("Yay, that b**** is dead!"). But if a survivor kills another on accident ("I didn't mean for my hand to slip and rip your wound open by 15 inches that caused you to bleed out!"), then it really depends on emotions afterwards.

  So basics: If a survivor kills someone afterwards and they enjoyed it or just continuously angry and looking for malicious intent, the Entity is going to be asking them if they want a job. If a survivor is remorseful and tries to repent or make up or whatever - as long as survival instinct and hope are still there - not much is going to happen besides other survivors being more nervous around them. But if a survivor loses hope, feels nothing, and welcomes death by the Entity regularly, I would say they will be another drained soul for the void.

  I apologize if it was a little rush and scatter-brained. I wanted to share, but I'm sleep deprived.

  in Lore wise what would happen if a survivor kills another survivor in a trail or at the campfire. Comment by VixyManacles February 21, 2019

• Although I like the idea of Jake and Michael in the Asylum too

  in Who do you think would ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) first? Comment by VixyManacles January 24, 2019

• @ItsDaEmuDood said:
  Jake and Claudette, in the Rotten Fields
  Kate and David, in The Thompson House
  Meg and Laurie, in the Strode House
  Dwight and Quentin, in a Badham Preschool classroom
  Bill and Nea, upstairs in the Crotus Prenn Asylum
  Ace and Feng, in the Grim Pantry
  Tapp just faps to some VHS Porn in The Game

  I could agree with half of this, but some of these pairings I feel are a bit off.

  My reasoning:
  1) Kate would not be into someone like David, though I totally see David eyeing her up
  -Instead, I see her more going for someone like Quentin. He's been in a living nightmare and needs a little of that 'sunshine'

  2) Nea would totally hangout with a vet like Bill, but I don't think she would go that far, nor would he.
  -Instead, I see Tapp "arresting" Nea and she just might let him catch her

  3) Dwight is a leader and while I could see Quentin working with him, Dwight has a tendency to say instead of do.
  -Instead, I 100% see David going for Dwight. A brute like him isn't going to just listen to anybody unless they have something that interests him - in this case, that booty. Why else would he listen to Dwight and also not make him do anything to contribute? Can we say, recovery time ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)? We all know that David can manhandle Dwight.

  in Who do you think would ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) first? Comment by VixyManacles January 24, 2019