Concerns against Mod Balrog and Behavior Staff
I'm fairly new to the forum community. I have made one post concerning the behavior and poor Moderation of a Behavior Staff Member named Stephen who in mybhiatoryvis notorious for closing q complaint ticket without genuine evaluations. I had concern of him again recently with a point that it went to Senior Staff members who went out of their way to defend him and jot consider the validatio. Of harasssment despite evidence.
Now. I'm not aiming to be negative or name and shaming. On the contrary to ky false accusation of breaching the rules a moderator here had accused me of naming and shaming a player. I. Fact my co.plaint per the rules was a serious concern to adress the community to be aware of Stephen and the trouble he may bring to your moderations.
So not only did Moderatot Balrog failed to read the issue in its entirely concern. They assumed that Stephen was a player which tells me they didn't quite read the issue and its seriousness or context which is a rule break in itself.
And before folks state rules it says you should AVOID discussing moderations not ignore the basis entirely meaning there is room to discuss them in a sensitive manner which I am trying to do. I'm not aiming at negative behavior I genuinely am not afraid toncall out something that is wrong. It was wrong to be warned and told I am name shaming which makes light of the seriousness of my post and concern for my gaming community because a staff member chose to be negative and shown a history of concerning behaviors.
Balrog made light of this issue. Its not a lightvissue as i have been struggling in reporting with Behavior on problematic players and puts into question the seriousness of BHVR Report8ng ataff snd how seriously they take complaints.
I am aware they are overwhelmed. But its painful when you have direct eveidence of a player delibrately holding the game hostage sndnkeeping everyone down for bleed out for Streaming Entertainment is a directboffense of toxicity and unfairplay ruining the game for others whcih breaches BHVR as well as that platforms cose od conduct and rules.
If these are the type of moderations a paying contributor to your platform is to expect. Why host forums, discords, twitch, and such for us to express concerning view points if your bot even going to entirely read the complaint and falsely reprimand a person on false or misleading rulings.
The rule states "please censor the name" on negative commentary.
Please is defined as a request. Not a statement nor a demand. Its considered optional as a courtesy. If you feel it is negative then make a point where it comes off negative and wait for a response.
I am concerned at the rhetoric and responses of a Moderator snd more importantly a Staff Reporting member. Our gaming community should be concern when staff members do not take issues or complaints seriously. I understand they are overworked with issues but when circumstances are relevant and the otherside attempts a form of transparency that shows no concern for the wellbeing for its community and a paying customer it shows a relevance of concern that we are not receiving a fairness while those who disrupt the game and ruin the game getaway with crimes BHVR staff simply chose to ignore while punishing those who care and show a relevance to put a stop to it by following the rules and doing their part.
If this offends Balrog or comes to the belief I have broken the rules by showing a seriousness of concern to my complaint and the unfairness of it. Then it only proves my point and I'll simply stop posting as I'm irrelevant.
If you think I'm wrong post your views. If you think I'm right post your views. Either way its an open discussion.
Comments
This is incorrect—it is very much not optional, especially not in public messages. Typical English use adds a 'please' to make it sound less direct. Not using 'please' makes your request read very rude. You'd be too direct, too demanding. Angry, even.
It doesnt matter anymore. And to be fair, they never do anything against their own people. History prooves this. Escpecially with a certain one.