What Licenses would you consider "Healthy" for the Game?

With the upcoming release of Vecna, that's soon to be followed by an as of yet unknown licensed survivor, that will then be upped by Castlevania being included (and don't forget the solo licensed killer in March).

What do you think is best for the game? Are licenses actually more worth it over regular chapters? Should only the ones considered "big" be focused on? Do you think more new players from a certain fanbase could be detrimental to the playing experience? Personally, this year looks worrying, but potentially very exciting if it's executed on well.

Comments

  • @Alice_pbg said:

    https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/3725197#Comment_3725197

    "still used religions' is such a funny sentence… XD

    pretty sure that eliminates all of them… people still worship zeus and bastet and probably any other god you might think it's no longer worshipped.

    personally don't think it's a good enough reason to not use them. as long as you are respectful and aren't putting giratina in the game just because, it should be free game.

    like… I'm up for some version of satan as a killer. just saying.

    https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/3725353#Comment_3725353

    so you never played a horror campaign? you should, it's cool.

    was never a fan of wesker either, specially because we already had nemesis. at least I like his camp

    depends on which dracula. the thing with castlevania is that they go from camp comedy to serious all the time. there are more scary incarnations of him. but the monster who gave their humanity away and keeps coming back to life to try and destroy humanity is absolutely a horror character.

    also, a series that produces such dumb but awesome lines such as these

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PrHEelh5oo

    https://youtu.be/TIvkKw4EtCU?si=A-bYYkIJY4kOFRuU&t=258

    should be everywhere.

    Wesker only got in because he snuck in behind Nemesis.

    🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    yeah thats true most religions are still praticed and thats why bhvr should stay away from them. i dont think there is a respectfull way to turn anything religion related into a dbd killer.

    plague worked well because they used a religion thats is so super dead there is nothing left of it cause there is not much left of the babilonian people in generall.

    and if there is a way to be super respectfull with religions and make cool dbd characters that i dont see right now (im open to be enlighted) i dont think bhvr would manage to stay on that path for more then half a second.

  • @ArkInk said:

    With the upcoming release of Vecna, that's soon to be followed by an as of yet unknown licensed survivor, that will then be upped by Castlevania being included (and don't forget the solo licensed killer in March).

    What do you think is best for the game? Are licenses actually more worth it over regular chapters? Should only the ones considered "big" be focused on? Do you think more new players from a certain fanbase could be detrimental to the playing experience? Personally, this year looks worrying, but potentially very exciting if it's executed on well.

    I've said it before and I will say it again:
    Cold Prey (Fritt Vilt). The nighttime snow themed map with the abandoned mountain hotel, and a new (and potentially terrifying) stealth killer would bring back so much of what made old DBD good. An actual scare factor that is not just an add-on for Myers

1 2 ›