kirometoro
kirometoro
About
- Username
- kirometoro
- Joined
- Visits
- 7
- Last Active
Comments
-
@ChurchofPig said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2228051#Comment_2228051
I understand she's wearing her RE3 cosmetics. I understand that. That's not what I'm talking about though.
True or False: The Resident Evil 3 Remake is the most recent appearance of Jill Valentine and most people would recognize it?
I'd say that's true.
True or False: Behavior likes using cosmetics for base licensed characters cosmetics that people will know and will be like "Yeah that's whoever"?
I'd say that's true.
I have no [bad word] idea what Jill looked like in Resident Evil 5. Honestly I didn't know she was even part of the game. (I'm not an expert of RE and a fairly new fan to the franchise) So why would they make her base a cosmetic that people who are new to RE but maybe know some of the characters, wouldn't recognize?
That's my argument to why her wearing her RE3 stars outfit does not necessarily mean she's from RE3. Anyone can go in their closet and pull out an old outfit that still fits them. If I went in my closet and picked out something I wore 3 years ago and then was taken into the fog, that doesn't mean I'm the version of me from 3 years ago it just means I'm wearing clothes from 3 years ago.
Nancy and Steve have bases that are from Season 1 of Stranger Things and I don't think they ever wore them again. That doesn't mean Nancy and Steve were taken after that season therefore Seasons 2, 3, and soon to be 4 don't make sense because they should be in Dead by Daylight. Also, their lore even has a reason that makes sense. The events of Stranger Things were over and they just happened to be wearing those outfits.
Also, like @MeltingPenguins said, even if they were taken right after the events of RE3, they could have somehow found a way out of the fog and landed back in their respective universe milliseconds after they were taken.
Literally as far as I'm reading from what you've said, you have no argument that both Dead by Daylight and Resident Evil contradict each others lore and games because basing that off of cosmetics has never turned out to be accurate for any franchise. I don't necessarily think you're wrong. I just want lore evidence for why you think this since you put this under the lore section. Instead you're going with the reasoning that can be worked around to explain how the events of the franchise still played out yet they look like this in the fog.
I'd also like to argue that they chose RE3 cosmetics because they took from RE2 and RE3 as seen by Leon and the map representing 2 and Jill and Nemesis representing 3. You could also argue they're pulling a Halloween on us where it's an alternate version of the story yet events still played out similarly, they just ended differently. That's completely possible and therefore you would be correct.
Maybe that cleared up why I'm asking, maybe it didn't and I still sound like an idiot to you (btw that's extremely rude making it sound like I'm an idiot when you're not explaining how a part of the game that's almost never explained by lore relates to a post about lore as an explanation, the entity makes you wear what it wants, that's literally proven by the cosmetics in the shop that make no sense according to lore)
It's pretty much guaranteed that it is RE3 Jill who was taken, as her bio mentions her fighting Nemesis right before the fog took her. Nemesis died along with Raccoon City so it'd be the only time. RE5 Jill was much older and she was blonde, so it wouldn't just be her wearing her old clothes anyways.
I don't know what we can really trust regardless when Behavior can't even do the proper research when adding these characters. Jill's bio is still wrong, saying that she is a founding member of STARS. Which she wasn't. She co-founded the BSAA with Chris. Leon's lore for his RE4 outfit is wrong also, saying that he went after Umbrella in it, which he never did. It's his outfit when he went to Spain to find the president's daughter. Jill, Chris, and Claire were the only ones who went on to go after Umbrella (if we don't count the mangas)
-
@[Deleted User] said:
So, when one survivor is on a gen, they are repairing it at the standard 100% speed.
When a second survivor gets on the same gen, the speed doesn't double, but rather both of the survivors' repairing speeds are "nerfed" just slightly.
So the repair speed is faster than 100%, but still lower than 200%, to keep the gens from being fixed too quickly.
Okay, that does make total sense. I appreciate it. I guess that also explains why it is a yellow bar when someone with Prove Thyself is nearby since they aren't actually on the gen themselves.