Capaldi
Capaldi
About
- Username
- Capaldi
- Joined
- Visits
- 5
- Last Active
Comments
-
I think toxicity isn't justified. Tunnel is a valid option even if it's annoying. I have been facecamped and tunnel, but as it's away from my control I try not to feel frustrated + even if it's a valid option it's not the best for the killer.
I mean you can tunnel the guy who has been hooked up, but going for the other guy makes the hooked up guy consume his time to heal himself while the other is being chased. So that makes 2 people busy instead of 1. Because if you go for the same guy in the hook the other completely healed guy will go repair as he don't have anything else to do.
So I think the tunnel or facecamp don't justify the toxicity. Toxic behaviour is something beyond what you can do in the gameplay. Facecamp and tunneling are valid options but poor choices at you will get less bloodpoints at the end of the day and most of survivors will know what you're doing and rush gens to escape quickly.
-
I find this as a legit strat. What the game offers you to do is ok. Letting them bleed out isn't against the rules. For me unsportsmanlike behaviours are the ones that are beyond the game, like verbal harrassment, DC, and other.
-
@Mandy said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/777146#Comment_777146
We have not confirmed the date of the Mid Chapter Patch - the only date we ever gave was for the event. Unless we actually confirm things on this forum or our official Twitter account it's best not to rely on what other people speculate.
I think that not confirming anything anytime as an excuse like "we didn't confirmed it, so you shouldn't be disappointed" it's not a very good strategy to keep your player base happy honestly.
-
Me parece que subir la probabilidad a 35% con un intento de más es demasiado. El concepto de librarse del gancho se basa en que es un intento desesperado, sabes que no tienes escapatoria pero aún así lo intentas (por eso en rangos medios y altos la gente no se suicida con el gancho). Tu propuesta rompe un poco esta dinámica y facilita muchísimo la gestión del tiempo a los supervivientes.
Si esta estrategia se volviera meta, el early game sería pan comido para los supervivientes. Verás, el early game ya es un momento crítico para los asesinos, ya que potencialmente tienes 4 supervivientes arreglando generadores hasta que encuentres 1 y lo tumbes. Durante ese tiempo los otros 3 supervivientes pueden arreglar generadores. Cuando consigues colgar al primer superviviente, eso ya empieza a ser presión para los supervivientes, ya que al menos 1 deberá ir a rescatarlo.
Si tu propuesta de rework saliera adelante, significaría que el asesino ya no dispone de esa presión a los supervivientes, ya que los demás pueden seguir reparando mientras el superviviente colgado puede sacarse solo. Ten en cuenta que todas las primeras fases de los supervivientes tendrían altas probabilidades de desengancharse.
No sé si te has dado cuenta, pero últimamente los perks que están saliendo para survivors te exigen realizar alguna acción como requisito para que se active, como puede ser Liberación. Tal vez añadir a tu propuesta algo como "tras completar un generador entero" o "curar un estado de salud completo" ayudarían a hacer de este perk algo más justo.
Me parece acertado fijarse en perks obsoletos que nadie usa y darles un rework adecuado, pero tu propuesta me parece que afectaría negativamente al juego.
Saludos!
-
@Peanits said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/777026#Comment_777026
Nothing at all- we didn't want to put an update out until it's ready. There were some issues we needed to sort out first and we figured it was better to push the release back a little than force it out ASAP. Sorry if this is disappointing.
What I am disappointed at is that the info that you give us is not very clear or helpful.
I mean, you announced that the event would take place on the 22nd with the mid-chapter 3.3.0. Now the info is that the event won't take place tomorrow, it will be with the mid patch (which I repeat was supposedly going to take place tomorrow). So what we should assume is that tomorrow the mid patch won't take place. It's not very hard to say: "The event and the patch won't take place tomorrow. Both are delayed, we will give you more info on the next hours" or something like that. It would help us not be as disappointed as we are.
Next time please, be clear with the info that you are adressing, don't make us the players make all the assumptions like this for example: https://twitter.com/PaulieEsther1/status/1186395057219362817?s=20
I wish for more clarity on this kind of issues. Again we understand you can encounter issues that need to be fixed, and in order to do that you need some time, but please be clear with the information that you give us. Thank you anyway for the updates.
Cheers